STUDENTS’ READING PROFICIENCY PROFILE AFTER ONLINE LEARNING IMPLEMENTATION ( A DESCRIPTIVE STUDY IN EIGHTH GRADERS OF MTS N 3 JEMBRANA)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23887/ika.v20i1.38268Keywords:
Reading Competency Profile, Online LearningAbstract
The Covid 19 pandemic makes learning should be done via online (distance learning) which has different characteristics than before. The basic difference is on the existence of interaction during teaching and learning process. This research aims at investigating the students’ reading proficiency profile and classical learning mastery of eighth graders in MTS N 3 Jembrana after online learning is implemented. This research researh was categorized into descriptive quantitative. This research used survey sampling technique so 73 respondents were selected. The data of reading proficiency were collected by using test in the form of multiple choice. The collected data were analyzed descriptively by calculating the general and dimension mean of reading proficiency. This research discovers that 1) students’ reading competency is categorized into avarage, but specifically, finding main idea is categorized into average, finding textual reference is categorized into low, finding implixit information is categorized into low, finding explicit information is categorized very high, and finding sinonym and antonym is categorized in to very high and 2) the reading classical mastery is 41,01%. It implies that teaching reading online should be done based on communicative teaching reading principles
References
Aditomo, A & Hasugian, E.J. 2018. Indonesian Adolescents’ EFL Reading Comprehension: Gender Differences and the Influence of Parental Background. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8(2): 325-335. DOI: 10.17509/ijal.v8i2.13279
Alderson, J. C. 2000. Assessing Reading. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Baugh, A, C. 2002. A History of the English Language. London: Routledge
Brown, H. D. 2004. Teaching by Principles. New York: Longman.
Celce-Murcia, M. 2001. Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language. Boston: Heinle and Heinle Publishers.
Chen, Y. 2006. From common Core to Specific. Asian ESP Journal, 1(3): 24-47.
Cooper, D.J. 2006. Literacy. New York: Houghton Mifflin Company
Delfi, S & Yamat, H. 2017. An Analysis of Studies on Teaching and Learning Reading in Indonesia. J-SHMIC, 4(2): 101-115
Frank, S. 2004. Understanding Reading: A Psycholinguistic Analysis of Reading and Learning to Read. Mahwah, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A., Matsala, J. L., & Cox, K. E. 1999. Motivational and Cognitive Predictors of Text Comprehension and Reading Amount. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3(3): 231-256, downloaded at https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr0303_3
Harmer, J. 2007. The Practice of English Language Teaching. Essex: Pearson Education Limited.
Kirmizi, F.S. 2011. The Relationship between Reading Comprehension Strategies and Reading Attitude. Education, 39 (3): 289–303.
Natsir, Y & Anisati. 2016. The Matters in Teaching Reading Comprehension to EFL Students. Siele Journal, 3(1): 65-78
Muslaini. 2017. Strategies for Teaching Reading Comprehension. English Education Journal (EEJ), 8(1): 67-78
Pammu, A. 2017. Reading Profiles in Indonesian Context: Concurrent Protocol Analysis. SciencePG : International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 5(5): 143-150. DOI: 10.11648/j.ijll.20170505.14
Rahmanita, M & Mukminatien,N. 2019. Teaching English as A Foreign Language: Making Use of Spontaneous Language. Jurnal Pendidikan Humaniora, 7(1): 26–29
Rao, P.S. 2019. The Importance of Teaching Language Skills to the Second or Foreign Language Learners of English: A Comprehensive Study. Academicia, 9(4): 6-9. DOI: 10.5958/2249-7137.2019.00061.2
Rofiuddin, A. 2003. Faktor Kreativitas dalam Kemampuan Membaca dan Menulis Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Bahasa dan Seni, 31 (2): 172-196.
Tarigan, H.G. 2008. Membaca sebagai suatu Keterampilan Berbahasa. Bandung: Angkasa
Van Staden, S., & Bosker, R. 2011. Factors that Affect South African Reading Literacy Achievement: Evidence from prePIRLS 2011. South African Journal of Education, 34(3): 1-9, downloaded at https://doi.org/10.15700/201409161059
