Bibliometric Analysis of Five Decades Research Progress on Boundary Delimitation

Main Article Content

Attala Zaidan Ghaffar
Ade Gafar Abdullah
Nanin Trianawati Sugito

Abstract

Boundary delimitation (BD) is essential for determining and identifying boundaries between different regions. To thoroughly understand boundary delimitation (BD) and the current research focus, this research uses a bibliometric analysis method to evaluate the most relevant themes related to BD from 1972 to 2022. This study uses the keyword "boundary delimitation" as input and relies on the Scopus database as the ideal data source for this study. To analyze the data, VOSviewer software was used to visualize a network of authors, countries, journals, and keywords. On June 8, 2023, an analysis of 611 documents from various types of scientific papers was carried out. The research findings show that in the last 24 years, there has been a significant increase in the number of publications discussing boundary delimitation (BD). The United States is a leader in BD research, with the world's most significant contribution to publications. The Journal of the Geography of Exclusion is one of the leading journals in BD publications. Keyword analysis shows that studies of BD in the last five decades have focused on topics such as maritime boundaries, the law of the sea, territory purchasing methodologies, Eurasia, and China.

Article Details

Section
Articles

References

Árnadóttir, S. (2022). Provisional boundaries and alternative solutions to maritime delimitation. Leiden Journal of International Law, 35, 397–406.

Bakk, M. (2020). The Boundaries of the Carpathian Basin – Frontiers and Regions. Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, European and Regional Studies, 18, 62–81.

Beckman, R., & Schofield, C. (2009). Moving Beyond Disputes Over Island Sovereignty: ICJ Decision Sets Stage for Maritime Boundary Delimitation in the Singapore Strait. Ocean Development & International Law, 40(1), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/00908320802631551

Cottier, T. (2015a). Equitable Principles of Maritime Boundary Delimitation: The new maritime zones: evolution and legal foundations.

Cottier, T. (2015b). Equitable Principles of Maritime Boundary Delimitation. Cambridge University Press.

Daddy, M. M. (2019). The Fate of the Agreement of 30 July 2007 in the Dispute Over the Delimitation of Maritime Boundaries between R.D.Congo and Angola: A Consideration based on the 1982 UNCLOS Forecast and the Principles of Maritime Delimitation Law.

Danaher, M. (1984). Transboundary stocks and maritime boundary delimitation in the Gulf of Maine area.

Davenvort, T. (2014). Southeast Asian Approaches to Maritime Boundaries. Asian Journal of International Law, 4(2), 309–357. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2044251313000313

Dundas, C. W. (1994). The impact of maritime boundary delimitation on the development of offshore mineral deposits. Resources Policy, 20(4), 273–279. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-4207(94)90007-8

Eng, M. A., Alsayel, M. Y., & Arabia, S. (2010). Towards Standardizing International Boundary Determination and Quality Control Consequences on Surveying and Mapping.

Gao, H., Weng, Y., Lu, Y., & Du, Y. (2022). An Innovative Framework on Spatial Boundary Optimization of Multiple International Designated Land Use. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14020587

Gaver, C. D. (2022). Maritime Delimitation in the Indian Ocean (Som. v. Kenya) (I.C.J.). International Legal Materials, 61, 501–604.

Grishin, E. S. (2023). The Practice of Composing Regional Complex Historical Atlases. Historical Geography Journal.

Guerrero-Bote, V. P., Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Z., Mendoza, A., & de Moya-Anegón, F. (2021). Comparative Analysis of the Bibliographic Data Sources Dimensions and Scopus: An Approach at the Country and Institutional Levels. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics, 5(January), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2020.593494

Haider, I. A. (2022). Bangladesh V Myanmar Maritime: Boundary Delimitation Case. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science.

Hasan, M. M., Jian, H., Alam, M. W., & Chowdhury, K. M. A. (2019). Protracted maritime boundary disputes and maritime laws. Journal of International Maritime Safety, Environmental Affairs, and Shipping, 2(2), 89–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/25725084.2018.1564184

Ishii, Y. (2020). Relevant Coasts and Relevant Area in the Maritime Delimitation of the EEZ and Continental Shelf. Ocean Development & International Law, 51, 307–329.

Jacquez, G. M., Maruca, S., & Fortin, M.-J. (2000). From fields to objects: A review of geographic boundary analysis. Journal of Geographical Systems, 2(3), 221–241. https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00011456

Jaya, B. P. M., Cahyani, F. A., Idris, I., & Permata, R. R. (2022). Method and Principle of Maritime Boundary Delimitation Between States with Opposite or Adjacent Coasts (Case of Indonesia and Timor-Leste). Diponegoro Law Review.

