Sir Francis Galton's Philosophy of Measurement Science and Its Relevance for the Development of the Psychometric Paradigm
Filsafat Ilmu Pengukuran Sir Francis Galton dan Relevansinya bagi Pengembangan Paradigma Psikometri
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23887/jfi.v7i3.69546Keywords:
measurement science philosophy, psychometrics, Sir Francis GaltonAbstract
This article discusses the origins of the psychometric paradigm and its reliance on the notion that mental attributes can be measured. Galton's assumption that mental attributes can be discerned through definite actions in response to definite situations is misguided. This article highlights the ternary nature of causality, involving causes, effects, and specific causal fields. The same cause may not produce the same effect in different causal fields, and different causes may produce the same effect in different causal fields. The relationships between observable measures and aspects of character are unclear, and indirect indices of mental attributes are inherently ambiguous. This article focuses on Francis Galton's role in establishing these beliefs and argues that his reasoning was flawed and influenced by Pythagoras' philosophy of science and his desire to present eugenics as science. This paper aims to describe Sir Francis Galton's theory regarding the science of measurement and its relevance to psychometrics. Using the literature review method on various sources (scientific articles and textbooks) related to the topic of discussion. Overall, this article challenges the assumption that mental attributes are inherently quantitative and argues for a more nuanced understanding of measurement in psychometrics.
References
Galton, F. (1869). Hereditary genius: An inquiry into its laws and consequences. Macmillan.
Galton, F. (1879). Psychometric experiments. Brain, 2(2), 149–162. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/2.2.149
Galton, F. (1883). Inquiries into the human faculty and its development. Macmillan.
Himbert, M. E. (2009). A brief history of measurement. The European Physical Journal Special Topics, 172(1), 25-35. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjst/e2009-01039-1
López-Beltrán, C. (2006). Storytelling, statistics and hereditary thought: The narrative support of early statistics. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 37(1), 41–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2005.12.003
Mari, L. (2003). Epistemology of measurement. Measurement, 34(1), 17–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-2241(03)00016-2
Mari, L. (2013). A quest for the definition of measurement. Measurement, 46(8), 2889–2895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2013.04.039
Mari, L., Maul, A., Irribarra, D. T., & Wilson, M. (2017). Quantities, quantification, and the necessary and sufficient conditions for measurement. Measurement, 100, 115–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2016.12.050
Mari, L., Wilson, M., & Maul, A. (2023). Measurement across the sciences: Developing a shared concept system for measurement (2nd Ed.). Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
Maul, A. (2013). On the ontology of psychological attributes. Theory & Psychology, 23(6), 752–769. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354313506273
Michell, J. (1997). Quantitative science and the definition of measurement in psychology. British Journal of Psychology, 88(3), 355–383. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1997.tb02641.x
Michell, J. (2022). The art of imposing measurement upon the mind: Sir Francis Galton and the genesis of the psychometric paradigm. Theory & Psychology, 32(3), 375–400. https://doi.org/10.1177/09593543211017671
Searle, J. (1992). The rediscovery of the mind. MIT Press.
Stevens, S. S. (1946). On the theory of scales of measurement. Science, 103(2684), 667–680. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.103.2684.677
Sweeney, G. (2001). Fighting for the good cause: Reflections on Francis Galton’s legacy to American hereditarian psychology. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, 91(2), 1–136. https://jstor.org/stable/3655117
Tal, E. (2020). Measurement in science. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Stanford University.
Waller, J. C. (2002). Putting method first: Re-appraising the extreme determinism and hard hereditarianism of Sir Francis Galton. History of Science, 40(1), 35–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/007327530204000102
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Jurnal Filsafat Indonesia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Filsafat Indonesia Undiksha is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.