Quality Analysis of Service Load Balancing Using PCC, ECMP, and NTH Methods

Authors

  • Kurnianto Tri Nugroho Akademi Komunitas Negeri Pacitan
  • Bagus Julianto Akademi Komunitas Negeri Pacitan
  • Dhodit Rengga Tisna Akademi Komunitas Negeri Pacitan
  • Danny Febryan Nur M S Akademi Komunitas Negeri Pacitan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23887/janapati.v12i1.55894

Keywords:

Load Balancing, Quality of Service (QoS), Per Connection Classifier, Equal-Cost Multiple Path

Abstract

One of the solutions to get a better quality of internet service is to utilize load balancing technology. We can use more than one different ISP (Internet Service Provider) which is then balanced with load balancing technology, where this technique is used to distribute the traffic load on two or more connection lines in a balanced way so that traffic can run optimally, maximizing throughput, minimizing response time. and avoid overload on any of the connection lines. This study aims to determine the comparison of Quality of Service load balancing with the PCC, ECMP and NTH methods on Mikrotik. The test method uses the web application www.speedtest.cbn.id, www.fast.com (1 connection), the results will show ping, download speed, upload speed, and monitoring from the Mikrotik router side. The research stages used the Network Development Life Cycle method, namely analysis, design, prototype simulation, implementation, monitoring and management. The results of the research are in the form of a performance comparison between load balancing on 2 internet lines using the PCC, ECMP and NTH methods on the proxy router. Based on the tests carried out as a whole the load balance using the ECMP method is superior and more reliable in terms of failover effects.

References

APJII, “Hasil Survei Profil Internet Indonesia 2022,” 2022. https://apjii.or.id/content/read/39/559/Laporan-Survei-Profil-Internet-Indonesia-2022 (accessed Jul. 14, 2022).

Z. Saharuna, R. Nur, and A. Sandi, “Analisis Quality Of Service Jaringan Load Balancing Menggunakan Metode PCC Dan NTH,” CESS (Journal Comput. Eng. Syst. Sci., vol. 5, no. 1, p. 131, 2020, doi: 10.24114/cess.v5i1.14629.

I. A. Pratama, “Analisa Perbandingan Kinerja Load Balance Pfsense Dengan Load Balance Per Connection Classifier Pada Mikrotik Router,” J. Tek. Inform., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 145–152, 2021.

U. A. Ahmad, A. Tarihoran, and Y. Mardiansyah, “Load Balancing Performance Comparison Analysis Ecmp Method With Pcc Method on Routers Microtic,” vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 11925–11938, 2021.

A. Tantoni, M. T. A. Zaen, and L. Mutawalli, “Komparasi QoS Load Balancing Pada 4 Line Internet dengan Metode PCC, ECMP dan NTH,” J. Media Inform. Budidarma, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 110, 2022, doi: 10.30865/mib.v6i1.3436.

R. Pakiding, C. Iswahyudi, and R. Y. Ariyana, “Simulasi Perbandingan Load Balancing Dengan Metode PCC, ECMP, Dan NTH Menggunakan Gns3,” J. Jarkom, vol. 09, no. 01, pp. 30–39, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://journal.akprind.ac.id/index.php/jarkom/article/view/3672

A. Fauzi and D. Y. Utami, “Implementasi Load Balancing Per address connection ECMP Algoritma Round Roubin Mikrotik Router,” J. Informatics Telecommun. Eng., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 463–472, 2022, doi: 10.31289/jite.v5i2.6319.

A. Tantoni et al., “Implementasi Load Balancing dengan Metode NTH Menggunakan Mikrotik di SMKN 2 Kuripan Load Balancing Implementation with NTH Method Using Mikrotik at SMKN 2 Kuripan,” JACIS J. Autom. Comput. Inf. Syst., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 141–152, 2021.

E. Darmawan, I. Purnama, M. I. Rohmat, and I. W. S. Wicaksana, “Bandwidth Manajemen Queue Tree VS Simple Queue,” in Konferensi Nasional Sistem Informasi 2012, 2012, pp. 642–647. [Online]. Available: https://adoc.pub/bandwidth-manajemen-queue-tree-vs-simple-queue.html

ETSI, “Telecommunications and Internet Protocol Harmonization Over Networks (TIPHON),” Valbonne, 1999.

PT. CITRAWEB SOLUSI TEKNOLOGI, “[Load Balance] Load Balance dengan Menggunakan Metode PCC (Simple),” 2020. https://citraweb.com/artikel_lihat.php?id=417 (accessed Mar. 14, 2022).

T. Rendra, Konsep dan Implementasi Routing Dengan Router MikroTik– 200% Connected. Jakarta: Penerbit Jasakom, 2013.

Mikrotik, “Manual:PCC,” 2016. https://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:PCC (accessed Mar. 04, 2022).

PT. CITRAWEB SOLUSI TEKNOLOGI, “[Load Balance] Load Balance Metode ECMP,” 2014. https://citraweb.com/artikel_lihat.php?id=76 (accessed Mar. 04, 2022).

R. Towidjojo, Mikrotik KungFu Kitab 2. Jakarta: Penerbit Jasakom, 2012.

PT. CITRAWEB SOLUSI TEKNOLOGI, “[Load Balance] Load Balance metode NTH,” 2016. https://citraweb.com/artikel_lihat.php?id=195 (accessed Mar. 04, 2022).

J. E. Goldman and P. T. Rawles, Applied Data Communications, A business-Oriented Approach. New York: Wiley, 2001.

K. Octavriana, Tania; Ibadillah, Achmad Fiqhi; Joni, “Optimalisasi Jaringan Internet Dengan Load Balancing Pada High Traffic Network,” J. Tek. Inf., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 28–39, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://journal.uinjkt.ac.id/index.php/ti/article/view/15018/pdf

Downloads

Published

2023-03-31

How to Cite

Nugroho, K. T., Julianto, B., Tisna, D. R., & Nur M S, D. F. (2023). Quality Analysis of Service Load Balancing Using PCC, ECMP, and NTH Methods. Jurnal Nasional Pendidikan Teknik Informatika : JANAPATI, 12(1), 33–41. https://doi.org/10.23887/janapati.v12i1.55894

Issue

Section

Articles