Buruknya Layanan dalam Kerangka Otonomi Khusus: Apakah Papua Masih Memiliki Kesempatan untuk Berkembang?

Authors

  • Indra Pratama Putra Salmon Universitas Terbuka https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3517-9074
  • Agung Budi Irawan Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pemerintah Provinsi Jawa Timur
  • Asih Widi Lestari Universitas Tribhuwana Tunggadewi
  • Fierda Nurany Universitas Bhayangkara Surabaya
  • Ihsan Rahmat Universitas Islam Negeri Fatmawati Bengkulu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23887/jish.v11i3.40754

Keywords:

Otonomi Khusus, Provinsi Papua, Layanan Dasar

Abstract

Pembangunan daerah di Provinsi Papua dalam kerangka otonomi khusus belum memiliki capaian signifikan meskipun telah berjalan selama dua puluh tahun. Kajian ini bertujuan merumuskan solusi atas belum otimalnya capaian pembangunan layanan dasar (pendidikan dan kesehatan) di Provinsi Papua dalam kerangka otonomi khusus. Metode yang digunakan berupa metode kualitatif dengan pendekatan naratif melalui studi kepustakaan. Data dan literatur dikumpulkan dari beberapa kajian bereputasi dengan topik kata kunci “otonomi khusus”, “layanan dasar”, dan “Provinsi Papua”. Analisa dilakukan dengan teknik triangulasi data dan literatur hasil penelitian untuk kemudian peneliti menarik sintesis dari setiap garis besar fokus kajian secara sistematis. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa tingginya dana otonomi khusus telah berkorelasi dengan peningkatan capaian pembangunan seperti IPM dan peningkatan lauanan dasar (pendidikan dan kesehatan), namun signifikansinya sangat rendah. Pada Undang-Undang Otonomi Khusus terbaru, Provinsi Papua berkesempatan besar dalam berkontestasi secara nasional mengingat adanya peningkatan alokasi anggaran otonomi khusus guna mengakselerasi pola pembangunan. Sebagai alternative rekomendasi, kajian ini menawarkan alternative solusi berupa perbaikan pemahaman esensi otonomi khusus yang bukan hanya dari perspektif fiscal, perbaikan model mekanisme transfer dan pengawasan, intensifikasi dan optimalisasi koordinasi pemerintah dengan pemerintah daerah dalam kerangka pembangunan pos-pos strategis pembangunan, dan meninjau ulang terkait dasar petunjuk pelaksanaan dan petunjuk teknis sebagai pedoman. Implikasi penelitian ini adalah perlunya perbaikan pada aspek-aspek strategis dalam pengembangan layanan dasar di Papua melalui mekanisme solusi yang direkomendasikan.

References

Alber, E. (2017). South Tyrol’s negotiated Autonomy. Treatises And Documents-Journal of Ethnic Studies, 78, 41-58. https://www.proquest.com/docview/2014097496

Aritenang, A. F. (2019). The Importance of Agglomeration Economies and Technological Level on Local Economic Growth: The Case of Indonesia. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 12(2), 544-563. https://doi.org/10.1080/13547860.2019.1675352

Badan Pusat Statistik. (2020, December). Indeks Pembangunan Manusia (IPM) Provinsi Papua Tahun 2020. Badan Pusat Statistik Provinsi Papua. https://papua.bps.go.id/pressrelease/2020/12/15/495/indeks-pembangunan-manusia-ipm-provinsi-papua-tahun-2020.html

Cahyaningsih, A., & Fitrady, A. (2019). The Impact of Asymmetric Fiscal Decentralization on Education and Health Outcomes: Evidence from Papua Province, Indonesia. Economics and Sociology, 12(2), 48-63. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2019/12-2/3

Chien, S. S., & Zhao, L. T. (2015). State-Mediated Knowledge Transfer and Resource Mobility: A Case Study of China Local Government Entrepreneurship. Issues & Studies, 51(2), 39-78. https://doi.org/10.7033/ISE.201506_51(2).0002

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Efriandi, T., Couwenberg, O., & Holzhacker, R.L. (2019). Decentralization and Public Service Provision: A Case Study of the Education Sector in Jayawijaya District, Papua, Indonesia. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 41(3), 364-389. http://dx.doi.org/10.1355/cs41-3b

