Filsafat Ekologi dan Pengetahuan Lokal untuk Mencapai Konservasi Keanekaragaman Hayati yang Holistik
Filsafat Ekologi dan Pengetahuan Lokal untuk Mencapai Konservasi Keanekaragaman Hayati yang Holistik
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23887/jfi.v7i1.62046Kata Kunci:
ekologi, filsafat, holistik, konservasi, pengetahuan lokalAbstrak
Pekerjaan konservasi Keanekaragaman hayati mengenal dua Gerakan utama, yakni konservasi ekologi dan konservasi sosial. Kedua kubu tersebut memiliki nilai filsafatnya sendiri, sehingga perdebatan dan perbedaan diantara keduanya sulit diakhiri. Untuk mengakhiri perdebatan tersebut, kita perlu melakukan refleksi tentag pandangan filsafat alternatif yang tidak membedakan antara konservasi ekologi dan sosial. Hal ini belum dikaji oleh literature yang ada. Sehingga, tujuan dari kajian ini adalah untuk melakukan refleksi tentang dasar-dasar filsafat ontology, epistemology, dan aksiologi untuk mencapai pekerjaan konservasi yang bersifat utuh (holistic). Dengan menggunakan metode kualtitatif reflektif, kajian ini menyimpulkan bahwa untuk mengakhiri perdebatan mengenai konservasi ekologi dan sosial adalah dengan mengintegrasikan komponen pengetahuan lokal berdasarkan filsafat lokal yang bersifat holistik
Referensi
Adade, W, P.; Sikutshwa, L. and Shackleton, S. 2020. Acknowledging Indigenous and Local Knowledge to Facilitate Collaboration in Landscape Approaches—Lessons from a Systematic Review. Land 9(9): 331, https://doi.org/10.3390/land9090331.
Baumeister, R.F. and Leary, M.R. 1997. Writing Narrative Literature Reviews. Review of General Psychology 1(3): 311–320, https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.1.3.311.
Beaton, R. and Maser, C. 2020. Reuniting Economy and Ecology in Sustainable Development. 1st ed. CRC Press, https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003072249
Berkes, F. 1999. Sacred Ecology: Traditional Ecological Knowledge and Resource Management. Philadelphia: Taylor and Francis.
Brenner, J. 2018. The Philosophy of Ecology and Sustainability: New Logical and Informational Dimensions. Philosophies 3(2): 16, https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies3020016.
Conradie, E. 2006. Christianity and Ecological Theology: Resources for Further Research. Univeristy of Western Cape: Sun Press.
Ellis, E.C.; Pascual, U. and Mertz, O. 2019. Ecosystem Services and Nature’s Contribution to People: Negotiating Diverse Values and Trade-offs in Land Systems. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 38: 86–94, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2019.05.001.
Forman, R. and Godron, M. 1981. Patches and Structural Components for a Landscape Ecology. BioScience 31(10): 733–740, https://doi.org/10.2307/1308780.
Gensler, H. 2002. Ethics: A Contemporary Introduction (Routledge Contemporary Introductions to Philosophy). New York: Routledge.
Grainger, A. 1995. The Forest Transition: An Alternative Approach. Area 27(3): 242–251.
Hay, A.M. 2019. The Myth of Silent Spring: Rethinking the Origins of American Environmentalism. Journal of American History 105(4): 984–985, https://doi.org/10.1093/jahist/jaz022.
Hickey, V. 2018. When Forest Protection and Economic Renewal Grow Hand in Hand. Worldbank.org. https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/feature/2018/09/19/when-forest-protection-and-economic-renewal-grow-hand-in-hand.
Hotak, S.; Islam, M.; Kakinaka, M. and Kotani, K. 2020. Carbon Emissions and Carbon Trade Balances: International Evidence from Panel ARDL Analysis. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 27(19): 24115–24128, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08478-w.
Jalkanen, J.; Toivonen, T. and Moilanen, A. 2020. Identification of Ecological Networks for Land-use Planning with Spatial Conservation Prioritization. Landscape Ecology 35(2): 353–371, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-019-00950-4.
Jung, C.G. and von Franz, M.-L. 1968. Man and His Symbols. New York: Dell Publishing Co.
Leiss, W. 2023. The Domination of Nature: New Edition. 89. McGill-Queen’s Press-MQUP.
Liding, C.; Yang, L.; Yihe, L.; Xiaoming, F. and Bojie, F. 2008. Pattern Analysis in Landscape Ecology: Progress, Challenges and Outlook. Acta Ecologica Sinica 28(11): 5521–5531, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1872-2032(09)60011-1.
Lyons, J. 2019. ‘Gore is the World’: Embodying Environmental Risk in An Inconvenient Truth. Journal of Risk Research 22(9): 1156–1170, https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2019.1569103.
Marks, R.B. 2019. The Origins of the Modern World: A Global and Environmental Narrative from the Fifteenth to the Twenty-first Century. Rowman & Littlefield.
Matthew, R.; Hsiao, E. (Lan Y.; Le Billon, P. and Saintz, G. 2022. Species on the Move: Environmental Change, Displacement and Conservation. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 112(3): 654–663, https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2021.1999200.
Miller, T.R.; Minteer, B.A. and Malan, L.-C. 2011. The New Conservation Debate: The view from Practical Ethics. Biological Conservation 144(3): 948–957, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2010.04.001.
Mithen, S. 2006. Ethnobiology and the Evolution of the Human Mind. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 12(s1): S45–S61, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9655.2006.00272.x.
Naess, A. 1973. The Shallow and the Deep, Long‐range Ecology Movement. A Summary. Inquiry 16(1–4): 95–100, https://doi.org/10.1080/00201747308601682.
