Kewarganegaraan yang Dimediasi: Kemunculan Broker Perempuan dalam Menyediakan Akses ke Layanan Publik
Main Article Content
Abstract
Pengalaman kewarganegaraan di negara-negara belahan dunia selatan seperti Indonesia lebih banyak dipengaruhi oleh praktik informalitas. Interaksi warga dan negara dimediasi oleh seorang broker yang bertugas membantu klien mereka – utamanya warga miskin – dalam pemenuhan hak-hak kewargaan. Artikel ini memfokuskan pada agensi broker perempuan dalam konteks kewarganegaraan yang dimediasi. Hal ini merujuk pada kenyataan empiris bahwa desa-desa di Indonesia umumnya terdapat perempuan yang terlibat aktif menjalankan peran sebagai mediator seperti membantu warga mengurus pembuatan dokumen kependudukan, layanan kesehatan, bantuan sosial, dan akses terhadap keuntungan sumber daya negara lainnya. Makalah ini memilih Desa Sukamenak, Kabupaten Serang, Provinsi Banten sebagai lokus penelitian. Dimensi yang ingin dipotret yaitu: mengapa perempuan menjadi broker dan bagaimana mereka berinteraksi dengan klien, pemerintah, dan sesama broker. Riset ini menunjukkan bahwa kemunculan broker perempuan sebagai respon atas kinerja pemerintah yang penuh ketidakpastian dan tidak efektif. Broker mengandalkan pengalaman personal mereka dalam mengakses pelayanan publik dan membangun koneksi personal dengan birokrat. Hubungan broker perempuan dengan klien terpelihara dengan rapi melalui mekanisme “moral ekonomi”. Pada beberapa kasus terjadi kompetisi dan kompromi antar broker perempuan dalam memperebutkan klien yang tinggal di wilayah yang sama.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with the Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Sosial agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Access)
References
Ansari, A., & Chambers, T. (2022). Gendering the everyday state: Muslim women, claim-making & brokerage in India. Contemporary South Asia, 30(1), 72–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/09584935.2021.2021856
Antonsich, M. (2010). Searching for belonging - An analytical framework. Geography Compass, 4(6), 644–659. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-8198.2009.00317.x
Aspinall, E. (2014). When Brokers Betray: Clientelism, Social Networks, and Electoral Politics in Indonesia. Critical Asian Studies, 46(4), 545–570. https://doi.org/10.1080/14672715.2014.960706
Auerbach, A. M. (2015). Clients and Communities: The Political Economy of Party Network Organization and Development in India’s Urban Slums. World Politics, 68(1), 111–148. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887115000313
Berenschot, W., & Bagchi, S. (2020). Comparing Brokers in India: Informal Networks and Access to Public Services in Bihar and Gujarat. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 50(3), 457–477. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2019.1605535
Berenschot, W., Hanani, R., & Sambodho, P. (2018). Brokers and citizenship: access to health care in Indonesia. Citizenship Studies, 22(2), 129–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/13621025.2018.1445493
Berenschot, W., & van Klinken, G. (2018). Informality and citizenship: the everyday state in Indonesia. Citizenship Studies, 22(2), 95–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/13621025.2018.1445494
Blunt, P., Turner, M., & Lindroth, H. (2012). Patronage, Service Delivery, and Social Justice in Indonesia. International Journal of Public Administration, 35(3), 214–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2011.641050
Bohman, J. (2014). Republican citizenship. Handbook of Political Citizenship and Social Movements, 45–59. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781781954706.00010
Creswell. (2014). Penelitian Kualitatif & Desain Riset (3rd ed.). Pustaka Pelajar.
