PBLRQA Strategy on Metacognitive Skills and Higher-order Thinking of Students in the Genetics Course
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23887/jppp.v8i1.61962Keywords:
PBLRQA Strategy, PBL Strategy, RQA Strategy, Metacognitive Skills, Higher-Order Thinking SkillsAbstract
Low metacognitive abilities and high-level thinking cause students to have difficulty understanding genetics course material. This research aims to analyze the effectiveness of PBLRQA, PBL, and RQA strategies on students' metacognitive and higher-order thinking skills. This research uses a non-equivalent control group pretest-posttest design. Sampling was carried out on 118 students consisting of four classes using saturated sampling techniques. The research instruments used were observation sheets on lecturer and student activities, essay-based metacognitive skills tests, and multiple-choice tests on high-level thinking skills. Lecturer and student activity data were analyzed based on the percentage of indicators categorized as high and very high syntactically. Data on metacognitive skills and higher-order thinking were analyzed using the Normalized Gain and Independent Kruskal Wallis tests. Research findings show that implementing PBLRQA, PBL, and RQA strategies is ineffective in improving students' metacognitive and higher-order thinking skills. To follow up on these findings, further research is needed to explore the involvement of learning styles and social support on students' metacognitive skills and higher-order thinking skills, focusing on implementing PBLRQA and RQA strategies.
References
Albab, U., Budiyono, & Indriati, D. (2020). Metacognition skills and Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) in mathematics. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1613/1/012017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1613/1/012017
Albanese, M. A., & Dast, L. C. (2014). Problem-based learning. In T. Swanwick (Ed.), Understanding Medical Education: Evidence, Theory and Practice (Second, hal. 63–78). London: The Association for the Study of Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118472361.ch5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118472361.ch5
Ali, A. M., & Razali, A. B. (2019). A review of studies on cognitive and metacognitive reading strategies in teaching reading comprehension for ESL/EFL learners. English Language Teaching, 12(6), 94–111. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v12n6p94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v12n6p94
Allen, D. E., Donham, R. S., & Bernhardt, S. A. (2011). Problem-based learning. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 128, 21–29. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.465. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.465
Alsaleh, N. J. (2020). Teaching critical thinking skills: Literature review. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 19(1), 21–39.
Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Pintrich, P. R., Raths, J., & Wittrock, M. C. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Boston: Addison Wesley Longman.
Angraini, E., Zubaidah, S., Susanto, H., & Omar, N. (2022). Enhancing creativity in genetics using three teaching strategies-based TPACK model. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(12), em2196. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12697. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12697
Ansari, B. I., Sulastri, R., & Apriana, E. (2019). The development of mathematics higher order thinking learning using metacognitive strategies in term of model effectiveness. Journal of Modern Education Review, 9(3), 218–229. https://doi.org/10.15341/jmer(2155-7993)/03.09.2019/010.
Bahri, A., & Idris, I. S. (2017). Teaching thinking: Memberdayakan keterampilan metakognitif mahasiswa melalui PBLRQA (integrasi Problem-Based Learning dan Reading, Questioning, & Answering). Jurnal Seminar Nasional Lembaga Penelitian UNM, 59–69.
Bahri, A., Idris, I. S., Nurman, R., & Ristiana, E. (2019). PBLRQA strategy potential in enhancing metacognitive skills of students with different academic achievement. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1317, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1317/1/012199 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1317/1/012199
Bajaj, R., & Sharma, V. (2018). Smart education with artificial intelligence based determination of learning styles. Procedia Computer Science, 132, 834–842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.05.095. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.05.095
Bell, C. C., & Gilan, O. (2020). Principles and mechanisms of non-genetic resistance in cancer. British Journal of Cancer, 122(4), 465–472. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-019-0648-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-019-0648-6
Bringman-Rodenbarger, L., & Hortsch, M. (2020). How students choose E-learning resources: The importance of ease, familiarity, and convenience. FASEB BioAdvances, 2(5), 286–295. https://doi.org/10.1096/fba.2019-00094. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1096/fba.2019-00094
Carr, M., & Jessup, D. L. (1995). Cognitive and metacognitive predictors of mathematics strategy use. Learning and Individual Differences, 7(3), 235–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/1041-6080(95)90012-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/1041-6080(95)90012-8
Cavallo, A. M. L. (1996). Meaningful learning, reasoning ability, and students’ understanding and problem solving of topics in genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(6), 625–656. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199608)33:6<625::AID-TEA3>3.0.CO;2-Q
Concina, E. (2019). The role of metacognitive skills in music learning and performing: Theoretical features and educational implications. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01583. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01583
Corebima, A. D. (2006). Metakognitive skill measurement integrated in achievement test. Third International Conference on Science and Mathematics Education (CoSMEd), 5(1).
