Aspect of Reasoning Development on Authentic Assessment Indicators in Electronic School Book in Senior High School

Wini Tarmini; Imam  Safi'i; Ade Hikmat; Sobri

doi:10.23887/jere.v6i3.46151

Authors

Wini Tarmini Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof. DR. HAMKA, Jakarta, Indonesia
Imam Safi'i Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof. DR. HAMKA, Jakarta, Indonesia
Ade Hikmat Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof. DR. HAMKA, Jakarta, Indonesia
Sobri Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa Banten

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23887/jere.v6i3.46151

Keywords:

Reasoning, authentic assessment indicators, high school electronic school books

Abstract

Reasoning is one of the most fundamental aspects in solving problems. This study aims to analyses the development of reasoning in authentic assessment indicators contained in language electronic school books for high school. The method used in this research is content analysis. The subject of this study are electronic school books for Senior High School class X, XI, and XII, The research procedure carried out refers to the stages of qualitative research, namely data collection, data display, data reduction, and drawing or verifying. The data that has been collected is then analyzed by calculating the number or intensity of the reasoning aspects and the tendency of the spread of various aspects of reasoning which are grouped into five categories. The result of this study found that reasoning contained in Senior High School electronic school book has been developed quite well, but has not developed the aspect of reasoning proportionally. The reasoning aspect that is most often developed in authentic assessment indicators is identifying problems and identifying assumptions. Aspects of reasoning that have not been developed are related to formulating problems in the form of questions, choosing their own problems, give reasons for the solution, give reasons for the strategy used, and evaluate the systematic strategy. The results of this study can be used to measure the quality of developing authentic assessment indicator supplements contained in high school electronic school books.

References

Adel, S. M. R., Davoudi, M., & Ramezanzadeh, A. (2016). A qualitative study of politeness strategies used by Iranian EFL learners in a class blog. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 4(1), 47–62. https://doi.org/10.30466/IJLTR.2016.20377.

Agustina, E. S. (2017). Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia Berbasis Teks: Representasi Kurikulum 2013. AKSARA : Jurnal Bahasa Dan Sastra, 18(1), 84–99. https://doi.org/10.23960/aksara.

Agustina, Y. (2020). Meningkatkan Kemampuan Menganalisis Struktur Teks Anekdot dengan Menggunakan Media Video Pembelajaran Pada Siswa Kelas X SMK Swasta Al Ma’shum Kisaran Tahun Pelajaran 2020/2021. Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran: JPPP, 1(3), 200–208. https://doi.org/10.30596%2Fjppp.v1i3.5416.

Almomani, E., Sullivan, J., Hijjeh, M., & Attlallah, K. (2021). The perceived relationship between reflective learning conversation and clinical reasoning skills amongst critical care and trauma nurses: A cross sectional parallel mixed method. Nurse Education Today, 105, 105044. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2021.105044.

Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl Peter W Airasian, D. R., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Pintrich, P. R., Raths, J., & Wittrock, M. C. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing. A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives (Abridged E). Ney York: Longman.

Antara, I. G. W. S., & Dewantara, K. A. K. (2022). E-Scrapbook: The Needs of HOTS Oriented Digital Learning Media in Elementary Schools. Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 5(1), 71–76. https://doi.org/10.23887/jlls.v5i1.48533.

Ayyoub, A. A., Bsharat, A., & Suleiman, M. (2021). The impact of alternative authentic assessment outcomes in Palestinian fourth grade math classrooms. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 70, 101056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.101056.

Bosica, J., Pyper, J. S., & MacGregor, S. (2021). Incorporating problem-based learning in a secondary school mathematics preservice teacher education course. Teaching and Teacher Education, 102, 103335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103335.

Charalambous, A. C. (2011). The Role and Use of Course Books in EFL. Online Submission, May.

Chong, M. S. F., Shahrill, M., & Li, H. C. (2019). The integration of a problem-solving framework for Brunei high school mathematics curriculum in increasing student’s affective competency. Journal on Mathematics Education, 10(2), 215–228. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.10.2.7265.215-228.

