From Variables to Research Design: A Deep Dive into Educational Research Methodology

Moses Adeleke  Adeoye

doi:10.23887/jere.v7i4.68173

Authors

Moses Adeleke Adeoye Al-Hikmah University Ilorin, Ilorin, Nigeria

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23887/jere.v7i4.68173

Keywords:

Variables, Background to the Study, Literature Review, Research Design

Abstract

The systematic collection and analysis of data relevant to the field of education are referred to as educational research. Research writing is a laborious practice that methodically approaches the solution to a given research challenge. It differs from educational institutions and is typically led by a format. This study aims to analyze methodological explanation of variables, background to the study, literature review & research design as ways of promoting vigorous scholarship. This research uses the Systematic Literature Review (SLR) method. The results of this research explain many types of in-depth research methodology. These resources' main goal is to assist young academics and education professionals in learning about the background of the study, literature review, research design, and methodological explanation of variables. Educational research plays a crucial role in the development and improvement of educational practices and policies. It enables educators and policymakers to make informed decisions based on evidence and data. These offer beneficial fundamental knowledge for those who wish to pursue careers as researchers.

References

Agustini, K., Santyadiputra, G. S., & Sugihartini, N. (2020). Visualizing the stages of the educational research methodology into animation infographics for vocational students. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, 9(3), 317–327. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpv.v9i3.22017.

Ahmmed, S., Saha, J., & Tamal, M. A. (2022). An empirical study for determining the quality indicators for the primary and secondary school of Bangladesh: A structural equation modeling approach. Heliyon, 8(10), e10870.1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10870.

Aldoobie, N. (2015). ADDIE Model. American International Journal of Contemporary Research, 5(6). www.aijcrnet.com/journals/Vol_5_No_6_December_2015/10.pdf.

Azrai, E. P., Sigit, D. V., & Puji, M. (2017). The Correlation between Environmental Awareness and Students Participation in Go Green School Activity at Adiwiyata’S School. Biosfer: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 10(2), 7–11. https://doi.org/10.21009/biosferjpb.10-2.2.

Baumfalk, B., Bhattacharya, D., Vo, T., Forbes, C., Zangori, L., & Schwarz, C. (2019). Impact of model-based science curriculum and instruction on elementary students’ explanations for the hydrosphere. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 56(5), 570–597. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21514.

Bhat, B. A., & Bhat, G. J. (2019). Formative and summative evaluation techniques for improvement of learning process. ,. European Journal of Business & Social Sciences, 7(5), 776–785. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Bilal-Bhat-6/publication/333633265.

Brooke, J. (2013). SUS: a retrospective. Journal of Usability Studies, 8(2), 29–40. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/John-Brooke-6/publication/285811057.pdf.

Bystrova, T. (2020). Infographics As a Tool for Improving Effectiveness of Education. KnE Social Sciences, 2020, 152–158. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v4i13.7710.

Dhanil, M., & Mufit, F. (2021). Design and Validity of Interactive Multimedia Based on Cognitive Conflict on Static Fluid Using Adobe Animate CC 2019. Jurnal Penelitian & Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika, 7(2), 177–190. https://doi.org/10.21009/1.07210.

Dharmadi, M. A., & Agustini, N. N. M. (2019). Description of School Health Development Index (SHDI) in Junior High Schools in Buleleng Regency – Bali. Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat, 14(3), 326–331. https://doi.org/10.15294/kemas.v14i3.12389.

Dixon-Woods, M., Agarwal, S., Jones, D., Young, B., & Sutton, A. (2005). Synthesising qualitative and quantitative evidence: A review of possible methods. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy, 10(1), 45–53. https://doi.org/10.1258/1355819052801804.

Dorfman, L. Y., & Kalugin, A. Y. (2020). Resources, potentials and academic achievements of students: Part 1. Differentiation of resources and potentials [Соотношение ресурсов, потенциалов и академических достижений студентов cообщение 1. дифференциация ресурсов и потенциалов]. Obrazovanie i Nauka, 22(4), 64–88. https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2020-4-64-88.

