Role of Religiosity Support in Generating Employee’s Positive Work Behaviour

Tri Wulida Afrianty

doi:10.23887/ijssb.v4i1.22942

Authors

Tri Wulida Afrianty Universitas Brawijaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23887/ijssb.v4i1.22942

Keywords:

Individual Religiosity, Religiosity Support, Organizational Commitment, Social Exchange Theory

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to examine the impact of individual religiosity as well as religiosity support on employee’s organizational commitment. This research is located in two Syariah Banking in Malang, East Java. A quantitative approach was undertaken in this research. The hypotheses were developed heavily based on Social Exchange Theory. The main finding of this research provides support to the theory, that is religiosity support (as a form of positive behaviour, managed by the organizations) has a significant impact in increasing employees’ organizational commitment

References

Afrianty, T. W. (2013). Work Life Balance Policies in the Indonesian Context. (November), 267. Retrieved from http://espace.library.curtin.edu.au/R?func=dbin-jump-full&local_base=gen01-era02&object_id=199554

Afrianty, T.W., Issa, T., & Burgess, J. (2016). Work-based religiosity support in Indonesia.

In S Gröschl, R Bendl (eds) Managing religious diversity in the workplace: Examples from around the world. Ashgate Publishing, Ltd

Azizah, Siti Nur. (2016). Religiosity Dimensions and the Effect on Organizational Citizenship Behavior Islamic Perspective. The International Conference of Management Sciences (ICoMS). 236- 247.

Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction

in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical

consideration. Journal of personality and social psychology, 51(61) pp.

-1182

Blau, P. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley

Cohen, A. (2007). Commitment before and after: An evaluation and reconceptualization of organizational

commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 17, 336-354.

Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S. (2005). Social

Exchange Theory: An Interdisciplinary Review. Journal of Management, 31(6), pp. 874-900.

Darto, Mariman., Setyadi, Djoko., Riadi, Sukisno S., & Hariyadi, Sugeng. (2015). The Effect

of Transformational Leadership, Religiosity, Job Satisfaction, and Organizational Culture on Organizational Citizenship Behavior and Employee Performance in The Regional Offices of National Institute of Public Administration, Indonesia. European Journal of Business and Management. 7(23): 205- 219. ISSN 2222- 2839

Glock, Charles Y. and Rodney Stark. 1965. Religion and Society in Tension. Chicago: Rand McNally.

Gouldner, A. W. (1960). The Norm of Reciprocity: A Preliminary Statement.

American Sociological Review, 25(2), 161-178.

Kucukcan, Talip. (2000).Can Religiosity be Measured: Dimensions of Religious Commitment. Theories

Revisited. 9(9): 1-5.

Mahudin, N., Noor, N., Dzulkifli, M., & Janon, N. (2016). Religiosity among Muslims: A Scale Development and Validation Study. Hubs-Asia, 20(2), 109. https://doi.org/10.7454/mssh.v20i2.480

Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1984). Testing the "Side-Bet Theory" of organizational commitment: Some

methodological considerations. Journal of Applied Psychology,69(3), 372-378.

Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of

organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1(1), 61-89.

Meyer, J. P., Allen, N. J., & Smith, C. A. (1993). Commitment to organizations and

occupations: Extension and test of a three-component conceptualization.

Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(4), 538-551.