Accountant’s Heroism to Report Fraud Collectively through Organizational Support
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23887/jia.v8i2.69944Keywords:
whistleblowing, accountants, individual-collective, organizational support systemAbstract
Financial fraud is possibly to be detected by accountants. However, not all accountants are willing to report fraud within the company. This study investigates the possibility of accountants’ heroic acts as whistleblowers individually or collectively in the presence or absence of organizational support. The data was collected from an experimental activity which was designed in the form of a 2x2 between-subject, by involving master accounting students and chartered accountant programs as participants. Then, data was analyzed using an independent sample t-test and analysis of variance to confirm the hypothesis. The results provide evidence that the likelihood of accountants intending to whistleblowing is more substantial when done collectively than individually, and the presence of organizational support strengthens whistleblowing intentions compared to those who do not receive organizational support. These findings contribute to supporting discussion in behavioral accounting and triggering companies to pay attention to the accountant's role as a whistleblower, and thus, support whistleblowing that accountants may carry out.
References
Albrecht, C.O., Holland, D.V., Skousen, B.R., and Skousen, C.J. (2018). The significance of whistleblowing as an anti-fraud measure. Journal of Forensic & Investigative Accounting 10 (1): 1-13.
Alleyne, P., Charles-Soverall, W., Broome, T., and Pierce, A. (2017). Perceptions, predictors, and consequences of whistleblowing among accounting employees in Barbados, Meditari Accountancy Research 25 (2): 241-267.
Alleyne, P., Hudaib, M., and Haniffa, R. (2018). The moderating role of perceived organisational support in breaking the silence of public accountants. Journal of Business Ethics 147 (2018): 509-527.
Alleyne, P., Haniffa, R., and Hudaib, M. (2019). Does group cohesion moderate auditors’ whistleblowing intentions?, Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation 34: 69-90.
Aruoren, E.E., and Oboreh, J. (2020). Whistleblowing intention and organizational commitment. International Journal of Business and Social Science 11 (3): 112-120.
Association Certified Fraud Examiners. (2022). Occupational Fraud A Report to The Nations 2022. Austin, USA: ACFE.
Bernawati, Y., and Napitupulu, G.B. (2018). The Effect of Organizational, individual, and demographic factors on the whistle-blowing intention. Journal of Accounting and Strategic Finance 1 (1): 1-12.
Blau, P.M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York, NY: Wiley.
Burnstein, E., and Vinokur, A. (1973). Testing two classes of theories about group induced shifts in individual choice, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 9 (2): 123-137.
Chalos, P., and Pickard, S. (1985). Information Choice and Cue Use: An Experiment in Group Information Processing, Journal of Applied Psychology 70 (4): 634-641.
Dhamija, S., and Rai, S. (2018). Role of retaliation and value orientation in whistleblowing intentions, Asian Journal Business Ethics 7: 37-52.
Dinc, M.S., Kuzey, C., Gungormus, A.H., and Francuske, B.A. (2018). Accountants’ whistle-blowing intentions: the impact of affective organizational commitment, International Journal Business Governance and Ethics 13 (1): 15-32.
Dungan, J., Waytz, A., and Young, L. (2015). The psychology of whistleblowing, Current Opinion in Psychology 6: 129-133.
Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchinson, S., and Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived organizational support, Journal of Applied Psychology 71 (3): 500-507.
Farooqi, S., Abid, G., and Ahmed, A. (2017). How bad it is to be good: Impact of organizational ethical culture on whistleblowing (the ethical partners), Arab Economic and Business Journal I (2): 69-80.
Festinger, L. (1954). A Theory of Social Comparison Processes, Human Relations 7: 117-140.
Francalanza, C., and Buttigieg, E. (2016). Maltese certified public accountants and whistleblowing: traits, influences and propensity, Journal of Applied Accounting Research 17 (3): 262-284.
Gao, L., and Brink, A.G. (2019). A Content Analysis of Organizations’ Internal Whistleblowing Policies. SSRN Electronic Journal.
