Implementation of Contextual Teaching and Learning and Authentic Assessments to the Science (IPA) Learning Outcomes of 4th Grade Students of Primary Schools (SD) in Kota Kupang
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23887/jere.v5i3.32338Keywords:
Authentic Assessments, Science Learning Outcomes, Contextual teaching and learningAbstract
This study aims to discover the implementation of CTL and authentic assessment to the science learning outcomes on 4th-grade students of primary school. This study is quasi-experimental using a 2 x 2 factorial design. There are 110 students as the population, in which 60 students are appointed as the samples thru a random sampling technique. Data collection uses an objective test method. The data are analyzed using one-way ANOVA and two-way ANOVA that is followed by t-Scheffe test. The results of this study indicate that: there is a difference of learning outcomes between the students who attend the CTL with the conventional learning; there is a difference on the students’ learning outcomes who attend the performance assessment with the project assessment; there is an influence of interaction between the learning model and assessment used to the learning outcomes; there is difference of the students’ learning outcomes who attend the CTL, in which it is between the students who attend the performance assessment and the students who attend the project assessment; there is a difference of learning outcomes on the students who attend the conventional learning, in which it is between the students who attend the performance assessment and the students who attend the project assessment; there is a difference of learning outcomes on the students who attend the performance assessment, in which it is between the students who attend the CTL and conventional learning; and there is a difference of learning outcomes on the students who attend the project assessment, in which it is between the students who attend the CTL and the students who attend the conventional learning. Hence, the implementation of CTL and authentic assessments toward the science learning outcomes of 4th-grade students of primary school.
References
Agustini, L. I., & Sastrawijaya, Y. (2013). Model Pembelajaran Kolaboratif dan asesmen autentik pada pembelajaran bahasa Inggris. Jurnal Evaluasi Pendidikan, 7(2), 86–94. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.21009/JEP.072.02.
Aiman, U., Hasyda, S., & Uslan. (2020). The influence of process oriented guided inquiry learning (POGIL) model assisted by realia media to improve scientific literacy and critical thinking skill of primary school students. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(4), 1635–1647. https://doi.org/10.12973/EU-JER.9.4.1635.
al Tabany, T. I. B. (2014). Mendesain Model Pembelajaran Inovatif, Progresif, dan Kontekstual (Konsep, Landasan, dan Implementasinya pada Kurikulum 2013). PT Kharisma Putra Utama.
Aliyyah, R. R., Ayuntina, D. R., Sri, E., Herawati, B., & Djuanda. (2020). Efforts To Improve Learning Outcomes in Natural Sciences Through Contextual Teaching. Indonesian Journal of Applied Research (IJAR), 1(2), 65–79. https://doi.org/10.30997/ijar.v1i2.50.
Allchin, D. (2013). Problem- and case-based learning in science: An introduction to distinctions, values, and outcomes. CBE Life Sciences Education, 12(3), 364–372. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.12-11-0190.
Anggreni, N. M. D., Dantes, N., Candiasa, I. M., & Kom, M. I. (2014). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Master dan Asesmen Autentik Terhadap Hasil Belajar IPA Siswa Kelas VIII SMP Negeri 1 Payangan. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan Indonesia, 4(1). https://ejournal-pasca.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/jurnal_ep/article/view/1187.
Ariesta, F. W., Suwarno, & Rombot, O. (2019). Enhancing science learning outcomes through moodle-based e-learning in elementary schools. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 8(10), 2183–2187.
Ariestuti, P. D., Darsana, I. W., & Kristiantari R. (2014). Penerapan pendekatan contextual teaching and learning (CTL) untuk meningkatkan keaktifan dan hasil belajar IPA siswa kelas VI SDN 3 Tonja Tahun Ajaran 2014/2015. Jurnal Mimbar PGSD, 2(1), 1-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.23887/jjpgsd.v2i1.4098.
Armstrong, C. M., & LeHew, M. L. A. (2011). The journey toward the integration of sustainability in apparel and textiles education: A case study. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, 494.
Arviansyah, R., Indrawati, I., & Harijanto, A. (2016). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Guided Inquiry Disertai LKS Audiovisual Terhadap Aktivitas dan Hasil Belajar IPA Siswa di SMP. Jurnal Pembelajaran Fisika, 4(4), 308–314. http://jurnal.unej.ac.id/index.php/JPF/article/view/3611.
