”Akan Setia Pada Bumi” Sebagai Etika Ekologi (Keseimbangan Antara Manusia dan Alam dalam Pemikiran Nietzsche)

"Will Be Loyal to the Earth" as Ecological Ethics (Balance Between Humans and Nature in Nietzsche's Thought)

Authors

  • Albertus Riko Sekolah Tinggi Filsafat dan Teologi Widya Sasana

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23887/jfi.v7i3.77552

Keywords:

ecological ethics, human, nature, balance, Nietzsche's thought

Abstract

The critical thinking disposition is one of the key abilities for success in the global competition of the 21st century. This concept refers to the extent to which a person has a tendency to be skeptical, gather more evidence, and analyze the information encountered. This disposition is generally shared by the students and the scholars in philosophy or a society with a high appreciation of philosophy, science and secularism. Recently there has been an interest in looking more deeply and empirically at the influence of social aspects such as religion and culture on critical thinking disposition. Conflicting research results were found showing the positive and negative influence of religion on critical thinking dispositions. These mixed results indicate the possibility of the presence of a mediator variable that can change the direction of the relationship or influence between the two variables. This research is interested in examining the influence of religiosity on critical dispositions through two pathways. The first path is the direct path of the two variables. Meanwhile, the second path is the path mediated by epistemic beliefs and epistemic emotions. It is hoped that this research can develop an explanation of the various and contradictory findings regarding the relationship or influence between the variables of religiosity and critical disposition. The research results show that epistemic beliefs can be a partial mediator for the causal relationship between religiosity and critical thinking disposition. However, epistemic emotions cannot be a mediator for both variables. These results show that religion, especially in Indonesian Muslim, has a significant influence on a person's critical attitude and that influence can become stronger if accompanied by contextualist epistemic.

References

Agustinus, D. (2017). Filsafat Moral. Pergumulan Etis Keseharaian Hidup Manusia (5th ed.). Kanisius.

Allison, D. B. (2001). Reading the New Nietzsche, The Birth of Tragedy, The Gay Science, Thus Spoke Zarathustra, and On the Genealogy of Morals (Maryland (ed.); 1st ed.). Rawman & Littlefield Publisher, Inc.

Anderson, M. (2014). Plato and Nietzsche, Their Philosophical Art. Bloomsbury.

Armada Ryanto. (2013). Menjadi-Mencintai Berfilsafat Teologi Sehari-Hari (1st ed.). Kanisius.

Armada Ryanto. (2018). Relasionalitas Filsafat Fondasi Interpretasi: Aku, Teks, Liyan, Fenomena (1st ed.). Kanisius.

Aryati, P. H. V. D. (n.d.). Relasi Manusia dan Alam. Jurnal Neo Teknika, 4.

Ayu Utami. (2022). Membaca Gurindam daripada Nietzsche, 8.

Cimi, S. S., & Tinambunan, E. R. L. (2023). Penegakan Hak-Hak Ekologis Masyarakat Setempat Sebagai Wujud Pengakuan Eksistensi Manusia Menurut Armada Riyanto. Ganaya : Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora, 6.

Eko Ariwidodo. (2104). Relevansi Pengetahuan Masyarakat Tentang Lingkungan dan Etika Lingkungan Dengan Partisipasinya Dalam Pelestarian Lingkungan. Nuansa, 1.

Ferri Irawan, Sawirman, L. (2020). Analisis Tipe Pergerakan Wacana Tentang Nietzsche di Kalangan Agamawan Dalam Perspektif Teori Break. Majalah Ilmiah Bahasa dan Sastra, 17.

Hardiman, F. B. (2011). Pemikiran-Pemikiran yang Membentuk Dunia Modern (1st ed.). Erlangga.

Indrajaya, F. (2010). Refleksi Pandangan Nietzsche terhadap Moralitas dan Kepentingan diri. Humaniora, 1.

Kaufmann, W. N. (1974). Philosopher, Psychologist, Antichrist. Princeton University Press.

Lestari, S. E., & Djanggih, H. (2019). Urgensi Hukum Perizinan dan Penegakannya Sebagai Sarana Pencegahan Pencemaran Lingkungan Hidup.

M.Yasir Said; Yati Nurhayati. (2020). Paradigma Filsafat Etika Lingkungan dalam Menentukan Arah Politik Hukum Lingkungan. Al’Adl, 12.

Magnis-Suseno, F. (1998). “F Nietzsche: Dekonstruksi Kemunafikan” 13 Model Pendekatan Etika: Bunga Rampai Teks-Teks Etika dari Plato sampai dengan Nietzsche (1st ed.). Kanisius.

Muhammad Iqbal Rahman. (2023). Pandangan Nihilisme Terhadap Ontologi (Studi Deskriptif Pemikiran Nietzsche).

Munir, M. (2011). Pengaruh Filsafat Nietzsche terhadap Perkembangan Barat Kontemporer. Jurnal Filsafat, 21.

Nietzsche, F. (1961). Thus Spoke Zarathustra. (Walter Kaufmann (ed.). Penguin Classics.

Nietzsche, F. (1989). The Genealogy of Morality (Horace B. Samuel (ed.). Hackett Publishing Company.

Nietzsche, F. (1998). Beyond Good And Evil (Terjemahan) (M. Fber (ed.); 1st ed.). Ikon Telaritera.

Nurul Listiyani, Muzahid Akbar Hayat, S. M. (2018). Penormaan Pengawasan Izin Lingkungan dalam Pencegahan Pencemaran dan Kerusakan Lingkungan Hidup dalam Eksploitasi Sumber Daya Alam. Hukum Media, 10.

P. Julius F. Nagel. (2020). Etika Lingkungan Hidup. Prosiding Seminar Teknologi Kebumian, Vol. 1.

Ringgana Wandy Wiguna. (2023). Pemikiran Filsafat Nietzsche dan Sosiologi ÜBERMENCH. Jurnal Zarathustra Jurnal Sosiologi dan Filsafat, 1.

Risno Mina. (2016). Desentralisasi Perlindungan dan Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup Sebagai Alternatif Menyelesaikan Permasalahan Lingkungan Hidup. ARENA HUKUM, 9.

Saputro, R. M. (2023). Penegakan Hukum Lingkungan di Indonesia Ditinjau Dari Teori Keadilan Aristoteles. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan (JISIP), 7.

Sindhunata. (1982). Dilema Usaha Manusia Rasional (1st ed.). Gramedia.

Wibowo, A. S. (2011). Filsafat Eksistensialisme Jean-Paul Sartre (7th ed.). Kanisius.

Wibowo, A. S. (2017). Gaya Filsafat Nietzshe (1st ed.). Kanisius.

Wiyanto, Y. A. (2021). Genealogi Baik dan Jahat dalam Moral Tuan dan Moral Budak Nietzsche.

Yogie Pranowo. (2017). Genealogi Moral Menurut Foucault dan Nietzsche: Beberapa Catatan. Melintas, 33.

Yohanes Mega Hendarto. (2024). Kritik Nietzsche Terhadap Kebahagiaan Eudaimonia Sokrates. Jurnal Dekonstruksi, 10.

Published

2024-09-30

Issue

Section

Articles