Co-Construction Online Learning Models in Early Childhood Education Management Courses
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23887/paud.v11i3.63904Keywords:
Co-Construction, Online, EffectivenessAbstract
The challenge of online learning in higher education is that there is often a lack of focus on students taking part in lectures, which causes a loss of learning. This study aims to analyze the feasibility and effectiveness of the co-construction online learning model in early childhood education management courses. The research method uses a research and development approach with the ADDIE model. Data collection was carried out by interviews, questionnaires, and observations on 88 students taking early childhood education management courses. Product feasibility testing was carried out from questionnaire data analysis on 10 statement items using a four-rating scale, while observations and interviews were used to analyze the effectiveness of implementing the co-construction online learning model. Data analysis used qualitative descriptive and quantitative techniques to analyze the feasibility and effectiveness of implementing the co-construction online learning model. The results of the study in the electronic feasibility test for teaching materials achieved a score of 71.4%, which means it is feasible and does not need revision. While the effectiveness test was carried out twice with different timeframes, in the first data collection there were 73% of active students, then it increased in the second data collection with 88% of active students. This increase is to Skinner's theory of operant conditioning learning, where individual behavior is influenced by the repetition of actions received.
References
Ahn, R., & Class, M. (2011). Student-Centered Pedagogy: Co-Construction of Knowledge through Student-Generated Midterm Exams. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 23(2), 269–281. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ946152.
Alkhudiry, R. (2022). The Contribution of Vygotsky’s Sociocultural Theory in Mediating L2 Knowledge Co-Construction. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 12(10), 2117–2123. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1210.19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1210.19
Altun, D. (2019). Investigating Pre-Service Early Childhood Education Teachers’ Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) Competencies Regarding Digital Literacy Skills and Their Technology Attitudes and Usage. Journal of Education and Learning, 8(1), 249–263. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1203450. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v8n1p249
Arikunto, S. (2010). Metode peneltian. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 173.
Beal, C., & Hontvedt, M. (2023). Video-based mind maps in higher education: A design-based research study of pre-service teachers’ co-construction of shared knowledge. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 41, 100720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2023.100720. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2023.100720
Bleiler-Baxter, S. K., Kirby, J. E., & Reed, S. D. (2023). Understanding authority in small-group co-constructions of mathematical proof. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2022.101015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2022.101015
Branch, R. M. (2010). Instructional design: The ADDIE approach. In Instructional Design: The ADDIE Approach. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09506-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09506-6
Chai, C. S., & Kong, S.-C. (2017). Professional learning for 21st century education. Journal of Computers in Education, 4(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-016-0069-y. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-016-0069-y
Cubukcu, C., Murat, K. C., & Yigit, O. (2020). “Mobile Game Development for Children with Down Syndrome.” International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 14(20), 174–83,. https://doi.org/10.3991/IJIM.V14I20.16573. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v14i20.16573
Donnelly, R., & Patrinos, H. A. (2021). Learning loss during Covid-19: An early systematic review. Prospects, 0123456789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-021-09582-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-518655/v1
Dyson, B., Howley, D., & Shen, Y. (2021). ‘Being a team, working together, and being kind’: Primary students’ perspectives of cooperative learning’s contribution to their social and emotional learning. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 26(2), 137–154. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2020.1779683. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2020.1779683
Ferri, F., Grifoni, P., & Guzzo, T. (2020). Online learning and emergency remote teaching: Opportunities and challenges in emergency situations. Societies, 10(4), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc10040086. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/soc10040086
Fonda, A., & Sumargiyani, S. (2018). The Developing Math Electronic Module With Scientific Approach Using Kvisoft Flipbook Maker Pro for Xi Grade of Senior High School Students. Infinity Journal, 7(2), 109. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v7i2.p109-122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v7i2.p109-122
Gillett-Swan, J. (2017). The challenges of online learning: Supporting and engaging the isolated learner. Journal of Learning Design, 10(1), 20–30. https://eprints.qut.edu.au/102750/. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5204/jld.v9i3.293
Greenhow, C., Graham, C. R., & Koehler, M. J. (2022). Foundations of online learning: Challenges and opportunities. Educational Psychologist, 57(3), 131–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2022.2090364. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2022.2090364
Gregory, M. S.-J., & Lodge, J. M. (2015). Academic workload: the silent barrier to the implementation of technology-enhanced learning strategies in higher education. Distance Education, 36(2), 210–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2015.1055056. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2015.1055056
Han, M., Yang, G., Zheng, X., & Li, Q. (2022). Research on the Influence of Co-construction Concept Map on Students’ Classroom Learning Effect in AR Environment. In Lecture Notes in Educational Technology (pp. 141–150). Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-5967-7_16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-5967-7_16
Hara, N., & Sanfilippo, M. R. (2016). Co-constructing controversy: Content analysis of collaborative knowledge negotiation in online communities. Information, Communication & Society, 19(11), 1587–1604. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1142595. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1142595
Hattinger, M., & Eriksson, K. (2018). Co-construction of Knowledge in Work-Integrated E-learning Courses in Joint Industry-University Collaboration. Int. J. Adv. Corp. Learn., 11(1), 10–16. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Fernando-Salvetti/publication/327297056. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3991/ijac.v11i1.9152
Hau, N. H., Cuong, T. V., & Tinh, T. T. (2020). Students and Teachers’ Perspective Of The Importance Of Arts In STEAM Education In Vietnam. Journal of Critical Reviews, 7(11), 666–671. https://doi.org/10.31838/jcr.07.11.121.