Habbe, A.H., Rasyid, S., Arif, H., and Muda, I. (2019). Measuring internal auditor’s intention to blow the whistle (A Quasi-experiment of internal auditors in the local government). Business: Theory and Practice 20 (2019): 224-233.
Iqbal, S., and Sholihin, M. (2019). The role of cognitive moral development in tax compliance decision making: An analysis of the synergistic and antagonistic tax climates, International; Journal of Ethics and Systems 35 (3): 227-241.
Jalilvand, M.R., Vosta, S.N., and Yasini, A. (2017). Motivational Antecedents of Whistle-Blowing in Iranian Public Service Organizations, Iranian Journal of Management Studies 10 (2): 385-408.
Johansson, E., and Carey, P. (2016). Detecting Fraud: The Role of the Anonymous Reporting Channel, Journal of Business Ethics 139 (2): 391–409.
Latan, H., Ringle, C.M., and Jabbour, C.J.C. (2018). Whistleblowing Intentions Among Public Accountants in Indonesia: Testing for the Moderation Effects, Journal Business Ethics 152 (2): 573-588.
Lee, G., and Turner, M.J. (2017). Do government-administered financial rewards undermine firms’ internal whistle-blowing systems?: A pitch, Accounting Research Journal 30 (1): 6-11.
Maulida, W.Y., and Bayunitri, B.I. (2021). The influence of whistleblowing system toward fraud prevention. International Journal of Financial, Accounting, and Management 2 (4): 275-294.
Namazi, M., and Ebrahimi, F. (2017). A study of accountants' whistle-blowing intention: evidence from Iran. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics 12 (4): 349-373.
Onyango, G. (2021). Whistleblowing behaviours and anti-corruption approaches in public administration in Kenya. Economic and Political Studies 9 (2): 230-254.
Pamungkas, I.D., Ghozali, I., and Achmad, T. (2017). The effects of the whistleblowing system on financial statements fraud: Ethical behavior as the mediators. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology 8 (10): 1592-1598.
PricewaterhouseCoopers. (2018). Pulling fraud out of the shadows: Global Economic Crime and Fraud. US: PwC.
Quayle, A. (2021). Whistleblowing and accounting for the public interest: a call for new directions. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 34 (7): 1555-1580.
Shawver, T., and Clements, L. (2019). Whistleblowing: The Factors that Contribute to Management Accountants Reporting Questionable Dilemmas, Management Accounting Quarterly 9 (2): 26-38.
Steiner, I.D. (1972). Group processes and productivity. New York: Academic Press.
Taylor, E.Z., and Curtis, M.B. (2013). Whistleblowing in Audit Firms: Organizational Response and Power Distance, Behavioral Research In Accounting 25 (2): 21-43.
Thau, S., Derfler-Rozin, R., Pitesa, M., Mitchell, M.S., and Pillutla, M. (2015). Unethical for the Sake of the Group: Risk of Social Exclusion and Pro-Group Unethical Behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology 100 (1): 98-113.
Wainberg, J., and Perreault, S. (2016). Whistleblowing in Audit Firms: Do Explicit Protections from Retaliation Activate Implicit Threats of Reprisal?, Behavioral Research in Accounting 28 (1): 83-93.
Watts, L.L., and Buckley, R.M. (2017). A dual-processing model of moral whistleblowing in organizations. Journal of Business Ethics 146 (2018): 669-683.
Young, R.F. (2017). Blowing the Whistle: Individual Persuasion under Perceived Threat of Retaliation, Behavioral Research in Accounting 29 (2): 97-111.
Zhang, J., Pany, K., and Reckers, P.M.J. (2013). Under Which Conditions are Whistleblowing ‘‘Best Practices’’ Best?, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 32 (3): 171-181.
Zhou, L., Liu, Y., Chen, Z., and Zhao, S. (2018). Psychological mechanisms linking ethical climate to employee whistle-blowing intention, Journal of Managerial Psychology 33 (2): 196-213.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Syaiful Iqbal, Putri Wulanditya
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
JIA (Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
1.png)
