Talking Stick Learning Model Assisted by Media Question Box: Effectiveness on Science Learning Outcomes in Elementary Schools

Bella Yulia Purnama Sari; Ika Candra Sayekti

doi:10.23887/jere.v7i1.58196

Authors

Bella Yulia Purnama Sari Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
Ika Candra Sayekti Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23887/jere.v7i1.58196

Keywords:

Talking Stick, Question Box, Learning Outcomes

Abstract

Science learning is still conventional, causing students to be less focused and get grades in the low category. The research objective was to analyze the effectiveness of using the talking stick learning model assisted by the media questions box on science learning outcomes in elementary schools. This type of quantitative research with experimental design. Selection of the sample using simple random sampling. The research subjects were fifth-grade elementary school. The research design used the "One Group Pretest-Posttest Design" involving one group without a comparison group. Observation and test data collection techniques. Data analysis techniques using descriptive statistical analysis techniques and inferential statistical analysis. The results showed that after applying the talking stick learning method assisted by the questions box, it increased so that most student scores were in the high category. Based on the analysis results, the output of the Independent Sample T Test is known to be the value of Sig. (2-tailed) of 0.000, then H0 is accepted, so there is an average difference between the pretest and posttest results. The talking stick learning model assisted by the question box media effectively improves science learning outcomes for students. This research implies that teachers can apply learning models to develop learning outcomes and student activity in the classroom.

References

Andre Suhardiana, I. P. (2019). Model Pembelajaran Talking Stick Sebagai Pendukung Penguasaan English Vocabulary Pada Anak Usia Dini. Pratama Widya : Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 3(1), 41–54. https://doi.org/10.25078/pw.v3i1.704.

Arianti, N. M., Wiarta, I. W., & Darsana, I. W. (2019). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Problem Posing Berbantuan Media Semi Konkret terhadap Kompetensi Pengetahuan Matematika. Jurnal Ilmiah Sekolah Dasar, 3(4), 394. https://doi.org/10.23887/jisd.v3i4.21765.

Asmara, S., Sumarni, W., & Hadisaputro, S. (2014). Pengaruhmetode Konsep Bertingkat Berbantuan Question Box Terhadap Peningkatan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis. Chemistry in Education, 3(1). http://eprints.ums.ac.id/id/eprint/108184.

Ayuni, I. G. A. P. A. S., Kusmariyatni, N., & Japa, I. G. N. (2017). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Talking Stick Berbantuan Media Question Box terhadap Hasil Belajar IPA Kelas V. Journal of Education Technology, 1(3), 183–190. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.23887/jet.v1i3.12503.

Cookson, P. S. (2015). Creating online courses step-by-step. International Handbook of E-Learning Volume 1: Theoretical Perspectives and Research, 181–196. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315760933-20.

Dewi, N. M. R., & Widiana, I. W. (2020). Question Box Dalam Pembelajaran IPS Dengan Model Creative Problem Solving Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar IPS Siswa. Jurnal Pedagogi Dan Pembelajaran, 3(2), 164. https://doi.org/10.23887/jp2.v3i2.25262.

Effendi, A., & Hartati, S. C. Y. (2018). Penerapan Permainan Tradisionalterhadap Minat Siswa Dalam Mengikuti Pembelajaran Pendidikan Jasmani, Olahraga Dan Kesehatan (Studi Pada Sdn Pelem Ii Kecamatan Kertosono, Kabupaten Nganjuk). Jurnal Pendidikan Olahraga Dan Kesehatan Volume 06, 6(1), 45–49. https://jurnalmahasiswa.unesa.ac.id/index.php/9/article/view/22218.

Fajrin, O. A. (2018). Pengaruh Model Talking Stick terhadap Hasil Belajar IPS Siswa SD. Jurnal Bidang Pendidikan Dasar, 2(1A), 85–91. https://doi.org/10.21067/jbpd.v2i1a.2353.

Gamage, K. A. A., Wijesuriya, D. I., Ekanayake, S. Y., Rennie, A. E. W., Lambert, C. G., & Gunawardhana, N. (2020). Online delivery of teaching and laboratory practices: Continuity of university programmes during COVID-19 pandemic. Education Sciences, 10(10), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10100291.

Habibi, H., Winiati, I., & Kurniawati, Y. (2020). Analisis Berpikir Kritis Matematis Siswa SMP Ditinjau Dari Gaya Kognitif Visualizer dan Verbalizer. Indonesian Journal of Mathematics and Natural Science Education, 1(2), 99–110. https://doi.org/10.35719/mass.v1i2.34.

