Usability Testing pada Aplikasi POTWIS

Authors

  • Tifani Yuliyana Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha
  • I Ketut Resika Arthana
  • Ketut Agustini

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23887/jstundiksha.v8i1.12081

Keywords:

usability, POTWIS, SUS, UEQ, wireframe.

Abstract

This research was conducted to evaluate POTWIS application by highlighting three usability concepts that effectiveness, efficiency, and the satisfaction of the user in using POTWIS application measured by usability testing methode, Performance Measurement, RTA, UEQ, and SUS technique. The purpose is to know the result of usability testing and improvement recommendation on POTWIS application based of the result of usability testing.

The result of this research is based on analysis of statical calculation Mann Whitney U Test, UEQ dan SUS which showed (1) POTWIS application is not effective seen from the existance of the mistake made by respondent during the task, (2) POTWIS application is efficient seen from the time of task execution because the execution time between proficient group and beginner group was not significantly different, (3) POTWIS application has not met the scale of efficiency measured by UEQ with score 0.625 which showed below the average and (4) POTWIS application has not fulfilled user satisfaction measured by SUS with score 53.00 which is stated still below the average score is > 68.

References

Arthana Resika, I. K., Setemen, K., Purnamawan, I. K., & Andiani, N. D. (2016). Penggalian dan Penyebaran Potensi Wisata melalui Aplikasi Mobile dengan Konsep Crowdsourcing. JPTK, 13(1), 111–126.

Bangor, A., Kortum, P., & Miller, J. (2009). Determining What Individual SUS Scores Mean: Adding an Adjective Rating Scale. Journal of Usability Studies, 4(3), 114–123. Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2835589

Faulkner, L. (2003). Beyond the five-user assumption: Benefits of increased sample sizes in usability testing. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 35(3), 379–383. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195514

Gatsou, C., Politis, A., & Zevgolis, D. (2013). Exploring inexperienced user performance of a mobile tablet application through usability testing. Computer Science and …, 557–564.

Hartmann, J. (2011). User Experience Monitoring: Über die Notwendigkeit geschäftskritische Online-Prozesse permanent zu überwachen. I-Com, 10(3), 59–62. https://doi.org/10.1524/icom.2011.0035

ISO 9241-11. (1998). ISO 9241-11:1998(en), Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs) — Part 11: Guidance on usability. Retrieved March 27, 2017, from https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:9241:-11:ed-1:v1:en

Laugwitz, B., Held, T., & Schrepp, M. (2008). Construction and Evaluation of a User Experience Questionnaire. LNCS, 5298, 63–76. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.472.3719&rep=rep1&type=pdf

Nalurita, R., Yogasara, T., & Hariandja, D. J. (2015). Evaluasi Metode dan Kriteria Usability Testing pada Aplikasi Mobile untuk Anak-Anak Sekolah Dasar di Indonesia. Seminar Nasional IENACO –, 2337–4349.

Nielsen, J. (1993). Usability Engineering - Jakob Nielsen - Paperback.

Nielsen, J. (2000). Why You Only Need to Test with 5 Users. Jakob Nielsens Alertbox, 19(September 23), 1–4.

https://doi.org/http://www.useit.com/alertbox/20000319.html

Nielsen, J. (2012). Usability 101: Introduction to Usability. Nielsen Norman Group, Articles. https://doi.org/10.1145/1268577.1268585

Rauschenberger, M., Hinderks, A., & Thomaschewski, J. (2011).

Benutzererlebnis bei Unternehmenssoftware : Ein Praxisbericht über die Umsetzung attraktiver Unternehmenssoftware. In Usability Professionals Konferenz 2011 (Vol. 1, p. pp--158). Retrieved from https://usability-bremen.de/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Rauschenberger-Hinderks-et-al-2011-Benutzererlebnis-bei-Unternehmenssoftware.pdf

Rubin, J., & Chisnell, D. (2008). Handbook of usability testing [electronic resource] : How to plan, design, and conduct effective tests (2nd ed.). Indianapolis, IN: Wiley Pub. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13398-014-0173-7.2

Saifulloh, & Asnawi, N. (2015). Data Manajemen Dan Teknologi Informasi. Jurnal Ilmiah DASI (Data Manajemen Dan Teknologi Informasi), 16(4), 55–58. Retrieved from http://ojs.amikom.ac.id/index.php/dasi/article/view/246/244

Sauro, J. (2011). MeasuringU: Mengukur Usability dengan Sistem Usability Skala (SUS). Retrieved March 3, 2017, from https://measuringu.com/sus/

Schrepp, M. (2015). User Experience Questionnaire Handbook. https://doi.org/10.13140/rg.2.1.2815.0245

U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. (2014). Usability evaluation basics, 6–7. Retrieved from http://www.usability.gov/what-and-why/usability-evaluation.html

Utama, S. (2011). Perbaikan User Interface Halaman Internet Banking dengan Metode Usability Testing. SKRIPSI.

Wieschnowsky, T., & Paulheim, H. (2011). A Visual Tool for Supporting Developers in Ontology-based Application Integration. 7th International Workshop on …. Retrieved from http://www.heikopaulheim.com/docs/swese2011b.pdf

Downloads

Published

2019-07-21

How to Cite

Yuliyana, T., Arthana, I. K. R., & Agustini, K. (2019). Usability Testing pada Aplikasi POTWIS. JST (Jurnal Sains Dan Teknologi), 8(1), 12–22. https://doi.org/10.23887/jstundiksha.v8i1.12081

Issue

Section

Articles