The validity and practicality of the chemistry learning device by using STEM-PjBL model

S W Suwadarma, I W Suja

Abstract


The purpose of this research is to improve the Motivation and Learning Achievement of Singaraja Vocational High School 2 Students in the 2016/2017 Academic Year with Discovery Learning Learning Model. This research is classroom action research. The research subjects that will be used as the research are students in class XI of Catering 4 Singaraja 2 nd Vocational School 2016/2017 in the year of 41 people 25 people and 16 women while the object of research is student motivation and learning achievement. Data on student learning achievements collected at the end of each cycle using the test. Data on learning motivation were collected using learning motivation questionnaire sheets in the form of questionnaires. Data analysis used in this study used descriptive data analysis. Based on the data analysis conducted, it can be concluded that the implementation of the Discovery Learning model can increase motivation and learning achievement of Crafts and Entrepreneurship in class XI 1 students of SMK Negeri 2 Singaraja Academic Year 2016/2017.

Keywords: Learning Devices, STEM-PJBL Model, Chemistry, Validity and Practicality


Full Text:

PDF

References


Afriana, J., Fitriani, A., & Permanasari, A.. 2016. Penerapan Project Based Learning Terintegrasi STEM untuk Meningkatkan Literasi Sains Siswa Ditinjau dari Gender. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 2 (2), 202 – 212. Tersedia pada http://uny.ac.id/index.php/jipi. Diakses 9 Nopember 2018.

Borich, G. D. 1994. Observation Skill for Effective Teaching. New York: Mac Millian Publishing Company.

Borg, W. R. & Gall, M. D. 1989. Educational Research. Fifth Edition. New York: Longman.

BSNP. 2010. Paradigma Pendidikan Nasional Abad XXI.

Capraro, R. M., Capraro, M. M., & Morgan, J. R., 2013. STEM Project-Based Learning: An Integrated Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathamatics (STEM) Approach (second ed). Rotherdam: Sense Publishers.

Capraro, R. M., Capraro, M. M., & Sunyoung, H., 2015. How Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Project-Based Learning (PBL) Affects High, Middle, and Low Achievers Differently: The Impact of Student Factors on Achievement. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, pp. 1-25.

Diaz, D., & King, P. (2007). Adapting a Post-Secondary STEM Instructional Model to K-5 Mathematics Instruction. Clemson: Clemson University.

Dyer, J. H., Gregersen, H. B., & Cristensen, C. M., 2009. Five Discovery Skills that Distinguish Great Innovators. Harvard Business School.

Gregory, R.J. 2000. Psychological Testing: History, Principles, and Applications. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Hake R.R. 1999. Analyzing Change/Gain Scores. Tersedia pada http://www.physics.indiana.edu/ /Analyzingchange-Gain.pdf (diakses 9 Pebruari 2019)

Heinich, R., Molenda, M., Russell, J., & Smaldino, S., 1996. Instructional Media and Technologies for Learning (5 ed). New Jersey : Simon & Schuster Company Engelewood Cliffs.

Ismayani, A. 2016. Pengaruh Penerapan STEM Project Based Learning Terhadap Kreativitas Matematis Siswa SMK. Journal of Mathematics and Education, 3 (4).

Katz, I. R., & Macklin, A. S. 2007. Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Literacy: Integration and Assessment in Higher Education. Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics, 5(4), 50-55. Tersedia pada: http://www.iiisci.org/Journal/CV$/sci/pdfs/P890541.pdf.

KBBI. Pengertian Model Pembelajaran STEM-PjBL. Tersedia pada: https://kbbi.web.id. Diakses pada 9 November 2018.

Kemendikbud. 2013. Kerangka Dasar Kurikulum 2013. Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Dasar: Jakarta.

Kornelia, D. K., Mayasari, T., dan Kurnadi, E., 2017. Pengaruh Pembelajaran STEM-PjBL terhadap Keterampilan Berpikir Kreatif. E-journal.UNIPMA III: 266 – 274. Tersedia pada http://e-journal.unipma.ac.id/index.php/snpf. Diakses tanggal 3 Maret 2019.

Laboy-Rush, D. 2010. Integrated STEM Education Through Project-Based Learning. www.learning.com/stem/whitepaper/integrated-STEM-through-Project-based-Learning

Linn, R.L. 1989. Educational Measurement. (3rd Ed.). New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.

Majid, A. 2009. Perencanaan Pembelajaran Mengembangkan Standar Kompetensi Guru. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Nichols, J. 2013. 4 Essential Rules of 21st Century Learning. [Online]. Tersedia di: http://www.teachthought.com/learning/4-essential-rules-of-21stcentury-learning/. Diakses 19 Nopember 2018.

Nunamaker, J.F., Chen, M., & Purdin, T. D. M., 1991. System Development in Information Systems Research. Journal of Management Information Systems, 7(3), 89-101.

