State Corporatism in Village Development Planning

Authors

  • Gregorius Sahdan Sekolah Tinggi Pembangunan Masyarakat Desa APMD
  • Minardi Minardi Sekolah Tinggi Pembangunan Masyarakat Desa APMD
  • Mohamad Firdaus Sekolah Tinggi Pembangunan Masyarakat Desa APMD
  • Junior Hendri Wijaya Sekolah Tinggi Pembangunan Masyarakat Desa APMD

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23887/jish.v12i2.63514

Keywords:

State Corporatism, Development Planning, Village

Abstract

This study departs from the problem that state corporatism is the biggest challenge in realizing village authority. The study of state corporatism has been considered obsolete along with the collapse of authoritarian regimes and governments. After authoritarianism in Indonesia, especially after the enactment of Law No. 6 of 2014 on Villages, state corporatism is very strong in gripping village authority. The question posed in this study is to what extent is state corporatism threatening village authority? Wes used exploratory qualitative methods with case study techniques in Bogem Village, Klaten Regency, Central Java Province, to answer this question—data wes collected by observation, in-depth interviews, and document collection. Data analysis uses triangulation techniques, and findings use interpretive and contextual analysis techniques. Wes found that the state carries out two strategies in corporatism toward villages, namely, a bifrontal strategy and a segmentary strategy. Through these two strategies, village authority and autonomy are weakened in the face of strengthening the grip of the state or village government through various supra-village programs and policies towards villages.

References

Agus, M. R. (2020). PARTISIPASI MASYARAKAT PADA FORMAT-FORMAT PEMERINTAHAN (Otoritarianisme Birokrasi, Politik Birokrasi, Korporatisme Negara, Politik teknokratis).

Alexiadou, D. (2018). Technocratic government and economic policy. In W. Thompson (Ed.), Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. Oxford University Press. http://politics.oxfordre.com/

Baccaro, L. (2002). The Construction of “Democratic” Corporatism in Italy. Politics & Society, 30(2), 327–357. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329202030002005

Budi, K. E. (2016). Desa Bogem Cikal Bakal Dawet Bayat. SINDOnews Lifestyle. https://lifestyle.sindonews.com/berita/1147103/185/desa-bogem-cikal-bakal-dawet-bayat

Cardoso, J. L., & Mendonça, P. (2012). Corporatism and beyond: An assessment of recent literature. Working Papers ICS, WP1-2012. https://repositorio.ul.pt/handle/10451/6770

Chen, L. (2018). Corporatism Reconsidered: Howard J. Wiarda’s Legacy. Polity, 50(4), 601–611. https://doi.org/10.1086/699630

Damayanti, R., & Syarifuddin, S. (2020). The inclusiveness of community participation in village development planning in Indonesia. Development in Practice, 30(5), 624–634. https://doi.org/10.1080/09614524.2020.1752151

Eko, S. (n.d.). Menantang SDGs Desa. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=umWjinwmkO8

Eko, S. (Director). (2022). Menantang SDGs Desa. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=umWjinwmkO8

Eko, Y. S. (Director). (2022). Membangun Indonesia Dari Desa? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_J7hQdEYh_E

Fukuyama, F. (2013). What is Governance?” Working Paper 313 Center for Global Development.

Gerring, J., & Thacker, S. C. (2008). A centripetal theory of democratic governance. Cambridge University Press.

Grunig, J. E., & Jaatinen, M. (1999). Strategic, symmetrical public relations in government: From pluralism to societal corporatism. Journal of Communication Management, 3(3), 218–234. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb026049

Ho, M.-S. (2015). State Corporatism. In The Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of Race, Ethnicity, and Nationalism (pp. 1–3). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118663202.wberen366

Martin, C. J. (2005). Corporatism from the Firm Perspective: Employers and Social Policy in Denmark and Britain. British Journal of Political Science, 35(1), 127–148. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123405000062

Ombudsman, O. (2019). Ombudsman: Banyak Masalah Terkait Dana Desa. https://ombudsman.go.id:443/artikel/r/artikel--ombudsman--banyak-masalah-terkait-dana-desa

Padhil, A., & Purnomo, H. (2018). Macroergonomic approaches as a solution to local wisdom-based tourist village development planning. MATEC Web of Conferences, 154, 01080. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201815401080

Regini, M. (1997). Still Engaging in Corporatism? Recent Italian Experience in Comparative Perspective. European Journal of Industrial Relations, 3(3), 259–278. https://doi.org/10.1177/095968019733001

Sahdan, G., Firdaus, M., & Minardi, M. (2022). Korporatisme Negara Dalam Perencanaan Pembangunan Desa. APMD.

Soleymanpour, J., & Kiadaliri, S. (2014). Analysis of Social Sciences Textbook in Fourth and Fifth Grade of Elementary Schools Based on Integrated Thinking Skills. Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review (Oman Chapter), 4(5), 13–22.

Syauqi, A. H. (2022). Warga Bogem Klaten Pasang Spanduk Penolakan, Buntut Seleksi Perangkat Desa. detikjateng. https://www.detik.com/jateng/berita/d-6257105/warga-bogem-klaten-pasang-spanduk-penolakan-buntut-seleksi-perangkat-desa

Wiarda, H. J., & Mott, M. M. (2001). Catholic roots and democratic flowers: Political systems in Spain and Portugal. Greenwood Publishing Group.

Downloads

Published

2023-08-31

Issue

Section

Articles