A Theoretical Analysis of ChatGPT Integration in Flipped Classrooms to Enhance Personal Learning Space

Risang Baskara

doi:10.23887/ijodlla.v1i1.59332

Authors

Risang Baskara Universitas Sanata Dharma

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23887/ijodlla.v1i1.59332

Keywords:

ChatGPT, flipped classrooms, personal learning space, theoretical analysis

Abstract

This paper presents a theoretical analysis of the interconnection between ChatGPT, flipped classrooms, and personal learning spaces in higher education. The context of this research is the need to improve teaching and learning support in higher education through research and practice applicable to all disciplines and contexts. This research addresses the following questions: How can ChatGPT be integrated into flipped classrooms to enhance personal learning space? What can theoretical frameworks be used to support this integration? Previous research has shown that flipped classrooms can enhance students' learning outcomes and personal learning space by allowing them to learn at their own pace. However, there is a need for theoretical frameworks that can guide the integration of ChatGPT into flipped classrooms to enhance personal learning space. The primary rationale for this research is to explore theoretical frameworks that can support the integration of ChatGPT into flipped classrooms to enhance personal learning space. This is important because it can enhance students' learning outcomes and promote personalised learning experiences. The research methods used in this paper involve a systematic review of the literature on ChatGPT, flipped classrooms, and personal learning space, followed by a theoretical analysis of the interconnection between these concepts. The main findings of this paper suggest that the integration of ChatGPT into flipped classrooms can enhance personal learning space by providing personalised support and feedback to students. These findings imply that ChatGPT can promote personalised learning experiences and improve teaching and learning support in higher education.

References

Adams, P. (2006). Exploring social constructivism: Theories and practicalities. Education, 34(3), 243–257.

Adinda, D., & Mohib, N. (2020). Teaching and instructional design approaches to enhance students’ self-directed learning in blended learning environments. Electronic Journal of ELearning, 18(2), 162–174.

Aidoo, B., Vesterinen, V.-M., Macdonald, M. A., Gísladóttir, B., & Pétursdóttir, S. (2022). Perceptions of Ghanaian Student Teachers on Benefits and Challenges of the Flipped Classroom: A Case Study. Contemporary Educational Technology, 14(4), ep377. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/12163

Arantes, J. (2022). The SAMR model as a framework for scaffolding online chat: A theoretical discussion of the SAMR model as a research method during these “interesting” times. Qualitative Research Journal, 22(3), 294–306. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRJ-08-2021-0088

Aydin, B., & Demirer, V. (2022). Are flipped classrooms less stressful and more successful? An experimental study on college students. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19(1), 55. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-022-00360-8

Baidoo-Anu, D., & Owusu Ansah, L. (2023). Education in the Era of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI): Understanding the Potential Benefits of ChatGPT in Promoting Teaching and Learning. Available at SSRN 4337484.

Bicalho, R. N. de M., Coll, C., Engel, A., & Lopes de Oliveira, M. C. S. (2022). Integration of ICTs in teaching practices: Propositions to the SAMR model. Educational Technology Research and Development. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-022-10169-x

Blundell, C. N., Mukherjee, M., & Nykvist, S. (2022). A scoping review of the application of the SAMR model in research. Computers and Education Open, 3, 100093. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2022.100093

Chiu, T. K., & Chai, C. (2020). Sustainable curriculum planning for artificial intelligence education: A self-determination theory perspective. Sustainability, 12(14), 5568. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12145568

Chowdhury, F. (2019). Blended learning: How to flip the classroom at HEIs in Bangladesh? Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning, 13(2), 228–242. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIT-12-2018-0030

Cleveland-Innes, M. (2019). The community of inquiry theoretical framework: Designing collaborative online and blended learning. In Rethinking pedagogy for a digital age (pp. 85–102). Routledge.

Crompton, H., & Burke, D. (2020). Mobile learning and pedagogical opportunities: A configurative systematic review of PreK-12 research using the SAMR framework. Computers & Education, 156, 103945. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103945

Dakhi, O., JAMA, J., & IRFAN, D. (2020). Blended learning: A 21st century learning model at college. International Journal Of Multi Science, 1(08), 50–65.

Divjak, B., Rienties, B., Iniesto, F., Vondra, P., & Žižak, M. (2022). Flipped classrooms in higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic: Findings and future research recommendations. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00316-4

Garrad, T.-A., & Nolan, H. (2022). Rethinking higher education unit design: Embedding universal design for learning in online studies. Student Success. https://doi.org/10.5204/ssj.2300

Gauvreau, A. N., Lohmann, M. J., & Hovey, K. A. (2019). Using a Universal Design for Learning framework to provide multiple means of representation in the early childhood classroom. The Journal of Special Education Apprenticeship, 8(1), 3.