Avvisati, F., Echazarra, A., Givord, P., & Schwabe, M. (2018). What 15-year-old students in Indonesia know and can do. In Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) Result from PISA 2018. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
Baker, E. L., Barton, P. E., Darling-Hammond, L., Haertel, E., Ladd, H. F., Linn, R. L., Ravitch, D., Rothstein, R., Shavelson, R. J., & Shepard, L. A. (2010). Problems with the use of student test scores to evaluate teachers. In EPI Briefing Paper (Vol. 278). https://files.epi.org/page/-/pdf/bp278.pdf.
Bao, L., & Koenig, K. (2019). Physics education research for 21st century learning. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 1(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-019-0007-8.
Best, J., & Dunlap, A. (2014). Continuous improvement in schools and districts: Policy considerations. McREL International, 40(5), 9–13. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=ED557599&site=eds-live&authtype=uid.
Brown, G. (2001). Learning outcomes and assessment criteria. In Assessment: A Guide for Lecturers. Learning & Teaching Support Network.
Crooks, T. J. (1988). The Impact of Classroom Evaluation Practices on Students. Review of Educational Research, 58(4), 438. https://doi.org/10.2307/1170281.
Curran, F. C., & Kitchin, J. (2019). Early Elementary Science Instruction: Does More Time on Science or Science Topics/Skills Predict Science Achievement in the Early Grades? AERA Open, 5(3), 233285841986108. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858419861081.
Darling-hammond, L., & Adamson, F. (2010). Beyond basic skills: The role of performance assessment in achieving 21st century standards of learning. 52. https://edpolicy.stanford.edu/publications/pubs/111.
Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791.
Davey, T., Ferrara, S., Holland, P. W., Shavelson, R., Webb, N. M., & Wise, L. L. (2015). Psychometric Considerations for the Next Generation of Performance Assessment. Center for K–12 Assessment & Performance Management at ETS.
Dhiu, M., Dama, A., & Sape, A. (2009). Menemukan Masalah Pendidikan di NTT. Dion DB Putra. http://www.dionbata.com/2009/03/menemukan-masalah-pendidikan-di-ntt-1.html
Dikli, S. (2003). Assessment at a distance : Traditional vs . Alternative Assessments. The Turkish Online Journal of Education Technology, 2(3), 13–19. http://www.tojet.net/articles/v2i3/232.pdf.
Djafar, R., Jamhari, M., & Sakung, J. (2014). Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa pada Mata Pelajaran IPA di kelas IV SDN Sijoli Melalui Penerapan Pendekatan Sains Teknologi Masyarakat. Jurnal Kreatif Tadulako, 4(5), 149–161.
Dolpino, D. (2015). Masalah Pendidikan di NTT. DolpinoBlog. https://dolpinoblog.wordpress.com/2015/10/04/masalah-pendidikan-di-ntt/.
Edmunds, J. (2006). How to Assess Student Performance in History: Going beyond Multiple-Choice Tests. Third Edition. 60. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED513873.pdf.
Edwards, F. (2013). Quality assessment by science teachers: Five focus areas. Science Education International, 24(2), 212–226. https://researchcommons.waikato.ac.nz/handle/10289/8243.
Fatonah, S., & Prasetyo, Z. K. (2013). Developing an Authentic Assessment Model in Elementary School Science Teaching. 4(13), 50–62.
Firdaus, F., Kailani, I., Bakar, M. N. Bin, & Bakry, B. (2015). Developing critical thinking skills of students in mathematics learning. Journal of Education and Learning, 9(3), 226–236. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v9i3.1830.
Genlott, A. A., & Grönlund, Å. (2013). Improving literacy skills through learning reading by writing: The iWTR method presented and tested. Computers and Education, 67, 98–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.03.007.
Gleason, B. L., Peeters, M. J., Resman-Targoff, B. H., Karr, S., McBane, S., Kelley, K., Thomas, T., & Denetclaw, T. H. (2011). An active-learning strategies primer for achieving ability-based educational outcomes. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 75(9), 186 (1-12). https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe759186.
Guntur, G. (2014). Penilaian Berbasis Kinerja (Performance-Based Assessment) Pada Pendidikan Jasmani. Jurnal Pendidikan Jasmani Indonesia, 10(1), 15–22.
Habók, A., & Nagy, J. (2016). In-service teachers’ perceptions of project-based learning. SpringerPlus, 5, 83. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-1725-4.
Hakim, M. F. Al, Sariyatun, S., & Sudiyanto, S. (2018). Constructing Student`s Critical Thinking Skill through Discovery Learning Model and Contextual Teaching and Learning Model as Solution of Problems in Learning History. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 5(4), 175. https://doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v5i4.240.
