The Effect of Board Gender Diversity on Corporate Sustainability Performance with Enterprise Risk Management as a Moderating Variable


  • Nurul Hidayah Universitas Mercu Buana, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Lucky Nugroho Universitas Mercubuana, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Rimi Guslinana Mais STIE Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia



Female Directors, Company Size, Number of directors, Enterprise Risk Management, Corporate Sustainability Performance


Corporate Sustainability Performance is an approach taken by companies to create long-term profits by developing business strategies that prioritize profits and pay attention to social, cultural, economic, and environmental factors. Gender diversity plays an important role in achieving sustainable performance because the gender diversity of board members can improve company performance. This study aims to examine the effect of board gender diversity on corporate sustainability performance by using ERM as a moderation variable. The study in this study took samples of energy and mining companies on the IDX. This includes mining companies that have published integrated reports (IRs). The type of data used is secondary data using random sampling to determine the number of sampling trials. This study used qualitative descriptive approach and causality method. Data analysis in this study used SPSS to examine the effect of the independent variable on the dependent variable. The results of this study provide an in-depth understanding of the relationship between independent and dependent variables, with implications that can increase awareness of the importance of gender diversity in the context of sustainable company performance.


Abdullah, S. N. (2014). The causes of gender diversity in Malaysian large firms. Journal of Management & Governance, 18, 1137–1159. DOI:

Ahmad, M., Raja Kamaruzaman, R. N. S., Hamdan, H., & Annuar, H. A. (2020). Women directors and firm performance: Malaysian evidence post policy announcement. Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences, 36(2), 97–110. DOI:

Ambulkar, S., Blackhurst, J., & Grawe, S. (2015). Firm’s resilience to supply chain disruptions: Scale development and empirical examination. Journal of Operations Management, 33, 111–122. DOI:

Arora, A. (2022). Gender diversity in boardroom and its impact on firm performance. Journal of Management and Governance, 26(3), 735–755. DOI:

Azevedo, A., & Shane, M. J. (2019). A new training program in developing cultural intelligence can also improve innovative work behavior and resilience: A longitudinal pilot study of graduate students and professional employees. The International Journal of Management Education, 17(3). DOI:

Babich, V., & Kouvelis, P. (2018). Introduction to the special issue on research at the interface of finance, operations, and risk management (iFORM): Recent contributions and future directions. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 20(1), 1–18. DOI:

Betts, T. K., Wiengarten, F., & Tadisina, S. K. (2015). Exploring the impact of stakeholder pressure on environmental management strategies at the plant level: what does industry have to do with it? Journal of Cleaner Production, 92, 282–294. DOI:

Bhuiyan, M. B. U., Cheema, M. A., & Man, Y. (2021). Risk committee, corporate risk-taking and firm value. Managerial Finance, 47(3), 285–309. DOI:

Braam, G., & Peeters, R. (2018). Corporate sustainability performance and assurance on sustainability reports: Diffusion of accounting practices in the realm of sustainable development. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(2), 164–181. DOI:

Braumann, E. C. (2018). Analyzing the Role of Risk Awareness in Enterprise Risk Management. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 30(2), 241–268. DOI:

Bromiley, P., McShane, M., Nair, A., & Rustambekov, E. (2015). Enterprise risk management: Review, critique, and research directions. Long Range Planning, 48(4), 265–276. DOI:

Chapple, L., & Humphrey, J. E. (2014). Does board gender diversity have a financial impact? Evidence using stock portfolio performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 122, 709–723. DOI:

Chen, S., Ni, X., & Tong, J. Y. (2016). Gender diversity in the boardroom and risk management: A case of R&D investment. Journal of Business Ethics, 136, 599–621. DOI:

Darmadi, S. (2013). Do women in top management affect firm performance? Evidence from Indonesia. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 13(3), 288–304. DOI:

Dasborough, M. T., Ashkanasy, N. M., Humphrey, R. H., Harms, P. D., Credé, M., & Wood, D. (2022). Does leadership still not need emotional intelligence? Continuing “The Great EI Debate.” The Leadership Quarterly, 33(6). DOI:

E-Vahdati, S., Zulkifli, N., & Zakaria, Z. (2018). A moderated mediation model for board diversity and corporate performance in ASEAN countries. Sustainability, 10(2), 556. DOI:

Ellwood, S., & Garcia-Lacalle, J. (2015). The influence of presence and position of women on the boards of directors: The case of NHS foundation trusts. Journal of Business Ethics, 130, 69–84. DOI:

Fakir, A. N. M., & Jusoh, R. (2020). Board gender diversity and corporate sustainability performance: Mediating role of enterprise risk management. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(6), 351–363. DOI:

Fernández-Temprano, M. A., & Tejerina-Gaite, F. (2020). Types of director, board diversity and firm performance. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 20(2), 324–342. DOI:

Gulzar, M. A., Cherian, J., Hwang, J., Jiang, Y., & Sial, M. S. (2019). The Impact of Board Gender Diversity and Foreign Institutional Investors on the Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Engagement of Chinese Listed Companies. Sustainability, 11(2), 307. DOI:

Ifada, L. M., Ghozali, I., & Faisal, F. (2019). Islamic organizational culture, Islamic corporate social responsibility, and corporate performance: Evidence from Sharia Bank in Indonesia. International Journal of Financial Research, 10(6), 118–123. DOI:

Kassinis, G., Panayiotou, A., Dimou, A., & Katsifaraki, G. (2016). Gender and Environmental Sustainability: A Longitudinal Analysis. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 23(6), 399–412. DOI:

Keay, A. (2017). Stewardship theory: is board accountability necessary? International Journal of Law and Management, 59(6), 1292–1314. DOI:

Koentjoro, S., & Gunawan, S. (2020). Managing knowledge, dynamic capabilities, innovative performance, and creating sustainable competitive advantage in family companies: A case study of a family company in Indonesia. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 6(3), 90. DOI:

Le, H., Jiang, Z., & Radford, K. (2021). Leader-member exchange and subjective well-being: The moderating role of metacognitive cultural intelligence. Personnel Review, 50(3), 954–970. DOI:

Linnenluecke, M. K., & Griffiths, A. (2013). Firms and sustainability: Mapping the intellectual origins and structure of the corporate sustainability field. Global Environmental Change, 23(1), 382–391. DOI:

Lundqvist, S. A. (2014). An exploratory study of enterprise risk management: Pillars of ERM. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 29(3), 393–429. DOI:

Malik, M. F., Zaman, M., & Buckby, S. (2020). Enterprise risk management and firm performance: Role of the risk committee. Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics, 16(1). DOI:

McCleskey, J. (2014). Emotional intelligence and leadership: A review of the progress, controversy, and criticism. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 22(1), 76–93. DOI:

McGuinness, P. B., Vieito, J. P., & Wang, M. (2017). The role of board gender and foreign ownership in the CSR performance of Chinese listed firms. Journal of Corporate Finance, 42, 75–99. DOI:

Nekhili, M., & Gatfaoui, H. (2013). Are demographic attributes and firm characteristics drivers of gender diversity? Investigating women’s positions on French boards of directors. Journal of Business Ethics, 118, 227–249. DOI:

Panait, M., Voica, M. C., & Radulescu, I. (2014). The activity of capital market’actors: Under the sign of social responsibility. Procedia Economics and Finance, 8, 522–528. DOI:

Parker, H., & Ameen, K. (2018). The role of resilience capabilities in shaping how firms respond to disruptions. Journal of Business Research, 88, 535–541. DOI:

Prewett, K., & Terry, A. (2018). COSO’s Updated Enterprise Risk Management Framework—A Quest For Depth And Clarity. Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance, 29(3), 16–23. DOI:

Rajput, M., & Jhunjhunwala, S. (2019). Corporate governance and payout policy: evidence from India. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 19(5), 1117–1132. DOI:

Rao, K., & Tilt, C. (2016). Board composition and corporate social responsibility: The role of diversity, gender, strategy and decision making. Journal of Business Ethics, 138, 327–347. DOI:

Reguera-Alvarado, N., De Fuentes, P., & Laffarga, J. (2017). Does board gender diversity influence financial performance? Evidence from Spain. Journal of Business Ethics, 141, 337–350. DOI:

Rehman, A. U., & Anwar, M. (2019). Mediating role of enterprise risk management practices between business strategy and SME performance. Small Enterprise Research, 26(2), 207–227. DOI:

Rezaee, Z. (2016). Business sustainability research: A theoretical and integrated perspective. Journal of Accounting Literature, 36(1), 48–64. DOI:

Rifandy, T., Radika, T., & Wardhana, L. I. (2021). Women in a dual board system and dividend policy. Bulletin of Monetary Economics and Banking, 24, 129–150. DOI:

Rodriguez-Fernandez, M. (2016). Social Responsibility and Financial Performance: The Role of Good Corporate Governance. BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 19(2), 137–151. DOI:

Saeidi, P., Saeidi, S. P., Sofian, S., Saeidi, S. P., Nilashi, M., & Mardani, A. (2019). The impact of enterprise risk management on competitive advantage by moderating role of information technology. Computer Standards & Interfaces, 63, 67–82. DOI:

Sanan, N. K. (2019). Impact of board characteristics on firm dividends: evidence from India. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 19(6), 1204–1215. DOI:

Shevchenko, A., Lévesque, M., & Pagell, M. (2016). Why firms delay reaching true sustainability. Journal of Management Studies, 53(5), 911–935. DOI:

Simionescu, L. N., & Dumitrescu, D. (2018). Empirical study towards corporate social responsibility practices and company financial performance. Evidence for companies listed on the Bucharest stock exchange. Sustainability, 10(9), 3141. DOI:

Smith, N., & Parrotta, P. (2018). Why so few women on boards of directors? Empirical evidence from Danish companies in 1998–2010. Journal of Business Ethics, 147, 445–467. DOI:

Tahir, H., Masri, R., & Rahman, M. M. (2020). Impact of board attributes on the firm dividend payout policy: evidence from Malaysia. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 20(5), 919–937. DOI:

Vilchez, V. F., Darnall, N., & Correa, J. A. A. (2017). Stakeholder influences on the design of firms’ environmental practices. Strategic Management Journal, 142, 3370–3381. DOI:

Wang, J., Zhao, L., & Huchzermeier, A. (2021). Operations-Finance Interface in Risk Management: Research Evolution and Opportunities. Production and Operations Management, 30(2), 355–389. DOI:

Wellalage, N. H., & Locke, S. (2013). Women on board, firm financial performance and agency costs. Asian Journal of Business Ethics, 2, 113–127. DOI:

Wiley, C., & Monllor-Tormos, M. (2018). Board gender diversity in the STEM&F sectors: the critical mass required to drive firm performance. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 25(3), 290–308. DOI:

Yang, S., Ishtiaq, M., & Anwar, M. (2018). Enterprise risk management practices and firm performance, the mediating role of competitive advantage and the moderating role of financial literacy. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 11(3), 35. DOI:




How to Cite

Hidayah, N., Nugroho, L. ., & Mais, R. G. . (2023). The Effect of Board Gender Diversity on Corporate Sustainability Performance with Enterprise Risk Management as a Moderating Variable. International Journal of Social Science and Business, 7(4), 986–993.