Eccles, D. W., & Arsal, G. (2017). The think aloud method: what is it and how do I use it? Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 9(4), 514–531. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2017.1331501.

Fryling, M. J., Johnston, C., & Hayes, L. J. (2011). Understanding Observational Learning: An Interbehavioral Approach. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 27(1), 191–203. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03393102.

Gopalan, M., Rosinger, K., & Ahn, J. B. (2020). Use of quasi-experimental research designs in education research: Growth, promise, and challenges. Review of Research in Education, 44(1), 218–243. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X20903302.

Gopalan, Maithreyi, Rosinger, K., & Ahn, J. Bin. (2020). Use of Quasi-Experimental Research Designs in Education Research: Growth, Promise, and Challenges. Review of Research in Education, 44(1), 218–243. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X20903302.

Gyasi, J. F., Zheng, L., & Zhou, Y. (2021). Perusing the Past to Propel the Future: A Systematic Review of STEM Learning Activity Based on Activity Theory. Sustainability, 13(16), 8828. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13168828.

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2017). Multivariate data analysis. In Pearson. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118895238.ch8.

Han, F., Ellis, R. A., & Pardo, A. (2022). The Descriptive Features and Quantitative Aspects of Students Observed Online Learning: How Are They Related to Self-Reported Perceptions and Learning Outcomes. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, May. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2022.3153001.

Hattan, C., Singer, L. M., Loughlin, S., & Alexander, P. A. (2015). Prior Knowledge Activation in Design and in Practice. Literacy Research: Theory, Method, and Practice, 64(1), 478–497. https://doi.org/10.1177/2381336915617603.

Hayama, Y., & Desai, H. (2022). Educational Probe for Developing Online Education: A Case of Online Problem-Based Learning in Design Education in India. Proceedings of the Design Society, 2, 2283–2292. https://doi.org/10.1017/pds.2022.231.

Heap, V., & Waters, J. (2019). Mixed methods in criminology. In Mixed Methods in Criminology. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315143354.

Hill, J. B. (2021). Pre-Service Teacher Experiences during COVID 19: Exploring the Uncertainties between Clinical Practice and Distance Learning. Journal of Practical Studies in Education, 2(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.46809/jpse.v2i2.18.

J, T. S., Robert, B., & Marjorie, D. (2015). Introduction To Qualitative Research Methods: A Guidebook And Resource. In John Wiley & Sons.

Jamulia, J. (2018). Identifying Students Learning Style Preferences At Iain Ternate. International Journal of Education, 10(2), 121–129. https://doi.org/10.17509/ije.v10i2.1631.

Jimerson, S., Carlson, E., Rotert, M., Egeland, B., & Sroufe, L. A. (1997). A prospective, longitudinal study of the correlates and consequences of early grade retention. Journal of School Psychology, 35(1), 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4405(96)00033-7.

Konakll, T. (2015). Effects of self-efficacy on social entrepreneurship in education: a correlational research. Research in Education, 94(1), 30–43. https://doi.org/10.7227/RIE.0019.

Lambert, V. a., & Lambert, C. E. (2013). Qualitative Descriptive Research: An Acceptable Design. Pacific Rim International Journal of Nursing Research, 16(4), 255–256. https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/PRIJNR/article/download/5805/5064.

Lee, B. C., Pandian, A., Rethinasamy, S., & Tan, D. A. L. (2019). Effects of PWIM in the ESL classroom: Vocabulary knowledge development among primary Malaysian learners. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature, 25(4), 179–197. https://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2019-2504-11.

Madu, B. C. (2020). Scientific Explanation of Phenomenon, Imagination and Concept Formation as Correlates of Students’ Understanding of Physics Concepts. Journal of Natural Sciences Research, 11(16), 17–28. https://doi.org/10.7176/jnsr/11-16-03.