Gorozidis, G. S., Tzioumakis, Y. S., Krommidas, C., & Papaioannou, A. G. (2020). Facebook group PETCoN (Physical Education Teacher Collaborative Network). An innovative approach to PE teacher in-service training: A self-determination theory perspective. Teaching and Teacher Education, 96, 103184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103184

Han, H., & Røkenes, F. M. (2020). Flipped classroom in teacher education: A scoping review. Frontiers in Education, 5, 601593.

Huang, A. Y., Lu, O. H., & Yang, S. J. (2023). Effects of artificial Intelligence–Enabled personalised recommendations on learners’ learning engagement, motivation, and outcomes in a flipped classroom. Computers & Education, 194, 104684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104684

Huang, C. L., Luo, Y. F., Yang, S. C., Lu, C. M., & Chen, A.-S. (2020). Influence of students’ learning style, sense of presence, and cognitive load on learning outcomes in an immersive virtual reality learning environment. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 58(3), 596–615. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633119867422

Israel, M., Jeong, G., Ray, M., & Lash, T. (2020). Teaching elementary computer science through universal design for learning. Proceedings of the 51st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, 1220–1226. https://doi.org/10.1145/3328778.3366823

Jang, H. Y., & Kim, H. J. (2020). A meta-analysis of the cognitive, affective, and interpersonal outcomes of flipped classrooms in higher education. Education Sciences, 10(4), 115. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10040115

Jdaitawi, M. (2019). The effect of flipped classroom strategy on students learning outcomes. International Journal of Instruction, 12(3), 665–680. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12340a

Jensen, L. X., Bearman, M., Boud, D., & Konradsen, F. (2022). Digital ethnography in higher education teaching and learning—A methodological review. Higher Education, 84(5), 1143–1162.

Julia, J., Afrianti, N., Ahmed Soomro, K., Supriyadi, T., Dolifah, D., Isrokatun, I., Erhamwilda, E., & Ningrum, D. (2020). Flipped classroom educational model (2010-2019): A bibliometric study. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(4), 1377–1392. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.4.1377

Kalpana, T. (2014). A constructivist perspective on teaching and learning: A conceptual framework. International Research Journal of Social Sciences, 3(1), 27–29.

Kung, T. H., Cheatham, M., Medenilla, A., Sillos, C., De Leon, L., Elepaño, C., Madriaga, M., Aggabao, R., Diaz-Candido, G., & Maningo, J. (2023). Performance of ChatGPT on USMLE: Potential for AI-assisted medical education using large language models. PLOS Digital Health, 2(2), e0000198. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000198

Law, K. M., Geng, S., & Li, T. (2019). Student enrollment, motivation and learning performance in a blended learning environment: The mediating effects of social, teaching, and cognitive presence. Computers & Education, 136, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.02.021

Lim, J. S., Choe, M.-J., Zhang, J., & Noh, G.-Y. (2020). The role of wishful identification, emotional engagement, and parasocial relationships in repeated viewing of live-streaming games: A social cognitive theory perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 108, 106327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106327

Luan, L., Lin, X., & Li, W. (2023). Exploring the Cognitive Dynamics of Artificial Intelligence in the Post-COVID-19 and Learning 3.0 Era: A Case Study of ChatGPT. ArXiv Preprint ArXiv:2302.04818.

Meda, L., & ElSayary, A. (2021). Establishing Social, Cognitive and Teacher Presences during Emergency Remote Teaching: Reflections of Certified Online Instructors in the United Arab Emirates. Contemporary Educational Technology, 13(4). https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/11073

Mhlanga, D. (2023). Open AI in Education, the Responsible and Ethical Use of ChatGPT Towards Lifelong Learning. Education, the Responsible and Ethical Use of ChatGPT Towards Lifelong Learning (February 11, 2023).

Mohammed, S. H., & Kinyó, L. (2020). The role of constructivism in the enhancement of social studies education. Journal of Critical Reviews, 7(7), 249–256.

Morris, T. H., & Rohs, M. (2021). The potential for digital technology to support self-directed learning in formal education of children: A scoping review. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1870501

Muhajirah, M. (2020). Basic of learning theory:(behaviorism, cognitivism, constructivism, and humanism). International Journal of Asian Education, 1(1), 37–42. https://doi.org/10.46966/ijae.v1i1.23

Muñoz, J. L. R., Ojeda, F. M., Jurado, D. L. A., Peña, P. F. P., Carranza, C. P. M., Berríos, H. Q., Molina, S. U., Farfan, A. R. M., Arias-Gonzáles, J. L., & Vasquez-Pauca, M. J. (2022). Systematic Review of Adaptive Learning Technology for Learning in Higher Education. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 98(98), 221–233.

