PENGEMBANGAN BUKU AJAR BIOLOGI SMA KELAS XI SEMESTER II BERBASIS ARGUMEN TOULMIN PADA TOPIK SISTEM TUBUH MANUSIA DAN HEWAN

Authors

  • Ayu Sri Purwaningsih

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23887/wms.v13i2.15943

Keywords:

high school biology textbook, Toulmin argument

Abstract

This study aims to develop products in the form of high school biology textbooks for class XI in the second semester based on Toulmin argument. Textbooks developed were reviewed based on the characteristic of Toulmin on textbooks, testing the content and construct validity by lecturers, teachers and the readability test by students. The type of this research is research and development (R and D) from Borg and Gall. Development research procedures include needs analysis, product planning, product development, product validation and legibility tests. The technical analysis of the development data includes describing the characteristic of textbooks seen from the Toulmin’s component in the form of claims, ground, warrant, backing, qualifier and rebbutal in the form of argument maps, validity tests by experts meet valid criteria seen from the aspects of validation assessment and legibility test meet the categories good seen from student’s reading responses. The result of the development research conducted, stated that the characteristic of Toulmin argument map in the form of C-G-W-B-Q-R, C-G-W-B or C-G-W. Validity results have very valid criteria in terms of content and construct validity by experts with an average score of 3.64. the readability test results of students in understanding the teaching material on the topic of human and animal body systems are stated in good category including 68% answering well and 32% answering very well. Based on the test results, it can be concluded that the development of high school biology textbooks in class XI in the second semester was based on Toulmin arguments on the topic of human and animal body systems that have fulfilled the quality of books which are seen based on characteristics, content validity and legibility test.

References

Agnah, S. M. 2017. “Penerapan Metode Peta Argumen Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Peserta Didik SMA”, Jurnal Biologi dan Pembelajaran, Volume 13, Nomor 1, 20-25.

Ambarsari, W. 2013. “Buku Ajar Biologi yang Dikembangkan Ditinjau dari Penilaian Para Ahli Materi, Ahli Media maupun Praktisi Pendidikan”. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Volume 2, Nomor 1, 5-8.

Arlitasari, Pujayanto dan Budiharti. 2013. “Pengembangan Bahan Ajar IPA Terpadu Berbasis Saling Temas dengan Tema Biomassa Sumber Energi Alternatif Terbaharukan”. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Volume 1, Nomor 1, 4-7.

Azwar. S. 2013. Metode Penelitian. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Borg, W. R. dan Gall, M. D. (1983). Educational Research An introduction. New York: Longman.

Badan Pusat Statistik. 2007. Indeks Pembangunan Manusia. Provinsi Lampung: Lampung

Brodie, K. 2010. Teaching Biology in Secondary School Classrooms. New York: Springer.

Chukwuyenum, A. N. 2013. “Impact of Critical Thinking on Performance in mathekatic among Senior Secondary School Students in Lagos State”. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education (IOSR-JRME). Volume 3, Nomor 5, 18-25.

Depdiknas Tahun 2001 Tentang Manajemen Mutu Berbasis Sekolah. Jakarta:

Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. Direktorat Pendidikan Menengah Umum

Degeng. 2001. Teori Belajar dan Strategi Pembelajaran. Surabaya: Citra Raya.

Dikmenli, M. Osman, C, dan Fulya, O. 2009. “Conceptual Problems in Biology-Related Topics in Primary Science and Technology Textbooks in Turkey”. Journal of Environmental and Science Education Volume 4, Nomor 4, 65-89.

Erduran, S., Simon, dan Osborne. (2004). “Tappping Into Argumentation: Development in The Application of Studying Science Discuorse. Science Education”. Volume 6, Nomor 8, 915-933.

Erduran, S., Osborne, J, dan Simon, S. (2005). “The role of argumentation in developing scientific literacy. In Research and the quality of science education. Springer Netherland”. Journal of Environmental and Science Education Volume 8, Nomor 4, 34-40.

Fadel. 2009. Pengembangan Buku Ajar Biologi SMA Pada Topik Sistem Pencernaan. Malang: FMIPA-UNM.

Hendri dan Defianti. 2015, Pengembangan Alat Praktikum IPA Materi Gelombang dan Indra Pendengaran. Jakarta: Prosinding Simposium Nasional.

Herlianti, Y. (2014). “Analisis Argumentasi Mahasiswa Pendidikan Biologi Pada Isu Sosiosaintifik Konsumsi Genetically Modified Organism”. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia Volume 3, Nomor 1, 4-10.

Irmawati. 2015. Penelitian Relevan Terkait Argumen Toulmin. Bandung: CV. Alfabeta

Gafur, A. 1994. Desain Instruksional Langkah Sistematis Penyusunan Pola Dasar Kegiatan Belajar Mengajar. Solo: Tiga Serangkai.

Gafur, A., Mahrina, dan Hardiansyah. 2004. Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran Interaktif. Bandung: Rosdakarya

Gay, L.R. 1991. Educational Evaluation and Measurement Competencies for Analysis and Application R and D. New York: Macmillan Publishing Compan.

Gunawan, W. 2009. Pengembangan komponen pembelajaran RPP. Diterjemahkan oleh S. Ketaren. Jakarta:UI-Press

Greene dan Petty. 1981. Peranan dan Kegunaan Buku Ajar. New York: Developing Language Skill in the Elementary Schools.

Guntur, T, dan Henry. 1986. Menyimak Sebagai Suatu Keterampilan Berbahasa. Bandung: Angkasa.

Hanifah, N. 2014. Memahami Fungsi Buku Ajar. Bandung: Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia PRESS.

Hashemi. 2010. “Evaluation of higher vs. lower-order cognitive skills-type examination in chemistry”, Implications for university in-class assessment and examination Journal. Volume 7, Nomor 3, 50-57.

Hendri, S. 2015. Pengembangan Alat Praktikum IPA Materi Gelombang dan Indra Pendengaran. Jakarta: Prosinding Simposium Nasional.

Ina, S., dan Ilah Nurlaelah. 2014. “Analisis Profil Kemampuan Berargumentasi Guru dan Mahasiswa Calon Guru dalam Pembelajaran Biologi Menggunakan Model Toulmin’s Argumen Pattern (TAP) dan Upaya Perbaikannya. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia Volume 1, Nomor 1, 7-15.

Indira M., dan Lestiyana. 2007. Pengembangan Buku Ajar Memiliki Tingkat Validasi Lebih Baik dan Mampu Meningkatkan Hasil Kognitif Siswa Melebihi KKM. Surakarta: Citra Raya.

Irmawati. 2015. “Pengembangan Buku Ajar berbasis Argumen Toulmin”. Jurnal Penelitian Biologi Volume 3, Nomor 2, 81-90.

Jingjing, Q. 2013. “The Journal of Language Teaching and Learning “Applying the Toulmin Model in Teaching L2 Argumentative Writing”. Artificial Intelligence, Netherlands Volume 1, Nomor 1, 439-448.

Kardi, S., dan Mohammad Nur. 2000. Pengajaran Langsung dan Pengajaran Tidak Langsung. Surabaya: Universitas Negeri Malang.

Kemendikbud Tahun 2012 Tentang Dokumen Kurikulum. 2013. Jakarta: Kementerian Republik Indonesia

Keraf, G. 2007. Keterampilan Argumentatif. Ende Flores: Nusa Indah.

Downloads

Published

2019-10-29