Holden, M. (2023). Exploring online lesson study as a vehicle for teacher collaborative professional learning. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 12(2), 179–193. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLLS-01-2022-0012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLLS-01-2022-0012
Hyun, C. C., Tukiran, M., Wijayanti, L. M., Asbari, M., Purwanto, A., & Santoso, P. B. (2020). Piaget Versus Vygotsky: Implikasi Pendidikan Antara Persamaan dan Perbedaan. Journal of Industrial Engineering & Management Research (JIEMAR, 1(2), 286–293. https://doi.org/10.7777/jiemar.v1i2.
Iqbal, M. H., Siddiqie, S. A., & Mazid, M. A. (2021). Rethinking theories of lesson plan for effective teaching and learning. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 4(1), 100172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2021.100172. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2021.100172
Jawas, U. (2019). Writing anxiety among Indonesian EFL students: Factors and strategies. International Journal of Instruction, 12(4), 733–746. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12447a. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12447a
Jun-Young, O. H., Maeng, H.-J., & SON, Y.-A. (2020). Using Teaching Strategies of Model-Based Co-construction of Pre-service Elementary Teachers about Seasonal Change. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 17(2), 253–270. http://www.tused.org/index.php/tused/article/view/975. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2020.25
Karabon, A. (2019). The use of mathematics in early childhood classroom transitions to foster co-construction of knowledge, negotiation, and cultural mediation. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 22, 100320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2019.100320. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2019.100320
Kilgour, P., Northcote, M., Williams, A., & Kilgour, A. (2020). A plan for the co-construction and collaborative use of rubrics for student learning. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(1), 140–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1614523. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1614523
Leeder, T. M. (2022). Behaviorism, skinner, and operant conditioning: considerations for sport coaching practice. Strategies, 35(3), 27–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/08924562.2022.2052776. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08924562.2022.2052776
Lister, K., Seale, J., & Douce, C. (2021). Mental health in distance learning: A taxonomy of barriers and enablers to student mental wellbeing. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2021.1899907. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2021.1899907
Littleton, K., & Whitelock, D. (2005). The negotiation and co‐construction of meaning and understanding within a postgraduate online learning community. Learning, Media and Technology, 30(2), 147–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439880500093612. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17439880500093612
Mehan, H., Hubbard, L., & Datnow, A. (2010). A co-construction perspective on organizational change and educational reform. Teachers College Record, 112(13), 98–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811011201307. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811011201307
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis : a methods sourcebook (Third Edition). In SAGE Publications. SAGE Publications.
Milkova, S. (2012). Strategies for effective lesson planning. Center for Research on Learning and Teaching, 1(1), 1–29. https://venktesh22.github.io/Strategies_for_Effective_Lesson_Planning.pdf.
Nungu, L., Mukama, E., & Nsabayezu, E. (2023). Online collaborative learning and cognitive presence in mathematics and science education. Case study of university of Rwanda, college of education. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11607-w. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11607-w
Obonyo, C. N. (2022). Collaborative learning with mobile technologies in teacher education. In Handbook of Research on Facilitating Collaborative Learning Through Digital Content and Learning Technologies (pp. 62–83). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-5709-2.ch004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-5709-2.ch004
Palmer, K., Yu, G. S., & Aprill, A. (2023). Co-Constructing Sustainable Collaborations in Early Childhood Settings Through the Arts. International Journal of Education and the Arts, 24(6), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.26209/ijea24n6.
Probst, G., & Zizka, L. (2022). Bridging the gap: from instruction to co-construction in higher education. In The Future of Business Schools (pp. 212–227). Edward Elgar Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800889224.00025
Richey, R. C., & Klein, J. D. (2014). Design and development research. In Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 141–150). Springer. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_12
Ryve, A., Larsson, M., & Nilsson, P. (2013). Analyzing Content and Participation in Classroom Discourse: Dimensions of Variation, Mediating Tools, and Conceptual Accountability. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 57(1), 101–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2011.628689. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2011.628689
Skinner, B. F. (2019). The behavior of organisms: An experimental analysis. BF Skinner Foundation.
Tarchi, C., & Pinto, G. (2016). Reciprocal teaching: Analyzing interactive dynamics in the co-construction of a text’s meaning. The Journal of Educational Research, 109(5), 518–530. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2014.992583. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2014.992583
Todd, A., & Romine, W. (2018). The learning loss effect in genetics: What ideas do students retain or lose after instruction? CBE—Life Sciences Education, 17(4), ar55. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-10-0310. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-10-0310
Toheri, W., W., & Haqq, A. A. (2019). Three parts of 21 century skills: Creative, Critical, and Communication Mathematics through Academic-constructive Controversy. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 7(11), 2314–2329. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2019.071109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2019.071109
Topçiu, M., & Myftiu, J. (2015). Vygotsky theory on social interaction and its influence on the development of pre-school children. European Journal of Social Science Education and Research, 2(3), 172–179. https://doi.org/10.26417/ejser.v4i1.p172-179. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26417/ejser.v4i1.p172-179
Widyastuti, E. (2019). Using the ADDIE model to develop learning material for actuarial mathematics. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1188(1), 012052. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1188/1/012052. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1188/1/012052
Zhao, B. (2022). An Online Learning and Co-construction Platform for Fragmented Knowledge Based on Computer Technology. 2022 International Conference on Education, Network and Information Technology, ICENIT 2022, 83–86. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICENIT57306.2022.00025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICENIT57306.2022.00025
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Syunu Trihantoyo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with the Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini Undiksha agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Access)