Dailami, D. (2016). Aspek Penalaran dalam Pengajaran Bahasa Indonesia. Ta’dib, 14(3), 157–163. https://doi.org/10.31958/jt.v14i2.207.

Daly, D., Rasmussen, A. V., & Dalsgaard, A. (2019). Learning about midwifery in another country from a distance: Evaluation of a virtual classroom learning session. Urse Education Today, 75, 47–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2019.01.007.

Durrani, N., CohenMiller, A., Kataeva, Z., Bekzhanova, Z., Seitkhadyrova, A., & Badanova, A. (2022). ‘The fearful khan and the delightful beauties’: The construction of gender in secondary school textbooks in Kazakhstan. International Journal of Educational Development, 88, 102508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2021.102508.

Ewais, A., & Troyer, O. De. (2019). A Usability and Acceptance Evaluation of the Use of Augmented Reality for Learning Atoms and Molecules Reaction by Primary School Female Students in Palestine. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 57(7), 1643–1670. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633119855609.

Fan, L., & Kaeley, G. S. (2000). The Influence of Textbooks on Teaching Strategies: An Empirical Study. Mid-Western Educational Researcher, 13(4), 2–9. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ620449.

Farrell, C. (2020). Do international marketing simulations provide an authentic assessment of learning? A student perspective. International Journal of Management Education, 18(1), 100362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2020.100362.

Fernandes, H. V. (2021). From student to tutor: A journey in problem-based learning. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 13(12), 1706–1709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2021.09.037.

Handayani, L. T. (2016). Pola Penalaran Penggalan Teks Materi Ajar Bahasa Indonesia Dalam Buku Siswa Kelas Vii Kurikulum 2013. Kajian Linguistik Dan Sastra, 1(1), 48. https://doi.org/10.23917/kls.v1i1.2478.

Hidayah, I. R., Kusmayadi, T. A., & Fitriana, L. (2021). Minimum Competency Assessment (AKM): An Effort To Photograph Numeracy. Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education, 11(1), 14–20. https://doi.org/10.20961/jmme.v11i1.52742.

Jalinus, N., Syahril, & Nabawi, R. A. (2019). A comparison of the problem-solving skills of students in pjBL versus CPjBL model: An experimental study. Journal of Technical Education and Training, 11(1), 36–43. https://doi.org/10.30880/jtet.2019.11.01.005.

Keifert, D., Xiao, C., Enyedy, N., & Danish, J. (2021). Learners as phenomena: Expansive inquiry as students embody water particles. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 31, 100572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2021.100572.

Kosasih, E. ; E. K. (2019). 22 Jenis Teks & Strategi Pembelajarannya di SMA-MA/SMK. Yrama Widya.

Kristyanawati, M. D., Suwandi, S., & Rohmadi, M. (2019). Peningkatan Keterampilan Menulis Teks EksposisiMenggunakanModel Problem Based Learning. Scholaria: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 9(2), 192–202. https://doi.org/10.24246/j.js.2019.v9.i2.p192-202.

Kurniawan, K. (2016). Kajian Buku Teks Bahasa Indonesia Berbasis Kecakapan Hidup. Lingua, 12(2), 124–132. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/index.php/lingua/article/view/9082.

Li, Y., Ouyang, S., & Zhang, Y. (2022). Combining deep learning and ontology reasoning for remote sensing image semantic segmentation. Knowledge-Based Systems, 243, 108469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2022.108469.

Lindgren, B. M., Lundman, B., & Graneheim, U. H. (2020). Abstraction and interpretation during the qualitative content analysis process. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 108, 103632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103632.

Luo, M., Sun, D., Zhu, L., & Yang, Y. (2021). Evaluating scientific reasoning ability: Student performance and the interaction effects between grade level, gender, and academic achievement level. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 41, 100899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100899.