Malmqvist, J., Hellberg, K., Möllås, G., Rose, R., & Shevlin, M. (2019). Conducting the Pilot Study: A Neglected Part of the Research Process? Methodological Findings Supporting the Importance of Piloting in Qualitative Research Studies. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919878341.

Noble, H., & Heale. (2019). Triangulation in research, with examples. Evidence-Based Nursing, 22(3). https://doi.org/10.1136/ebnurs-2019-103145.

Rahman, S. A., & Manaf, N. F. A. (2017). A Critical Analysis of Bloom’s Taxonomy in Teaching Creative and Critical Thinking Skills in Malaysia through English Literature. English Language Teaching, 10(9), 245. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v10n9p245.

Rea, L. M., & Parker, R. A. (2014). Designing and Conducting Survey Research: A Comprehensive Guide, 4th Edition. Jossey-Bass.

Rintayati, P., Lukitasari, H., & Syawaludin, A. (2020). Development of Two-Tier Multiple Choice Test to Assess Indonesian Elementary Students’ Higher-Order Thinking Skills. International Journal of Instruction, 14(1), 555–566. https://doi.org/10.29333/IJI.2021.14133A.

Saat, R. M., Fadzil, H. M., Aziz, N. A. A., Haron, K., Rashid, K. A., & Shamsuar, N. R. (2016). Development of an online three-tier diagnostic test to assess pre-university students’ understanding of cellular respiration. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 15(4), 532. https://search.proquest.com/openview/3bc0f381fa7e5fd087e3bda79f093ee0/1?pq-origsite.

Schlegel, E. C., Tate, J. A., Pickler, R. H., & Smith, L. H. (2021). Practical strategies for qualitative inquiry in a virtual world. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 77(10), 4035–4044. https://doi.org/10.29173/iasl7898.

Shane-Simpson, C., Desens, E., Kleutsch, A., & Obeid, R. (2022). Relationships Among Study Guide Format, Academic Motivation, Self-Efficacy, and Student Grades. Sage Journal: Teaching of Psychology, 1(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/00986283221134594.

Šimunović, M., & Babarović, T. (2020). The role of parents’ beliefs in students’ motivation, achievement, and choices in the STEM domain: a review and directions for future research. Social Psychology of Education, 23(3), 701–719. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-020-09555-1.

Siswono, H. (2017). Analisis Pengaruh Keterampilan Proses Sains Terhadap Penguasaan Konsep Fisika Siswa. Momentum: Physics Education Journal, 1(2), 83–90. https://doi.org/10.21067/mpej.v1i2.1967.

Siti, C., Md, L., Nur, L., Binti, D., Mohd, I., Afiq, D., & Tazilah, K. (2021). Application of technology acceptance model (TAM) toward online learning during covid-19 pandemic: Accounting students perspective. International Journal of Business, Economics and Law, 24(1), 13–20. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Mohd-Khamar-Tazilah/publication/349214593.

Smets, W., & Struyven, K. (2020). A Teachers’ Professional Development Programme to Implement Differentiated Instruction in Secondary Education: How Far do Teachers Reach? Cogent Education, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2020.1742273.

Triandini, E., Jayanatha, S., Indrawan, A., Werla Putra, G., & Iswara, B. (2019). Systematic Literature Review Method for Identifying Platforms and Methods for Information System Development in Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Information Systems, 1(2), 63. https://doi.org/10.24002/ijis.v1i2.1916.

Yu, J., Kreijkes, P., & Salmela-Aro, K. (2022). Students’ growth mindset: Relation to teacher beliefs, teaching practices, and school climate. Learning and Instruction, 80, 101616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2022.101616.

Yue, X. (2019). Exploring Effective Methods of Teacher Professional Development in University for 21st Century Education. International Journal for Innovation Education and Research, 7(5), 248–257. https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol7.iss5.1506.