Konsep Filsafat Barat dan Islam Tentang Sumber Pengetahuan (Perspektif Rene Descartes, John Locke, dan Al-Ghazali)

Western and Islamic Philosophical Concepts Regarding Sources of Knowledge (Perspectives of Rene Descartes, John Locke, and Al-Ghazali)

Authors

  • Muhammad Isa Anshari UIN Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23887/jfi.v7i1.65409

Keywords:

Source of Knowledge, Al-Ghazali, Rene Descrates, John Locke

Abstract

In history there has been an important debate between Western philosophy and Islamic philosophies. This debate concerns the source of human knowledge, whether the role of reason, sensory perception, or intuition is emphasized in the process of attaining true knowledge. This research involves the views of Al-Ghazali, Rene Descartes, and John Locke, this research uses the method of literature study. In the context of this debate, the Western view of epistemology represented by Rene Descartes saw the human mind as a source of knowledge and formulated a method known as the method of the question method, while John Locke, on the other hand, highlighted the role of human senses as a resource for knowledge and elaborated the theory of tables of senses. In the midst of this Western view, Al-Ghazali presents an Islamic perspective by emphasizing the role of intuition or heart in achieving the highest knowledge. In this article, we will look at the thinking and comparison of the perspective of three figures namely Al-Ghazali, Rene Descartes, and John Locke. Each of them has a different view of the true source of knowledge.

References

Nurohman, M. (2020). Rasionalisme dan Empirisme dalam Filsafat Ontologi. Dewantara, 9.

Teng, M. B. (2016). Rasionalis dan Rasionalisme dalam Perspektif Sejarah. Jurnal Ilmu Budaya, 4(2).

Choiriyah, N. (2014). Rasionalisme Rene Descartes. Anterior Jurnal, 12(2).

Diny, M. (2017). Epistemologi Keilmuwan Al-Ghazali Dan Implikasinya Terhadao Konsep Pendidikan Islam. UIN Antasari.

Yanti, A., & Hambali, R. Y. A. (2023). Aliran Rasionalisme Filsuf Abad Modern (Rene Descartes). Gunung Djati Conference Series, 19.

Hasanah, U. (2007). Epistemologi Al-Ghazali. Al-Fath, 1(1).

Muddin, M., & Ahmad. (2022). Potensi Bawaan Manusia: Studi Komparatif Teori Tabularasa dan Konsep Fitrah. Studi Keislaman, 21(2). https://doi.org/10.24042/ajsk.v21i2.9359

Jahja, Z. (1996). Teologi Al-Ghazali: Pendekatan Metodologi. Pustaka Pelajar.

Jamhari. (2022). Epistemologi Ilmu Pengetahuan Dalam Perspektif Karl Raimund Popper dan John Locke. C-TiaRS, 1(1).

Nawawi, A. (2011). Perspektif Teologi dan fisafat Al-Ghazali dan Hume. Madani.

Noer, M. F. (2015). Pemikiran Al-Ghazali Tentang Ilmu dan Epistemolog Dalam Kajian Filsafat Ilmu. Saintifika Islamica, 2(2).

Nurhadi. (2022). Debat Pemikiran dan Pergulatan Filsafat Moderen. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Sosial Budaya, 2(3).

Puspitasari, R. (2012). Kontribusi empirisme terhadap pendidikan ilmu pengetahuan sosial. Edukeksos, 1(1).

Raihan. (2017). Metodologi Penelitian. Universitas Islam Jakarta.

Sapitri, E. (2020). Epistemologi Al-Ghazali tentang Ilmu Laduni dalam Kitab Risalah Al-Laduniyyah. Manthiq, 5(2).

Setiawan, N. K. (2014). Nalar Kritis Epistemologi Islam. Teras.

Sodiq, A. (2017). Epistemologi Islam Argumen Al-Ghazali atas Superioritas Ilmu Ma’rifat. Kencana.

Soleh, A. K. (2013). Teologi Islam Perspektif Al-Farabi dan Al-Ghazali. UIN-Maliki Press.

Susanti, V., & Hambali, A. (2021). Aliran Rasionalisme dan Empirisme dalam Kerangka Ilmu Pengetahuan. Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Ushuluddin, 1(2).

Triwidyastuti. (2018). Konsep Pengembangan Pendidikan Islam. Universitas Islam Indonesia.

Waris. (2014). Pengantar Filsafat. STAIN Po Press.

Published

2024-04-30

Issue

Section

Articles