PEMBELAJARAN BERBASIS OTAK (BRAIN BASED LEARNING), GAYA KOGNITIF KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR KREATIF DAN HASIL BELAJAR MAHASISWA

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v6i1.8562

Keywords:

Brain Based, cognitive style, ability to think creatively

Abstract

This research purpose is to examine the effect of brain-based learning model on the ability to think creatively and student’s learning outcome. This type of research is experimental research design with non-equivalent control group design. Population of this research is the students of Semester V PGSD Ganesha University of Education which is consist of 8 classes. The samples were taken by random sampling technique as much as 2 classes. Data ability to think creatively and learning outcomes was collected by using test. Data collected were analyzed using ANOVA two lanes. Based on the results of data analysis, it’s found that the results of the study as follow. First, there are significant differences between the groups understanding of the concept of brain-based learning model and learning model Conventional group (F = 5.13; p <0.05). Second, there are significant differences between the groups understanding of the concept of cognitive style field independent and field dependent cognitive style groups (F = 23.43; p <0.05). Thirdly, in achieving an understanding of concepts, models of learning and cognitive style interacts significantly (F = 6.11; p <0.05). Fourth, there are significant differences between the groups ability to think creatively brain-based learning model and conventional learning model group (F = 12.75; p <0.05). Fifth, there are significant differences between the groups ability to think creatively cognitive style field independent and field dependent cognitive style groups (F = 44.94; p <0.05). Sixth, in the achievement of creative thinking ability, learning and cognitive style models do not interact significantly (F = 0.06; p> 0.05)

References

Anderson, et al.(2011). A Theory of Quality Management Underlying The Deming Management Method. Academy of Management (Online), Vol. 19, 39 halaman. Tersedia: http://www.jstor.org/stable/258936(05/09/2011 23:07).

Angga Wiguna, dkk. 2014. “Penerapan Pembelajaran Berbasis Otak Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Siswa Kelas V”. e-Journal PGSD Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha Jurusan PGSD Vol: 4 No: 1 Tahun: 2016.

Ardhana, W., Purwanto., Kaluge, L., & Santyasa, I W. 2004. Implementasi Pembelajaran Inovatif untuk Pemahaman dalam Belajar Fisika di SMU. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan. 2(11). 152-168.

Berger, Peter L. & Thomas Luckmann 1990. Tafsir Sosial atas Kenyataan: Risalah tentang Sosiologi Pengetahuan (diterjemahkan dari buku asli The Social Construction of Reality oleh Hasan Basari). Jakarta: LP3ES

Bodnar, George H., and William, S Hopwood. 1996. Sistem Informasi Akuntansi. Edisi Indonesia. Jakarta : Salemba Empat.

Candiasa, I M. 2006. Pendidikan Berbhinneka. Orasi Pengenalan Jabatan Dosen Besar Tetap dalam Bidang Matematika Terapan IKIP Negeri Singaraja. Disampaikan pada Sidang Senat Terbuka IKIP Negeri Singaraja pada Senin, 30 Januari 2006.

Cangelosi James S. 1995. Merancang Tes Untuk Menilai Prestasi Siswa. Bandung:IT

Collete A.T & Chiappeta, E.L. 1994. Science Instruction in the Midldle and Secondary School . New York: Macmillan Publishing Company

Davis, J K. (1991). Educational implications of field dependence-independence. In S. Wapner & J. Demick (Eds.), Field dependence-independence: cognitive styles across the lifespan (pp. 149–175. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

DePorter, Bobbi, et.al.2006. Quantum Teaching. Bandung: Kaifa

Djemari Mardapi. (1999). Pengukuran, penilaian dan evaluasi. Makalah disampaikan pada Penataran evaluasi pembelajaran matematika untuk guru inti matematika tanggal 8 – 23 Nopember 1999 di PPPG Matematika Yogyakarta

Given,K.B.(2007). Brain-based teaching. Bandung:Kafia

Grieshober, W. E. (2004). Continuing a Dictionary of Creativity Terms & Definition. New York: International Center for Studies in Creativity State University of New York College at Buffalo. [Online]. Tersedia: http://www.buffalostate.edu/orgs/cbir/ReadingRoom/theses/Grieswep.pdf. [7 Juni 2008]

Karyawati, Ni Komang., I Nyoman Murda., I Wayan Widiana. 2014. “Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Think Pair Square berbantu Kartu Kerja terhadap Hasil belajar Matematika”. Jurnal Mimbar PGSD Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha. Vol. 2 No. 1 hal: 1-10.