Halili, S. H. (2019). Technological Advancements in Education 4.0. The Online Journal of Distance Education and E-Learning, 7(1), 63–69. https://tojdel.net/journals/tojdel/volumes/tojdel-volume07-i01.pdf#page=70.

Hall, A. K., Nousiainen, M. T., Campisi, P., Dagnone, J. D., Frank, J. R., Kroeker, K. I., Brzezina, S., Purdy, E., & Oswald, A. (2020). Training disrupted: Practical tips for supporting competency-based medical education during the COVID-19 pandemic. Medical Teacher, 42(7), 756–761. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2020.1766669.

Handhika, J., Cari, Suparmi, & Sunarno, W. (2015). Exsternal Representation To Overcome Misconception in Physics. International Conference on Mathematics, 2015(Icmse), 1–4. https://icmseunnes.com/2015/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/76_PE.pdf.

Hasrudin, F., & Asrul, A. (2020). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Talking Stick Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa pada Pelajaran IPA di SD Inpres 16 Kabupaten Sorong. Jurnal Papeda: Jurnal Publikasi Pendidikan Dasar, 2(2), 94–102. https://doi.org/10.36232/jurnalpendidikandasar.v2i2.521.

Heong, Y. M., Hamdan, N., Ching, K. B., Kiong, T. T., & Azid, N. (2020). Development of integrated creative and critical thinking module in problem-based learning to solve problems. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 9(3), 6567–6571. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Nurulwahida-Azid/publication/341311839.

Herpratiwi, Erni, Astuti, N., & Qomario. (2019). The implementation of a thematic team games tournament-Cooperative learning in the fifth grade of elementary school in lampung province. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 9(11), 192–205. http://repository.lppm.unila.ac.id/id/eprint/21938.

Juniati, N. W., & Widiana, I. W. (2017). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Ipa. Journal of Education Action Research, 1(2), 122. https://doi.org/10.23887/jear.v1i2.12045.

Khairunnisa, & Surya, E. (2017). Improve the Learning Outcomes of Mathematics through the Learning Model of Talking Stick in the Fifth-Grade of Public Primary School 060843 of Medan Barat. International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research, 34(1), 81–90. http://digilib.unimed.ac.id/id/eprint/24799.

Laksana, D. N. L. (2019). Kesulitan belajar anak dengan gaya belajar yang berbeda dalam menghadapi pembelajaran 4.0 serta strategi yang digunakan. December 2019, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3792390.

Lee, J., Lee, H. J., Song, J., & Bong, M. (2021). Enhancing children’s math motivation with a joint intervention on mindset and gender stereotypes. Learning and Instruction, 73, 101416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2020.101416.

Lemos, M. S., & Veríssimo, L. (2014). The Relationships between Intrinsic Motivation, Extrinsic Motivation, and Achievement, Along Elementary School. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 112(Iceepsy 2013), 930–938. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1251.

Liu, G., & Fang, N. (2016). Student misconceptions about force and acceleration in physics and engineering mechanics education. International Journal of Engineering Education, 32(1), 19–29. https://spada.uns.ac.id/pluginfile.php/232092/mod_resource/content/1/03_ijee3131ns_2016.pdf.

Malekian, F., Akhtar, M., & kakabaraee, K. (2013). Designing Training Math in Fifth Grade (Based on Logical Approach) and the Role of It on Critical Thoughts, Behaviour and Students Academic Motivation. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 82, 790–795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.350.

Megawati. (2018). Pentingnya Pengakomodasian Pengalaman Belajar pada Pembelajaran IPA. Jurnal Tunas Pendidikan, 1(1), 21–30. https://ejournal.ummuba.ac.id/index.php/pgsd/article/view/62.

Megita Rani, N. M. A., Ardana, I. K., & Oka Negara, I. G. A. (2019). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Talking Stick Berbantuan Lagu Tradisional Terhadap Kompetensi Pengetahuan Ipa. Mimbar Ilmu, 24(3), 345. https://doi.org/10.23887/mi.v24i3.21676.

Monroe, M. C., Plate, R. R., Oxarart, A., Bowers, A., & Chaves, W. A. (2019). Identifying effective climate change education strategies: a systematic review of the research. Environmental Education Research, 25(6), 791–812. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2017.1360842.

Murtiningsih. (2013). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Talking Stick Pada Mata Pelajaran IPS di Sekolah Dasar. Prosiding Seminar Nasional KSDP Prodi S1 PGSD FIP Universitas Negeri Malang, 99–106. http://pgsd.fip.um.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/12.pdf.

