Communication Ethics of Indonesian Netizens on Social Media as a Democratic Space in the Study of Public Sphere by Jurgen Habermas

Authors

  • Stepanus Angga Sekolah Tinggi Filsafat Teologi Widya Sasana
  • Antonius Alfredo Poa Sekolah Tinggi Filsafat Teologi Widya Sasana
  • Fabianus Rikardus Sekolah Tinggi Filsafat dan Teologi Widya Sasana

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23887/jfi.v6i3.59229

Keywords:

netizen, social media, public sphere, democracy

Abstract

The focus of this writing is to question the phenomenon of netizen comments on various social media accounts as a space for freedom of expression. Social media often allows many people to express their feelings and circumstances. At the same time, social media has become a public space for conveying ideas to many people. In it, people are free to have opinions and comments without having strong validity. These netizen comments apparently can lead people to irrational communication because they are done without consideration. So in the methodology of writing this article, the researcher conducted a qualitative research study by searching for data through journals and books related to the communication ethics of Indonesian netizens. This paper will be based on the philosophy of public space by Jurgen Habermas who makes several claims in communicating. Then, after the data was collected, the researcher used the content analysis method to examine the research data. The analysis will produce research findings, namely that the communications and opinions conveyed in the comments column are often without rational consideration. Netizens tend to get carried away to participate in comments without understanding reality well. Social media is only seen as an ordinary public space without any element of rationality that respects each other's rights and encourages the formation of social solidarity.

References

Asri, R. (2021). Ekspresi Kebebasan Berpendapat di Media Sosial: Telaah Kritis Ruang Publik

Habermas di Era Post Truth. January, 35.

Bertens, K. (2001). Perspektif Etika. Kanisius.

Bo’do, S., Siahaan, H., & Ida, R. (2019). Social Media, Public Space, and Movement Discussion

of Urban Farming in Indonesia. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute

(BIRCI-Journal) : Humanities and Social Sciences, 2(3), 250–261.

https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v2i3.414.

Center, I. N. (2021). Studi Terbaru dari Microsoft Menunjukkan Peningkatan Digital Civility

(Keadaban Digital) di Seluruh Kawasan Asia-Pacific Selama Masa Pandemi. Indonesia

News Center. https://news.microsoft.com/id-id/2021/02/11/studi-terbaru-dari-microsoftmenunjukkan-peningkatan-digital-civility-keadaban-digital-di-seluruh-kawasan-asia-pacificselama-masa-pandemi/.

Elen Inderasari, Ferdian Achsani, B. L. (2019). Bahasa Sarkasme Netizen Dalam Komentar Akun

Instagram “Lamber Turah.” Sematik, 8(1), 1–13.

https://doi.org/10.22460/semantik.vXiX.XXX.

Fauziah, N. (2021). Analisis Framing Pemberitaan Netizen Paling Tidak Sopan Pada Media

Online CNN Indonesia dan Kompas.com.

Gamayanto, I., Nilawati, F. E., & Suharnawi. (2017). Pengembangan dan Implementasi dari Wise

Netizen (E-Comment) di Indonesia. Techno.Com, 16(1), 80–95.

https://doi.org/10.33633/tc.v16i1.1323.

Gunawibawa, E. Y., Oktiani, H., & Frasetya, V. (2021). Pengetahuan Literasi Digital Terhadap

Digital Surveillance Mewujudkan Sumber Daya Manusia Unggul Pada Era Internet of

Things. Jurnal LeECOM (Leverage, Engagement, Empowerment of Community), 3(1), 71–

https://doi.org/10.37715/leecom.v3i1.1892.

Habermas, J. (1998). Postmetaphysical Thingking: Philosopicals Essays. Blackwell Publisher Ltd.

Habermas, J. (2007). Ruang Publik Sebuah Kajian Tentang Kategori Masyarakat Borjuis (I. R.

Muzir (ed.)). Kreasi Wacana.

Haezer, E. (2018). Menyoal Internet Sebagai Ruang Publik dalam Perspektif Habermas.

Dakwatuna: Jurnal Dakwah Dan Komunikasi Islam, 4(2), 181–196.

Hardiman, F. B. (2009a). Demokrasi Deliberatif Menimbang Negara Hukum dan Ruang Publik

dalam Teori Diskursus Jurgen Habermas. Kanisius.

Hardiman, F. B. (2009b). Menuju Masyarakat Lomunikatif (5th ed.). Kanisius.

Harmaningsih, D., Yunarti, S., & Wijayanti. (2021). Anonimitas Netizen di Media Sosial. KRA-ITH

HUMANIORA: Jurnal Sosial dan Humaniora, 5(3), 76–85.

Howe, L. A. (2000). On Habermas,. Wadsworth Philosophers Series.