Maaß, K., & Artigue, M. (2013). Implementation of inquiry-based learning in day-to-day teaching: a synthesis. ZDM Mathematics Education, 45, 779–795. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-013-0528-0.

Margana, M., & Widyantoro, A. (2017). Developing English Textbooks Oriented to Higher Order Thinking Skills for Students of Vocational High Schools in Yogyakarta. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 8(1), 26. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0801.04.

Maude, P., Livesay, K., Searby, A., & McCauley, K. (2021). Identification of authentic assessment in nursing curricula: An integrative review. Nurse Education in Practice, 52, 103011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2021.103011.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2018). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. Sage Publications.

Mpalanyi, M., Nalweyiso, I. D., & Mubuuke, A. G. (2020). Perceptions of radiography students toward problem-based learning almost two decades after its introduction at Makerere University, Uganda. Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, 51(4), 639–644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmir.2020.06.009.

Murphy, C., Abu-Tineh, A., Calder, N., & Mansour, N. (2021). Teachers and students’ views prior to introducing inquiry-based learning in Qatari science and mathematics classrooms. Teaching and Teacher Education, 104, 103367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103367.

Nurtanto, M., Kholifah, N., Masek, A., Sudira, P., & Samsudin, A. (2021). Crucial Problems in Arranged The Lesson Plan of Vocational Teacher. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 10(1), 345–354. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v10i1.20604.

Orfan, S. N., Noori, A. Q., & Akramy, S. A. (2021). Afghan EFL instructors’ perceptions of English textbooks. Heliyon, 7(11), e08340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08340.

Pangestika, D. N., Andayani, A., & Suhita, R. (2017). Kajian buku teks bahasa Indonesia tingkat Sekolah Menengah Pertama. BASASTRA, 5(2), 31–48. https://jurnal.fkip.uns.ac.id/index.php/bhs_indonesia/article/view/11550.

Paulsen, V. H., & Kolst, S. D. (2022). Students’ reasoning when faced with test items of challenging aspects of critical thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 43(9), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100969.

Pawar, R., Kulkarni, S., & Patil, S. (2020). Project based learning: An innovative approach for integrating 21st century skills. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 33(4), 58–63. https://doi.org/10.16920/jeet/2020/v33i4/139423.

Puspitasari, D., Widodo, H. P., Widyaningrum, L., Allamnakhrah, A., & Lestariyana, R. P. D. (2021). How do primary school English textbooks teach moral values? A critical discourse analysis. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 70, 101044. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.101044.

Rahman, M. M. (2019). 21st Century Skill “Problem Solving”: Defining the Concept. Asian Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, 2(1), 64–74. https://doi.org/10.34256/ajir1917.

Ratmelia, Y. (2018). Nilai Moral dalam Buku Teks Pelajaran Sejarah. Historia: Jurnal Pendidik Dan Peneliti Sejarah, 1(2), 115–121. https://doi.org/10.17509/historia.v1i2.10711.

Rokhim, D. A., Widarti, H. R., & Fajaroh, F. (2020). Pengembangan Bahan Belajar Flipbook pada Materi Redoks dan Elektrokimia Berbasis Pendekatan STEM-PjBL Berbantuan Video Pembelajaran. Kwangsan: Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, 8(2), 234–250. https://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.31800/jtp.kw.v8n2.p234--250 PENGEMBANGAN.

Safi’i, I., Tarmini, W., & Wahdini, L. (2021). Critical thinking in evaluation instruments at BSE Indonesian language. ,. Kembara: Jurnal Keilmuan Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pengajarannya, 7(2), 11–19. https://doi.org/10.22219/kembara.v7i2.17300.

Safi’i, I., & Wahdini, L. (2021). Communicative and Collaborative Aspects in Indonesian BSE Evaluation Instruments. Journal of Education Research and Evaluation, 5(2), 168–175. https://doi.org/10.23887/jere.v5i2.33146.

