Developing of Authentic Assessment Rubric Based on 21st Century Learning Methods for Assessing Second Semester of 11th Grade Senior High School

Authors

  • Pande Kadek Dika Saputra Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha
  • Putu Kerti Nitiasih Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha
  • Luh Gd Rahayu Budiarta Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23887/ika.v21i2.62594

Keywords:

authentic assessment rubric, 21st-century learning methods, teacher and students of 11th-grade senior high school

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to create an authentic assessment rubric using Problem-Based Learning (PBL) based learning, project-based learning (PjBl), and discovery learning, three 21st-century learning strategies. This study employed the Richey and Klein (2007) design and development (DnD) approach, which has four stages: analysis, design, development, and evaluation, or ADDE. The participants in this study were a senior high school English instructor and 11th graders. The data was gathered using a variety of tools, including surveys, interviews, and document analyses, and was then examined using a mixed technique. Instructions for instructors and students as well as the proper assessment methods were included in the created rubric. The developed rubric then produced an appropriate and unique product that is in line with the syntax of each teaching method. It has been specifically adapted for the learning objectives, topics, themes, teaching strategies, from the expert's examination, it can be concluded that the product developed can be categorized as a superior rubric that is suitable for learning English

References

A. Nkhoma, C., Nkhoma, M., Thomas, S., & Quoc Le, N. (2020). The Role of Rubrics in Learning and Implementation of Authentic Assessment: A Literature Review. Proceedings of the 2020 InSITE Conference, 4606, 237–276. https://doi.org/10.28945/4606

Abu, U. A., & Halim, A. (2017). Effective EFL Teachers as Viewed by Senior High School. ELT Worldwide: Journal of English Language Teaching, 4(2), 180. https://doi.org/10.26858/eltww.v4i2.4505

Alolaywi, Y. (2021). Teaching online during the COVID-19 pandemic: Teachers’ perspectives. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 17(4), 2022–2045. https://doi.org/10.52462/jlls.146

Ashford-Rowe, K., Herrington, J., & Brown, C. (2014). Establishing the critical elements that determine authentic assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(2), 205–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2013.819566

Bas, G. (2008). Implementation of multiple intelligences supported project-based learning in EFL/ESL classrooms. ERIC Document.(ED503870), 1–11. http://www.bcl.edu.ar/spip/IMG/pdf/2.pdf

Chowdhury, F. (2018). Application of Rubrics in the Classroom: A Vital Tool for Improvement in Assessment, Feedback and Learning. International Education Studies, 12(1), 61. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v12n1p61

Coulson, D., & Harvey, M. (2013). Scaffolding student reflection for experience-based learning: A framework. Teaching in Higher Education, 18(4), 401–413. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2012.752726

Darling-Hammond, L., & Snyder, J. (2000). Authentic assessment of teaching in context. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16(5), 523–545. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(00)00015-9

Darsih, E. (2014). Indonesian Efl Teachers’ Perception on the Implementation of 2013 English Curriculum. English Review: Journal of English Education, 2(2), 1–8.

DIAB, R., & BALAA, L. (2011). Developing Detailed Rubrics for Assessing Critique Writing: Impact on EFL University Students’ Performance and Attitudes. TESOL Journal, 2(1), 52–72. https://doi.org/10.5054/tj.2011.244132

Emiliasari, R. N., & Jubaedah, I. S. (2019). Lesson Planning in Efl Classroom : a Case Study. 3(2), 367–375.

Geisinger, K. F. (2016). 21st Century Skills: What Are They and How Do We Assess Them? Applied Measurement in Education, 29(4), 245–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/08957347.2016.1209207

Hasim, E. (2020). Penerapan Kurikulum Merdeka Belajar Perguruan Tinggi Di Masa Pandemi Covid-19. Prosiding Webinar Magister Pendidikan Dasar Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Gorontalo “Pengembangan Profesionalisme Guru Melalui Penulisan Karya Ilmiah Menuju Anak Merdeka Belajar,” 68–74.

Kane, S. N., Mishra, A., & Dutta, A. K. (2016). Preface: International Conference on Recent Trends in Physics (ICRTP 2016). Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 755(1), 6–11. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/755/1/011001

Khan, M., & Azim, S. (2012). Authentic Assessment: An Instruction Tool to Enhance Students Learning. Academic Research International, 2(3), 314–320.

Laal, M., Laal, M., & Kermanshahi, Z. K. (2012). 21st Century Learning; Learning in Collaboration. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 47, 1696–1701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.885

Lund, J. (1997). Authentic Assessment: Its Development & Applications. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 68(7), 25–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/07303084.1997.10604979

Marhaeni, A. A. I. N., & Dantes, N. (2014). Toward Authentic Language Assessment: A Case in Indonesian EFL Classrooms. The European Conference on Language Learning, 1–0. https://papers.iafor.org/wp-content/uploads/papers/ecll2014/ECLL2014_02956.pdf

Mukminin, A., Masbirorotni, M., Noprival, N., Sutarno, S., Arif, N., & Maimunah, M. (2015). Journal of Education and Learning. Journal of Education and Learning, 9(3), 217–225. http://journal.uad.ac.id/index.php/EduLearn/article/view/1828/pdf_93

Mursyid, M., & Kurniawati, N. (2019). Higher Order Thinking Skills Among English Teachers Across Generation in Efl Classroom. English Review: Journal of English Education, 7(2), 119. https://doi.org/10.25134/erjee.v7i2.1775

Natalia, D. E., Asib, A., & Kristina, D. (2018). The Application of Authentic Assessment for Students Writing Skill. Journal of Education and Human Development, 7(2), 49–53. https://doi.org/10.15640/jehd.v7n2a5

Othman, N., & Shah, M. I. A. (2013). Problem-based learning in the English language classroom. English Language Teaching, 6(3), 125–134. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v6n3p125

Palm, T. (2008). Performance assessment and authentic assessment: A conceptual analysis of the literature. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 13(4), 1–11.