Mynard, J., & Shelton-Strong, S. J. (2022). Self-Determination Theory: A Proposed Framework for Selfaccess Language Learning. Journal for the Psychology of Language Learning, 4(1), e414522. https://doi.org/10.52598/jpll/4/1/5

N, A. J., & Shyamsundar, S. (2022). Integration of MS Teams as an LMS Tool for Language Classroom: An Analysis using SAMR Model. International Journal of Humanities and Education Development (IJHED), 4(6), 91–95. https://doi.org/10.22161/jhed.4.6.9

Namaziandost, E., & Çakmak, F. (2020). An account of EFL learners’ self-efficacy and gender in the Flipped Classroom Model. Education and Information Technologies, 25(5), 4041–4055. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10167-7

Niemiec, C. P., & Ryan, R. M. (2009). Autonomy, competence, and relatedness in the classroom: Applying self-determination theory to educational practice. Theory and Research in Education, 7(2), 133–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878509104318

Njai, S. N. (2021). Constructivist Pedagogical Approaches in Higher Education: A Qualitative Case Study of Students and their Learning Experiences in a Collaborative Learning Space. Ohio University.

Plass, J. L., & Kalyuga, S. (2019). Four ways of considering emotion in cognitive load theory. Educational Psychology Review, 31, 339–359. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09473-5

Purwanti, I. T., & Suryawati, E. (2022). Video Lectures in Online EFL Flipped-Classroom: Effectiveness, Students’ Evaluation and Experiences. European Journal of Educational Research, 11(2), 885–898. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.11.2.885

Rannikmäe, M., Holbrook, J., & Soobard, R. (2020). Social Constructivism—Jerome Bruner. Science Education in Theory and Practice: An Introductory Guide to Learning Theory, 259–275. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43620-9_18

Redmond, P., & Lock, J. (2019). Secondary pre-service teachers’ perceptions of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): What do they really think? Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 35(3). https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.4214

Rudolph, J., Tan, S., & Tan, S. (n.d.). ChatGPT: Bullshit spewer or the end of traditional assessments in higher education? Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 6(1).

Shaalan, I. E.-N. A. W. (2019). Remodeling teachers’ and students’ roles in self-directed learning environments: The case of Saudi context. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 10(3), 549–556. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1003.19

Shah, R. K. (2019). Effective constructivist teaching learning in the classroom. Shah, RK (2019). Effective Constructivist Teaching Learning in the Classroom. Shanlax International Journal of Education, 7(4), 1–13.

Shea, P., & Bidjerano, T. (2010). Learning presence: Towards a theory of self-efficacy, self-regulation, and the development of a communities of inquiry in online and blended learning environments. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1721–1731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.07.017

Shen, C., & Ho, J. (2020). Technology-enhanced learning in higher education: A bibliometric analysis with latent semantic approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 104, 106177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.106177

Singh, J., Singh, L., & Matthees, B. (2022). Establishing social, cognitive, and teaching presence in online learning—A panacea in COVID-19 pandemic, post vaccine and post pandemic times. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 51(1), 28–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472395221095169

Stearley, K. (2022). Encouraging Adolescents to be Self-Directed Learners: Influences of Classroom Motivation on Student Outcomes.

Sun, Y., Ni, L., Zhao, Y., Shen, X.-L., & Wang, N. (2019). Understanding students’ engagement in MOOCs: An integration of self‐determination theory and theory of relationship quality. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(6), 3156–3174. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12724

Swart, W., MacLeod, K., Wengrowicz, N., & Paul, R. (2021). Flipped Classrooms and COVID-19 Disruption: Empirical Results. Journal of Higher Education Theory & Practice, 21(3).

Tanak, A. (2020). Designing TPACK-based course for preparing student teachers to teach science with technological pedagogical content knowledge. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 41(1), 53–59.

Tlili, A., Shehata, B., Adarkwah, M. A., Bozkurt, A., Hickey, D. T., Huang, R., & Agyemang, B. (2023). What if the devil is my guardian angel: ChatGPT as a case study of using chatbots in education. Smart Learning Environments, 10(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00237-x

Tseng, J.-J., Chai, C. S., Tan, L., & Park, M. (2022). A critical review of research on technological pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK) in language teaching. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(4), 948–971. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1868531

Tunjera, N., & Chigona, A. (2020). Teacher Educators’ Appropriation of TPACK-SAMR Models for 21st Century Pre-Service Teacher Preparation. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education (IJICTE), 16(3), 126–140. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJICTE.2020070110

Turnbull, D., Chugh, R., & Luck, J. (2021). Transitioning to E-Learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: How have Higher Education Institutions responded to the challenge? Education and Information Technologies, 26(5), 6401–6419. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10633-w

Villamil, O. S., & de Guerrero, M. C. (2006). Sociocultural theory: A framework for understanding the social-cognitive dimensions of peer feedback. Feedback in Second Language Writing: Contexts and Issues, 23–41. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524742.004

Wang, C., Fang, T., & Gu, Y. (2020). Learning performance and behavioral patterns of online collaborative learning: Impact of cognitive load and affordances of different multimedia. Computers & Education, 143, 103683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103683

Yawson, D. E., & Yamoah, F. A. (2020). Understanding satisfaction essentials of E-learning in higher education: A multi-generational cohort perspective. Heliyon, 6(11), e05519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05519