Kasali, R. (2019). MO Sebuah Dunia Baru Yang Membuat Banyak Orang Gagal Paham (1st ed.).

MIZAN.

Magnis-Suseno, F. (1997). Mencari Sosok Demokrasi Sebuah Telaah Filosofis. Gramedia

Pustaka Utama.

Menoh, G. A. B. (2015). Agama dalam Ruang Publik Hubungan antara Agama dan Negara dalam

Masyarakat Postsekuler Menurut Jurgen Habermas. Kanisius.

Muawanah, L. (2021). Etika Komunikasi Netizen di Instagram dalam Perspektif Islam. Jurnal AthThariq, 05(02), 129–148. https://e-journal.metrouniv.ac.id/index.php/ath_thariq

Mustofa, S. (2019). Berebut Wacana : Hilangnya Etika Komunikasi di Ruang Publik Dunia Maya.

(01), 58–74. https://doi.org/10.23971/jsam.v15i1.1139

Nuraeni, I., Harisanti, N. L. R., & Maksum, H. (2022). Tuturan Kebencian dalam Komentar

Warganet. Ranah: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, 11(3), 189–197.

Nurrachmi F, S., & Puspita T, R. (2018). Etika Komunikasi Netizen di Media Sosial (Studi Etnografi

Virtual Terhadap Etika Berkomunikasi Netizen dalam Menerima Berita dan Informasi pada

Halaman Facebook E100 Radio Suara Surabaya). Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 1(1), 1-9s.

Pandor, P. (2014). Seni Merawat Jiwa Tinjauan Filosofis (Y. Lesek (ed.); 1st ed.). OBOR.

Pembayun, J. G. (2017). Rekonstruksi Pemikiran Habermas di Era Digital. Jurnal Komunikasi dan

Kajian Media, 1(1), 1–14.

Prasetya, A., Retnasary, M., & Azhar, D. A. (2022). Pola Perilaku Bermedia Sosial Netizen

Indonesia Menyikapi Pemberitaan Viral di Media Sosial. Journal of Digital Communication

and Design, 1(1), 1–12.

Prasetyo, A. A. (2022). Disrupsi Perpustakaan Sebagai Ruang Publik: Membedah Pemikiran

Jurgen Habermasdan Ruang Publik Digital. Jurnal Filsafat Indonesia, 5(3), 213–218.

Purwaningsih, D. A., & Sabardila, A. (2020). Respons Netizen terhadap Caption Publik Figur di

Instagram. Lingua Franca, 4(2), 213–225.

Rasuanto, B. (2005). Keadilan Sosial Pandangan Deontologis Rawls dan Habermas Dua Teori

Filsafat Politik Modern. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Regilme, S. S. F. (2018). Habermasian Thinking on Civil Society and the Public Sphere in the

Age of Globalization. Perspectives on Political Science, 47(4), 271–277.

https://doi.org/10.1080/10457097.2016.1175805.

Riyanto, F. X. E. A. (2018). Relasionalitas Filsafat fondasi Interpretasi: Aku, Teks, Liyan,

Fenomen (Widiantoro (ed.); 1st ed.). Kanisius.

Salikov, A. (2018). Hannah Arendt, Jürgen Habermas, and Rethinking the Public Sphere in the

Age of Social Media. Russian Sociological Review, 17(4), 88–102.

https://doi.org/10.17323/1728-192X-2018-4-88-102

Sherly Christina. (2019). Sarcasm in Sentiment Analysis of Indonesian Text: A Literature Review.

Jurnal Teknologi Informasi Jurnal Keilmuan dan Aplikasi Bidang Teknik Informatika, 13(2),

–59. https://doi.org/10.47111/jti.v13i2.255.

Siahaan, J., Wella, W., & Desanti, R. I. (2020). Apakah Youtuber Indonesia Kena Bully Netizen?

Ultima InfoSys : Jurnal Ilmu Sistem Informasi, 11(2), 130–134.

https://doi.org/10.31937/si.v11i2.1764.

Siska Lutfiyani , Burhan Eko Purwanto, S. A. (2021). Sarkasme Pada Media Sosial Twitter dan

Implikasinya Terhadap Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia di SMA. Tabasa: Jurnal Bahasa,

Sastra Indonesia, dan Pengajarannya, 1(2).

Suciartini, N. N. A., & Sumartini, N. L. U. (2018). Verbal Bullying dalam Media Sosial. Jurnal

Pendidikan Bahasa Indonesia, 6(2), 152–171.

Supriadi, Y. (2017). Relasi Ruang Publik dan Pers Menurut Habermas. Jurnal Kajian Jurnalisme,

(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.24198/kj.v1i1.12228

Published

2023-09-30

Issue

Section

Articles