Naime, J.; Mora, F.; Sánchez-Martínez, M.; Arreola, F. and Balvanera, P. 2020. Economic Valuation of Ecosystem Services from Secondary Tropical Forests: Trade-offs and Implications for Policy making. Forest Ecology and Management 473: 118294, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118294.
Nelson, M.P. 2018. Deep Ecology. In Callicot, J.B. and Frodeman Robert F (Eds), Encyclopedia of Environmental Ethics and Philosophy, Farmington Hills, MI: Macmillan Reference USA/Gale Cengage Learning.
Newman, E.A.; Kennedy, M.C.; Falk, D.A. and McKenzie, D. 2019. Scaling and Complexity in Landscape Ecology. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 7: 293, https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2019.00293.
Nicholson, E.; Watermeyer, K.E.; Rowland, J.A.; Sato, C.F.; Stevenson, S.L.; Andrade, A.; Brooks, T.M.; Burgess, N.D.; Cheng, S.-T.; Grantham, H.S.; Hill, S.L.; Keith, D.A.; Maron, M.; Metzke, D.; Murray, N.J.; Nelson, C.R.; Obura, D.; Plumptre, A.; Skowno, A.L. and Watson, J.E.M. 2021. Scientific foundations for an ecosystem goal, milestones and indicators for the post-2020 global biodiversity framework. Nature Ecology & Evolution 5(10): 1338–1349, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-021-01538-5.
Oates, J.F. 1999. Myth and Reality in the Rain Forest: How Conservation Strategies Are Failing in West Africa,. Berkeley: University of California.
Odum, E.P. and Barret, G.W. 2005. Fundamentals of Ecology. 5th ed. Belmont, CA: Thompson Brooks/Cole.
Parida, P.; Syukri, A.; Badarussyamsi, B. and Fadhil Rizki, A. 2021. Kontruksi Epistimologi Ilmu Pengetahuan. Jurnal Filsafat Indonesia 4(3): 273–286, https://doi.org/10.23887/jfi.v4i3.35503.
Posey, D.A. 1999. Cultural and Spiritual Values of Biodiversity. London: Intermediate Technology.
Retnowati, A. 2014. Culture and Risk Based Water and Land Management in Karst Areas: An Understanding of Local Knowledge in Gunungkidul, Java, Indonesia. Justus Liebig University Giessen.
Robbins, P. 2019. Political Ecology: A Critical Introduction. John Wiley & Sons.
Roe, D. and Elliott, J. 2006. Pro-poor Conservation: the Elusive Win-win for Conservation and Poverty Reduction? 11.
Rogelj, J.; Huppmann, D.; Krey, V.; Riahi, K.; Clarke, L.; Gidden, M.; Nicholls, Z. and Meinshausen, M. 2019. A new scenario logic for the Paris Agreement long-term temperature goal. Nature 573(7774): 357–363, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1541-4.
Sanderson, J. and Harris, L.D. (Eds). 2020. Landscape Ecology: A Top-Down Approach. 1st ed. CRC Press, https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429148996
Sasaki, N.; Myint, Y.Y.; Abe, I. and Venkatappa, M. 2021. Predicting Carbon Emissions, Emissions Reductions, and Carbon Removal Due to Deforestation and Plantation Forests in Southeast Asia. Journal of Cleaner Production 312: 127728, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127728.
Scheiner, S.M.; Hudson, A.J. and VanderMeulen, M.A. 1993. An Epistemology for Ecology. Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America 74(1): 17–21.
Sessions, G. 2014. Deep Ecology, New Conservation, and the Anthropocene Worldview 30(2): 9.
Smith, B. 2004. Beyond Concepts: Ontology as Reality Representation. In Varzi, A. and Vieu, L. (Eds), Proceedings of FOIS, p. 12. Turin.
Snyder, H. 2019. Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research 104: 333–339, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039.
Suliantoro, B.W. and Runggandini, C.W.M. 2018. Model Penyelesaian Konflik Pemanfaatan Sumber Daya Hutan Berperspektif Gender Berbasis Kearifan Lokal 19(1): 12.
Terborgh, J. and Schaik, C.V. 2002. Why the World Needs Parks. In Terborgh, J. and Schaik, C.V. (Eds), Making Parks Work: Strategies for Preserving Tropical Nature, Washington, D.C.: Island Press.
Tilman, D.; Clark, M.; Williams, D.R.; Kimmel, K.; Polasky, S. and Packer, C. 2017. Future Threats to Biodiversity and Pathways to Their Prevention. Nature 546(7656): 73–81, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature22900.
Von Rintelen, K.; Arida, E. and Häuser, C. 2017. A review of Biodiversity-Related Issues and Challenges in Megadiverse Indonesia and Other Southeast Asian Countries. Research Ideas and Outcomes 3: e20860, https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.3.e20860.
Warren, D.M. 1992. Indigenous Knowledge, Biodiversity Conservation and Development. International Conference on Conservation of Biodiversity in Africa: Local Initiatives and Institutional Roles 18.
Watts, A. 1966. On The Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are. Great Britain: Jonathan Cape Ltd.
Zubaidi, A.; Maharani, S.D. and Sairah, A.R. 2022. Kearifan Lokal Desa Wisata Karangrejo dan Karanganyar untuk Memperkuat Ketahanan Ekonomi Desa Pasca Pandemi Covid-19. Jurnal Filsafat Indonesia 5(3): 227–234, https://doi.org/10.23887/jfi.v5i3.51818.
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2024 Jurnal Filsafat Indonesia
Artikel ini berlisensiCreative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Filsafat Indonesia Undiksha is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.