Science Materials with Guided Discovery Methods to Increase Problem Solving Ability for Junior High Schools

Syamsul Hadiwiyono; I Nyoman Sudana Degeng; Nurmida Catherine Sitompul

doi:10.23887/jipp.v8i3.78862

Authors

Syamsul Hadiwiyono Universitas PGRI Adi Buana Surabaya, Surabaya, Indonesia
I Nyoman Sudana Degeng Universitas Negeri Malang, Malang, Indonesia
Nurmida Catherine Sitompul Universitas PGRI Adi Buana Surabaya, Surabaya, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9838-7036

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23887/jipp.v8i3.78862

Keywords:

Guided discovery method, Learning Materials, problem solving ability, Science Subject

Abstract

Science learning aims to improve problem-solving skills, and the guided discovery method has been proven to improve problem-solving skills. However, this method has not been widely practiced because teachers have difficulty designing this learning. This research aims to produce science learning materials using The Guided Discovery method for problem-solving learning for junior high school students on Light. The subjects of this study were VIII-grade students. Questionnaires and tests collected data. Questionnaires were used to obtain product feasibility, and tests were used to measure product effectiveness. Data analysis used percentages, paired t-tests, and one-way ANOVA. The results showed that, the development product meets the feasibility of being an effective learning material to build problem-solving skills. So, it can be said that products for science subjects using the Guided Discovery method are feasible and effective to be used as teaching materials to develop problem-solving skills for junior high school students, especially in the material of Light. The implication of this research shows that the product of science teaching materials based on the Guided Discovery method has the potential to be applied in the junior high school learning environment, especially in the topic of Light.

References

Afifah, I. R. N., & Retnawati, H. (2019). Is it difficult to teach higher order thinking skills? Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1320(1), 4–11. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1320/1/012098.

Alhusban, H. A., & Torki, S. (2021). An Original Computerized and Web-based Method for Assessing Textbook Readability via Lexical Coverage. TESOL International Journal, 16(2), 7–30. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1329400.

Arikunto, S. (2010). Prosedur penelitian : suatu pendekatan praktik. Rineka Cipta. https://opac.perpusnas.go.id/DetailOpac.aspx?id=801361&__cf_chl_tk=25dG9kmcTmJuJXXIfutwMwj.kvwMlIxYVhiZUiChKi8-1730304890-1.0.1.1-Jch33kR9JtYdoRPhEvdso_AFGaeExfDUT9.Iuo6wdIk.

Bajracharya, J. R. (2019). Instructional Design and Models: ASSURE and Kemp. Journal of Education and Research, 9(2), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3126/jer.v9i2.30459.

Budiarto, D., Hidayanto, E., & Negeri, S. (2022). Penerapan Pembelajaran Inkuiri Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik Materi Integral Berbantuan Geogebra. JPE (Jurnal Pendidikan Edutama, 9(2), 267–276. http://dx.doi.org/10.30734/jpe.v9i2.1366.

Cahyaningtyas, D., Wardani, N. S., & Yudarasa, N. S. (2023). Upaya Peningkatan Hasil Belajar dan Sikap Kerjasama Siswa Melalui Penerapan Discovery Learning. Scholaria: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 13(1), 59–67. https://doi.org/10.24246/j.js.2023.v13.i1.p59-67.

Cao, Y., Postareff, L., Lindblom-Ylänne, S., & Toom, A. (2023). A survey research on Finnish teacher educators’ research-teaching integration and its relationship with their approaches to teaching. European Journal of Teacher Education, 46(1), 171–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2021.1900111.

Darling-Hammond, L. (2021). Defining teaching quality around the world. European Journal of Teacher Education, 44(3), 295–308. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2021.1919080.

Degeng, I. N. S., & Degeng, P. D. (2018). Ilmu Pembelajaran: Klasifikasi Variabel untuk Pengembangan Teori dan Penelitian. Yayasan Taman Pustaka Kristen Indonesia. https://opac.perpusnas.go.id/DetailOpac.aspx?id=801361&__cf_chl_tk=25dG9kmcTmJuJXXIfutwMwj.kvwMlIxYVhiZUiChKi8-1730304890-1.0.1.1-Jch33kR9JtYdoRPhEvdso_AFGaeExfDUT9.Iuo6wdIk.

Dilekçi, A., & Karatay, H. (2023). The effects of the 21st century skills curriculum on the development of students’ creative thinking skills. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101229.

Dolmans, D. H. J. M., Loyens, S. M. M., Marcq, H., & Gijbels, D. (2016). Deep and surface learning in problem-based learning: a review of the literature. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 21(5), 1087–1112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-015-9645-6.