Nilayati, P. ., Suastra, I. ., & Gunamantha, I. . (2019). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Talking Stick Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Dan Literasi Sains Siswa Kelas IV SD. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Indonesia, 3(1), 31–40. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpdi.v3i1.2865.

Özerem, A. (2012). Misconceptions In Geometry And Suggested Solutions For Seventh Grade Students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 55, 720–729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.557.

Pane, A., & Dasopang, M. D. (2017). Belajar Dan Pembelajaran. FITRAH:Jurnal Kajian Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman, 3(2), 333. https://doi.org/10.24952/fitrah.v3i2.945.

Panjaitan, S. (2017). Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Ipa Melalui Media Gambar Pada Siswa Kelas Iia Sdn 78 Pekanbaru. Primary: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, 6(1), 252. https://doi.org/10.33578/jpfkip.v6i1.4105.

Perwita, L. W., & Indrawati, T. (2020). Peningkatan Proses Pembelajaran Tematik Terpadu Menggunakan Model Cooperative Learning Tipe Talking Stick di SD. E-Journal Inovasi Pembelajaran SD, 8(5), 41–56. https://doi.org/10.31004/jptam.v4i3.750.

Pour, A. N., Herayanti, L., & Sukroyanti, B. A. (2018). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Talking Stick terhadap Keaktifan Belajar Siswa. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengkajian Ilmu Pendidikan: E-Saintika, 2(1), 36. https://doi.org/10.36312/e-saintika.v2i1.111.

Putri, A. I. K. D., Putra, T. P., & Putra, P. D. A. (2017). Penerapan model pembelajaran talking stick disertai metode demonstrasi berbantuan media kokami. Jurnal Pembelajaran Fisika, 5(4), 321–328. http://jurnal.unej.ac.id/index.php/JPF/article/view/4226.

Redhana, I. W. (2019). Mengembangkan Keterampilan Abad Ke-21 Dalam Pembelajaran Kimia. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Kimia, 13(1). https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/index.php/JIPK/article/view/17824.

Sajidan, Suranto, Atmojo, I. R. W., Saputri, D. Y., & Etviana, R. (2022). Problem-Based Learning-Collaboration (Pbl-C) Model in Elementary School Science Learning in the Industrial Revolution Era 4.0 and Indonesia Society 5.0. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 11(3), 477–488. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v11i3.30631.

Saribas, D., & Ceyhan, G. D. (2015). Learning to teach scientific practices: pedagogical decisions and reflections during a course for pre-service science teachers. International Journal of STEM Education, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-015-0023-y.

Sayekti, I. C., & Kinasih, A. M. (2018). Kemampuan Guru Menerapkan Keterampilan Proses Sains Dalam Pembelajaran Ipa Pada Siswa Kelas Iv B Sdm 14 Surakarta. Profesi Pendidikan Dasar, 1(1), 93. https://doi.org/10.23917/ppd.v1i1.4464.

Stuckey, M., Hofstein, A., Mamlok-Naaman, R., & Eilks, I. (2013). The meaning of “relevance” in science education and its implications for the science curriculum. Studies in Science Education, 49(1), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2013.802463.

Tompo, B., Ahmad, A., & Muris, M. (2016). The development of discovery-inquiry learning model to reduce the science misconceptions of junior high school students. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(12), 5676–5686. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ej1115682.

Trianti Lestari, N. K., Kristiantari, M. R., & Ganing, N. N. (2018). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Talking Stick Berbantuan Lagu Daerah Terhadap Hasil Belajar Ips. International Journal of Elementary Education, 1(4), 290. https://doi.org/10.23887/ijee.v1i4.12960.

Trotskovsky, E., & Sabag, N. (2015). One output function: a misconception of students studying digital systems – a case study. Research in Science and Technological Education, 33(2), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2014.983468.

Üce, M., & Ceyhan, İ. (2019). Misconception in Chemistry Education and Practices to Eliminate Them: Literature Analysis. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 7(3), 202. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v7i3.3990.

Vosniadou, S., & Skopeliti, I. (2017). Is it the Earth that turns or the Sun that goes behind the mountains? students’ misconceptions about the day/night cycle after reading a science text. International Journal of Science Education, 39(15), 2027–2051. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1361557.

Wahyono, P., & Susetyorini, E. (2021). Misconceptions of biology education students in Biochemistry Course during the COVID-19 pandemic. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 7(2), 104–110. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v7i2.17093.