Jeeva, Z., & Cilliers, J. (2021). An explorative approach to the evolving municipal landscape of South Africa: 1993-2020. Town and Regional Planning, 78(78), 81–91. https://doi.org/10.18820/2415-0495/trp78i1.6

Kadagi, N. I., Okafor-Yarwood, I. M., Glaser, S., & Lien, Z. (2020). Joint management of shared resources as an alternative approach for addressing maritime boundary disputes: the Kenya-Somalia maritime boundary dispute. Journal of the Indian Ocean Region, 16, 348–370.

Keyuan, Z. (2005). The Sino-Vietnamese Agreement on Maritime Boundary Delimitation in the Gulf of Tonkin. Ocean Development & International Law, 36(1), 13–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/00908320590904920

Keyuan, Z. (2021). Implementing the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea in East Asia. The International Law of the Sea in the 21st Century.

Kittichaisaree, K. (1988). The Law of the Sea and Maritime Boundary Delimitation in South-East Asia.

Magadán-Díaz, M., & Rivas-García, J. I. (2022). Publishing Industry: A Bibliometric Analysis of the Scientific Production Indexed in Scopus. Publishing Research Quarterly, 38(4), 665–683. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12109-022-09911-3

Magassing, A., Patittingi, F., Alwy, S., Hambali, R., Sumardi, J., Kadarudin, & Hendrapati, M. (2018). The removal of offshore installation in Indonesian national regulation. Journal of East Asia and International Law, 11(1), 183–192. https://doi.org/10.14330/jeail.2018.11.1.09

Magnússon, B. M. (2015a). 4 Delimitation of the Continental Shelf Beyond 200 nm—The Method (pp. 117–213). Brill | Nijhoff. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004296848_005

Magnússon, B. M. (2015b). The Continental Shelf Beyond 200 Nautical Miles: Delineation, Delimitation and Dispute Settlement. Brill | Nijhoff. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004296848

Maina, J., Gamoyo, M., Adams, V. M., D’agata, S., Bosire, J. O., Francis, J., & Waruinge, D. (2019). Aligning marine spatial conservation priorities with functional connectivity across maritime jurisdictions. Conservation Science and Practice, 2.

Marek, P. (2020). Transformation of the identity of a region: Theory and the empirical case of the perceptual regions of Bohemia and Moravia, Czech Republic. Moravian Geographical Reports, 28, 154–169.

McBurney, M. K., & Novak, P. L. (2002). What is bibliometrics and why should you care? Proceedings. IEEE International Professional Communication Conference, 108–114.

McDorman, T. L. (2002). The Role of the Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf: A Technical Body in a Political World. The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law, 17(3), 301–324. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1163/157180802X00099

Østhagen, A. (2020). Maritime boundary disputes: What are they and why do they matter? Marine Policy, 120(March). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2020.104118

Østhagen, A. (2021). Drawing Lines at Sea: Australia’s Five Decades of Maritime Boundary Delimitation. The Australian Year Book of International Law Online.

Partridge, T. C., Brink, A. B. A., & Mallows, E. W. N. (1973). Morphological Classification and Mapping as a basis for Development Planning. South African Geographical Journal, 55, 69–80.

Qiwei, G., Xiaojian, C., & Yucong, Z. (2015). A Study on Urban Growth Boundary Delimitation: The Case of Baoji, Weinan and Ankang Urban Master Plan. The Open Cybernetics & Systemics Journal, 9.

Rechlin, A. M. (1972). The Epsilon Generalization. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 62(4), 578–581. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.1972.tb00886.x

Shaban, A., & Khan, A. U. (2022). Cultural Diversity and Development. Journal of Development Policy and Practice, 8, 7–12.

Spitzer, A. J. (2021). Approaching the boundary problem: Self-determination, inclusion, and the unpuzzling of transboundary conflicts. Journal of International Political Theory, 18(2), 244–261. https://doi.org/10.1177/17550882211020386

Utama, Y. J., Setiyono, B., Jamari, Tauviqirrahman, M., & Susanto, H. (2019). Bibliometric Analysis of Publications in the Scopus Database: A Study at Diponegoro University during 2014-2018. E3S Web of Conferences, 125(201 9), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/201912523001

Wyżlic, T. (2020). Eastern Prussia’s border with Poland in the years 1919–1922.

Zhao, Y., Leng, H., Sun, P., & Yuan, Q. (2018). A spatial zoning model of municipal administrative areas based on major function-oriented zones. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/su10092976