Learning Intensity and Visual Learning Style on Learning Outcomes

Fachruddiansyah Muslim; Ekawarna Ekawarna; Aminah Ramalia; Ricky Purnama Wirayuda; Diki Chen

doi:10.23887/jere.v6i2.40312

Authors

Fachruddiansyah Muslim Universitas Jambi
Ekawarna Ekawarna Universitas Jambi
Aminah Ramalia Universitas Jambi
Ricky Purnama Wirayuda Universitas Jambi
Diki Chen Universitas Jambi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23887/jere.v6i2.40312

Keywords:

Learning intensity, Learning Style, Learning Outcomes

Abstract

Learning activities do not have to be done for a long time. Good learning intensity is carried out regularly will make learning activities a habit. The learning process also needs to be supported by a learning style that suits the characteristics of students. This study aimed to analyze the intensity of learning-on-learning outcomes, visual learning styles on learning outcomes, and learning intensity and visual learning styles on learning outcomes. This type of research is quantitative with a descriptive quantitative approach. The sample used was 65 students with purposive sampling. Data collection method using questionnaire and documentation. The instrument used is a questionnaire. Data analysis techniques are qualitative descriptive analysis, quantitative, and inferential statistics. The results showed a significant effect of learning intensity on learning outcomes in macroeconomic theory courses. There is a significant effect of visual learning style on learning outcomes in macroeconomic theory courses. There is a significant influence between visual learning styles on learning outcomes of macroeconomic theory courses. There are significant effects of visual learning style on learning outcomes of macroeconomic theory courses. It is concluded that there is a simultaneous influence between learning intensity and visual learning style on learning outcomes in macroeconomic theory courses.

References

Agung Rinaldy Malik, Emzir, & Sri Sumarni. (2020). Pengaruh Strategi Pembelajaran Mobile Learning Dan Gaya Belajar Visual Terhadap Penguasaan Kosakatabahasa Jerman Siswa Sma Negeri 1 Maros. Visipena Journal, 11(1), 194–207. https://doi.org/10.46244/visipena.v11i1.1090.

Aldila, F. T., Wirayuda, R. P., Wulandari, M., & Ningsi, A. P. (2021). Deskripsi Keterampilan Proses Sains Siswa Kesetimbangan Pada Tali. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 9(2), 112–119. https://doi.org/10.22611/jpf.v9i2.21494.

Ambarsari, P., Bharati, D. A. L., & Ani Rusilowati. (2017). Pengembangan instrumen Penilaian Unjuk Kerja pada Reading Aloud Text Recount Siswa SMP pada kurikulum 2013. Jurnal of Educational and Evaluation, 6(1), 10–18. https://doi.org/10.15294/jrer.v6i1.16203.

Andrietti, V. (2015). The Causal Effects of Increased Learning Intensity on Student Achievement: Evidence from a Natural Experiment. SSRN Electronic Journal, June. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2632002

Anggrawan, A. (2019). Analisis Deskriptif Hasil Belajar Pembelajaran Tatap Muka dan Pembelajaran Online Menurut Gaya Belajar Mahasiswa. MATRIK : Jurnal Manajemen, Teknik Informatika Dan Rekayasa Komputer, 18(2), 339–346. https://doi.org/10.30812/matrik.v18i2.411.

Asrul, Ridlo, S., & Susilo. (2018). Creative Thinking Analysis, Motivation and Concept Mastery on Learning of Cooperative Discovery Model in Elementary School. Journal of Primary Education, 07(1), 48–56. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/jpe/article/view/21736.

Astalini, A., Kurniawan, D. A., & Sumaryanti, S. (2018). Sikap Siswa Terhadap Pelajaran Fisika di SMAN Kabupaten Batanghari. JIPF (Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Fisika), 3(2), 59–64. https://doi.org/10.26737/jipf.v3i2.694.

Asyhari, A. (2015). Profil Peningkatan Kemampuan Literasi Sains Siswa Melalui Pembelajaran Saintifik. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika Al-Biruni, 4(2), 179–191. https://doi.org/10.24042/jpifalbiruni.v4i2.91.

Asyhari, A., & Silvia, H. (2016). Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran Berupa Buletin dalam Bentuk Buku Saku untuk Pembelajran IPA Terpadu. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika Al-Biruni, 5(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.24042/jpifalbiruni.v5i1.100.

Budiwanto. (2017). Mertode Penelitian Dalam Keolahragaan. universitas Negeri malang.

