Checking Similarity in EFL Undergraduate Students’ Research Proposal


  • I Gede Yoga Permana STKIP Agama Hindu Singaraja



EFL, Similarity, Research Proposal.


The current study aimed at identifying the similarity found in undergraduate students’ research working paper. In doing similarity check, a software named Plagiarism X checker was used. A hundred students’ research paper were collected and similarity checked. The result showed that the similarity identified in students work is 22.18% which falls into medium category. The highest percentage of similarity is found in the background of study (13.86%) followed with theoretical review (5.22%) and research method (3.08%). In background of study, the highest percentage of similarity is 34% that belongs to medium level. Meanwhile in theoretical review and research method the similarity is less than 15% that indicates a small level. Some papers were identified contain a stolen paragraph because the use of exact same words with the original sources without any process of editing. Discussion and suggestions are further presented.


Al Darwish, S., & Sadeqi, A. A. (2016). Reasons for College Students to Plagiarize in EFL Writing: Students’ Motivation to Pass. International Education Studies, 9(9), 99.

Alsied, S. M., & Ibrahim, N. W. (2017). Exploring Challenges Encountered by EFL Libyan Learners in Research Teaching and Writing. IAFOR Journal of Language Learning, 3(2), 143–158.

Anney, V. N., & Mosha, M. A. (2015). Student’s Plagiarisms in Higher Learning Institutions in the Era of Improved Internet Access: Case Study of Developing Countries. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(13), 203–216. on 10th August 2015.

Atkinson, D., & Yeoh, S. (2008). Student and staff perceptions of the effectiveness of plagiarism detection software. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24(2), 222–240.

Bakhtiyari, K., Salehi, H., Embi, M. A., Shakiba, M., Zavvari, A., Shahbazi-Moghadam, M., Ebrahim, N. A., & Mohammadjafari, M. (2014). Ethical and unethical methods of plagiarism prevention in academic writing. International Education Studies, 7(7), 52–62.

Batane, T. (2010). Turning to Turnitin to Fight Plagiarism among University Students. Educational Technology and Society, 13(2), 1–12.

Brown, V., Jordan, R., Rubin, N., & Arome, G. (2010). Strengths and Weaknesses of Plagiarism Detection Software. Journal of Literacy and Technology, 11(1), 110–131.

Carroll, J., & Zetterling, C. (2013). Guiding students away from plagiarism. In Writing integrity workshop, Stockholm.

Doró, K. (2015). Why Do Students Plagiarize? Efl Undergraduates’ Views on the Reasons Behind Plagiarism. Romanian Journal of English Studies, 11(1), 255–263.

Gasparyan, A. Y., Nurmashev, B., Seksenbayev, B., Trukhachev, V. I., Kostyukova, E. I., & Kitas, G. D. (2017). Plagiarism in the context of education and evolving detection strategies. Journal of Korean Medical Science, 32(8), 1220–1227.

Grossberg, M. (2011). History and the Disciplining of Plagiarism. In C. Eisner & M. Vicinus (Eds.), Originality, Imitation, and Plagiarism: Teaching Writing in the Digital Age (4th ed., pp. 159–172). University of Michigan Press.

Helgesson, G., & Eriksson, S. (2018). Plagiarism in research. Getting to Good: Research Integrity in the Biomedical Sciences, 262–273.

Hermansyah, H., & Aridah, A. (2021). Teachers’ Perception toward the Challenges in Online English Teaching during Covid-19 Pandemic. Indonesian Journal of EFL and Linguistics, 6(1), 63.

Hu, G., & Sun, X. (2016). Chinese university EFL teachers’ knowledge of and stance on plagiarism. Comunicar, 24(48), 29–37.

Ison, D. (2014). Does the Online Environment Promote Plagiarism? A Comparative Study of Dissertations from Brick-and-Mortar versus Online Institutions. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 10(2), 272.

Konstantinidis, A., Theodosiadou, D., & Pappos, C. (2020). Plagiarism: Examination of Conceptual Issues and Evaluation of Research Findings on Using Detection Services. Contemporary Educational Technology, 4(3), 212–221.

Louw, H. (2017). Defining plagiarism: Student and staff perceptions of a grey concept. South African Journal of Higher Education, 31(5), 116–135.

McGee, P. (2013). Supporting academic honesty in online courses. Journal of Educators Online, 10(1), 1–31.

Nadelson, S. (2007). Academic Misconduct by University Students: Faculty Perceptions and Responses. Plagiary, Cross‐ Disciplinary Studies in Plagiarism, Fabrication, and Falsification, 67–76.

Paul, M., & Jamal, S. (2015). An improved SRL based plagiarism detection technique using Sentence ranking. Procedia Computer Science, 46(Icict 2014), 223–230.

Pecorari, D. (2003). Good and original: Plagiarism and patchwriting in academic second-language writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12(4), 317–345.

Permana, I. G. Y., & Santosa, M. H. (2018). EFL Students ’ Perception on Plagiarism. Language in the Online & Offline World 6: The Fortitude, May, 128–133.

Romanowski, M. H. (2021). Preservice Teachers’ Perception of Plagiarism: A Case from a College of Education. Journal of Academic Ethics.

Sariffuddin, S., Astuti, K. D., & Arthur, R. (2017). Investigating Plagiarism: The Form and The Motivation in Performing Plagiarism in High Education. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 11(2), 172–178.

Srivastava, S., & Govilkar, S. (2017). A Survey on Paraphrase Detection Techniques for Indian Regional Languages. International Journal of Computer Applications, 163(9), 42–47.

Stapleton, P. (2012). Gauging the effectiveness of anti-plagiarism software: An empirical study of second language graduate writers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11(2), 125–133.

Sulaiman, R. (2018). Types and Factors Causing Plagiarism in Papers of English Education Students. Inspiring: English Education Journal, 1(1), 95–104.

Sutherland-Smith, W. (2005). Pandora’s box: Academic perceptions of student plagiarism in writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 4(1), 83–95.