PENERAPAN PEMBELAJARAN IPA BERBASIS SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, ENGINEERING, ART, MATHEMATICS (STEAM) UNTUK MENINGKATKAN KETERAMPILAN PROSES KREATIF
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23887/jppii.v14i1`.68873Keywords:
Keterampilan Proses Kreatif; Pembelajaran IPA; STEAMAbstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk meningkatkan keterampilan proses kreatif (creative process) peserta didik dengan menggunakan pendekatan Science, Technology, Engineering, Art, Mathematics (STEAM). Penelitian dilakukan di SMP Negeri 16 Surakarta dengan jumlah sampel sebanyak 32 orang. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian tindakan kelas yang dilakukan dalam 2 siklus. Setiap siklus terdiri dari 4 tahap, yaitu 1) perencanaan (planning), 2) pelaksanaan (act), 3) pengamatan (observing), dan 4) refleksi (reflection). Teknik pengumpulan data menggunakan observasi pembelajaran IPA pada materi Zat dan Perubahannya. Terdapat peningkatan persentase rata-rata kreativitas dari pra-siklus sebesar 44,7% (kategori: kurang kreatif), menjadi 56,9% (kategori: cukup kreatif) pada siklus 1, dan meningkat lagi pada siklus 2 menjadi 87,4% (kategori: kreatif). Oleh karena itu, dapat disimpulkan bahwa penggunaan pendekatan STEAM dalam pembelajaran IPA mampu meningkatkan kreativitas peserta didik.
References
Aguilera, D., & Ortiz-Revilla, J. (2021). STEM vs. STEAM Education and Student Creativity: A Systematic Literature Review. Education Sciences, 11(7), 331. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11070331
Altan, E. B., & Tan, S. (2020). Concepts of creativity in design based learning in STEM education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 31(3), 503–529. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-020-09569-y
Bertrand, M. G., & Namukasa, I. K. (2020). STEAM education : student learning and transferable skills. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning, 13(1), 43–56. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIT-01-2020-0003
Henriksen, D., Mehta, R., & Mehta, S. (2019). Design Thinking Gives STEAM to Teaching: A Framework That Breaks Disciplinary Boundaries. STEAM Education, 57–78. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04003-1_4
Huang, X. (2022). Constructing the associations between creative role identity, creative self-efficacy, and teaching for creativity for primary and secondary teachers. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000453
Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R., & Nixon, R. (2014). The Action Research Planner. South Asian Education Policy, Research, and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4560-67-2
Liu, X., Gong, S.-Y., Zhang, H., Yu, Q., & Zhou, Z. (2021). Perceived teacher support and creative self-efficacy: The mediating roles of autonomous motivation and achievement emotions in Chinese junior high school students. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 39, 100752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100752
Madyani, I., Yamtinah, S., Utomo, S. B., Saputro, S., & Mahardiani, L. (2020). Profile of Students’ Creative Thinking Skills in Science Learning. 397(Icliqe 2019), 957–964. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200129.119
Magnisalis, I., Demetriadis, S., & Karakostas, A. (2011). Adaptive and Intelligent Systems for Collaborative Learning Support: A Review of the Field. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 4(1), 5–20. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2011.2
Mardiyah, R.H ; Aldriani, S. ; Chitta, F. ; Zulfikar, M. (2021). Pentingnya Keterampilan Belajar di Abad 21 sebagai Tuntutan dalam Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia. 12(1), 29–40. https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.1991.n.20210906.1730.014.html
Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2008). 21st Century Skills, Education & Competitiveness. A Resource and Policy Guide, 20.
Plucker, J. A., Guo, J., & Dilley, A. (2018). Research-guided programs and strategies for nurturing creativity. APA handbook of giftedness and talent. 387–397. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000038-025
Root-Bernstein, R. (2015). Arts and crafts as adjuncts to STEM education to foster creativity in gifted and talented students. Asia Pacific Education Review, 16(2), 203–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-015-9362-0
Starko, A. J. (2014). Creativity in the Classroom. Sage Journals, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/026142949901400105
Sugiyono. (2008). Metode penelitian pendidikan: (Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R & D). Alfabeta.
Taylor, C. P. (2016). Why is a STEAM Curriculum Perspective Crucial to the 21st Century. Conference: Australian Council for Education Research: 'Improving STEM Learning - What Will It Take?'At: Brisbane Convention Centre, Qld. 89–93. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/307396291_Why_is_a_STEAM_Curriculum_Perspective_Crucial_to_the_21st_Century
Torrance, E. P. (1977). Creativity in the classroom: What research says to the teacher. In The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity.
Wulandari, A. S., Suardana, I. N., & Devi, N. L. P. L. (2019). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Proyek Terhadap Kreativitas Siswa SMP Pada Pembelajaran IPA. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Sains Indonesia, 2(1), 47–58. https://doi.org/10.23887/jppsi.v2i1.17222
Sara, N. (2022). Pengaruh Pembelajaran Daring Terhadap Kreativitas Berpikir Siswa MTS Negeri 2 Pelalawan (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Islam Riau).