Harding, A. (2017). Devolution of Powers in Sarawak: A Dynamic Process of Redesigning Territorial Governance in a Federal System. Asian Journal of Comparative Law, 12(2), 257-279. https://doi.org/10.1017/asjcl.2017.13

Isran, S., Villiers, B., & Arifin, Z. (2019). Asymmetry in a Decentralized, Unitary State: Lessons from the Special Regions of Indonesia. Journal on Ethnopolitics and Minority Issues in Europe, 18(2), 43-71. http://www.ecmi.de/fileadmin/downloads/publications/JEMIE/2019/DeVilliers et al.pdf

Jayani, D. H. (2021, August 19). Dana Otsus Papua Naik 12,6% dalam RAPBN 2022. Katadata. https://databoks.katadata.co.id/datapublish/2021/08/19/dana-otsus-papua-naik-126-dalam-rapbn-2022

Lane, J. E. (2011). Rediscovering the unitary model: State format and transaction costs. French Politics, 9, 87-96. https://doi.org/10.1057/fp.2010.23

Lele, G. (2021). Asymmetric decentralization, accommodation and separatist conflict: lessons from Aceh and Papua, Indonesia. Territory, Politics, Governance (article in press). https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2021.1875036

Lembang, H. (2019). Effect of Government Expenditures and Banking Loan Distribution on the Performance of Human Resource Development in Papua Province. International Journal of Social Science and Business, 3(2), 86-96. http://dx.doi.org/10.23887/ijssb.v3i2.17581

Lewis, B. D. (2016). Local government spending and service delivery in Indonesia: the perverse effects of substantial fiscal resources. Regional Studies, 51(11), 1695-1707. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2016.1216957

Lewis, B. D. (2017). Does local government proliferation improve public service delivery? Evidence from Indonesia. Journal of Urban Affairs, 39(8), 1047-1065. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2017.1323544

Li, L., & Chan, R. C. K. (2017). Contesting China’s Engagement with Neoliberal Urbanism: An Overview of The Evolving Policy and Mismatches in Urban China. Asian Education and Development Studies, 6(1), 44-56. https://doi.org/10.1108/AEDS-03-2016-0021

Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gotzsche, P. C., Loannidis, J. P. A., Clarke, M., Deveraux, P. J., Kleijnen, J., & Moher, D. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. J Clin Epidemiol, 62, 1-34. https://doi.org/110.016/j.clinepi.2009.06.006

Madubun, J., Akib, H. M., & Malago, J. D. (2017). The Prototype Model of Asymmetric Decentralization in Providing Public Services to the Island Areas. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 8(2), 209-218. http://dx.doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2017.v8n2p209

Martinez-Vasquez, J. (2007). Asymmetric Federalism in Rusia: Cure or Poison? In R. M. Bird & R. D. Ebel (Eds.), Fiscal Fragmentation in Decentralized Countries: Subsidiarity, Solidarity and Asymmetry (pp. 227-266). Chaltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.

Pemerintah Provinsi Papua. (2021). Kinerja Pemerintah Papua Terendah Secara Nasional. Pemerintah Provinsi Papua. https://papua.go.id/view-detail-berita-5588/kinerja-pemerintah-papua-terendah-secara-nasional.html

Prabowo, P. A., Supriyono, B., Noor, I., & Muluk, M. K. (2021). Special autonomy policy evaluation to improve community welfare in Papua province Indonesia. International Journal of Excellence in Governement, 2(1), 24-40. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEG-06-2019-0011

Prud’homme, R. (1995). The dangers of decentralization. World Bank Research Observer, 10(2), 201-220. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3986582

Purwanto, E. A., & Pramusinto, A. (2018). Decentralization and functional assignment in Indonesia: the case of health and education services. Policy Studies, 39(6), 589-606. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2018.1530413

Schultz, R., & Cairney, S. (2017). Caring for country and the health of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders Australians. The Medical Journal of Australia, 207(1), 8-10. https://doi.org/10.5694/mja16.00687

Rahmatunnisa, M. (2013). The Rise and the Fall of Indonesia’s Decentralization Policies: from Independence to the Post-Suharto Era. Bandung: AIPI.

