Embedding “Profit for Purpose” in Business and Entrepreneurial Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23887/jia.v9i1.71507Keywords:
business education, entrepreneurship, social enterprises, sustainabilityAbstract
The paradigm shift in the business and entrepreneurial environment will also have an impact on business education in universities. This study aims to explore the uniqueness of social enterprises and then integrate the values into business and entrepreneurship education through the perspective of entrepreneurship theory. The research uses qualitative methods with a case study approach to social enterprises in East Kalimantan province. The data source comes from interviews with informants who are founders and managers of social enterprises and related documents. The result, based on entrepreneurship theory, reveals that two stages can be instilled in the learning process, which is the venture and monetization stage. The process between those stages will create the social enterprise values related to value potential (opportunity), driven value (competencies), and value appropriate (entrepreneur reward that is specifically related to entrepreneur characters).
References
Aloni, N. (2011). Humanistic education: from theory to practice. In W. Veugelers (Ed.), Education and humanism linking autonomy and humanity (pp. 35–46). Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
Barnett, R. (2011). Being a University (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.580980
Baxter, P., & Jack, S. (2008). Qualitative Case Study Methodology : Study Design and Implementation for Novice Researchers Qualitative Case Study Methodology : Study Design and Implementation. The Qualitative Report, 13(4), 544–559.
Besley, T., & Ghatak, M. (2017). Profit with Purpose? A Theory of Social Enterprise. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 9(3), 19–58.
Birkinshaw, J., Foss, N. J., & Lindenberg, S. (2014). Combining Purpose with Profit. MIT Sloan Management Review, 55(3), 49–56.
Bull, M. (2007). “Balance”: the development of a social enterprise business performance analysis tool. Social Enterprise Journal, 3(1), 49–66. https://doi.org/10.1108/17508610780000721
Cai, X., Hussain, S., & Zhang, Y. (2022). Factors That Can Promote the Green Entrepreneurial Intention of College Students: A Fuzzy Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 12(March), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.776886
Corvo, L., Pastore, L., Doronzo, E., & Salvi, A. (2020). Does collaborative orientation boost the performance of social enterprises ? June 2019, 24–27.
Creswell, J. W. (2015). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9299.00177
Denzin, N. K. (1978). The Research Act A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods (2nd Editio). McGraw Hill.
Desiana, P. M., Syamsul, M., Puspitawati, H., & Rachmawati, R. (2022). Strategy for Sustainability of Social Enterprise in Indonesia : A Structural Equation Modeling Approach. Sustainability, 14.
Ebrashi, R. El. (2013). Social entrepreneurship theory and sustainable social impact. Social Responsibility Journal, 9(2), 188–209. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-07-2011-0013
Gregory, J. (2007). Article_Dees_TakingSESeriously_2007.pdf. https://centers.fuqua.duke.edu/case/wp-content/uploads/sites/7/2015/02/Article_Dees_TakingSESeriously_2007.pdf
Haryanti, D. M., Rahayu, S., Hati, H., Wirastuti, A., & Susanto, K. (2015). BERANI JADI WIRAUSAHA SOSIAL ? DBS Foundation.
Hsu, J. L., & Pivec, M. (2021). Integration of sustainability awareness in entrepreneurship education. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(9), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13094934
Kedmeneć, I., Rebernik, M., & Peric, J. P. (2015). The impact of individual characteristics on intentions to pursue social entrepreneurship. Ekonomski Pregled, 66(2), 119–137.
Maulinda, K. (2018). Proses Pengembangan Social Enterprise Agriculture : Studi Biografi pada Agradaya. Jurnal Studi Pemuda, 7(2017), 133–146.
Mishra, C. S., & Zachary, R. K. (2015). The theory of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 5(4), 251–268. https://doi.org/10.1515/erj-2015-0042
Nuringsih, K., & Nuryasman, M. N. (2021). The role of green entrepreneurship in understanding indonesia economy development sustainability among young adults. Estudios de Economia Aplicada, 39(12), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.25115/eea.v39i12.6021
Nyssens, M. (2015). Social Enterprise At the crossroads of market, public policies and civil societ. Routledge.
Ozili, P. K. (2020). Accounting and Financial Reporting during a Pandemic. SSRN Electronic Journal, March. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3613459
Pirson, M., Vázquez-Maguirre, M., Corus, C., Steckler, E., & Wicks, A. (2019). Dignity and the Process of Social Innovation: Lessons from Social Entrepreneurship and Transformative Services for Humanistic Management. Humanistic Management Journal, 4(2), 125–153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41463-019-00071-9
Plerhoples, A. E. (2015). Social Enterprise As Commitment : A Roadmap Social Enterprise As Commitment : A Roadmap. Washington University Journal of Law & Policy, 48.
Prior, C., & Clark, W. H. (2014). Profit with Purpose Businesses: Subject Paper of the Mission Alignment Working Group. Social Impact Investment Taskforce - Report of Mission Alignment Working Group, 2014(September 2014), 1–43. http://www.socialimpactinvestment.org/reports/Mission Alignment WG paper FINAL.pdf
Pujari, D. (2006). Eco-innovation and new product development: Understanding the influences on market performance. Technovation, 26(1), 76–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2004.07.006
Ridwan, I., Sri, A. Y., & Kusumawardhani, D. (2020). A Social Enterprise Approach to Empowering Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) in Indonesia. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 6(3), 1–17.
Skivko, M. (2021). Digital Technologies, Social Entrepreneurship and Governance for Sustainable Development. Research in Social Change, 13(1), 165–173. https://doi.org/10.2478/rsc-2021-0016
Tapaninaho, R., & Heikkinen, A. (2022). Value creation in circular economy business for sustainability: A stakeholder relationship perspective. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(6), 2728–2740. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3002
Teasdale, S., Bellazzecca, E., de Bruin, A., & Roy, M. J. (2023). The (R)evolution of the Social Entrepreneurship Concept: A Critical Historical Review. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 52(1_suppl), 212S-240S. https://doi.org/10.1177/08997640221130691
Terziev, V., & Arabska, E. (2018). Social Entrepreneurship, Social Values and Social Impact. SSRN Electronic Journal, 07(04), 41–46. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3142936
Thompson, J. L. (2009). Social enterprise and social entrepreneurship: where have we reached? A summary of issues and discussion points. Social Enterprise Journal, 4(2), 149–161.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Fibriyani Nur Khairin, Anisa Kusumawardani, Yoremia Lestari Ginting
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
JIA (Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).