Cowan, N. (2020). Short-term memory based on activated long-term memory: A review in response to Norris (2017). Psychol Bull, 145(8), 822–847. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000199.Short-term. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000199
Dahar, W. R. (2011). Teori-teori belajar dan pembelajaran. Bandung: Erlangga.
Darmawati, Prenti, A., & Srifatmini, E. (2011). Peningkatan pembelajaran genetika dan evolusi melalui model pembelajaran Problem Based Learning (PBL) pada mahasiswa Biologi FKIP UNRI. Pilar Sains, 11(1), 29–37.
Darmayanti, V. (2015). Profil penguasaan pembelajaran RQA (Reading, Questioning, and Answering) oleh Guru IPA SMP di Jember. Seminar Nasional Fisika Dan Pembelajarannya 2015, 8.
Desender, K., & Sasanguie, D. (2022). Math anxiety relates positively to metacognitive insight into mathematical decision making. Psychological Research, 86(3), 1001–1013. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-021-01511-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-021-01511-8
Eliaumra. (2019). Pengembangan Asesmen Kinerja Praktikum Pencemaran Lingkungan Berbasis Karakter untuk Mengukur Kemampuan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi dan Konsep Diri Mahasiswa. Disertasi Doktoral, Universitas Tadulako.
Ewens, W. J. (2013). Mathematics, genetics and evolution. Quantitative Biology, 1(1), 9–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40484-013-0003-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40484-013-0003-5
Fitriani, H., Asy’ari, M., Zubaidah, S., & Mahanal, S. (2019). Exploring the prospective teachers’ critical thinking and critical analysis skills. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 8(3), 379–390. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v8i3.19434. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v8i3.19434
Forsberg, A., Blume, C. L., & Cowan, N. (2021). The development of metacognitive accuracy in working memory across childhood. Developmental Psychology, 57(8), 1297–1317. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0001213. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0001213
Gabriel, F., Buckley, S., & Barthakur, A. (2020). The impact of mathematics anxiety on self-regulated learning and mathematical literacy. Australian Journal of Education, 64(3), 227–242. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004944120947881. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0004944120947881
Gajić, M. M., Miljanović, T. B., Babić-Kekez, S. S., Županec, V. D., & Jovanović, T. T. (2021). Correlations between teaching strategies in biology, learning styles, and student school achievement: Implications for inquiry based teaching. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 20(2), 184–203. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/21.20.184. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/21.20.184
Hadwin, A., Järvelä, S., & Miller, M. (2018). Shared regulation in collaborative learning environments. In Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (hal. 83–106). New York, NY: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315697048.ch6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315697048-6
Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64–74. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18809. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18809
Hamzah, H., Hamzah, M. I., & Zulkifli, H. (2022). Systematic literature review on the elements of metacognition-based Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) teaching and learning modules. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14020813. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14020813
Hariyadi, S. (2015). Evaluasi akademik mahasiswa Biologi terhadap perkuliahan Genetika di Universitas Jember. Jurnal Bioedukasi, 3(2), 2301–4678. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33387/bioedu.v3i2.102
Haryani, S., Masfufah, Wijayati, N., & Kurniawan, C. (2018). Improvement of metacognitive skills and students’ reasoning ability through problem-based learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 983, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/983/1/012174. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/983/1/012174
Henry, R. J. (2020). Innovations in plant genetics adapting agriculture to climate change. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 56, 168–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2019.11.004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2019.11.004
Herlanti, Y., Zulfiani, Hutagalung, F. D., & Sigit, D. V. (2019). Metacognitive attitude and knowledge of biology teacher candidates. Advanced Science Letters, 25(1), 138–142. https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2019.13204. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2019.13204
Iqbal, M., & Hariyadi, S. (2015). Pengaruh implementasi strategi RQA (Reading, Questioning, Answering) pada mata kuliah Pengantar Teknologi Informasi dalam meningkatkan hasil belajar mahasiswa. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Sains, 1421–1423.
