Senjata Energi Terarah: Tinjauan Aksiologis
Directed Energy Weapons: An Axiological Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23887/jfi.v7i1.67531Keywords:
axiology, ethnics, morals, laws of war, human rights, regulation, directed energy weaponsAbstract
This research discusses the development of Directed Energy Weapons (DEW) in the context of the philosophy of defense science, with a focus on axiological aspects. The background of the study highlights social and ethical changes resulting from the advancement of science, while the lack of script understanding also affects the meaning that can be achieved through language. Philosophy, as an initiator of critical thinking, plays a crucial role in liberating humans from the limitations of knowledge.The research uses a qualitative descriptive approach with the researcher as the main instrument. The focus is on DEW, a weapon that uses concentrated electromagnetic energy, creating debates on ethics and law. The laws of war and international agreements are considered incapable of accommodating the technological advancements of DEW, raising concerns about violations of legal agreements and international humanitarian law. The research results indicate that the axiological perspective in the philosophy of defense science is needed to guide the development of DEW technology. Evaluation is done through teleological and deontological approaches, emphasizing moral goals and obligations. The ethical and moral implications of DEW development are examined by considering their impact on humanity, human rights, and environmental sustainability. This approach reinforces the urgency of forming an Ethical Code for the development and use of DEW, emphasizing clear definitions, involvement of independent experts, restrictions on sales and technology transfer, and military ethics training. Additionally, the research suggests international dialogue to build consensus and address common issues related to the development of this technology. By integrating axiological aspects of the philosophy of defense science, this research provides a holistic view of DEW development, considering moral and ethical values as guidelines in its utilization.
References
Affan Ahmed, S., Mohsin, M., & Zubair Ali, S. M. (2021). Survey and Technological Analysis of Laser and its Defense Applications. Defence Technology, 17(2), 583–592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dt.2020.02.012.
Aris, T., Mamahit, D. A., & Ras, A. R. (2022). Pemahaman Terhadap Filsafat Ilmu Pertahanan Sebagai Upaya Meningkatkan Kemampuan Dasar Bela Negara. DEFENDONESIA, 6(1), 58-65.
C. Chesterman, M., & E. Huffman, R. (2010). Collateral Damage Effects of Directed Energy Weapons. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Paper, 1–10.
Cannin, A. J. (2021). Directed Energy Weapons Ethical Implementation Obstacles. Naval Postgraduate School.
Davis, S. D. (2015). Controlled Warfare: How Directed-Energy Weapons Will Enable the US Military to Fight Effectively in an Urban Environment While Minimizing Collateral Damage. Small Wars and Insurgencies, 26(1), 49–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/09592318.2014.959764.
Feickert, A. (2018). U.S. Army Weapons-Related Directed Energy (DE) Programs: Background and Potential Issues for Congress. https://crsreports.congress.gov.
Henckaerts, J.-M. (2005). Studi (Kajian) Tentang Hukum Humaniter Internasional Kebiasaan: Sebuah Sumbangan bagi Pemahaman dan Penghormatan Terhadap Tertib Hukum dalam Konflik Bersenjata. International Review of the Red Cross, 87(857), 1–44.
Idris, S., & Ramly, F. (2016). Dimensi Filsafat Ilmu dalam Diskursus Integrasi Ilmu (T. ZA, Ed.; 1st ed.). Darussalam Publishing.
M. Sayler, K. (2020). Emerging Military Technologies: Background and Issues for Congress. https://crsreports.congress.gov.
Manurung, Y., Saragih, H., & Sarjito, A. (2022). Martabat Bangsa dan Negara di Atas Segala-Galanya: Tinjauan Aksiologis Filsafat Ilmu Pertahanan dalam Upaya Meningkatkan Kemampuan Bela Negara. Jurnal Civic Hukum, 7(1), 21–30. https://doi.org/10.22219/jch.v7i1.20511.
Marozas, T. (2020). Legality Of Targeting Satellites Under Jus In Bello: Specific Focus on Non-Kinetic Asat Weapons. Social Transformations in Contemporary Society, 8, 27–39.
Melzer, N. (2019). Hukum Humaniter Internasional: Sebuah Pengantar Komperhensif (E. Kuster, Ed.; 1st ed.). International Committe of the Red Cross. www.icrc.org.
Nataliana, E., Yulianto, B. A., Widodo, P., Saragih, H. J. R., & Suwarno, P. (2022). Filsafat Pancasila sebagai Karakter Bangsa Indonesia dalam Realisasi Poros Maritim Dunia. Jurnal Kewarganegaraan, 6(4), 6844-6851.
Pangestu, L. G., & Almubaroq, H. Z. (2022). Filsafat Ilmu Pertahanan dalam Upaya Meningkatkan Kemampuan Dasar Bela Negara. Jurnal Paris Langkis, 2(2), 62-69.
Sinarta, O. (2014). Penerapan Etika Bisnis pada PT KK Indonesia [Skripsi]. Uiversitas Kristen Petra.
Souder, L. J. K., & Langille, D. B. (2004). How Directed Energy Benefits the Army.
Supriyatno, M. (2014). Tentang Ilmu Pertahanan. Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.
Zamroni, M. (2022). Filsafat Komunikasi: Pengantar Ontologis, Epistemologis, dan Aksiologis. IRCiSoD.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Jurnal Filsafat Indonesia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Filsafat Indonesia Undiksha is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
