Accuracy Analysis of WP, AHP-WP, Entropy-Topsis Methods in Determining Majors
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23887/janapati.v12i3.57718Keywords:
computerized system, decision, decision support system, recommendationAbstract
Determination of majors at SMK AR Rahma is still manual and Excel is only used to find average scores. On the other hand, the number of students is around 140 students, so the majors can cause inaccuracies. In this study, the accuracy of the WP, AHP-WP, and ENTROPY-TOPSIS methods was analyzed in determining the majors of SMK AR Rahma’s students. So that it will be known which method is more accurate in producing student majors. In the process of student majors, data are needed in the form of report cards, academic test scores, majors test scores and health scores. The result is that the majors produced by the AHP-WP method are more accurate than the majors produced by the other two methods, respectively by 70.71%, 64.29%, and 62.86%.
References
Qomariyah and M. U. Siregar, “Comparative Study of K-Means Clustering Algorithm and K-Medoids Clustering in Student Data Clustering,” JISKA (Jurnal Inform. Sunan Kalijaga), vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 91–99, May 2022, doi: 10.14421/jiska.2022.7.2.91-99.
Desiana Nurul Maftuhah, Lia Ellyanti, Dana Indra Sensuse, Damayanti Elisabeth, Nadya Safitri, and Sofian Lusa, “Knowledge Management System Evaluation Using DeLone McLean Model: A Case Study of IT Service Desk Bank XYZ,” J. Nas. Pendidik. Tek. Inform., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 223–233, 2023, doi: 10.23887/janapati.v12i2.59609.
E. Ardiyanto, “Perbandingan Metode AHP-TOPSIS dan AHP-WP untuk Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Kelayakan Pengajuan Pinjaman Dana PMW di UNSEC,” Unnes, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 96–107, 2017.
G. S. Mahendra and P. G. S. C. Nugraha, “Komparasi Metode AHP-SAW dan AHP-WP Pada SPK Penentuan E-Commerce Terbaik di Indonesia,” J. Sist. dan Teknol. Inf., vol. 8, no. 4, p. 346, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.26418/justin.v8i4.42611.
E. B. Setiawan, F. B. Herlambang, and A. Setiyadi, “Culinary Business Recommendation Application Using Promethee-II Method,” IJID (International J. Informatics Dev., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 182–191, 2022, doi: 10.14421/ijid.2022.3562.
A. I. Lubis, U. Erdiansyah, and F. Setiawan, “Kombinasi Metode AHP dan Weighted Product Dalam Penentuan Evaluasi Kinerja Asisten Pengajar,” vol. 1, no. 2, 2021, doi: 10.47709/briliance.v1i2.
M. U. Siregar, T. Nasiroh, and M. Mustakim, “Suatu Pendekatan Hibrid Menggunakan Topsis - Entropi pada Penentuan Siswa Penerima Beasiswa Prestasi Berbasiskan Kriteria Objektif,” J. Teknol. Inf. dan Ilmu Komput., vol. 8, no. 1, p. 167, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.25126/jtiik.0814261.
D. G. Williamson, “Document 3,” in The Third Reich, 2019, pp. 159–161. doi: 10.4324/9781315121154-16.
M. Zainuri, M. H. Fahmi, and R. A. Hamdhana, “Komparasi Metode Klasifikasi Algoritma C5.0 dan Naïve Bayes untuk Menentukan Jurusan Siswa,” J. Sist. Inf. dan Inform., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2022, doi: 10.33379/jusifor.v1i1.1277.
A. Setiawan and A. Artanti, “InfoTekJar : Jurnal Nasional Informatika dan Teknologi Jaringan Komparasi Metode Elimination Et Choix Traduisant La Realite ( Electre ) dan K-NN Similarity dalam Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Konsentrasi Jurusan Siswa SMK,” vol. 2, 2021.
M. E. Iswanto, M. U. Siregar, S. ’Uyun, and M. T. Nuruzzaman, “Recommender systems for specializing new students in the K-13 curriculum using the profile matching, SAW, and a combination of both,” J. Teknol. dan Sist. Komput., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 96–105, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.14710/jtsiskom.2021.13902.
S. T. Novira, H. Mubarok, and R. N. Shofa, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Jurusan dengan menggunakan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process dan Weighted Product (Studi Kasus: SMK Al-Khoeriyah Kota Tasikmalaya),” SAIS| Sci. Artic. Informatics Students, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 111–122, 2020.
D. N. Nafi’, A. Mulyanto, and M. G. Wonoseto, “Perbandingan Sensitivitas Metode SAW Dan TOPSIS Dalam Pemilihan Ustadz Teladan Ponpes Wahid Hasyim Yogyakarta,” Fountain Informatics J., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 34–44, 2021.
T. L. Saaty, “Decision making with the Analytic Hierarchy Process,” Sci. Iran., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 215–229, 2002, doi: 10.1504/ijssci.2008.017590.
D. C. Yoni and H. Mustafidah, “93123-ID-penerapan-metode-wp-weighted-product-unt.pdf,” Juita, vol. IV, no. 1, pp. 22–27, 2016.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Maria Ulfah Siregar, Saiful Bahri
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Janapati agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Access)