Chandrasekera, T., & Yoon, S.-Y. (2018). The Effect of Augmented and Virtual Reality Interfaces in the Creative Design Process. International Journal of Virtual and Augmented Reality, 2(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijvar.2018010101.

Dashtaki, D. G. M., Mohammadi, A., Zolfaghari, M., Imani, S., & Tahmasebian, S. (2020). The Relationship of Satisfaction and Usage of Virtual Learning Facilities with Learning Style in Medical, Health, and Operating Room Students. The Strides in Development of Medical Education Journal, 17(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/doi:10.22062/SDME.2020.91007.

Djamarah, S. B., & Zain, A. (2006). Stategi Belajar Mengajar. Rimeka Cipta.

Esia-Donkoh, K. (2020). Students’ Personal Characteristics and Differences in Their Learning Style Preferences in Public Colleges of Education in the Central-Western Zone of Ghana. PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences, 5(1), 592–608. https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2019.51.592608.

Fatonah, U., Wirayuda, R. P., Wibisono, G., Analisis, S., & Kelas, M. B. (2020). Analisis Minat Belajar Kelas Xi Sma Negeri 1 Sungai Penuh Pada Pembelajaran Fisika. Jurnal Sains Dan Pendidikan Fisika (JSPF) Jilid, 16(02), 2548–6373. https://doi.org/10.35580/jspf.v16i2.15511.

Fricticarani, A., & Maksum, H. (2020). Improving Student Activity and Learning Outcomes by Applying the Jigsaw Type Learning Model in PPHP Skills Study. Journal of Education Research and Evaluation, 4(4), 296. https://doi.org/10.23887/jere.v4i4.30240.

George, D., & Mallery, P. (2019). IBM SPSS Statistics 26 Step by Step. Routledge.

Goos, P., & Maintrup, S. (2015). Statistics with JMP: Hypothesis Tests, ANOVA and Regression. fraktur book fair.

Hasmidyani, D. (2016). Pendekatan Scaffolding Sebagai Upaya Meningkatkan Aktivitas Dan Hasil Belajar Mahasiswa. Jurnal Profit, 3(1), 87–100. https://doi.org/10.36706/jp.v3i1.5558.

Jannah, M. M., Supriadi, N., & Suri, F. I. (2019). Efektivitas Model Pembelajaran Visualization Auditory Kinesthetic (Vak) Terhadap Pemahaman Konsep Matematis Berdasarkan Klasifikasi Self-Efficacy Sedang Dan Rendah. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 8(1), 215–224. https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v8i1.1892.

Kirichenko, A., & Van Zanten, H. (2015). Optimality of poisson processes intensity learning with Gaussian processes. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 16, 2909–2919. https://www.jmlr.org/papers/volume16/kirichenko15a/kirichenko15a.pdf.

Kurniawati, D., Taufiq, M., Kasiyun, S., & Naufi’ah, N. (2020). Meta-Analysis of Teams Games Tournament Learning Model with Spinning Wheel Media-Based on Local Wisdom Toward Students’ Learning Outcomes. Journal of Education Research and Evaluation, 4(3), 296. https://doi.org/10.23887/jere.v4i3.28183.

Leite, E. A. M., Lencastre, J. A., Silva, B. D., & Neto, H. B. (2020). Learning style in a virtual environment: a study with elementary school teachers at in- service training. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 6(11), 951–952., 9(7), 1–27. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v9i7.3790.

Lewis, S., & Holloway, J. (2019). Datafying the teaching ‘profession’: remaking the professional teacher in the image of data. Cambridge Journal of Education, 49(1), 35–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2018.1441373.

Liberna, H. (2018). Hubungan Gaya Belajar Visual dan Kecemasan Diri Terhadap Pemahaman Konsep Matematika Siswa Kelas X SMK Negeri 41 Jakarta. JNPM (Jurnal Nasional Pendidikan Matematika), 2(1), 98. https://doi.org/10.33603/jnpm.v2i1.988.

Lu, L., & Wu, Y. (2020). Does religion enhance firm performance? Evidence from private firms in China. China Economic Review, 62, 101480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2020.101480.

Maison, Astalini, Kurniawan, D. A., & Sholihah, L. R. (2018). Deskripsi Sikap Siswa Sma Negeri Pada Mata Pelajaran Fisika. Jurnal Eduasains, 10(1), 160–167. https://doi.org/10.15408/es.v10i1.7214.

Masus, S. B., & Fadhilaturrahmi, F. (2020). Peningkatan Keterampilan Proses Sains IPA dengan Menggunakan Metode Ekperimen Di Sekolah Dasar Soni. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Konseling, 2(2), 161–167. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31004/jpdk.v2i1.1129.

