Peningkatan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Kreatif Siswa TKJ SMK Negeri 2 Seririt Melalui Pelatihan Robot Bioloid

Authors

  • Luh Putu Ary Sri Tjahyanti Universitas Panji Sakti, Singaraja
  • Agus Adiarta Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha
  • Made Santo Gitakarma Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1583-9795

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23887/jwl.v8i1.16041

Abstract

With the development of robotics technology in almost every area of human life, education and teaching the concept of robotics is expected to be included in the education curriculum in secondary schools. Technology Vocational Schools are expected to build robotics technology and practice it. One of the Technology Vocational Schools in Buleleng Regency, Bali, namely SMK Negeri 2 Seririt became a partner for the development of the Workshop and Entrepreneurship in Engineering (PKR) subject through the application of robotics training. This training uses Bioloid robots to improve creative critical thinking skills to students in the Computer and Network Engineering (TKJ) SMK Negeri 2 Seririt. The results obtained include students being very enthusiastic in participating in training, students increased understanding in assembling and programming robots as well as students' creative skills and critical thinking skills increased up to 72%.

References

Altin, H., & Pedaste, M. (2013). Learning Approaches to Applying Robotics in Science Education. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 12(3), 365–377. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROBOT.1994.351321

Angelo, T. A. (1995). Classroom Assessment for Critical Thinking. Teaching Psychology, 22(1), 6–7. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328023top2201

Endarta, A. ; (2017). Literasi Pedagogi & Teknologi > Kurikulum 2013 > Struktur Kurikulum SMK 2017. Retrieved from http://duniapendidikan.putrautama.id/struktur-kurikulum-smk-2017/

Goh, H., & Aris, B. (2007). Using Robotics in Education: Lessons Learned and Learning Experiences. 1st International Malaysian Educational Technology Convention, (July 2015), 1156–1163.

Halim, S. (2007). Merancang Mobile Robot Pembawa Objek Menggunakan OOPic-R. PT Elex Media Komputindo. https://doi.org/10.31154/cogito.v3i2.67.164-172

Halpern, D. F., & Nummedal, S. G. (1995). Closing Thoughts about Helping Students Improve how they Think. Teaching of Psychology, 22(1), 82–83. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328023top2201_24

Johnson, A. P. (2011). A Short Guide to Action Research (4th Edition).

Johnson, J. (2003). Children, Robotics, and Education. Artificial Life and Robotics, 7(1–2), 16–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02480880

Loh, S. C., Loo, C. K., Loh, H. C., & Lim, Y. K. (2013). Transformative Robotic Education for the Realization of Malaysia National Philosophy of Education. Communications in Computer and Information Science, 376 CCIS, 416–426. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40409-2_35

Marzano, R. J. ., Brandt, R. S. ., Hughes, C. S., Jones, B. F., Presseisen, B. Z. ., Rankin, S. C. ., & Suhor, C. (1998). Dimensions of Thingking: A Framework for Curriculum and Instruction. Association for Supercision and Curriculum Development.

Mendikbud RI. (2013). Permendikbud Nomor 73 Tahun 2013 tentang Kerangka Dasar dan Struktur Kurikulum Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan / Madrasah Aliyah Kejuruan.

Mubin, O., Stevens, C. J., Shahid, S., Mahmud, A. Al, & Dong, J.-J. (2013). A Review of the Applicability of Robots in Education. Technology for Education and Learning, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.2316/Journal.209.2013.1.209-0015

Taufiq Dwi Septian Suyadhi. (2010). Buku Pintar Robotika Bagaimana Merancang dan Membuat Robot Sendiri. Andi Yogyakarta.

Thai, C. N., & Paulishen, M. (2011). Using Robotis Bioloid Systems for Instructional Robotics. Conference Proceedings - IEEE SOUTHEASTCON, 300–306. https://doi.org/10.1109/SECON.2011.5752954

Turner, P. (2009). Tribotix - Educational Info: Why use Robots in Education. Retrieved from http://www.tribotix.com/EducationInfo/WhyRobotics.htm

Downloads

Published

2019-01-31

Issue

Section

Articles