Efl Students’ Learning Styles Preference And Problems Encountered In Critical Reading Course
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23887/jipp.v8i2.68153Keywords:
Learning Style, EFL Students, Critical Reading CourseAbstract
Several theories in the world of education state that student learning styles must be known by both teachers and students because learning styles play an important role in the learning process. This study aims to identify the preferred learning styles and problems faced by English Language Education students who take the Critical Reading Course. This research is in the form of a descriptive case study with the subject of the study being English Language Education students. Data were collected through questionnaires, observations, and interviews. The data analysis method used is descriptive analysis. The findings of the study show that the most preferred learning style by students is the visual learning style, followed by kinesthetic and auditory learning styles. Some students also prefer multimodal learning styles, such as visual-kinesthetic and visual-auditory. Students with visual-kinesthetic learning styles tend to intertextualize texts to understand the meaning in critical reading texts. The main obstacle students face in reading is lack of focus. Topics that students consider challenging include the main idea implied, supporting details, arguments, and logical fallacies. This study provides valuable information about the learning style of English Language Education students based on the sensory perception dimension. This research suggests that teachers create an inclusive classroom environment by implementing various teaching strategies, media, and activities to accommodate different learning styles of students. In addition, students are expected to be aware of their respective learning styles to acquire material efficiently and enjoyably.
References
Al-Zarikat, A. M., & Damour, A. N. (2020). Intertextuality in the novel ‘The Wheat Bearer.’ International Journal of Language and Literature, 8(2), 93–105. https://doi.org/10.15640/ijll.v8n2a11.
Alexander, L. (2015). Questioning the text: Critical reading in the English language classroom. English Australia Journal, 30(2), 72–75. https://doi.org/10.3316/informit.164440101769346.
Ariani, S., Valiantien, N. M., & Rachmawaty, N. (2021). Students’ Language Learning Style Preferences at English Literature Study Program. CaLLs: Journal of Culture, Arts, Literature, and Linguistics, 7(1), 103–112. https://doi.org/10.30872/calls.v7i1.5160.
Arni, Y., Utami, W. W., Khoirunnisak, L., & Amelia, F. (2024). The Effect of Visual, Auditory, Kinestic Learning Styles on Student Learning Outcomes in Science Subjects. Journal Of Education And Teaching Learning (JETL), 6(1), 119–129. https://doi.org/10.51178/jetl.v6i1.1794.
Awla, H. A. (2014). Learning styles and their relation to teaching styles. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 2(3), 241–245. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20140203.23.
Bagheri, N. (2015). Intertextuality in Novel: An Escape from Patriarchal Soliloquy. Epiphany, 8(3), 9–18. https://doi.org/10.21533/epiphany.v8i3.177.
Chetty, N. D. S., Handayani, L., Sahabudin, N. A., Ali, Z., Hamzah, N., Rahman, N. S. A., & Kasim, S. (2019). Learning styles and teaching styles determine students’ academic performances. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 8(4), 610–615. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v8i4.20345.
Dunn, R. S., Dunn, K. J., & Price, G. E. (1981). Learning style inventory. Lawrence, KS: Price Systems.
El-Bishouty, M. M., Aldraiweesh, A., Alturki, U., Tortorella, R., Yang, J., Chang, T. W., & Graf, S. (2019). Use of Felder and Silverman learning style model for online course design. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67(1), 161–177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-9634-6.
Fahim, A., Rehman, S., Fayyaz, F., Javed, M., Alam, M. A., Rana, S., & Alam, M. K. (2021). Identification of preferred learning style of medical and dental students using VARK questionnaire. BioMed Research International, 1, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/4355158.
Gallardo, J., Cruz, N. D., Opinga, G., & Albino, F. S. (2023). Visual Learning-Style-Based Activities in Improving the Reading Comprehension Skills of Second-Year English Major Students. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 4(10), 3530–3536. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.04.10.09.
Glaser, M., & Schwan, S. (2015). Explaining pictures: How verbal cues influence processing of pictorial learning material. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(4). https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000044.
Ha, N. T. T. (2021). Effects of learning style on students achievement: experimental research. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(S3), 329–339. https://doi.org/10.21744/lingcure.v5nS3.1515.
Kayalar, F., & Kayalar, F. (2017). The effects of auditory learning strategy on learning skills of language learners (students’ views). IOSR Journal Of Humanities And Social Science (IOSR-JHSS), 22(10), 4–10. https://doi.org/10.9790/0837-2210070410.
Kendeou, P., McMaster, K. L., & Christ, T. J. (2016). Reading comprehension: Core components and processes. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3(1), 62–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732215624707.
Khoirunnisa, S., & Iba, K. (2022). Correlation Study Of Visual, Auditorial and Kinesthetic Learning Styles (VAK) With Mathematics Learning Outcomes For Elementary School Students. Jurnal Paedagogy, 9(4), 790–798. https://doi.org/10.33394/jp.v9i4.5495.
