Developing Online Formative Assessment Using Quizizz for Assessing Reading Competency of the Tenth Grade Students in Buleleng Regency

Desak Made Ari Puspitayani, I Nyoman Adi Jaya Putra, Made Hery Santosa

Abstract


This research and development study (R&D) aimed to: (1) develop online quiz prototype using Quizizz  and (2) examine the quality of the developed online quiz. This study employed Four-D model with Define, Design, Develop, and Disseminate phases by Thiagarajan (1974). The subjects of this study were 10 Senior High School English Teachers in Buleleng regency. The data about the teachers’ need were collected by administering questionnaire and analyzing the teachers’ documents while the quality of the developed online quiz was validated by expert and user judges. The data of the teachers’ need were analyzed descriptively. The quality of the developed online quiz in terms of content validity was analyzed by using Gregory’s formula while the practicality was analyzed by using practicality criteria. The results of the study shows that the teachers need online quiz as formative assessment instruments which consisted of of linguistic and level comprehension aspects. The prototype of online formative assessment was initiated in define phase by doing target situation analysis, learner analysis, concept analysis, task analysis, and present situation analysis. The quality of the developed online quiz was examined in develop phase. The result of the study shows that the quality of the developed online quizzes as a formative assessment in terms of content validity was very high and the practicality was excellent. The implication of this finding is that the developed online quiz as formative assessment instrument is highly recommended to be implemented in the real classroom and widely disseminated. It is not only beneficial for the teachers in teaching and learning process but also improve teachers’ competence. Therefore, this formative assessment instrument is ready to be used for assessing the tenth grade students’ reading competency.

 

Keywords: formative assessment; online quiz; prototype; reading competency; teachers’ competency

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anderson, M., & Anderson, K. (2003). Text Types in English. Australia: Macmillan.

Argina, A. W., Mitra, D., Ijabah, N., & Setiawan, R. (2017). Indonesia PISA Result : What Faktors and What Should be Fixed? The 1st Educational and Language International Conference Proceedings Center for International Developmentof Unissula, 69–79.

Arkorful, V., & Abaidoo, N. (2015). The role of e-learning, advantages and disadvantages of its adoption in higher education. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 12(1), 29–42.

Arvanitis, P., Krystalli, P., & Panagiotidis, P. (2016). Applications for Mobile Assisted Language Learning: a Current Field Research. INTED2016 Proceedings, 1, 7645–7651. https://doi.org/10.21125/inted.2016.0803

Basuki, Y., & Hidayati, Y. (2019). Kahoot! or Quizizz: the Students’ Perspectives, (July). https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.27-4-2019.2285331

Brown, D. (2003). Language Assessment: Principles and Classroom Practices. San Fransisco: San Fransisco State University.

Cadieux Bolden, D., Hurt, J., & Richardson, M. K. (2017). Implementing Digital Tools to Support Student Questioning Abilities: A Collaborative Action Research Report. I.E.: Inquiry in Education, 9(1).

Chaqmaqchee, Z. A. (2015). Student ’ s Perspective on Formative Assessment : Quizzes and Discussion as Ongoing Process in Higher Education. American Scientific Research Journal for Engineering, Technology, and Sciences (ASRJETS), 13(August), 160–177.

Cohen and Sasson. (2016). Online Quiz in a Virtual Learning Environment as a Tool For Formative Assessment. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 2(2), 77–85. http://www.jotse.org/index.php/jotse/article/view/49/67

Coogan, P. (2006). Text Types.

Cook, B. R., & Babon, A. (2017). Active learning through online quizzes: better learning and less (busy) work. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 41(1), 24–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2016.1185772

Cox, K., & Clark, D. (1998). The use of formative quizzes for deep learning. Computers and Education, 30(3–4), 157–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1315(97)00054-7

Dantes. (2012). Metodologi Penelitian. Yogyakarta: Andi.

Derewianka. (1991). Exploring How Text Work. Rozelle: Primary English Teaching Association.

Djiwandono. (2011). Tes Bahasa: Pegangan Bagi Pengajar Bahasa. Jakarta: PT. Indeks.

Gholami, V., & Moghaddam, M. M. (2013). The Effect of Weekly Quizzes on Students’ Final Achievement Score. International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science, 5(1), 36–41. https://doi.org/10.5815/ijmecs.2013.01.05

Kane, T. S. (2000). The Oxford Essential Guide to Writing. New York: Barkley Books.

Kemendikbud. (2018). Persentase UNBK SMA Tahun 2018.

Kong. (2009). A brief discussion on motivation and ways to motivate students in English language learning. International Education Studies, 2, 145. http://ccsenet.org/journal.html

Korucu, A. T., & Alkan, A. (2011). Differences between m-learning (mobile learning) and e-learning, basic terminology and usage of m-learning in education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 1925–1930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.029

Marhaeni. (2012). Language Assessment for Masters’ Program of English Language Education. Ganesha University of Education.

Nitko. (2001). Educational Assessment of Students (Third Edit). New Jersey: Prentice hall, Inc.

Gilakjani, A., & Sabouri, N. B. (2016). How Can Students Improve Their Reading Comprehension Skill? Journal of Studies in Education, 6(2), 229. https://doi.org/10.5296/jse.v6i2.9201

Roison, G. (2004). Writing Resource Book. Victoria: Rigby Heinemann.

Salas-Morera, L., Arauzo-Azofra, A., & García-Hernández, L. (2012). Analysis of Online Quizzes As a Teaching and Assessment Tool. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.30

Sarica, G. N., & Cavus, N. (2009). New trends in 21st Century English learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 439–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.079

Syamsinar and Jabu. (2016). The Problems in Professional Competence of Teachers in Teaching English Subjet At Vocational High Schools. ETERNAL (English, Teaching, Learning and Research Journal), 1(1), 98–111. https://doi.org/10.24252/eternal.v11.2015.a5

Thiagarajan, S. A. O. (1974). Instructional Development for Training Teachers of Exceptional Children: A Sourcebook. Indiana Univ., Bloomington. Center for Innovation in Teaching the Handicapped. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED090725.pdf




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23887/jipp.v4i1.24169

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.



Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran (JIPP) indexed by:


 Crossref  

Akreditasi SINTA  




Creative Commons License

Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.