Fraud dalam Pengelolaan Keuangan Desa Adat

Authors

  • I Made Anjol Wiguna Undiksha
  • Anantawikrama Tungga Atmadja Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha
  • Gede Adi Yuniarta Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23887/jiah.v12i3.49490

Keywords:

padruwen desa adat, prajuru, tri hita karana, fraud

Abstract

This study aims to find out the background of why fraud occurs, know the process of fraud, and the implications of fraud in the financial management of indigenous villages. This research is qualitative research using primary data sourced from interviews, observations, and document studies. The results of this study show that fraud in the financial management of jimbaran traditional villages occurs because it is backgrounded by the lack of critical attitude towards traditional village prajuru, as well as the intentions of traditional village prajuru using positions. The existence of fraud is caused by weak village padruwen rules and governance, the influence of ewuh pakewuh culture, rationalization attitudes, and cultural capital factors. The process of fraud in the financial management of the Jimbaran Traditional Village is caused by opportunities and opportunities. The short-term implication that can be caused by fraud from the perpetrator's side is the mental pressure felt by the fraud perpetrators because they have to perform a bendu piduka ceremony in front of the krama. The long-term implication arising from fraud is the level of trust in indigenous villages in later periods. This research can be used as a reference for customary villages when supervising the performance of customary village prajuru, and can be used as a reference by customary village prajuru to prevent fraud in the financial management of customary villages

References

Ardhana, I. K. (2020). Pemetaan Tipologi dan Karakteristik Desa Adat di Bali. Cakra Media Utama.

Atmadja, A. T. (2006). Penyertaan Modal Sosial dalam Struktur Pengendalian Intern LPD (Studi Kasus pada Lima LPD di Kecamatan Buleleng, Kabupaten Buleleng, Bali). Universitas Airlangga.

Atmadja, N. B. (2013). Ajeg Bali: Gerakan, Kultural, dan Globalisasi. KLiS.

Hardiwinoto. (2017). Struktur Pengendalian Internal.

Karyono. (2013). Forensic Fraud. ANDI.

Kuntadi, C. (2015). Sikencur (Sistem Kendali Kecurangan) Menata Birokrasi Bebas Korupsi. PT Alex Media Komputindo.

Kusumohamidjojo, B. (2011). Dialog Kebudayaan Menuju Ko-Eksistensi Damai Antarperadaban Diskursus. 10(1).

Moleong, L. J. (2019). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif (Edisi Revisi). PT. Remaja Rosda Karya.

Mulyadi. (2017). Sistem Akuntansi. Edisi empat. Salemba Empat.

Padet, I. W., & Krishna, I. B. W. (2018). Falsafah Hidup Dalam Konsep Kosmologi Tri Hita Karana. Genta Hredaya, 2(2).

Ratna, F. (2016). Budaya Birokrasi Ewuh Pakewuh Dan Kecurangan Akuntansi Di Pemerintahan: Persepsi Aparat Pengawas Internal Pemerintah (APIP) Inspektorat Kabupaten Sragen. Aktual, 2(1).

Santoso, L., Meyriswati, D., & Alfian, I. N. (2014). Korupsi dan Mentalitas: Kendala Kultural Dalam Pemberantasan Korupsi Di Indonesia. Universitas Airlangga.

Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. In Bandung : Alfabeta.

Wahyuningtias, F. (2016). Analisis Elemen-Elemen Fraud Diamond Sebagai Determinan Finansial Statement Fraud Pada Perusahaan Perbankan Di Indonesia. Program Studi Magister Akuntansi. Universitas Airlangga.

Downloads

Published

2023-01-01

Issue

Section

Articles