Jacobs, J. E., & Paris, S. G. (1987). Children’s metacognition about reading: Issues in definition, measurement, and instruction. Educational Psychologist, 22(3–4), 255–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.1987.9653052. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.1987.9653052
Jager, T. De. (2019). Impact of eportfolios on science student-teachers’ reflective metacognitive learning and the development of higher-order thinking skills. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 16(3), 2–15. https://doi.org/10.53761/1.16.3.3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53761/1.16.3.3
Jones, J. S., Milton, F., Mostazir, M., & Adlam, A. R. (2020). The academic outcomes of working memory and metacognitive strategy training in children: A double-blind randomized controlled trial. Developmental Science, 23(4), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12870. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12870
Karau, S. J., & Wilhau, A. J. (2020). Social loafing and motivation gains in groups: An integrative review. Individual Motivation within Groups: Social Loafing and Motivation Gains in Work, Academic, and Sports Teams, 3–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-849867-5.00001-X. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-849867-5.00001-X
Katoch, S., Chauhan, S. S., & Kumar, V. (2021). A review on genetic algorithm: Past, present, and future. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 80(5), 8091–8126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-020-10139-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-020-10139-6
Kazemian, M., Irawan, L. A., & Haerazi, H. (2021). Developing Metacognitive Writing Strategy to Enhance Writing Skills Viewed from Prospective Teachersâ€TM Critical Thinking Skills. Journal of Language and Literature Studies, 1(1), 15–28. https://doi.org/10.36312/jolls.v1i1.499. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36312/jolls.v1i1.499
Kiliç, D., & Saǧlam, N. (2014). Students understanding of genetics concepts: The effect of reasoning ability and learning approaches. Journal of Biological Education, 48(2), 63–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2013.837402. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2013.837402
Kirschner, P. A., & Sweller, J. (2018). From cognitive load theory to collaborative cognitive load theory. Intern. J. Comput.-Support. Collab. Learn, 13, 213–233. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-018-9277-y
Knippels, M.-C. P. J. (2002). Coping with the abstract and complex nature of genetics in biology education. Utrecht: CD-β Press.
Knippels, M. C. P. J., Waarlo, A. J., & Boersma, K. T. (2005). Design criteria for learning and teaching genetics. Journal of Biological Education, 39(3), 108–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2005.9655976. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2005.9655976
Komori, M. (2016). Effects of working memory capacity on metacognitive monitoring: A study of group differences using a listening span test. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00285. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00285
Kustiana, Suratno, & Wahyuni, D. (2020). The analysis of metacognitive skills and creative thinking skills in STEM education at senior high school for biotechnology. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1465, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1465/1/012045. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1465/1/012045
Leasa, M., Abednego, A., & Batlolona, J. R. (2023). Problem-Based Learning (PBL) with Reading Questioning and Answering (RQA) of preservice elementary school teachers. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 22(6), 245–261. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.22.6.14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.22.6.14
Liunokas, Y. (2020). Assessing students’ ability in writing argumentative essay at SMAN 1 Soe Kab. Timur Tengah Selatan NTT. IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature, 8(1), 184–196. https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v8i1.1344. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v8i1.1344
Lv, A. zhi, Zhang, H., Zhang, Z. xin, Tao, Y. sheng, Yue, B., & Zheng, Y. lian. (2012). Conversion of the statistical combining ability into a genetic concept. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 11(1), 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1671-2927(12)60781-0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1671-2927(12)60781-0
Lyons, A. C., Kass-Hanna, J., Zucchetti, A., & Cobo, C. (2019). Leaving no one behind: Measuring the multidimensionality of digital literacy in the age of AI and other transformative technologies. the Future of Work and Education for the Digital Age, 1–17.
Morrison, A. B., & Richmond, L. L. (2020). Offloading items from memory: Individual differences in cognitive offloading in a short-term memory task. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 5(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-019-0201-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-019-0201-4
Murray-Nseula, M. (2011). Incorporating case studies into an undergraduate genetics course. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 11(3), 75–85.
Najmi, N., Rofiq, M. H., & Ma`arif, M. A. (2021). The effect of cooperative learning model type of Teams Games Tournament (TGT) on student’s learning achievement. At-Tarbiyat: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 4(2), 246–258.