Rahmatunnisa, M., Hindersah, R., & Achmad, T. H. (2018). Why Regions with Archipelagic Characteristics in Indonesia Also Need Asymmetric Decentralization?. Jurnal Bina Praja: Journal of Home Affairs Governance, 10(2), 251-261. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.10.2018.251-261

Rohim, N. (2014). Optimalisasi Otonomi Khusus Papua dalam Peningkatan Kesadaran Hukum Masyarakat Guna Meredam Konflik dan Kekerasan. Fiat Justisia Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 8(1), 80-100. https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v8no1.289

Rosenfield, S. S., Marks, G., & Hooghe, L. (2014). A Comparative Measure of Decentralization for Southeast Asia. Journal of East Asian Studies, 14(1), 85-108. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1598240800009590

Simpson, M. (2017). The Social Union after the Coalition: Devolution, Divergence and Convergence. Journal of Social Policy, 46(2), 251-268. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279416000568

Soko, A., & Zorič, J. (2018). Municipal Efficiency and Economies of Scale in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Journal of Local Self-Government, 16(4), 715-734. https://doi.org/10.4335/16.4.715-734

Sudhipongpracha, T. (2017). Do the poor count in fiscal decentralization policy? A comparative analysis of the general grant allocation systems in Indonesia and Thailand. Journal of Asian Public Policy, 10(3), 231-248. https://doi.org/10.1080/17516234.2016.1195946

Sudhipongpracha, T., & Wongpredee, A. (2017). Fiscal Decentralization in Comparative Perspective: Analysis of the Intergovernmental Grant Systems in Indonesia and Thailand. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 19(3), 245-261. https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2016.1138659

Talitha, T., Firman, T., & Hudalah, D. (2019). Welcoming two decades of decentralization in Indonesia: a regional development perspective. Territory, Politics, Governance, 8(5), 690-708. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2019.1601595

Tawil, M., Tawil, Y. P., Rahmarini, G. M., & Salmon, I. P. P. (2021). Public Services, Public Acceptance, and Satisfaction: Macro Evaluation of Government Services in Sigi Regency. Journal of Governance, 6(1), 117-134. http://dx.doi.org/10.31506/jog.v6i1.10831

Tempo. (2020, Maret 10). Bagaimana Masa Depan Papua Setelah Dana dan Status Otonomi Khusus Berakhir. TEMPO. https://www.tempo.co/abc/5376/bagaimana-masa-depan-papua-setelah-dana-dan-status-otonomi-khusus-berakhir

Tomaro, Q. P. V. (2019). The ‘Moros of Mindanao: A Subject of Social Closure. Journal of Governance and Public Policy, 6(2), 75-100. https://doi.org/10.18196/jgpp.v6i2.5954

Utami, S. (2021, May 31). Dana Otsus Papua belum Beri Dampak Kepada Masyarakat. Media Indonesia. https://m.mediaindonesia.com/ekonomi/408435/dana-otsus-papua-belum-beri-dampak-kepada-masyarakat

Villiers, B. (2015). Special regional autonomy in a unitary system-preliminary observations on the case of the Bangsomoro homeland in the Philippines. Law and Politics in Africa, Asia and Latin America, 48(2), 205-226. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26160114

Vulovic, M. (2020). Performing statehood in Northern Kosovo: Discursive struggle over contested space. Cooperation and Conflict, 55(3), 326-346. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010836720906851

Wael, B., & Laurens, S. (2015). Policy Implementation of Special Autonomy Funds: Case Study of Education Funding in The District Manokwari West Papua, Indonesia. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 4(4), 77-81. https://www.ijstr.org/final-print/apr2015/Policy-Implementation-Of-Special-Autonomy-Funds-Case-Study-Of-Education-Funding-In-The-District-Manokwari-West-Papua-Indonesia.pdf

Yogiantoro, M., Komariah, D., & Irawan, I. (2019). Effects Of Education Funding In Increasing Human Development Index. JEJAK: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Kebijakan, 12(2), 482-497. https://doi.org/10.15294/jejak.v12i2.2339

Zongkeng, L., Zhuoran, L., Mykhallov, A., Shi, W., Zhuquan, Y., & Surong, X. (2021). Evaluation and Analysis of Socio-Economic Development Level and Management in Guangxi Province China. Special Issue: Innovation in the Economy and Society of The Digital Age, 39(5), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.25115/eea.v39i5.5089

Published

2022-11-30

Issue

Section

Articles