Fata, I. A., Komariah, E., & Riski Alya, A. (2022). Assessment of Readability Level of Reading Materials in Indonesia EFL Textbooks. Lingua Cultura, 16(1), 97–104. https://doi.org/10.21512/lc.v16i1.8277

Gottschling, J., Krieger, F., & Greiff, S. (2022). T blem-Solving. Journal of Intelligence, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence10010014.

Harwati, K., & Rokhmat, J. (2021). Development of student worksheet to improve creative and critical thinking ability of students in causalitic-learning model. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1816(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1816/1/012038.

Hermayuni, N. M. T. D., Lasmawan, I. W., & Gunamantha, M. (2022). Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Ditinjau dari Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Melalui Pendekatan Saintifik Berbasis Pembelajaran Treffinger. Jurnal Imiah Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 6(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.23887/jipp.v6i1.44008.

Hillmayr, D., Ziernwald, L., Reinhold, F., Hofer, S. I., & Reiss, K. M. (2020). The potential of digital tools to enhance mathematics and science learning in secondary schools: A context-specific meta-analysis. Computers and Education, 153(April), 103897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103897.

Huang, P. S., Peng, S. L., Chen, H. C., Tseng, L. C., & Hsu, L. C. (2017). The relative influences of domain knowledge and domain-general divergent thinking on scientific creativity and mathematical creativity. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 25, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.06.001.

Jauhariyah, M. N. R., Sunarti, T., Wasis, Supardiyono, Setyarsih, W., & Zainuddin, A. (2021). Analysis of physics questions based on HOTS criteria: The result of physics teacher training. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1805(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1805/1/012023.

Kurnianto, B., & Sarwono, R. (2023). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Berbasis TPACK dalam Meningkatkan Aktivitas Belajar dan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Siswa. Scholaria: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 13(3), 210–221. https://doi.org/10.24246/j.js.2023.v13.i3.

PISA. (2023). PISA 2022 Results Factsheets Indonesia. The Language of Science Education, 1, 1–9. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/pisa-2022-results-volume-i-and-ii-country-notes_ed6fbcc5-en/indonesia_c2e1ae0e-en.html.

Pramusinta, Y., Setyosari, P., Widiati, U., & Kuswandi, D. (2019). Exploring metacognitive and critical thinking skills of pre-service elementary school teachers through discovery learning method by integrating various cognitive styles. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 7(4), 999–1017. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.614028.

Purwaningsih, E., Sari, S. P., Sari, A. M., & Suryadi, A. (2020). The effect of stem-pjbl and discovery learning on improving students’ problem-solving skills of the impulse and momentum topic. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 9(4), 465–476. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v9i4.26432.

Rochman, S., & Hartoyo, Z. (2018). Analisis High Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) Taksonomi Menganalisis Permasalahan Fisika. Science and Physics Education Journal (SPEJ), 1(2), 78–88. https://doi.org/10.31539/spej.v1i2.268.

Ryantini, N. M. A., Sudria, I. B. N., & Ristiati, N. P. (2022). Perangkat Pembelajaran IPA SMP Berorientasi Pendekatan Saintifik Pada Topik Pencemaran Lingkungan dan Pemanasan Global. Jurnal Imiah Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 6(2), 249–258. https://doi.org/10.23887/jipp.v6i2.46995.

Suryani, E., & Rini, Z. R. (2023). Pengembangan E-LKPD Berbasis SETS Untuk Meningkatkan Aktivitas Belajar Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Scholaria: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 13(2), 158–167. https://doi.org/10.24246/j.js.2023.v13.i2.p158-167.

Suryanti, Widodo, W., & Budijastuti, W. (2020). Guided discovery problem-posing: An attempt to improve science process skills in elementary school. International Journal of Instruction, 13(3), 75–88. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.1336a.

Thahir, R., Magfirah, N., & Anisa, A. (2021). Hubungan Antara High Order Thinking Skills dan Kemampuan Literasi Sains Mahasiswa Pendidikan Biologi. Biodik, 7(3), 105–113. https://doi.org/10.22437/bio.v7i3.14386.

Wang, Y., Chen, A., Schweighardt, R., Zhang, T., Wells, S., & Ennis, C. (2020). of cognitive engagement in physical education. 25(2), 293–310. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336x17724173.The.

Wati, R., Lesmono, A. D., & Prastowo, S. H. B. (2019). Pengembangan Modul Fisika Interaktif Berbasis Hots (High Order Thinking Skill) Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Literasi Sains Siswa Sma Pada. Jurnal Pembelajaran Fisika, 8(3), 202–207. https://doi.org/10.19184/jpf.v8i3.15225.

Yudha, E. B. S., Prihatin, J., Dwi, P., Putra, A., & Author, C. (2024). Edutama Education Journal. 11(1), 229–236. http://dx.doi.org/10.30734/jpe.v11i1.4044.