Halik, N. (2016). Contextual Teaching and Learning Method to Third Year Students of MTsN Balang-Balang Kabupaten Gowa. ETERNAL (English, Teaching, Learning and Research Journal), 2(2), 147–166. https://doi.org/10.24252/eternal.v22.2016.a1.
Hallas, J. (2008). Rethinking teaching and assessment strategies for flexible learning environments. ASCILITE 2008 - The Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education, 1992, 373–381. https://ascilite.org/conferences/melbourne08/procs/hallas.pdf.
Handini, D., Gusrayani, D., & Panjaitan. R. L. (2016). Penerapan model contextuan teaching and learning meningkatkan hasil belajar siswa kelas IV pada materi gaya. Jurnal Pena Ilmiah, 1(1), 451-460. https://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/penailmiah/article/view/2974.
Haryanto, P. C., & Arty, I. S. (2019). The Application of Contextual Teaching and Learning in Natural Science to Improve Student’s HOTS and Self-efficacy. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1233(1), 0–8. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1233/1/012106.
Haryati, A. S. (2017). The implementation of 21st century learning to improve high level thinking skills through various model. The 2nd International Conference on Education (ICE), 1, 1–12.
Hilliard, P. (2015). Performance-Based Assessment: Reviewing the Basics. Edutopia. https://www.edutopia.org/blog/performance-based-assessment-reviewing-basics-patricia-hilliard.
Hossain, M. I. (2015). Teaching Productive Skills to the Students: A Secondary Level Scenario. BRAC University.
Howard, S. J., Burianová, H., Calleia, A., Fynes-Clinton, S., Kervin, L., & Bokosmaty, S. (2017). The method of educational assessment affects children’s neural processing and performance: behavioural and fMRI Evidence. Npj Science of Learning, 2(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-017-0010-9.
Irianto, D. M., Nadiroh, N., & Nuryadin, S. (2017). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran dan Hasil Belajar IPA Terhadap Kemampuan Memecahkan Masalah Lingkungan Hidup. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Lingkungan Dan Pembangunan, 16(02), 122–142. https://doi.org/10.21009/plpb.162.05.
Jimaa, S. (2011). The impact of assessment on students learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 28(December 2011), 718–721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.11.133.
Keiler, L. S. (2018). Teachers’ roles and identities in student-centered classrooms. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(34), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0131-6.
Kennedy, D., Hyland, A., & Ryan, N. (2018). Writing and using learning outcomes: A practical guide. In Implementing Bologna in your institution (pp. 1–31). http://hdl.handle.net/10468/1613.
Kraft, M. A. (2017). Teacher and teaching effects on students’ attitudes and behaviors. Educ Eval Policy Anal., 39(1), 146–170. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373716670260.Teacher.
Kumalasari, L., Sulistyorini, S., & Sudarmin. (2021). Development of Supplementary Science Teaching Materials with Ethnoscience Contained to Foster Students ’ Critical Thinking. Journal of Primary Education, 10(3), 326–333. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/jpe/article/view/35357.
Kurniawati, M. W., Anitah, S., & Suharno, S. (2017). Developing Learning Science Teaching Materials Based on Scientific to Improve Student Learning Outcome in Elementary School. European Journal of Education Studies, 34(20), 319–330. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.398991.
Lalian, O. N., Siregar, E., & Winarsih, M. (2019). The effects of using realia media on increasing science learning outcomes of elementary school students: A meta-analysis. In A. Boukerche (Ed.), ACM International Conference Proceeding Series: Vol. Part F1483 (pp. 1–4). ACM.
Lasmini, N. W. (2018). Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa Melalui Pembelajaran Paikem dengan Model Kooperatif pada Mata Pelajaran IPA di Kelas VI SD Inpres Palupi. Jurnal Kreatif Tadulako, 4(4), 329–342. https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/116269-ID-meningkatkan-hasil-belajar-siswa-melalui.pdf.
Lestari, E., Supardi, Z. A. I., & Widodo, W. (2019). Research Design prototype of Teacher Book and Student Book based on Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) to Practice Critical Thinking Skills of Grade VII. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications (IJSRP), 9(10), p9436. https://doi.org/10.29322/ijsrp.9.10.2019.p9436.
Lotulung, C. F., Ibrahim, N., & Tumurang, H. (2018). Effectiveness of learning method contextual teaching learning (CTL) for increasing learning outcomes of entrepreneurship education. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology - TOJET, 17(3), 37–46. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1184198.
