The Influence Of Implementation Brain-Friendly Learning Through The Whole Brain Teaching To Students’ Response and Creative Character In Learning Mathematics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23887/jpp.v50i1.9863Keywords:
Brain friendly learning, Whole Brain Teaching, Response, Creative CharacterAbstract
This study aims to determine whether the application of brain-friendly learning through whole brain teaching gives a positive effect on the creative character of students, to know the response of the students against the application of brain-friendly learning through whole brain teaching, and to find out if the student response against the application of brain-friendly learning through whole brain teaching correlates positively with the creative character of students in learning mathematics. The research method used that is quantitative. The instruments used, namely the now student response related application of brain-friendly learning through whole brain teaching, and sheets of observation about the creativity of students in learning mathematics after implementing this method. The correlation analysis with the results of the study showed that the value of the larger significance of the alpha values (5%) which means accepting and rejecting H0 Ha which means student response against the application of brain-friendly learning through whole brain teaching not correlated positively with the creative character of students in learning mathematics. The average student response score against this method is found on very good i.e. amounted to 85%. As for the observations of the creative character of the students, after this method is applied, the average score of 68% is found quite creativeReferences
Albab, A. F. (2013). Penerapan Pendekatan Accelerated Learning dengan Metode Whole Brain Teaching dalam Pembelajaran Fisika Di SMP. Retrieved from http://repository.unej.ac.id/handle/123456789/11041.
Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., & Bloom, B. S. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. Allyn & Bacon.
Arends, R.I. (2009). Learning to teach. New York: McGraw Hill.
Atkinson, J. W. (1964). An Introduction To Motivation. England: Oxford.
Bergen, D., & Coscia, J. (2001). Brain Research and Childhood Education: Implications for Educators. Association for Childhood Education International, 17904 Georgia Avenue, Suite 215, Olney, MD 20832.
Biffle, C. (2013). Whole Brain Teaching For Challenging Kids (and the rest of your class, too!). Whole Brain Teaching LLC.
Brown, J. D. (2000). What issues affect Likert-scale questionnaire formats.Shiken: JALT Testing & Evaluation SIG Newsletter, 4(1), 18-21.
Byrne, R. W., & Russon, A. E. (1998). Learning by imitation: A hierarchical approach. Behavioral and brain sciences, 21(05), 667-684.
Chinn, S. (2001). Learning styles and mathematics. Dyslexia: Successful Inclusion in the Secondary School, 117.
Craft, A. (2010). Creativity and Education Futures: Learning in a Digital Age. Trentham Books Ltd. Westview House 734 London Road, Oakhill, Stoke-on-Trent, Staffordshire, ST4 5NP, UK.
Eisenstadt, J. M. (1978). Parental loss and genius. American Psychologist,33(3), 211-223.
Cherry, K. (2012). Child development theories. Psychology. About. com. The New York Times.
Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (1993). How to design and evaluate research in education (Vol. 7). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Goertzel, M. G., Goertzel, V., & Goertzel, T. G. (1978). Three hundred eminent personalities. Jossey-Bass.
Goleman, D., Kaufman, P., & Ray, M. L. (1992). The creative spirit. EP Dutton.
Guilford, J. P. (1975). Factors and factors of personality. Psychological Bulletin,82(5), 802.
Innamorato, G. (1998). Creativity in the development of scientific giftedness: Educational implications. Roeper Review, 21(1), 54-59.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1994). Learning together and alone. Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning. Allyn and Bacon, 160 Gould Street, Needham Heights, MA 02194.
Kagan, S. (2014). Brain Friendly Teaching: Tools, Tips & Structures.
Kash, I. A., & Parkes, D. C. (2010). Impersonation strategies in auctions. In International Workshop on Internet and Network Economics (pp. 492-495). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
Lombard, K., & Grosser, M. (2008). Critical thinking: are the ideals of OBE failing us or are we failing the ideals of OBE?. South African journal of education, 28(4), 561-579.
Magnesen, V. A. (1983). A Review of Findings from Learning and Memory Retention Studies. In Innovation Abstracts (Vol. 5, No. 25, p. n25).
Magno, C. (2011). Assessing the relationship of scientific thinking, self-regulation in research, and creativity in a measurement model. International Journal, 6(1). 17-47.
McWilliam, E., & Dawson, S. (2008). Teaching for creativity: Towards sustainable and replicable pedagogical practice. Higher education, 56(6), 633-643.
Meintjes, H., & Grosser, M. (2010). Creative thinking in prospective teachers: the status quo and the impact of contextual factors. South African Journal of Education, 30(3), 361-386.
Mendenhall, W., Sincich, T., & Boudreau, N. S. (1996). A second course in statistics: regression analysis (Vol. 5). Upper Saddle River^ eNew Jersey New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Mielke, P. W. (1984). 34 Meteorological applications of permutation techniques based on distance functions. Handbook of statistics, 4, 813-830.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
Nolan, V. (2004). Creativity: the antidote to the argument culture. Creativity and cultural diversity. Leeds: The Creativity Centre Educational Trust, 1.
Papalia, R. B., & Bertarelli, S. (2009). Decomposing productivity patterns in a conditional convergence framework. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 31(1), 57-75.
Schunk, D. H., Meece, J. R., & Pintrich, P. R. (2012). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications. Pearson Higher Ed.
Simonton, D. K. (1999). Genius, creativity, and leadership: Historiometric inquiries. Cambridge, MA: IUniverse.
Sousa, D. A. (2009). Brain-friendly learning for teachers. Educational Leadership, 66(9).
Spradley, J. P. (2016). Participant observation. United states of America: Waveland Press.
Sternberg, R. J. (2006). Creating a vision of creativity: The first 25 years. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, (1), 2-12.
Stiyowati, R. (2014). Pengaruh Metode Whole Brain Teaching Terhadap Aktivitas Dan Hasil Belajar Eaching (WBT) Vitas Dan Hasil Belajar Siswa Kelas XI SMAN 1 Jember. Retrieved from http://repository.unej.ac.id/handle/123456789/17318.
Tri, D., Dafik, D., & Susanto, S. (2013). The Development Of A Character Based Mathematics Learning Materials Based On Whole Brain Teaching For Three-Dimensional Topic Of Junior Hight School Year 9. Pancaran Pendidikan, 2(1), 26-34.
Veronesi, P. (2000). Testing and assessment in science education: Looking past the scoreboard. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 74(1), 27-30.
Willis, J. (2008). How your child learns best: Brain-friendly strategies you can use to ignite your child's learning and increase school success. Sourcebooks, Inc.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengajaran agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Access)