Sailer, M., Bauer, E., Hofmann, R., Kiesewetter, J., Glas, J., Gurevych, I., & Fischer, F. (2022). Adaptive feedback from artificial neural networks facilitates pre-service teachers’ diagnostic reasoning in simulation-based learning. Learning and Instruction, 101620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2022.101620.

Sani, R. A. (2022). Penilaian autentik. Bumi Aksara.

Selman, Y. F., & Jaedun, A. (2020). Evaluation of The Implementation of 4C Skills in Indonesian Subject at Senior High Schools. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 9(2), 244–257. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v9i2.23459.

Setiawati, W., Asmira, O., Ariyana, Y., Bestary, R., & Pudjiastuti. (2019). Implementasi Program Pengembangan Keprofesian Berkelanjutan Guru melalui Peningkatan Kompetensi Pembelajaran Berbasis Zonasi. Direktorat Jendral Guru Dan Tenaga Kependidikan, 10(2), 84–94. https://doi.org/10.37411/pedagogika.v10i2.60.

Sokhanvar, Z., Salehi, K., & Sokhanvar, F. (2021). Advantages of authentic assessment for improving the learning experience and employability skills of higher education students: A systematic literature review/doi.org/. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 70, 101030. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.101030.

Sufairoh, S. (2016). Pendekatan Saintifik dan Model Pembelajaran K-13. Jurnal Pendidikan Profesional, 5(3), 116–124. http://www.jurnalpendidikanprofesional.com/index.php/JPP/article/view/186.

Suherman, S., & Vidákovich, T. (2022). Assessment of Mathematical Creative Thinking: A Systematic Review. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 101019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101019.

Suryaman, M., Cahyono, Y., Muliansyah, D., Bustani, O., Suryani, P., Fahlevi, M., Pramono, R., Purwanto, A., Purba, J. T., Munthe, A. P., Juliana, & Harimurti, S. M. (2020). COVID-19 pandemic and home online learning system: Does it affect the quality of pharmacy school learning? Systematic Reviews in Pharmacy, 11(8), 524–530. https://doi.org/10.31838/srp.2020.8.74.

Suryaningtyas, A., Kimianti, F., & Prasetyo, Z. K. (2020). Developing Science Electronic Module Based on Problem-Based Learning and Guided Discovery Learning to Increase Critical Thinking and Problem-Solving Skills. 401(Iceri 2019), 65–70. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200204.013.

Syahdan, S. (2019). Peningkatan Motivasi dan Ketuntasan Belajar melalui Penerapan Pembelajaran Kontekstual Berbasis Pemodelan. NUSANTARA, 1(3), 317–338. https://doi.org/10.36088/nusantara.v1i3.678.

Turan, E., Kobaş, M., & Göksun, T. (2021). Spatial language and mental transformation in preschoolers: Does relational reasoning matter? Cognitive Development, 57, 100980. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2020.100980.

Wahyuni, T., Suwandi, S., Slamet, S. Y., & Andayani, A. (2019). The Content Of Indonesian Language Syntactic Learning Instrument Based On The Need Analysis Directed To The Indonesian Language And Literature Education Department Students Among The Universities In Surakarta Indonesia. Anatolian Journal of Education, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.29333/aje.2017.211a.

Wardani, R. K., & Syofyan, H. (2018). Pengembangan Video Interaktif pada Pembelajaran IPA Tematik Integratif Materi Peredaran Darah Manusia. Jurnal Ilmiah Sekolah Dasar, 2(4), 371. https://doi.org/10.23887/jisd.v2i4.16154.

Zhang, P., Du, J., Wang, L., Fei, M., Yang, T., & Pardalos, P. M. (2022). A human learning optimization algorithm with reasoning learning. Applied Soft Computing, 122, 108816. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2022.108816.

Zoe Deveau, M., & Redmond, S. (2021). Exploring Cognitive Biases and Clinical Reasoning During Simulation With BScN Students. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 61, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2021.08.025.