Maisaroh, M., & Rostrieningsih, M. (2012). Peningkatan Hasil Belajar Siswa Dengan Menggunakan Metode Pembelajaran Active Learning Tipe Quiz Team Pada Mata Pelajaran Keterampilan Dasar Komunikasi Di SMK Negeri 1 Bogor. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Pendidikan, 7(2), 157–172. https://doi.org/10.21831/jep.v7i2.571.
Maranan, V. M. (2017). Basic process skills and attitude toward science: Inputs to an enhanced students’ cognitive performance [Laguna State Polytechnic University]. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED579181.pdf.
Memari, A., Zahraee, S. M., Anjomanshoae, A., & Rahim, A. R. B. A. (2013). Performance Assessment in a Production-Distribution Network Using Simulation . Caspian Journal of Applied Sciences Research, 2(5), 48–56.
Muchtar, M. I. (2017). Contextual teaching and learning method in studying arabic. Hunafa: Jurnal Studia Islamika, 14(1), 175–188. https://doi.org/10.24239/jsi.v14i1.465.175-188.
Mufarrid, H., Miaz, Y., Padang, U. N., & Padang, K. (2020). Improving the science learning outcomes of elementary school student using quantum teaching. PRIMARY: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, 9(April), 185–193.
Munawaroh, M. (2017). The Influence of Teaching Methods and Learning Environment to the Student’s Learning Achievement of Craft and Entrepreneurship Subjects at Vocational High School. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 12(4), 665–678.
Munawaroh, S. B., Sukestiyarno, Y. L., & Masrukan, M. (2017). High School Mathematics Curriculum Development Integrated with Character Education Within Project Assessment as Spiral System Leveled. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education, 6(2), 163–173. https://doi.org/10.15294/ujme.v6i2.12969.
Ningsih, S. R., Sumantri, M. S., Nurjanah, N., & Utomo, E. (2019). Enhancing Elementary School Students’ Learning Outcomes in the Field of Social Sciences Studies through Problem Based Learning Method. Al-Ta Lim Journal, 26(2), 97–111. https://doi.org/10.15548/jt.v26i2.572.
Nurjanah, N. (2016). Peningkatan Hasil Belajar IPA dengan Menerapkan Metode Inkuiri Siswa Kelas V SD Negeri 68 Kec. Bacukiki Kota Parepare. Jurnal Publikasi Pendidikan, 6(2), 107–110. http://ojs.unm.ac.id/pubpend/article/download/1899/888.
Nurkholis, A. (2019). Student Worksheet Based on Scientific Approach to Improve Learning Outcomes and Creative Thinking Ability of Elementary Student. Mudarrisa: Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Islam, 11(1), 87–100.
OECD. (2016). PISA 2015 Results; Overview: Excellence and Equity in Education: Vol. I. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264266490-5-en.
Oktaviani, L., Dantes, N., & Sadia, W. (2014). Pengaruh Model Problem Based Learning Berbasis Asesmen Kinerja Terhadap Hasil Belajar IPA Ditinjau Dari Gaya Kognitif. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Ganesha, 4(1), 207551. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpepi.v4i1.1117.
Pardiyana, P. (2020). The Cooperative Learning Model with STAD Type to Improve Science Learning Outcomes of Class IV Elementary School Students. BIO-INOVED : Jurnal Biologi-Inovasi Pendidikan, 2(2), 87. https://doi.org/10.20527/bino.v2i2.9094.
Permana, A. R. Y., Wulansari, H., & Kelana, J. B. (2018). Efforts to improve science leanring outcomes using demonstration methods. Journal of Elementary Education, 1(5), 298–305.
Qistina, M., Hermita, N., Alpusari, M., Noviana, E., Antosa, Z., Witri, G., Munjiatun, M., & Indarni, A. (2019). Improving Science Learning Outcomes of Elementary Students by Using Interactive Multimedia on Human Order Materials. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1351(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1351/1/012075.
Quansah, F. (2018). Traditional or Performance Assessment: What is the Right Way to Assessing Learners? Research on Humanities and Social Sciences, 8(1), 21–24.
Rukmini, D., & Saputri, L. A. D. E. (2017). The authentic assessment to measure students’ English productive skills based on 2013 Curriculum. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7(2), 263–273. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v7i2.8128.
Sánchez, A. V., Poblete, M., & Eds, R. (2006). Competence Based Learning. In Bulletin of University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca. Horticulture (Vol. 63, Issues 1–2). https://doi.org/10.15835/buasvmcn-hort:1894.