Nasrudin, H., & Azizah, U. (2019). Reading, Questioning, and Answering (RQA) strategies’: An alternative to empowering undergraduate student thinking abilities. Proceedings of the National Seminar on Chemistry 2019 (SNK-19), 1, 135–139. https://doi.org/10.2991/snk-19.2019.32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/snk-19.2019.32
Norman, E. (2020). Why metacognition is not always helpful. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01537. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01537
Nurman, R., Hala, Y., & Arsad, B. (2018). Profil keterampilan metakognitif dan sikap ilmiah mahasiswa jurusan biologi FMIPA UNM. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Biologi dan Pembelajarannya, 371–376.
Ozturk, N. (2017). Assessing metacognition: Theory and practices. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 4(2), 134–134. https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.298299. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.298299
Pereira, R., Oliveira, J., & Sousa, M. (2020). Bioinformatics and computational tools for next-generation sequencing analysis in clinical genetics. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9010132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9010132
Rahayu, W. P., Hasanah, U., & Wiliandri, R. (2020). Developing a higher order thinking skill-oriented and metacognitive-based assessment for vocational school students. Jurnal Pendidikan Bisnis dan Manajemen, 6(1), 10–23. https://doi.org/10.17977/um003v6i12020p010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17977/um003v6i12020p010
Rahayu, Y., Erlin, E., & Sopyan, T. (2021). Hubungan antara self efficacy dengan hasil belajar kognitif siswa pada materi fungi (di SMAN 1 Cihaurbeuti). J-KIP (Jurnal Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan), 2(3), 259–264. https://doi.org/10.25157/j-kip.v2i3.6103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25157/j-kip.v2i3.6103
Rahman, M. M. (2019). 21st century skill “Problem Solving”: Defining the concept. Asian Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, 2(1), 71–81.
Rahman, S. R., Herna, H., Pujiastuti, I. P., & Fausan, M. M. (2020). RQA learning strategy in the biology classroom and its effect on students’ metacognitive awareness. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2215, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0000578. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0000578
Redifer, J. L., Bae, C. L., & Zhao, Q. (2021). Self-efficacy and performance feedback: Impacts on cognitive load during creative thinking. Learning and Instruction, 71, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2020.101395. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2020.101395
Říčan, J., & Chytrý, V. (2020). The level of metacognitive monitoring with learners at higher elementary grade in processing informational texts in the subject of science depending on the type of educational curriculum. EduPort, 4(1), 11–24. https://doi.org/10.21062/edp.2020.006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21062/edp.2020.006
Riduwan. (2009). Belajar mudah penelitian guru, karyawan dan peneliti pemula. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Rozi, A., Khoiri, A., Dewi Mutia Farida, R., Sunarsi, D., Jasmani, Paeno, Munawaroh, & Iswadi, U. (2021). The fullness of Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTs) in applied science textbooks of vocational schools. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1764, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1764/1/012143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1764/1/012143
Rui, L. (2022). Examining foreign language listening anxiety and its correlates: A meta-analysis. Porta Linguarum, 2022(38), 99–117. https://doi.org/10.30827/portalin.vi38.22173. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30827/portalin.vi38.22173
Rustaman, N. Y. (2011). Pendidikan dan penelitian sains dalam mengembangkan keterampilan berpikir tingkat tinggi untuk pembangunan karakter. Prosiding Seminar Nasional VIII Pendidikan Biologi, 8(1), 15–34.
Sadler, D. R. (2009). Indeterminacy in the use of preset criteria for assessment and grading. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 34(2), 159–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930801956059. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930801956059
Sadler, D. R. (2014). The futility of attempting to codify academic achievement standards. Higher Education, 67(3), 273–288. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-013-9649-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-013-9649-1
Saleh, M. (2013). Strategi pembelajaran fiqh dengan problem-based learning. Jurnal Ilmiah Didaktika, 14(1), 190–220. https://doi.org/10.22373/jid.v14i1.497. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22373/jid.v14i1.497
Samosir, R. N., Siagian, P., & Banjarnahor, H. (2019). Differences in the ability to understand mathematical concepts of students taught by using guided discovery learning and contextual teaching and learning models assisted by autograph software viewed from student learning styles. American Journal of Educational Research, 7(11), 830–836. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-7-11-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12691/education-7-11-12
Schraw, G. (2000). Assessing metacognition: Implications of the buros symposium. In G. Schraw & J. C. Impara (Ed.), Issues in the measurement of metacognition (hal. 297–321). Lincoln, Nebraska: Buros Institute of Mental Measurements.
