Application of Didactic Methods in Planting Values of Culture Through Maligya Ceremony at Hindu Communities

Gusti Ayu Santipatni

doi:10.23887/jere.v5i2.31359

Authors

Gusti Ayu Santipatni STAHN Gde Pudja Mataram

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23887/jere.v5i2.31359

Keywords:

Cultivation Of Values, Cultural Practices, Maligya Ceremony

Abstract

The maligya ceremony is an implementation of Hinduism that involves Balinese cultural practices in Lombok. This study aims to study the application of didactic methods in cultivating cultural values through the maligya ceremony at the research location. The focus of this research is on the application of didactic methods in instilling cultural values through the maligya ceremony. This research method is qualitative interpretive with a case study approach. The results of the data analysis found three new findings. First, the dimension of introducing cultural values in religious practice as a cognitive aspect in the implementation of the maligya ceremony involves an aspect of awareness for lifelong learning. Second, the dimensions of the appreciation of cultural values in the maligya ceremony as the implementation of the affective aspects related to the awareness to respect the cultural values of ancestral heritage. Third, the dimension of practicing cultural values in the practice of the maligya ceremony is related to the realization of a sense of devotion before the ancestors and the preservation of cultural values as a means of improving the quality of life of the Hindu community who performs it. Based on the results of this study, it can be concluded that the didactic method is an effective strategy in instilling cultural values in the implementation of Hinduism through the maligya ceremony.

References

Arikunto, S. (2002). Metodologi Penelitian. Rineka Cipta.

Bungin, B. (2001). Metodelogi Penelitian Sosial, Format-Format Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif. Erlangga University Press.

Darmawan, I. P. A. (2020). Estetika Panca Suaradalam Upacara Yadnya di Bali. Jñānasiddhânta: Jurnal Teologi Hindu, 2(1), 61–70. http://jurnal.stahnmpukuturan.ac.id/index.php/jnanasidanta/article/view/821.

Emzir. (2011). Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan. PT. Grafindo Persada.

Fuad, M., Efendi, A., & Muhammad, U. A. (2020). The Use of Pepaccur Local Wisdom for Indonesian Literary Teaching Materials. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 9(2), 213–223. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v9i2.22779.

Gentorang, I. M. A. (2016). Penggunaan Kajang dalam Ritus Kematian (Kelepasan) Klen Brahmana Buddha di Desa Budakeling dan Sebarannya di Desa Batuan. E-Jurnal Humanis, 15(3), 84–91. https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/sastra/article/download/21861/14494.

Miles, B., Huberman, M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. SAGE Pub.

Moleong, L. J. (2012). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Muhajir, N. (1990). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Yake Sarasin.

Pitriani, N. R. V. (2020). Tattwa dalam Yadnya Perspektif Filsafat Hindu (Siwa Tattwa) bagi Masyarakat Hindu di Bali. ŚRUTI: Jurnal Agama Hindu, 1(1), 45–57. http://jurnal.ekadanta.org/index.php/sruti/article/view/61.

Purwita, I. B. P. (1997). Upacara Ngaben. Upada Sastra.

Putra. (1982). Kumpulan Kuliah-Kuliah Agama Hindu Jilid II. Cudamani.

Putra, N. (1988). Upacara Manusa Yadnya. IHD Denpasar.

Renawati, P. W. (2019). Implementasi Upacara Manusa Yadnya Dalam Naskah Dharma Kahuripan (Perspektif Teologi Hindu). Mudra Jurnal Seni Budaya, 34(3), 372–384. http://jurnal.isi-dps.ac.id/index.php/mudra/article/view/796.

Satori, A., & Widiastuti, W. (2018). Model Pendidikan Multikultural pada Pesantren Tradisional di Kota Tasikmalaya dalam mencegah Ancaman Radikalisme. Sosiohumaniora, 20(1), 22–28. http://jurnal.unpad.ac.id/sosiohumaniora/article/view/10304.

Satori, Djam’an, & Komariah, A. (2010). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Alfabeta.

Suamba, I. B. . (1996). Yajña Basis Kehidupan (Sebuah Canang Sari). Warta Hindu Dharma.

Sudarsana, I. B. P. (2002). Ajaran Agama Hindu Upacara Pitra Yajña. Yayasan Dharma Acarya Percetakan Mandara Sastra.

Sudarsana, I. K. (2017). Interpretation Meaning of Ngaben for Krama Dadia Arya Kubontubuh Tirtha Sari Ulakan Village Karangasem District (Hindu Religious Education Perspective). Vidyottama Sanatana: International Journal of Hindu Science and Religious Studies, 1(1), 1–13. http://www.ejournal.ihdn.ac.id/index.php/IJHSRS/article/view/148.

Sugiyono. (2012). Sugiyono. 2012. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R & D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Suprayogo, I., & Tabroni. (2001). Metode Penelitian Sosial-Agama. PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Suryawan, N., & Gata, I. W. (2020). Catur Pariksa Sebagai Landasan Kepemimpinan Hindu Berbasis Kearifan Lokal (Suatu Tinjauan Pustaka). Suluh Pendidikan, 18(2), 225–235. http://jurnal.ikipsaraswati.ac.id/index.php/suluh-pendidikan/article/view/213.

Tantra, D. K. (2015). Solipsisme Bali: antara Persatuan dan Perseteruan. Wisnu Press.

Titib M. (2000). Theologi & Simbol-Simbol dalam Agama Hindu. Paramita.

Wiana, I. K. (1998). Berbhakti Pada Leluhur Upacara Pitra Yajña dan Upacara Nuntun Dewa Hyang. Paramitha.

Wiana, I. K. (2004). Makna Upacara Yajña dalam Agama Hindu II. Paramitha.

Wiriawan, I. G. N. (2021). Upacara Manusa Yadnya Dalam Lontar Smarareka. Kalangwan Jurnal Pendidikan Agama, Bahasa Dan Sastra, 10(2), 93–183. http://www.ejournal.ihdn.ac.id/index.php/Kalangwan/article/view/2362.

Yanti, N. L. P. Y. S. (2017). Upacara Ngaben Ningkeb Di Banjar Kebon Desa Pakraman Blahbatuh Kecamatan Blahbatuh Kabupaten Gianyar (Kajian Filosofis). Jurnal Penelitian Agama Hindu, 1(2), 472–478. http://www.ejournal.ihdn.ac.id/index.php/JPAH/article/view/284.

Zafi, A. A. (2018). Transformasi budaya melalui lembaga pendidikan (pembudayaan dalam pembentukan karakter). Al Ghazali, 1(1), 1–16. https://ejournal.stainupwr.ac.id/index.php/al_ghzali/article/download/5/1.