Mendenhall, W. M., & Sincich, T. L. (2016). Statistics for engineering and the sciences, sixth edition. In Statistics for Engineering and the Sciences, Sixth Edition. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224065.2016.11918168.

Muslim, F., Refnida, R., Chen, D., & Wirayuda, R. P. (2021). Macroeconomic Digital Book Development: How are the Feasibility of Experts and Student Responses? Journal of Education Technology, 5(3), 501–510. https://doi.org/10.23887/jet.v5i3.38280.

Nafi’ah, U., Mashuri, & Wijaya, D. N. (2019). The development of digital book of European history to shape the students’ democratic values. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 14(6), 147–154. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v14i06.9760.

Nasution, L. M. (2017). Statistik Deskriptif. Jurnal Hikmah, 14(1), 49–55. http://e-jurnal.staisumatera-medan.ac.id/index.php/hikmah/article/view/16.

Ozdemir, A., Alaybeyoglu, A., Mulayim, N., & Uysal, M. (2018). An intelligent system for determining learning style. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 4(1), 208–214. https://doi.org/10.21890/ijres.383140.

Pardede, S. S. P. (2021). Pengaruh penggunaan metode tanya jawab terhadap hasil belajar ekonomi pada materi pengangguran di kelas xi sma negeri 1 siabu. Jurnal Misi, 4(2), 112–121. http://journal.ipts.ac.id/index.php/MISI/article/view/624.

Rahayu, N. S. (2018). Perbandingan Hasil Belajar Matakuliah Pengantar Ekonomi Mikro Pada Mahasiswa Lulusan Program IPA dan IPS. JPEKA: Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi, Manajemen Dan Keuangan, 2(1), 49. https://doi.org/10.26740/jpeka.v2n1.p49-56.

Saidi, S. S., & Siew, N. M. (2019). Assessing Students’ Understanding of the Measures of Central Tendency and Attitude towards Statistics in Rural Secondary Schools. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 14(1), 73–86. https://doi.org/10.12973/iejme/3968.

Suhendri, H. (2011). Pengaruh Kecerdasan Matematis–Logis dan Kemandirian Belajar terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika. Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA, 1(1), 29–39. https://doi.org/10.30998/formatif.v1i1.61.

Sumyadi, Y., Umasih, U., & Syukur, A. (2020). The Effect of Teacher Teaching Skills and Student Interest on History Learning Outcomes. Journal of Education Research and Evaluation, 4(3), 315–320. https://doi.org/10.23887/jere.v4i3.28349.

Suryani, I., & Maksum, H. (2020). Positive Contribution of Creativity and Independence to Student Learning Outcomes in Digital Communication Simulation. Journal of Education Research and Evaluation, 4(4), 414. https://doi.org/10.23887/jere.v4i4.29932.

Ware, K., & Rohaeti, E. (2018). Penerapan Model Problem Based Learning Dalam Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Analitis Dan Keterampilan Proses Sains Peserta Didik Sma. JTK (Jurnal Tadris Kimiya), 3(1), 42–51. https://doi.org/10.15575/jtk.v3i1.2219.

Wulandari, M., Astalini, A., & Darmaji, D. (2021). Analisis Kebutuhan Mahasiswa terhadap Pengembangan E-Modul Fisika Matematika I di Program Studi Pendidikan Fisika FKIP Universitas Jambi. Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 11(Desember 2021), 23–28. https://doi.org/10.37630/jpm.v11i2.473.

Wulandari, M., Wirayuda, R. P., Aldila, F., & Wulandari, R. (2020). Description of students’ Integrated Science Process Skills on Friction Material on a Flat Field. Lensa: Jurnal Kependidikan Fisika, 8(2), 93–103. https://doi.org/10.33394/j-lkf.v8i2.3206.

Yulfianti, S. Y., & Dewi, R. M. (2021). Efek Learning Management System Berbasis Google Classroom dan Minat Belajar Terhadap Hasil Belajar Ekonomi Siswa. Jurnal Kependidikan: Jurnal Hasil Penelitian Dan Kajian Kepustakaan Di Bidang Pendidikan, Pengajaran Dan Pembelajaran, 7(2), 491. https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v7i2.3717.

Yundarini, N. K. S., Nyoman Sudana, D., & Astawan, I. G. (2020). Assessment Instruments of Social Attitudes and Social Studies Learning Outcomes for Class V SD on Theme of Lingkungan Sekitar Kita. Journal of Education Research and Evaluation, 4(3), 288. https://doi.org/10.23887/jere.v4i3.27486.