Kočiský, T., Schwarz, J., Blunsom, P., Dyer, C., Hermann, K. M., Melis, G., & Grefenstette, E. (2018). The narrativeqa reading comprehension challenge. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 6, 317–328. https://doi.org/10.1162/tacl_a_00023.
Malacapay, M. C. (2019). Differentiated Instruction in Relation to Pupils’ Learning Style. International Journal of Instruction, 12(4), 625–638. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12440a.
Prasetia, I., & Adlan, M. (2022). Management of the Literacy Movement Program (LMP) to Improve Reading Culture in Elementary Schools. Journal of Innovation in Educational and Cultural Research, 3(3), 316–322. https://doi.org/10.46843/jiecr.v3i3.117.
Pratiwi, C. P. (2020). Analisis Keterampilan Membaca Permulaan Siswa Sekolah Dasar: Studi Kasus pada Siswa Kelas 2 Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan Edutama, 7(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.30734/jpe.v7i1.558.
Putri, T. L., Azizahwati, A., & Islami, N. (2018). Effectiveness of Phenomenon Based Learning (Phenobl) Model Application for Improving Student Learning Results in Optical Materials. Jurnal Geliga Sains: Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 6(1), 53. https://doi.org/10.31258/jgs.6.1.53-59.
Rafiq, M., Hardiyanto, A., & Sumarno, S. (2023). An Analysis of Student Learning Style in Learning English in Sekolah Indonesia Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Voices of English Language Education Society, 7(1), 145–157. https://doi.org/10.29408/veles.v7i1.7869.
Rahmatika, T., & Fajriawan, I. M. (2023). Preferred Learning styles among Junior High School students Using non Cognitive Diagnostic Assessment. EDULANGUE, 6(2), 220–233. https://doi.org/10.20414/edulangue.v6i2.9112.
Sartika, M., Hatim, M., & Rosmiyati, E. (2023). The Correlation of Learning Style and English Achievement of Students of Nurul Huda Senior High School. Esteem Journal of English Education Study Programme, 6(2), 311–318. https://doi.org/10.31851/esteem.v6i2.12310.
Setiowati, H. (2019). Identifying Students’ Learning Styles on Reading Comprehension Achievement. Pedagogy: Journal of English Language Teaching, 7(1), 49–54. https://e-journal.metrouniv.ac.id/pedagogy/article/view/1458.
Solihatin, E., & Syahrial, Z. (2019). The Effects of Brain-Based Learning and Project-Based Learning Strategies on Student Group Mathematics Learning Outcomes Student Visual Learning Styles. Pedagogical Research, 4(4), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/5949.
Supriyadi, E., Septian, A., Dahlan, J. A., & Juandi, D. (2022). GeoGebra Research in Indonesia: A Bibliometric Analysis. Prisma, 11(2), 559–575. https://doi.org/10.35194/jp.v11i2.2572.
Tippett, C. D. (2016). What recent research on diagrams suggests about learning with rather than learning from visual representations in science. International Journal of Science Education, 38(5), 725–746. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1158435.
Toofaninejad, E., & Alahkarami, A. (2017). The Effect of E-Content Designed by Absorb-Type Activities on the Learning and Retention of Students. Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.5812/IJVLMS.12656.
Tran, T. T. H., & Ngo, H. T. (2024). Measures Taken by Lecturers in Teaching Language Skills to Large EFL Classes Online at Some Universities in Vietnam. AsiaCALL Online Journal, 15(1), 90–104. https://doi.org/10.54855/acoj.241516.
Troussas, C., Chrysafiadi, K., & Virvou, M. (2021). Personalized tutoring through a stereotype student model incorporating a hybrid learning style instrument. Education and Information Technologies, 26(2), 2295–2307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10366-2.
Wahab, I., & Nuraeni, N. (2020). The Analysis of Students’Learning Style. Seltics Journal: Scope of English Language Teaching Literature and Linguistics, 3(1), 41–46. https://doi.org/10.46918/seltics.v3i1.509.
Wakweya, K., & Tegegne, W. (2022). The Effect of Reading Strategy Training on Students’ Reading Comprehension Performance. Journal of Science and Sustainable Development, 10(2), 25–35. https://doi.org/10.20372/au.jssd.10.2.2022.0418.
Wilson, B. (2014). Teach the how: Critical lenses and critical literacy. English Journal, 103(4), 68–75. https://doi.org/10.58680/ej201424646.
Zulianti, A., & Asari, S. (2022). Student English achievement and their learning style: A correlation study on English learners exposure. English Language in Focus (ELIF), 4(2), 107–116. https://doi.org/10.24853/elif.4.2.107-116.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Luh Indrayani
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with the Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran (JIPP) agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Access)