An Integrated Public Accountability Model: Lessons from the Pandemic
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23887/jia.v9i2.87317Keywords:
integrated public accountability, organizational performance, stakeholder engagement, public sector governance, social and economic performanceAbstract
The Integrated Public Accountability Model proposes a comprehensive framework for enhancing accountability in public organizations, emphasizing both technical and non-technical aspects as foundational pillars. This model advocates for a strategic approach where accounting serves as the primary vehicle for delivering performance information, supported by the pillars of institutional capacity, robust governance, spirituality/religiosity, and local customs. By focusing on these dimensions, the model aims to address the diverse informational needs of stakeholders, ensuring that public organizations deliver high-quality economic and social performance data. The potential impact of this research extends beyond traditional accountability frameworks by highlighting the necessity for an integrated approach during uncertain times, such as pandemics, where typical governance structures are disrupted. Future research should explore the empirical applicability of this model across different cultural and institutional contexts to validate its effectiveness in real-world scenarios. Additionally, studies should consider the dynamic interaction between these pillars to understand how they collectively contribute to enhancing accountability in public sectors. By pursuing these avenues, further research can refine the model's components and their interrelations, potentially establishing a new paradigm for public accountability that is both inclusive and adaptive to various governance challenges.References
Ahrens, T., & Ferry, L. (2020). Financial resilience of English local government in the aftermath of COVID-19. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting and Financial Management, 32(5), 813–823. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBAFM-07-2020-0098
Ahrens, T., & Ferry, L. (2021). Accounting and Accountability Practices in Times of Crisis: A Foucauldian Perspective on the UK Government’s Response to COVID-19 for England. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 34(6), 1332–1344. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-07-2020-4659
Ahyaruddin, M., & Akbar, R. (2017). Akuntabilitas dan Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah: Semu atau Nyata? Jurnal Akuntansi & Auditing Indonesia, 12(2), 105–117. https://doi.org/10.20885/jaai.vol21.iss2.art3
Arjalies, D. L. (2022). What trees taught me about Covid-19: on relational accounting and other magic. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 35(2), 569–575. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-02-2022-138
Bastida, F., Bracci, E., & Hoque, Z. (2022). Accounting for Unstable Environments in the Public Sector: Managing Post-COVID-19 Times. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting and Financial Management, 34(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBAFM-09-2021-0136
Bestari, P. (2020). Public Policy Studies: Reveal Policy Overlap in Indonesia Nowadays. PalArch’s Journal of Archaeology of Egypt, 17(5), 191–201. https://archives.palarch.nl/index.php/jae/article/download/737/721
Broadbent, J. (2020). The response to Covid-19 in England: political accountability and loss of trust. Journal of Accounting and Organizational Change, 16(4), 527–532. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAOC-07-2020-0093
CNN Indonesia. (2020). Bansos Covid-19 di Pusaran Korupsi dan OTT Pejabat Kemensos. https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20201205121418-12-578353/bansos-covid-19-di-pusaran-korupsi-dan-ott-pejabat-kemensos
Demirag, I., Fırtın, C. E., & Bilbil, E. T. (2020). Managing expectations with emotional accountability: making City Hospitals accountable during the COVID-19 pandemic in Turkey. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting and Financial Management, 32(5), 889–901. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBAFM-07-2020-0097
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.
Dowdle, M. W. (2017). Public Accountability: Conceptual, Historical and Epistemic Mappings. In P. Drahos (Ed.), Regulatory Theory: Foundations and Applications (pp. 197–215). Australian National University Press. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444320114.ch42
Ebrahim, A. H., & Buheji, M. (2020). A Pursuit for a ‘Holistic Social Responsibility Strategic Framework’ Addressing COVID-19 Pandemic Needs. American Journal of Economics, 10(5), 293–304. https://doi.org/10.5923/j.economics.20201005.04
Greiling, D., & Grüb, B. (2014). Sustainability Reporting in Austrian and German Local Public Enterprises. Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 17(3), 209–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/17487870.2014.909315
Grover, V. K. (2014). Top down versus bottoms up accountability: an analysis for implementation in educational institution. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Educational Research, 3(10), 258–282.
Hapsari, A. N. S., Utami, I., & Kean, Y. W. (2020). Accountability in governance: will and can traditional village-owned enterprises achieve it? The Indonesian Accounting Review, 10(2), 215–222. https://doi.org/10.14414/tiar.v10i2.2165
Heald, D., & Hodges, R. (2020). The accounting, budgeting and fiscal impact of COVID-19 on the United Kingdom. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting and Financial Management, 32(5), 785–795. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBAFM-07-2020-0121
Kompas.com. (2021). Kasus Korupsi di Tengah Pandemi Covid-19 yang Berujung pada Wacana Hukuman Mati.
