Checking Similarity in EFL Undergraduate Students’ Research Proposal

Authors

  • I Gede Yoga Permana STKIP Agama Hindu Singaraja

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23887/ika.v20i1.43315

Keywords:

EFL, Similarity, Research Proposal.

Abstract

The current study aimed at identifying the similarity found in undergraduate students’ research working paper. In doing similarity check, a software named Plagiarism X checker was used. A hundred students’ research paper were collected and similarity checked. The result showed that the similarity identified in students work is 22.18% which falls into medium category. The highest percentage of similarity is found in the background of study (13.86%) followed with theoretical review (5.22%) and research method (3.08%). In background of study, the highest percentage of similarity is 34% that belongs to medium level. Meanwhile in theoretical review and research method the similarity is less than 15% that indicates a small level. Some papers were identified contain a stolen paragraph because the use of exact same words with the original sources without any process of editing. Discussion and suggestions are further presented.

References

Al Darwish, S., & Sadeqi, A. A. (2016). Reasons for College Students to Plagiarize in EFL Writing: Students’ Motivation to Pass. International Education Studies, 9(9), 99. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v9n9p99

Alsied, S. M., & Ibrahim, N. W. (2017). Exploring Challenges Encountered by EFL Libyan Learners in Research Teaching and Writing. IAFOR Journal of Language Learning, 3(2), 143–158.

Anney, V. N., & Mosha, M. A. (2015). Student’s Plagiarisms in Higher Learning Institutions in the Era of Improved Internet Access: Case Study of Developing Countries. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(13), 203–216. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1080502 on 10th August 2015.

Atkinson, D., & Yeoh, S. (2008). Student and staff perceptions of the effectiveness of plagiarism detection software. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24(2), 222–240.

Bakhtiyari, K., Salehi, H., Embi, M. A., Shakiba, M., Zavvari, A., Shahbazi-Moghadam, M., Ebrahim, N. A., & Mohammadjafari, M. (2014). Ethical and unethical methods of plagiarism prevention in academic writing. International Education Studies, 7(7), 52–62. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v7n7p52

Batane, T. (2010). Turning to Turnitin to Fight Plagiarism among University Students. Educational Technology and Society, 13(2), 1–12.

Brown, V., Jordan, R., Rubin, N., & Arome, G. (2010). Strengths and Weaknesses of Plagiarism Detection Software. Journal of Literacy and Technology, 11(1), 110–131.

Carroll, J., & Zetterling, C. (2013). Guiding students away from plagiarism. In Writing integrity workshop, Stockholm. http://people.kth.se/~ambe/KTH/Guidingstudents.pdf

Doró, K. (2015). Why Do Students Plagiarize? Efl Undergraduates’ Views on the Reasons Behind Plagiarism. Romanian Journal of English Studies, 11(1), 255–263. https://doi.org/10.2478/rjes-2014-0029

Gasparyan, A. Y., Nurmashev, B., Seksenbayev, B., Trukhachev, V. I., Kostyukova, E. I., & Kitas, G. D. (2017). Plagiarism in the context of education and evolving detection strategies. Journal of Korean Medical Science, 32(8), 1220–1227. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2017.32.8.1220

Grossberg, M. (2011). History and the Disciplining of Plagiarism. In C. Eisner & M. Vicinus (Eds.), Originality, Imitation, and Plagiarism: Teaching Writing in the Digital Age (4th ed., pp. 159–172). University of Michigan Press.

Helgesson, G., & Eriksson, S. (2018). Plagiarism in research. Getting to Good: Research Integrity in the Biomedical Sciences, 262–273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-014-9583-8

Hermansyah, H., & Aridah, A. (2021). Teachers’ Perception toward the Challenges in Online English Teaching during Covid-19 Pandemic. Indonesian Journal of EFL and Linguistics, 6(1), 63. https://doi.org/10.21462/ijefl.v6i1.342

Hu, G., & Sun, X. (2016). Chinese university EFL teachers’ knowledge of and stance on plagiarism. Comunicar, 24(48), 29–37. https://doi.org/10.3916/C48-2016-03

Ison, D. (2014). Does the Online Environment Promote Plagiarism? A Comparative Study of Dissertations from Brick-and-Mortar versus Online Institutions. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 10(2), 272.

Konstantinidis, A., Theodosiadou, D., & Pappos, C. (2020). Plagiarism: Examination of Conceptual Issues and Evaluation of Research Findings on Using Detection Services. Contemporary Educational Technology, 4(3), 212–221. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/6104

Louw, H. (2017). Defining plagiarism: Student and staff perceptions of a grey concept. South African Journal of Higher Education, 31(5), 116–135. https://doi.org/10.20853/31-5-580

McGee, P. (2013). Supporting academic honesty in online courses. Journal of Educators Online, 10(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.9743/JEO.2013.1.6

Nadelson, S. (2007). Academic Misconduct by University Students: Faculty Perceptions and Responses. Plagiary, Cross‐ Disciplinary Studies in Plagiarism, Fabrication, and Falsification, 67–76.

Paul, M., & Jamal, S. (2015). An improved SRL based plagiarism detection technique using Sentence ranking. Procedia Computer Science, 46(Icict 2014), 223–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.02.015

Pecorari, D. (2003). Good and original: Plagiarism and patchwriting in academic second-language writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12(4), 317–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2003.08.004

Permana, I. G. Y., & Santosa, M. H. (2018). EFL Students ’ Perception on Plagiarism. Language in the Online & Offline World 6: The Fortitude, May, 128–133.

Romanowski, M. H. (2021). Preservice Teachers’ Perception of Plagiarism: A Case from a College of Education. Journal of Academic Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-021-09395-4

Sariffuddin, S., Astuti, K. D., & Arthur, R. (2017). Investigating Plagiarism: The Form and The Motivation in Performing Plagiarism in High Education. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 11(2), 172–178. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v11i2.5994

Srivastava, S., & Govilkar, S. (2017). A Survey on Paraphrase Detection Techniques for Indian Regional Languages. International Journal of Computer Applications, 163(9), 42–47. https://doi.org/10.5120/ijca2017913757

Stapleton, P. (2012). Gauging the effectiveness of anti-plagiarism software: An empirical study of second language graduate writers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11(2), 125–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2011.10.003

Sulaiman, R. (2018). Types and Factors Causing Plagiarism in Papers of English Education Students. Inspiring: English Education Journal, 1(1), 95–104. https://doi.org/10.35905/inspiring.v1i1.836

Sutherland-Smith, W. (2005). Pandora’s box: Academic perceptions of student plagiarism in writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 4(1), 83–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2004.07.007

Published

2022-03-31

Issue

Section

Articles