Analisis Perbedaan Peformance dan Quality Of Service (Qos) Antara Eigrp dengan Ospf (Studi Kasus Menggunakan 6 Router Melalui GNS 3 dan Wireshark)

Authors

  • Unung Verawardina Program Studi Pendidikan Teknologi Informasi dan Komputer IKIP-PGRI Pontianak Pontianak, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23887/ijnse.v2i1.13908

Abstract

In a dynamic routing setting a routing protocol is required to perform the settings to find the shortest and best path. Routing protocols are of two types: vector distance and link state. Use of EIGRP routing that includes long-range vectors and link state OSPF Link link state coverage, peg well to be implemented in complex network because it can adapt well. In this research is the method used for routing and speed of time available EIGRP routing and OSPF routing through simulator GNS3 and wireshark application, then analyze the difference of peformance with speed of routing table and speed of time. While for Quality of Service (QoS) compare network service quality from EIGRP and OSPF routing which include delay, packet loss, and throughput. Based on the results of the research shows the EIGRP routing table is better in the selection path, EIGRP smaller time tansfer data then its data transfer faster than the OSPF. Overall Quality Of Service (Qos) delay, packetloss and throughput on EIGRP and OSPF are well balanced and good.

References

Anonim. 2012. “Routing OSPF” https://www.braincert.com/tutorial/Routing-OSPF (diakses pada tanggal 5 september 2015).

Febri, U., dan Naemah, M., 2014. Analisis Kinerja Routing Dinamis Dengan Teknik RIP Pada Topologi Ring Menggunakan Jaringan LAN menggunakan Cisco Tracer, Journal Singuda Ensikom, volume 7.

Ferguson, P. & Huston, G. 1998. Quality of Service. John Wiley & Sons Inc.

Kurniawan, W. 2007. Jaringan Komputer. Semarang: Andi.

Lammle, T. 2005. CCNA Cisco Certified Network Associate Study Guide. Cetakan I. Terjemahan S’to, CCNA, MCSE. Jakarta: PT. Elex Media Komputindo.

Lin, Y.D., Hwang R.H., Baker, F., 2012. Computer Network An Open Source Approuch. McGraw - Hill International Edition.

Munir.M.T. 2009. Pembelajaran Jarak Jauh Berbasis Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Putri,E.K., Anggun,F, dan Alfin, H. 2014. Analisis Qos pada jaringan multi protocol label switching (MPLS) studi kasus di pelabuhan indonesia cabang tanjung intan cilacap, Journal.2014 Http://www.Academia.Edu/10258365/Analisis_Qos_Pada_Jaringan_Multi. (diakses pada tanggal 5 september 2016).

Ramdhani, S,. Lina, O., dan Ery,S. 2015. Analisis Perbandingan Kinerja Routing RIV EIGRP dan OSPF di PT.Chevron Pacific, Journal JomFTEKNIK, volume 2, 2015.

Resnu ,K.L.,.2015. Analisis Quality of service video streaming berbasis web, Journal.

Sofana, I., 2008. Membangun JaringanKomputer, Membuat jaringan Komputer (Wire & Wireless) Untuk Pengguna Windows dan Linux. Informatika: Bandung.

Sofana, I. 2012. “Cisco CCNA Dan Jaringan Komputer”. Informatika: Bandung.

Downloads

Published

2018-04-18

How to Cite

Verawardina, U. (2018). Analisis Perbedaan Peformance dan Quality Of Service (Qos) Antara Eigrp dengan Ospf (Studi Kasus Menggunakan 6 Router Melalui GNS 3 dan Wireshark). International Journal of Natural Science and Engineering, 2(1), 10–19. https://doi.org/10.23887/ijnse.v2i1.13908

Issue

Section

Articles