OECD. 2014. PISA 2012 Resultsin Focus: What15-year-oldsknowandwhat they can do with what they know.

OECD. 2016. PISA 2015 Result in Focus-OECD.org.

Padmo, D., Belawati, T., dan Purwanto. 2004. Teknologi Pembelajaran (Peningkatan Kualitas Belajar Melalui Teknologi Pembelajaran). Jakarta: Pustekkom.

Pannen, P., dan Purwanto. 1995. Penulisan Bahan Ajar. Dalam Mengajar di Perguruan Tinggi Bagian Empat Program Applied Approach. Proyek Pendidikan Tenaga Guru Dirjen Dikti Depdikbud.

Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M. A., & Chatterjee, S., 2007. A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems Research. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(3), 45-77.

Permanasari, A. 2016. STEM Education: Inovasi dalam Pembelajaran Sains. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Sains (SNPS) 2016. Bandung: Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.

Permendikbud. 2016. Salinan Lampiran Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Nomor 22 Tahun 2016 Tentang Standar Proses Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. Tersedia pada: http://bsnp-indonesia.org/id. Diakses pada 9 November 2018.

Retnawati, H. 2015. Akurasi Instrumen Skala Likert dan Pilihan Ganda untuk Mengukur Self Regulated Learning. Laporan Penelitian. Tidak Dipublikasikan.

Retnawati, H. 2015. Analisis Kuantitatif Instrumen Penelitian. Yogyakarta: Parama

Ridwan, A.S., Sondang, R. M., Hary, S., Sudiran. 2018. Penelitian Pendidikan. Tanggerang: Tira Smart.

Sadjati, I. M. 2012. Pengembangan Bahan Ajar. In: Hakikat Bahan Ajar. Universitas Terbuka, Jakarta, pp. 1-62. ISBN 9790110618. http://repository.ut.ac.id/id/eprint/4157. Diakses 13 Januari 2019.

Sahin, A., & Top, N., 2015. STEM Student on The Stage (SOS): Promoting Student Voice and Choiche in STEM Education Through an Interdisciplinary, Standars-Focused, Project Based Learning Approach. Journal of STEM Education, Innovations and Research, 16(3), 22 – 33.

Santyasa, I W. 2014. Asesmen dan Evaluasi Pembelajaran Fisika. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Satchwell, R.E., & Loepp, F. L., 2002. Designing and Implementing an Integrated Mathematics, Science, and Technology Curriculum for the Middle School. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 39(3). http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/JITE/v39n3/satchwell.html.

Stiggins, R. J. 1994. Student-Centered Classroom Assessment. New York: Macmillan College Publishing Company.

Sudijono, A. 2011. Pengantar evaluasi pendidikan. Jakarta: Rajagrafindo Persada.

Sudjana, N. 2005. Dasar-Dasar Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: Sinar Baru Algensindo.

Sugiyono. 2009. Metode Penelitian Bisnis (Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D). Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sukmadinata, N. S. 2010. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Suryana, A., Utami, I. S., Septiyanto, R. F., dan Wibowo, F. C., 2017. Pengembangan STEM-A Berbasis Kearifan Lokal dalam Pembelajaran Fisika. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika Al-BiRuNi, 06 (1) (2017) 67 – 73. Diakses pada 28 Pebruari 2019.

Sutrisno, H. 2004. Metodologi Research. Yogyakarta: Andi Offset.

Syafura, D. T., & Bunawan, S. W. 2017. The Effect of Scientific Inquiry Model Assisted Visual Media on Students’ Conceptual and Procedural Knowledge. American Journal of Educational Research. 5(6).623-628. Tersedia pada: http://pubs.sciepub.com. Diakses 9 November 2018.

Thiagarajan, et al. 1974. Instructional Development for Training Teachers of Exceptional Children. Washinton DC: National Centre for Improvement Educational System.

Tretten, R., & Zachariou, P. 1997. Learning about Project-Based Learning: Assessment of Project-Based Learning in Tinkertech Schools.

Trianto, 2007. Model-Model Pembelajaran Inovatif Berorientasi Kontruktivistik. Prestasi Pustaka: Jakarta.

Trilling, B., & Fadel, C., 2009. 21st Century Skills Learning For Life In Our Times. USA: HB Printing.

Tseng, K. H., Chang, C. C., Lou, S. J., & Chen, W. P., 2013. Attitudes Towards Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) in a Project Based Learning (PjBL) Environment. International Journal Technology and Design Education vol 23:87–102

Widoyoko, S. E. P. 2009. Evaluasi Program Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Wiggins, G. P., & McTighe, J. 1998. Understanding by Design. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23887/jipp.v4i1.24150

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.



Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran (JIPP) indexed by:


 Crossref  

Akreditasi SINTA  




Creative Commons License

Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.