REVOLUSI PANDEMI COVID-19
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23887/jpsu.v4i1.48817Keywords:
Normal Baru, Pandemi Covid-19, Perubahan Sosial, Revolusi PandemiAbstract
Sejak masuknya SARS-CoV-2 di Indonesia pada awal tahun 2020 hingga November 2021, terdapat lebih dari 4 juta warga negara Indonesia terkonfirmasi positif Covid-19 dengan lebih dari 11 ribu kasus aktif (Satgas Penanganan Covid-19). Segala akibat pandemi Covid-19 yang dirasakan oleh hampir seluruh masyarakat dunia merupakan suatu cerminan deglobalisasi. Kondisi ini juga menjadi titik balik pengaturan ulang global dan juga dapat dipertimbangkan sebagai revolusi hening yang membawa perubahan mendasar dalam tatanan kehidupan manusia. Setidaknya pandemi mempertaruhkan dua unsur dasar penting yang menyangkut kelangsungan hidup manusia, yakni ekonomi dan kesehatan. Selama ini globalisasi menuntut dunia bergerak dinamis dan mengepakkan sayap kapitalisme, khususnya sejak abad ke-18 ketika teknologi informasi dan komunikasi berkembang pesat. Tragedi hari ini justru mendorong manusia melakukan perubahan secara signifikan dan fundamental guna memelihara kelangsungan hidup bersama. Artikel ini ditulis dengan perspektif makrososiologis untuk melihat akibat pandemi Covid-19 terhadap korelasi sosial dalam hal primer kehidupan masyarakat Indonesia.
References
Adinda, P. 2021. Kasus Covid-19 Naik, Akses Terbatas, Vaksinasi Minim: Pertahanan Masyarakat Adat Mulai Jebol. Project Multatuli. Diakses pada 22 Agustus 2021, dari https://projectmultatuli.org/kasus-Covid-19-naik-akses-terbatas-vaksinasi-minim-pertahanan-masyarakat-adat-mulai-jebol/.
Ahmed, A., & Jackson, J. 2021. Race, Risk, and Personal Responsibility in the Response to Covid-19. Columbia Law Review Forum, 121: 47-70.
Barasheed, O., et. al. 2016. Uptake and Effectiveness of Facemask Against Respiratory Infections at Mass Gatherings: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1-7. doi:10.1016/j.ijid.2016.03.023.
Blossfeld, H. 1996. Macro-Sociology, Rational Choice Theory, and Time: A Theoretical Perspective on the Empirical Analysis of Social Processes. European Sociological Review Rational Choice Theory and Large-Scale Data Analysis 12 (2): 181-206. doi:10.2307/522435.
Braveman, P., & Gottlieb, L. 2014. The Social Determinants of Health: It’s Time to Consider the Causes of the Causes. Public Health Reports, 129: 20–2.
Carr, L. J. 1932. Disaster and the Sequence-Pattern Concept of Social Change. The American Journal of Sociology, 38 (2): 207-18.
Chandra, W. 2020. Hadapi COVID-19, Masyarakat Adat Banua Lemo Karantina Wilayah hingga Jaga Stok Pangan. Mongabay. Diakses pada 23 Agustus 2021, dari https://www.mongabay.co.id/2020/04/13/hadapi-Covid-19-masyarakat-adat-banua-lemo-karantina-wilayah-hingga-jaga-stok-pangan/.
Chase-Dunn, C., & Lerro, B. 2016. Social Change: Globalization from the Stone Age to the Present. Oxon: Routledge.
Coleman, J. S. 1990. Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Collins, R. 1988. The Micro Contribution to Macro Sociology. Sociological Theory 6 (2): 242–53. doi:10.2307/202118.
Cooley, C. H. 1897. The Process of Social Change. Political Science Quarterly, 12 (1): 63-81.
Coser, L. A. 1957. Social Conflict and the Theory of Social Change. The British Journal of Sociology 8 (3): 197–207. doi:10.2307/586859.
Costa, F. M. L. 2021. Kasus Covid-19 Terus Meluas di Pedalaman Papua. Kompas. Diakses pada 23 Agustus 2021, dari https://www.kompas.id/baca/nusantara/2021/08/08/kasus-Covid-19-terus-meluas-di-pedalaman-papua.
Etzioni, A. 2017. Toward A Macrosociology. Academy of Management Proceedings 1967 (1): 12–33. doi:10.5465/ambpp.1967.4980638.
Friedman, L. M. 1975. The Legal System: A Social Science Perspective. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Gans, J. 2020. The Pandemic Information Gap: The Brutal Economics of Covid-19. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
Geertz, C. 1992. Tafsir Kebudayaan. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.