Daby, M. (2021). The Gender Gap in Political Clientelism: Problem-Solving Networks and the Division of Political Work in Argentina. Comparative Political Studies, 54(2), 215–244. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414020926194
Darwin, R. L. (2017). The power of female brokers: Local elections in North Aceh. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 39(3), 532–551. https://doi.org/10.1355/cs39-3g
Effendi, W. R. (2018). Konsepsi Kewarganegaraan dalam Perspektif Tradisi Liberal dan Republikan. Jurnal Trias Politika, 2(1), 55. https://doi.org/10.33373/jtp.v2i1.1238
Erdal, M. B., Doeland, E. M., & Tellander, E. (2018). How citizenship matters (or not): the citizenship–belonging nexus explored among residents in Oslo, Norway. Citizenship Studies, 22(7), 705–724. https://doi.org/10.1080/13621025.2018.1508415
Gottlieb, J. (2017). Explaining Variation in Broker Strategies: A Lab-in-the-Field Experiment in Senegal. Comparative Political Studies, 50(11), 1556–1592. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414017695336
Holland, A. C., & Palmer-Rubin, B. (2015). Beyond the Machine: Clientelist Brokers and Interest Organizations in Latin America. Comparative Political Studies, 48(9), 1186–1223. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414015574883
Isin, F. I., & Turner, S. B. (2002). Citizenship Studies: An Introduction. In E. I. and B. S. Turner (Ed.), Handbook of Citizenship Studies (1st ed., pp. 1–12). SAGE Publications Ltd.
Lieres, L. P. and B. von. (2014). Mediated Citizenship: The Informal Politics of Speaking for Citizens in the Global South. November, 1–22. https://studydirect.sussex.ac.uk/mod/resource/view.php?id=954979
Manik, T. S., & Samsuri, S. (2021). Pendekatan Kewarganegaraan Indonesia. Jurnal Citizenship Virtues, 1(1), 42–50. https://doi.org/10.37640/jcv.v1i1.915
Marshall, T. . (1950). Citizenship and Social Class. University Press.
Nisaul Fadillah. (2020). Female brokers: Mobilising voters within Indonesia’s Majelis Taklim Network. Global Media Journal Australian, 14(1), 12.
Robins, S., Cornwall, A., & von Lieres, B. (2008). Rethinking “citizenship” in the postcolony. Third World Quarterly, 29(6), 1069–1086. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436590802201048
Saskia E, W. (2013). The Birth of the New Order State in Indonesia: Sexual Politics and Nationalism. Journal Of Women’s History, 15(1), 70–91. https://doi.org/10.1353/jowh.2003.0039
Sayer, A. (2000). Moral Economy and Political Economy. Studies in Political Economy, 61(1), 79–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/19187033.2000.11675254
Serpa, S., & Ferreira, C. M. (2019). The Concept of Bureaucracy by Max Weber. International Journal of Social Science Studies, 7(2), 12. https://doi.org/10.11114/ijsss.v7i2.3979
Stokke, K. (2017). Politics of citizenship: Towards an analytical framework. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift, 71(4), 193–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/00291951.2017.1369454
Suryakusuma, J. I. (1996). The State and Sexuality in New Order Indonesia (S. Laurie J (ed.)). Duke University Press.
Tawakkal, G. T. I., Kistanto, N. H., Asy’ari, H., Pradhanawati, A., & Garner, A. D. (2017). Why Brokers Don’t Betray: Social Status and Brokerage Activity in Central Java. Asian Affairs(UK), 44(2), 52–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/00927678.2017.1307641
Thun, V. (2016). Liberal, Communitarian or Cosmopolitan? (Issue October). http://www.arena.uio.no
Tidey, S. (2016). Between the ethical and the right thing: How (not) to be corrupt in Indonesian bureaucracy in an age of good governance. American Ethnologist, 43(4), 663–676. https://doi.org/10.1111/amet.12382
Utama, A. (2017). Proyek e-KTP: Kisah perjuangan mendapatkan sekeping kartu identitas. Bbc.Com. https://www.bbc.com/indonesia/indonesia-42326444
Van Bochove, M., Rusinovic, K., & Engbersen, G. (2010). The multiplicity of citizenship: Transnational and local practices and identifications of middle-class migrants. Global Networks, 10(3), 344–364. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0374.2010.00292.x
van Klinken, G. (2018). Citizenship and local practices of rule in Indonesia. Citizenship Studies, 22(2), 112–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/13621025.2018.1445489