Implementasi Prinsip Keadilan dalam Pengelolaan Dana Kemahasiswaan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23887/jiah.v11i3.34640Keywords:
Student Organization, Justice, Fund ManagementAbstract
The aim of this study was to determine the extent of the implementation of the principles of justice in managing funds in the scope of student organizations. The object of this research is Student Affairs at Faculty X, ABC University. The method used in this research is descriptive qualitative. This study uses primary data types by conducting data collection techniques in the form of interviews, observation and documentation. Interviews in this study were conducted with the committee and member of the Student Affairs Organization functionaries. The results of this study indicate that the application of the principle of justice has not been maximally implemented. This is based on predetermined indicators. The cause of not optimal implementation of the principle of justice in the management of student funds is the prejudice that the distribution of funds is still inequality and inconsistencies in Standard Operating Procedures for submitting and accountability for budget proposals by the committee.
References
Adams, J. S. (1963). Towards an understanding of inequity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67(5), 422–436. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040968
Arifah, A. (2018). Pengaruh Ketaatan Aturan Akuntansi, Keefektifan Pengendalian Internal, Kesesuaian Kompensasi, Keadilan Prosedural, dan Komitmen Organisasi terhadap Kecenderungan Kecurangan Akuntansi (Studi pada Perguruan Tinggi Negeri di Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta). Jurnal Pendidikan Akuntansiurnal Pendidikan Akuntansi, 1(1), 1–24.
BAN-PT. (2019). Akreditasi perguruan tinggi kreteria dan prosedur 3.0.
Colquitt, J. A. (2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 386–400. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.386
Dewi, R. A., Ramadhanti, W., & Wiratno, A. (2016). Faktor-Faktor yang Berpengaruh terhadap Kinerja Keuangan Pemerintah Desa Pasca Penerapan Undang-Undang Nomor 6 tahun 2014. Jurnal Akuntansi Aktual, 3(4), 311–327.
Fachrunisa, A. (2016). Pengaruh Keadilan Organisasi, Sistem Pengendalian Intern dan Komitmen Organisasi terhadap Kecurangan (Fraud). 3(1), 64–78.
Ikbal, & Rahim, S. (2019). Pengaruh Keadilan Distributif dan Keadilan Prosedural terhadap Kecurangan Akuntansi dengan Pertimbangan Etis sebagai Variabel Moderasi. Jurnal Akuntansi Aktual, 5(3), 215–222. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17977/um004v5i32019p215
Integrity-indonesia.com. (2019). Korupsi di Universitas. Integrity-Indonesia.Com. https://www.integrity-indonesia.com/id/blog/2019/10/31/korupsi-di-universitas/
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). An Expanded Sourcebook: Qualitative Data Analysis. Sage Publiciations.
Nasional.okezone.com. (2019). Arie Dwi Satrio, Okezone ·Rabu 15 Mei 2019 13:54 WIB. Nasional.Okezone.Com. https://nasional.okezone.com/read/2019/05/15/337/2055989/kpk-ungkap-uang-pelicin-masuk-universitas-fakultas-kedokteran-jadi-sorotan
Nasution, B. J. (2017). Kajian Filosofis tentang Hukum dan Keadilan Dari Pemikiran Klasik sampai Pemikiran Mmodern. Al-Ihkam: Jurnal Hukum & Pranata Sosial, 11(2), 130. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.19105/al-ihkam.v11i2.936
Ranto, D. W. P. (2019). Perilaku Menyimpang sebagai Respon terhadap Ketidakadilan Organisasional. JBMA: Jurnal Bisnis Manajemen Dan Akuntansi , VI(2), 74–79.
Wahyubroto, A. M., & Mustamu, R. H. (2017). Implementasi Prinsip-Prinsip Good Corporate Governance pada Perusahaan di Kota Gresik. Agora - Online Graduate Humanities Journal, 5(3), 1–6.
Yuliyanti, D., & Hapsari, A. N. S. (2020). Menyingkap Budaya Kecurangan dalam Organisasi Kemahasiswaan. Seminar Nasional UNIBA Surakarta 2020, 289–303.