Giddens, A. 2009. Sociology. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Polity Press.
Goldthorpe, J. H. 2007. Current Issues in Comparative Macrosociology. In John H. Goldthorpe, Sociology: Critique and Program, Edisi ke-2 Volume 1: 39-60. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
Hawley, A. H. 1992. The Logic of Macrosociology. Annual Review of Sociology 18: 1-15. doi:10.1146/annurev.so.18.080192.000245.
Homer-Dixon, T. 2020. Coronavirus Will Change the World. It Might Also Lead to a Better Future. The Globe and Mail. Diakses pada 18 Agustus 2021, dari https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/article-the-coronavirus-is-a-collective-problem-that-requires-global/.
Inglehart, R., & Baker, W. E. 2000. Modernization, Cultural Change, and the Persistence of Traditional Values. American Sociological Review, 65 (1): 19-51.
Inhorn, M. C., & Brown, P. J. 1990. The Anthropology of Infectious Disease. The Annual Review of Anthropology, 19: 89-117.
Kaplan, A., & Wolf, Jr. C. 2017. The Conduct of Inquiry: Methodology for Behavioral Science. New York: Routledge.
Liker, J. K., et. al. 1999. Perspectives on Technology and Work Organization. The Annual Review of Sociology, 25: 575-96.
Lyman, S. M. 1988. Review: Symbolic Interactionism and Macrosociology. Sociological Forum 3 (2): 295-301. doi:10.2307/684372.
MacIver, R. M., & Page, C. H. 1957. Society: An Introductory Analysis. New York: Rinehart and Company, Inc.
Mackenzie, D. 2020. Covid-19: The pandemic That Never Should Have Happened and How to Stop the Next One. New York: Hachette Book Group, Inc.
McKie, R. 2020. Why Do Some Young People Die of Coronavirus? The Guardian. Diakses pada 23 Agustus 2021, dari https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/apr/09/why-do-some-young-people-die-of-coronavirus-Covid-19-genes-viral-load.
Mekki, N. 2021. No-one is safe until everyone is safe – why we need a global response to COVID-19. UNICEF. Diakses pada 25 Oktober 2021. https://www.unicef.org/press-releases/no-one-safe-until-everyone-safe-why-we-need-global-response-Covid-19.
Moore, W. E. 1960. A Reconsideration of Theories of Social Change. American Sociological Review 25 (6): 810–18. doi:10.2307/2089978.
Nulman, E. 2022. Coronavirus Capitalism Goes to the Cinema. Oxon dan New York: Routledge.
Perrin, R. G. 1973. The Functionalist Theory of Change Revisited. The Pacific Sociological Review 16 (1): 47–60. doi:10.2307/1388653.
Persoon, G. 1998. Isolated Groups or Indigenous Peoples: Indonesia and the International Discourse. Bijdragen tot de Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde, 154 (2): 281-304.
Radu, R. 2020. Fighting the ‘Infodemic’: Legal Responses to COVID-19 Disinformation. Social Media + Society, 1–4. doi:10.1177/2056305120948190.
Ramzy, A., & Chien, A. C. 2021. Rejecting Covid Inquiry, China Peddles Conspiracy Theories Blaming the U.S. The New York Times. Diakses pada 25 Oktober 2021. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/08/25/world/asia/china-coronavirus-Covid-conspiracy-theory.html.
Satuan Tugas Penanganan COVID-19. 3 November 2021. Peta Sebaran COVID-19. Diakses pada 3 November 2021, dari https://Covid19.go.id/peta-sebaran.
Sayer, A. 2010. Method in Social Science. London, New York: Routledge.
Tiruneh, G. 2014. Social Revolutions: Their Causes, Patterns, and Phases. SAGE Open, 1–12.
Turshen, M. 1984. The Political Ecology of Disease in Tanzania. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Rutgers University Press.
Ulung, A. K. 2021. Indonesia: Indigenous Groups Face COVID Vaccine Barriers. Deutsche Welle. Diakses pada 18 Agustus 2021, dari https://www.dw.com/en/indonesia-indigenous-groups-face-Covid-vaccine-barriers/a-58673603.
Vago, S., & Steven E. Barkan. 2018. Law and Society. New York: Routledge.
Wettergren, Å., Holmes, M., & Manning, N. 2020. Emotions in the Pandemic: Crises and Politics of Change. Emotions and Society 2 (2): 115–19. doi:10.1332/263169020X15988069522042.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