Sarah, S. (2020). Meningkatkan aktivitas dan hasil belajar IPA menggunakan metode inkuiri terbimbing pada siswa kelas VI SDN 3 Labuhan Dalam Bandar Lampung. Pedagogia Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar Indonesia, 2(1), 125–134.
Searls, K., Associates, A. S. I., & Hippel, E. Von. (2002). Performance Assessment of the Lead User Idea Generation Process for New Product Development Gary L . Lilien *, Penn State Pamela D . Morrison , University of New South Wales Mary Sonnack , 3M. Management Science, 48, 1042–1059.
Setiawan, D., Khodijah, K., & Mansyur, A. (2020). Implementing Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) Model to Teach Fiqh. Journal of Research in Islamic Education, 2(2), 93–105.
Shavelson, R. J., Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, O., Beck, K., Schmidt, S., & Marino, J. P. (2019). Assessment of University Students’ Critical Thinking: Next Generation Performance Assessment. International Journal of Testing, 19(4), 337–362. https://doi.org/10.1080/15305058.2018.1543309.
Sihombing, E., Jufrizal, J., & Anwar, S. (2017). Scoring Rubric as the Authentic Assessment Used by the English Teachers to Run the National Curriculum in South Sumatera, Indonesia. English Language Teaching and Research, 1(1), 84–96. https://doi.org/10.2991/icla-17.2018.53.
Sihono, T. (2004). Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL). Jurnal Ekonomi & Pendidikan, 1(1), 63–64.
Tirtasari, N. L., Sudhita, W. R., & Rati, N. W. (2015). Penerapan Pendekatan Contextual Teaching and Learning Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar IPA pada Siswa Kelas V. E-Journal PGSD Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, 3(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.24114/esjpgsd.v7i2.7276.
Trisnawaty, F. (2017). Peningkatkan Hasil Belajar IPA Melalui Penggunaan Metode Demonstrasi Pada Siswa Kelas IV SD. Satya Widya, 33(1), 37. https://doi.org/10.24246/j.sw.2017.v33.i1.p37-44.
Twiningsih, A. T. (2020). Improving Learning Outcomes Through the Use of Media STEM Based in Volcano Eruption Simulation in the Theme of Natural Events. International Journal of Theory and Application in Elementary and Secondary School Education, 2(2), 64–78. https://doi.org/10.31098/ijtaese.v2i2.229.
Utami, S. H. A., Mawardi, M., & Astuti, S. (2019). Improving critical thinking skills and learning outcomes using science, technology, and society (STS) learning model on the 5th grade elementary school students. JPSD: Jurnal Pendidikan Sekolah Dasar, 5(1), 137–149.
Vereijken, M. W. C., van der Rijst, R. M., van Driel, J. H., & Dekker, F. W. (2018). Student learning outcomes, perceptions and beliefs in the context of strengthening research integration into the first year of medical school. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 23(2), 371–385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-017-9803-0.
Villarroel, V., Bloxham, S., Bruna, D., Bruna, C., & Herrera-Seda, C. (2018). Authentic assessment: creating a blueprint for course design. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(5), 840–854. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2017.1412396.
Wahono, B., Lin, P. L., & Chang, C. Y. (2020). Evidence of STEM enactment effectiveness in Asian student learning outcomes. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00236-1.
Wahyuni, E. S. (2013). The Application of Contextual Teaching Learning Using React in Speaking Practices for Business English Class. Magister Scientiae, 34(Oktober), 145–158.
Wahyuningtyas, R. S., & Wuryadi, W. (2018). The Influence of Contextual Teaching And Learning ( CTL ) towards Chritical Thinking and Problem Solving Ability on Skeletal System Materials. 5thICRIEMS Proceedings, 117–123.
Widiana, I. W. (2016). Pengembangan Asesmen Proyek Dalam Pembelajaran IPA di Sekolah Dasar. JPI (Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia), 5(2), 147. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v5i2.8154.
Wulansari, N. K. A. M., & Suarni, N. K. (2020). Animation in Science Learning with Brain Based Learning Models to Improve Student Learning Outcomes. International Journal of Elementary Education, 4(2), 160. https://doi.org/10.23887/ijee.v4i2.25244.
Yuniati, S. (2011). Asesmen Kinerja (Performance Assessment) dalam pembelajaran matematika. An-Nida’, 36(1), 37–51.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with the Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (JERE) agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Access)
