Evaluation of Photo Math in Teaching Elementary Algebra

Authors

  • Raymund Medrano Igcasama Visayas State University
  • Dexter T. Ramirez University of San Carlos
  • Naome P. Salanap St. Peter’s College

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23887/jere.v4i4.29749

Keywords:

photomath, mobile application, math education

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate “Photo Math” in teaching Elementary Algebra.  Specifically, it aimed to identify the effect of teaching Elementary Algebra with the use of “Photo Math”. To achieved these objectives, the researchers used qualitative, quantitative and experimental design. This was conducted through a separate teaching demo in Elementary Algebra of the two Grade 7 sections. Pre-test was administered before the conduct of the demo and post-test after the teaching demo. The study showed that there was a significant difference between the pre-test and post-test results of the section with “Photo Math” as intervention. Moreover, there was also a significant difference between the pre-test and post-test results of the section without the said application as intervention. However, it showed that there was no significant difference between the two section. The first section showed that there was an effect to the performance of the students when “Photo Math” was applied as teaching tool but it was not fully claimed when compared with the traditional method of teaching. This was because the sample size of the study is small so it was recommended to have a larger number of sample size to see the effect of “Photo Math” in teaching Elementary Algebra. The study implied that Photo math as a teaching tool had an effect on teaching elementary algebra.

Author Biography

Raymund Medrano Igcasama, Visayas State University

Instructor

Department of Mathematics and Physics

 

References

Anghileri, J. (2006). Scaffolding Practices that Enhance Mathematics Learning. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 9, 33–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-006-9005-9

Asarta, C. J., & Schmidt, J. R. (2020). The effects of online and blended experience on outcomes in a blended learning environment. Internet and Higher Education, 44(June 2018), 100708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2019.100708

Casinillo, L. F. & Casinillo, E. L. (2020. (2020). Modelling Experiences and its Factors in General Mathematics: The Case of Grade 11 Students. Indonesian Journal of Educational Research and Review, 3(2), 25–34.

Chansky, N. M. (1966). Anxiety, Intelligence and Achievement in Algebra. The Journal of Educational Research, 60(2), 90–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.1966.10883444

Chazan, D., Yerushalmy, M., & Leikin, R. (2008). The Journal of Mathematical Behavior An analytic conception of equation and teachers ’ views of school algebra. 27, 87–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2008.07.003

Chen, S., Lo, H. C., Lin, J. W., Liang, J. C., Chang, H. Y., Hwang, F. K., Chiou, G. L., Wu, Y. T., Lee, S. W. Y., Wu, H. K., Wang, C. Y., & Tsai, C. C. (2012). Development and Implications of Technology in Reform-based Physics Laboratories. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 8(2), 287–302. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.020113

Chiu, T. K. F., & Mok, I. A. C. (2017). Learner expertise and mathematics different order thinking skills in multimedia learning. Computers & Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.01.008

Hall, V. (1990). A Review of Computer Algebra and its Educational Implications in the Teaching of Mathematics. 5(1989), 243–259.

Litke, E. (2020). Instructional practice in algebra : Building from existing practices to inform an incremental improvement approach. Teaching and Teacher Education, xxxx, 103030. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103030

Lynch, K., & Star, J. R. (2014). The Journal of Mathematical Behavior Exploring teachers ’ implementation of comparison in Algebra I. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 35, 144–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2014.07.003

Ozdag, H., & Aygor, N. (2012). Undergraduate students ’ performances in linear algebra : factorization of a determinant of n * n dimensional matrices. 46, 125–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.080

Richardson, K., Berenson, S., & Staley, K. (2009). The Journal of Mathematical Behavior Prospective elementary teachers use of representation to reason algebraically. 28, 188–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2009.09.002

Saprudin, S., Liliasari, L., Setiawan, A., & Prihatmanto, A. (2019). The effectiveness of using digital game towards students’ academic achievement in small and large classes: A comparative research. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 18(12), 196–210. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.18.12.12

Sarmiento, D. H., & Orale, R. L. (2016). Senior high school curriculum in the Philippines, USA and Japan. Journal of Academic Research, 1(3), 12–23.

Srisawasdi, N., & Sornkhatha, P. (2014). The Effect of Simulation-based Inquiry on Students’ Conceptual Learning and Its Potential Applications in Mobile Learning. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 8(1), 28–49. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMLO.2014.059996

Taylor, P., & Sangwin, C. J. (2007). International Journal of Mathematical Assessing elementary algebra with. October 2014, 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207390601002906

Trouche, L., Gitirana, V., Miyakawa, T., Pepin, B., & Wang, C. (2018). Studying mathematics teachers interactions with curriculum materials through different lenses : Towards a deeper understanding of the processes at stake. International Journal of Educational Research, September, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2018.09.002

Downloads

Published

2020-11-17

Issue

Section

Articles