Levi, M., & Smith, R. (2021). Fraud and its relationship to pandemics and economic crises: from Spanish flu to COVID-19. In Australian Institute of Criminology Report 19. https://doi.org/10.52922/rr78115
Ma, K. W. F., & McKinnon, T. (2021). COVID-19 and cyber fraud: emerging threats during the pandemic. Journal of Financial Crime, 29(2), 433–446. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-01-2021-0016
Messner, M. (2009). The limits of accountability. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34(8), 918–938. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2009.07.003
Nasyi’ah, E. Z., Triyuwono, I., Djamhuri, A., & Ghofar, A. (2022). A Critical Review of Accountability from the Islamic Perspective: Phenomena, Position, and Alignment of Methodology. The International Journal of Accounting and Business Society, 30(2), 135–145.
Nzimakwe, T. I. (2014). Practising Ubuntu and leadership for good governance The South African and continental dialogue. African Journal of Public Affairs, 7(4), 30–41.
OECD. (2022). First Lessons from Government Evaluations of COVID-19 Responses: A Synthesis. Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development, January, 1–45. https://www.oecd.org/coronavirus/policy-responses/first-lessons-from-government-evaluations-of-covid-19-responses-a-synthesis-483507d6/
Ongaro, E., & Tantardini, M. (2023). Religion, spirituality, faith and public administration: A literature review and outlook. Public Policy and Administration, 39(4), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/09520767221146866
Pärl, Ü., Paemurru, E., Paemurru, K., & Kivisoo, H. (2022). Dialogical Turn of Accounting and Accountability Integrated Reporting in Non-Profit and Public-Sector Organisations. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting and Financial Management, 34(1), 27–51. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBAFM-11-2019-0178
Passetti, E. E., Battaglia, M., Bianchi, L., & Annesi, N. (2021). Coping with the COVID-19 pandemic: the technical, moral and facilitating role of management control. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 34(6), 1430–1444. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-08-2020-4839
Patty, T. F. Q., & Ardini, L. (2021). Risiko Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan Pemerintah Pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19. Liquidity: Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Dan Manajemen, 10(2), 186–194. https://doi.org/10.32546/lq.v10i2.1076
Putra, I. P. M. J. S., & Narsa, I. M. (2022). Extended Triple Bottom Line Theory for A New Framework of Divinity Environmental Accounting with Local Genius Catur Brata PeNyepian. JIA (Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi), 7(2), 289–311. https://doi.org/10.23887/jia.v7i2.41356
Saadah, K., & Falikhatun, F. (2021). Local Wisdom as the Soul of Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure. Jurnal Akuntansi Multiparadigma, 12(3), 583–600. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jamal.2021.12.3.33
Salvador, M., & Sancho, D. (2023). Smart Local Governments Facing Turbulence: Robust Governance and Institutional Capacities (Issue May). https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202305.1413.v1
Sambala, E. Z., Cooper, S., & Manderson, L. (2020). Ubuntu as a Framework for Ethical Decision Making in Africa: Responding to Epidemics. Ethics and Behavior, 30(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2019.1583565
Schillemans, T. (2015). Calibrating Public Sector Accountability: Translating Experimental Findings to Public Sector Accountability. Public Management Review, 18(9), 1400–1420. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2015.1112423
Shahib, H. M., Hasanuddin, M. R., Nurdin, Y., Palete, S., Mika, F., & Rahayu Saputri, R. (2021). Akuntabilitas dan Transparansi Anggaran Pemerintah di Era Covid-19 Pada Website Pemerintah Daerah Se-Indonesia. Jurnal Transformative, 8(1), 102–127. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.transformative.2022.008.01.5
Sharon, S. S., & Paranoan, S. (2020). Refleksi Rumah Adat Ammatoa Dalam Akuntabilitas Organisasi. Jurnal Akuntansi Multiparadigma, 11(1), 59–76. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jamal.2020.11.1.04
Shimizu, K., & Mossialos, E. (2021). Accountability and transparency are vital in a pandemic response. Journal of General and Family Medicine, 22(2), 113–114. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgf2.401
Sinclair, A. (1995). The Chameleon of Accountability: Forms and Discourses. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 20(2/3), 219–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-092X(86)90070-8
Sinclair, R., Hooper, K., & Ayoub, S. (2013). Perspectives of Accountability in Charities in New Zealand. Journal of Asia-Pacific Business, 14(4), 312–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/10599231.2013.803904
Taylor, D., Tharapos, M., & Sidaway, S. (2014). Downward Accountability for A Natural Disaster Recovery Effort: Evidence and Issues from Australia’s Black Saturday. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 25(7), 633–651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2013.01.003
Tower, G. (1993). A Public Accountability Model of Accounting Regulation. British Accounting Review, 25(1), 61–85. https://doi.org/10.1006/bare.1993.1006
UNDP. (2015). UNDP Measuring Capacity.
Unerman, J., & O’Dwyer, B. (2010). NGO Accountability and Sustainability Issues in The Changing Global Environment. Public Management Review, 12(4), 475–486. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2010.496258
Van der Stede, W. A. (2011). Management Accounting Research in The Wake of The Crisis: Some Reflections. European Accounting Review, 20(4), 605–623.
Wang, X., Xiao, H., Yan, B., & Xu, J. (2021). New Development: Administrative Accountability and Early Responses during Public Health Crises—Lessons from Covid-19 in China. Public Money and Management, 41(1), 73–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2020.1819012
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Nurkholis Nurkholis
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
JIA (Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).