McGregor, Douglas. (1960). The Personal Management. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Martin, D. A., (2005). Smart emotion. Jakarta: Gramedia.

Mustiada. 2014. “Pengaruh model Pembelajaran BBL bermuatan karakter terhadap hasil belajar IPA”. Jurnal Mimbar PGSD Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha Jurusan PGSD (Vol: 2 No: 1).

Indra Yuda .2014. “Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Berbasis-Otak (Brain Based Learning) Terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika Siswa Kelas V Sd Negeri Di Desa Sinabun ”. Jurnal Mimbar PGSD Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha Jurusan PGSD (Vol: 2 No: 1).

Rosyada, Amrina. 2002. Upaya Peningkatan Keaktifan Siswa Dalam Pembelajaran. Matematika. Skripsi (tidak diterbitkan). Surakarta: UMS. Sriyono, dkk.1992. Teknik Belajar Mengajar dalam CBSA. Jakarta: Melton Putra

Joyce, B., Weil, M., and Shower, B. (1992) Models of Teaching. Massachusetts: Allyn and Bacon.

Aguseri, effendi.2011. “Pengaruh Interaksi Media dan Gaya Kognitif Terhadap Penguasaan Konsep Bangun Datar dan Bangun Ruang”. Tekno-Pedagogi Vol. 1 No. 2 September 2011 : 15-26

Himmatul, Ulya. 2015. “Hubungan Gaya Kognitif dengan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Siswa”. Jurnal Konseling GUSJIGANG Vol. 1 No. 2 Tahun 2015 ISSN 2460-1187.

Amrina, Z. 2004. Hubungan antara gaya kognitif dengan hasil belajar matematika mahasiswa kelas II SMU negeri di kota Padang. Jurnal Pembelajaran 27(1), 57-69.

Handayaningrat, Soewarno. 1987. Pengantar Studi Ilmu Administrasi dan Manajemen. Jakarta : Cv Haji Masagung.

Candiasa, I M. 2004. Statistik Multivariat Dilengkapi Aplikasi dengan SPSS. Singaraja: Unit Penerbitan IKIP Negeri Singaraja.

Santoso Singgih, 2002 Statistik Parametrik, Cetakan Ketiga, PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama, Jakarta.

Grouws, D.A. 1992. Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.

Witkin, H., Moore, C., Goodenough, D., & Cox, P. (1977). Field-dependent and field-independent cognitive styles and their educational implications. Review of Educational Research, 47 (1), 1-64.

Setiawan, 2004. Pengembangan Pembelajaran Berbasis Otak Dalam Pembelajaran Matematika Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis. e-Journal PGSD Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha Jurusan PGSD Vol: 4 No: 1 Tahun: 2016. 1-10

Souza, S.L., Aguieiras, E.C.G & Langone, M.A.P., “Study of The Commercial Immobilized Lipases Reuse in Biodiesel Synthesis via Transesterification Reactions of Soybean Oil”, 11th European Congress on Catalysis, Lyon, France, September 1st-6th , 2013.

Tinajero, C., & Paramo, M. F. (1997). Field dependence-independence and academic achievement: A reexamination of their relationship. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 67 (2), 199-212.

Yulvinamaesari.2014. “Implementasi Brain Based Learning dalam Pembelajaran Berbasis Pendidikan Karakter”. Prosiding Seminar Nasional. Vol. 01 No. 1 hal: 100-102

Yunita Kusumaningsih. (2009).Faktor – faktor yang mempengaruhi prestasi belajar siswa di SMA N 12 Jakarta. FE UI.

Witkin, H. A., Moore, C. A., Goodenough, D. R., & Cox, P. W. (1976). Field-dependent and field-independent cognitive styles and their educational implications. Review of Educational Research, 47(1), 1-64.

Widiana. 2016. Pengembangan Pembelajaran Berbasis Otak Dalam Pembelajaran Matematika Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis. Artikel. e-Journal PGSD Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha Jurusan PGSD Vol: 4 No: 1 Tahun: 2016. http://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/JJPGSD/article/view/7690/5242

Downloads

Published

2017-03-23

Issue

Section

Articles