Shakirova, D. M. (2007). Technology for the shaping of college students’ and upper-grade students’ critical thinking. Russian Education and Society, 49(9), 42–52. https://doi.org/10.2753/RES1060-9393490905. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2753/RES1060-9393490905
Shamsuddin, N., & Kaur, J. (2020). Students’ learning style and its effect on blended learning, does it matter? International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 9(1), 195–202. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v9i1.20422. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v9i1.20422
Siegel, A. L. M., & Castel, A. D. (2019). Age-related differences in metacognition for memory capacity and selectivity. Memory, 27(9), 1236–1249. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080%2F09658211.2019.1645859. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2019.1645859
Simatupang, N. I., Sitohang, S. R. I., Azzahra, S. F., & Sormin, E. (2021). Analysis of High Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) of high school students learned using the Problem Based Learning (PBL). Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference of Education and Science (ICES) 2021, 383–388. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.17-11-2021.2318676. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.17-11-2021.2318676
Skagerlund, K., Östergren, R., Västfjäll, D., & Träff, U. (2019). How does mathematics anxiety impair mathematical abilities? Investigating the link between math anxiety, working memory, and number processing. PLoS ONE, 14(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211283. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211283
Speth, E. B., Shaw, N., Momsen, J., Reinagel, A., Le, P., Taqieddin, R., & Long, T. (2014). Introductory biology students’ conceptual models and explanations of the origin of variation. CBE Life Sciences Education, 13(3), 529–539. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.14-02-0020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.14-02-0020
Sumampouw, H. M. (2011). Keterampilan metakognitif dan berpikir tingkat tinggi dalam pembelajaran genetika (artikulasi konsep dan verifikasi empiris). Bioedukasi, 4(2), 23–39.
Supena, I., Darmuki, A., & Hariyadi, A. (2021). The influence of 4C (Constructive, Critical, Creativity, Collaborative) learning model on students’ learning outcomes. International Journal of Instruction, 14(3), 873–892. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14351a
Suryanti, E., Fitriani, A., Redjeki, S., & Riandi, R. (2019). Identifikasi kesulitan mahasiswa dalam pembelajaran biologi molekuler berstrategi modified free inquiry. Perspektif Pendidikan dan Keguruan, 10(2), 37–47. https://doi.org/10.25299/perspektif.2019.vol10(2).3990. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25299/perspektif.2019.vol10(2).3990
Syaputra, D. A., Mulyono, M., & Hasratuddin, H. (2022). Analisis kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis siswa dalam pembelajaran berbasis lesson study for learning community berdasarkan gaya belajar kolb. Jurnal Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 6(1), 721–734. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v6i1.1225. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v6i1.1225
Torrance, H. (2007). Assessment as learning? How the use of explicit learning objectives, assessment criteria and feedback in post-secondary education and training can come to dominate learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 14(3), 281–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/09695940701591867. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09695940701591867
Veenman, M. V. J., & Cleef, D. Van. (2019). Measuring metacognitive skills for mathematics: students’ self-reports versus on-line assessment methods. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 51(4), 691–701. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-018-1006-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-018-1006-5
Veenman, M. V. J., Hout-Wolters, B. H. A. M. Van, & Afflerbac, P. (2006). Metacognition and learning: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Metacognition Learning, 1, 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-006-6893-0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-006-6893-0
Xu, K. M., Koorn, P., de Koning, B., Skuballa, I. T., Lin, L., Henderikx, M., Marsh, H. W., Sweller, J., & Paas, F. (2021). A growth mindset lowers perceived cognitive load and improves learning: Integrating motivation to cognitive load. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(6), 1177–1191. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000631
Zepeda, C. D., Hlutkowsky, C. O., Partika, A. C., & Nokes-Malach, T. J. (2019). Identifying teachers’ supports of metacognition through classroom talk and its relation to growth in conceptual learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(3), 522–541. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000300. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000300
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Isharyadi Hasan, I Made Budiarsa, Astija, Mursito S Bialangi, Mohammad Jamhari
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with the Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pendidikan agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Access)