Perdagangan, P., & Surakarta, K. (2018). Jurnal Informasi dan Komunikasi Administrasi Perkantoran Volume 2, No 2, Februari 2018 Online: http://jurnal.fkip.uns.ac.id/index.php/jikap. 2(2).

Plews, J. L., & Zhao, K. (2010). Tinkering with tasks knows no bounds: ESL Teachers’ Adaptations of Task-Based Language-Teaching. TESL Canada Journal, 28(1), 41. https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v28i1.1059

Rennert-Ariev, P. (2005). A theoretical model for the authentic assessment of teaching. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 10(2), 1–11.

Rodríguez-Bonces, M., & Rodríguez-Bonces, J. (2010). Task-Based Language Learning: Old Approach, New Style. A New Lesson to Learn. Profile, 12(2), 165–178. http://www.scielo.org.co/pdf/prf/v12n2/v12n2a11.pdf

Rogiers, A., Merchie, E., & Van Keer, H. (2019). Learner profiles in secondary education: Occurrence and relationship with performance and student characteristics. Journal of Educational Research, 112(3), 385–396. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2018.1538093

Sarimanah, E., Dewi, F. I., Efendi, R., Suhendra, S., Nurul, M., & Soeharto, S. (2019). The Implementation of Discovery Learning Models in Enhancing Speech Script Writing Skills for Students. Lingua Cultura, 13(2), 145. https://doi.org/10.21512/lc.v13i2.5613

Sobari & Husnussalam. (2019). the Use of Discovery Learning Method To Improve Students’ Writing Descriptive Text. PROJECT (Professional Journal of English Education), 2(2), 234–240. https://journal.ikipsiliwangi.ac.id/index.php/project/article/view/2654

Svinicki, M. D. (2004). Authentic assessment: Testing in reality. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2004(100), 23–29. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.167

Tambak, S., Hamzah, Ahmad, M. Y., Siregar, E. L., Sukenti, D., Sabdin, M., & Rohimah, R. B. (2022). Discussion method accuracy in Islamic higher education: The influence of gender and teaching duration. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 41(2), 507–520. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v41i2.40644

Thaler, N., Kazemi, E., & Huscher, C. (2009). Developing a Rubric to Assess Student Learning Outcomes Using a Class Assignment. Teaching of Psychology, 36(2), 113–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/00986280902739305

Thi Bich Thuy, N., & Buu Huan, N. (2018). the Effects of Question-Answer Relationship Strategy on Efl High School Students’ Reading Comprehension. European Journal of English Language Teaching, 3(4), 34–48. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1295713

Tümen-Akyıldız, S., Çelik, V., & Ahmed, K. H. (2021). The Impact of Covid-19 Pandemic on EFL Classes through the Lenses of Secondary Learners. Shanlax International Journal of Education, 9(4), 389–406. https://doi.org/10.34293/education.v9i4.4210

Ulker, V. (2017). The Design and Use of Speaking Assesment Rubrics. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(32), 135–141.

UZUN, L., & ERTOK, Ş. (2020). Student Opinions on Task-Based Approach as Formative Evaluation versus Exam-Based Approach as Summative Evaluation in Education. Sakarya University Journal of Education, 10, 226–250. https://doi.org/10.19126/suje.598048

Wiggins, G. (1990). Recommended Citation Recommended Citation Wiggins. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 2(2), 1990–1991.

Wiseman, C. S. (2012). A Comparison of the Performance of Analytic vs . Holistic Scoring Rubrics to Assess L2 Writing. Iranian Journal of Language Testing, 2(1), 59–92.

Yune, S. J., Lee, S. Y., Im, S. J., Kam, B. S., & Baek, S. Y. (2018). Holistic rubric vs. analytic rubric for measuring clinical performance levels in medical students. BMC Medical Education, 18(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1228-9

Zahrok, S. (2009). Asesmen Autentik Dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa. Jurnal Sosial Humaniora, 2(2), 166–180. https://doi.org/10.12962/j24433527.v2i2.660

Zaim, M., Refnaldi, & Arsyad, S. (2020). Authentic assessment for speaking skills: Problem and solution for english secondary school teachers in Indonesia. International Journal of Instruction, 13(3), 587–604. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13340a

Zaman, M. M., & Azad, M. A. K. (2012). Feedback in EFL Writing at Tertiary Level: Teachers’ and Learners’ Perceptions. ASA University Review, 6(1), 139–156. http://ezproxy.lib.ucalgary.ca/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=117176277&site=ehost-live

Downloads

Published

2023-09-30

Issue

Section

Articles