Totalitarianisme, Banalitas Kejahatan dan Kebebasan Berpikir: Refleksi Bersama Hannah Arendt
Totalitarianism, the Banality of Evil and Freedom of Thought: Reflections with Hannah Arendt
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23887/jfi.v7i1.62413Keywords:
the banality of evil, totalitarianism, thinking, normalityAbstract
This article aims to analyze further Hannah Arendt’s idea on the banality of evil and freedom to think by placing it back in its specific context namely the problem of totalitarianism. The main argument of this article is that the concept of the banality of evil can only be understood in terms of individual existence in totalitarian regime, or in a social and political atmosphere where freedom to think and creative imagination are hindered by totalitarian power. The method of this study is library research and critical analysis of primary literatures namely Arendt’s works, especially Eichmann in Jerusalem, and secondary literatures that discuss Arendt’s thought on the banality of evil. This study indicates that the banality of evil is a different type of evil that rises in a totalitarian regime when the moral status of evil is exceeded by the claims of normality or normativity. Therefore, thinking as dialogue with conscience can prevent someone to commit the banality of evil. Thus, overcoming the banality of evil requires both critical thinking capacity and a friendly political system to freedom of thought.
References
Arendt, H. 2006. Eichmann In Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil. Penguin Group.
Arendt, H. 1978. The Life of Mind. A Harvest Book.
Arendt, H. 1979. The Origins of Totalitarianism. A Harvest Book.
Arendt, H. 1994. Essays in Understanding. Schocken Books.
Arendt, H. 2003. Responsibility and Judgment. Schocken Books.
Arendt, H. 1998. The Human Condition. University of Chicago Press.
Arendt, H. 1992. Lectures on Kant’s Political Philosophy. University of Chicago Press.
Balfour, Danny L. & Guy B. Adams. Rethinking the Banality of Evil. 2008. Public Administration Review, Vol. 10 (2).
Bergen, Bernard. J. 1998. The Banality of Evil: Hannah Arendt and The Final Solution. USA: Rowman & Littlefield.
Bernstein, Richard B. 2018. Why Read Hannah Arendt Now. Polity Press.
Breen, Keith. 2007. Violence and Power: A critique of Hannah Arendt on the Political. Philosophy and Social. Vol 33 (3). DOI: 10.1177/0191453707076143.
Czobor-Lupp, Mihaela. 2008. Hannah Arendt on the Power of Creative Making in a World of Plural Cultures. The European Legacy, Vol. 13 (4). DOI:10.1080/10848770802180722.
Geddes, Jennifer L. 2003. Banal Evil and Useless Knowledge: Hannah Arendt and Charlotte Delbo on Evil after the Holocaust. Journal of Hypatia, Vol. 18, No. 1.
Hardiman, F. Budi. 2007. Filsafat Modern. Gramedia.
Hardiman, F. Budi. 2005. Massa, Teror dan Trauma. Kanisius.
Hardiman, F. Budi. 2015. Seni Memahami. Kanisius.
Hayden, Patrick. 2009. Political Evil in a Global Age: Hannah Arendt and International Theory. Routledge.
Heidegger. 1962. Being and Time. Basic Blackwell.
Hunt, Grayson. 2015. Arendt on Resentment: Articulating Intersubjectivity. The Journal of Speculative Philosophy, 29 (3). https://muse.jhu.edu/article/588863.
Jeffery, Renée. 2008. Evil and the Problem of Responsibility. Renée Jeffer (ed.), Confronting Evil in International Relations: Ethical Responses to Problems of Moral Agency. Palgrave Macmillan.
Kleden, Paul Budi. 2006. Membongkar Derita. Penerbit Ledalero.
Koten, Yosef Keladu. 2018. Etika Keduniawiaan Hannah Arendt. Penerbit Ledalero.
Koten, Yosef Keladu. 2016. Banalitas Kejahatan Korupsi dan Aktivitas Berpikir. Jurnal Ledalero, Vol. 15 (1).
Lang, Berel.1988. Hannah Arendt and The Politics of Evil. Judaism, Vol. 37, No. 3.
Lechte, John. 2008. Fifty Key Contemporary Thinkers: From Structuralism to Post-Humanism. Routledge.
Magnis-Suseno, F. 1987. Etika Dasar. Kanisius.
Morgan, Marie. Hannah Arendt and the Freedom to Think. 2016. Journal of Educational Administration and History, Vol. 15 (4). DOI: 10.1080/00220620.2016.1144579.
Ophir, Adi. 2014. Between Eichmann and Kant: Thinking on Evil after Arendt. History and Memory, Vol. 8 (2).
Ruankool, Nopparat. 2023. Reflecting on Teacher’s Authority Through Hannah Arendt’s “The Crisis in Education.” Jurnal Diskursus, Vol.19 (1).
Sandel, Michael. 1996. Democracy’s Discontent: America in Search of a Public Philosophy. Harvard University Press.
Schiff, Jacob. 2012. The Varieties of Thoughtlessness and the Limit of Thinking. European Journal of Political Theory, Vol. 12 (2).
Selamat, Shelomita & Yustinus. 2022. Thinking Prevents Grave Evil: An Analysis of Thinking According to Hannah Arendt. International Journal of Indonesian Philosophy & Theology, Vol. 3 (2). DOI: 10.47043/ijipth.v3i2.38.
Supriatma, Made. 2020. Akar dari Kekejian. https://supriatma.substack.com/p/akar-dari-kekejian.
Umam, Ahmad Khoirul. 2021. Koreksi Total Kinerja Demokrasi. Wijayanto (ed.), Demokrasi Tanpa Demos. Jakarta: LP3ES.
Vetlesen, Arne John. 2001. Hannah Arendt on Conscience and Evil. Philosophy and Social Criticism, Vol. 27 (5).
Volk, Christian. 2015. Towards a Critical Theory of the Political: Hannah Arendt on Power and Critique. Philosophy and Social Criticism. DOI: 10.1177/0191453715568921.
Žižek, Slavoj. 1997. The Plague of Fantasies. Verso.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Jurnal Filsafat Indonesia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Filsafat Indonesia Undiksha is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.