Comparative Test of Cronbach's Alpha Reliability Coefficient, Kr-20, Kr-21, And Split-Half Method
Keywords:
Empirical Quality, Final Semester Exam, Graphic Media DevelopmentAbstract
Final semester exams have an essential role in measuring student learning outcomes. Therefore, the tests must be of good quality. The problem is that lecturers must use reliable measuring tools to measure learning outcomes. This research aims to compare various reliability coefficients to determine which method has the highest reliability. The data collection methods in this research are observation, interviews, and tests based on student responses to the final semester exams. The data analysis technique uses the reliability of the Alpha Cronbach formula, Kuder Richardson 20, 21, and the split-half method consisting of Spearman-Brown, Flanagan, Rulon, and Hoyt. This type of research uses quantitative description. Comparative research designs are ex post facto. The research subjects were 90 undergraduate students. The research results provide several conclusions: first, the odd-even Rulon method has the highest reliability coefficient, namely 0.86; second, all reliable methods have a coefficient above 0.7 as the minimum requirement for acceptance; and third. All reliability methods have relatively the same reliability coefficient, namely around 0.8. fourth, all reliable techniques are suitable for measuring tools in the final semester exam. This research implies that lecturers are advised to use the odd-even Rulon reliability coefficient when measuring learning outcomes.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 hari setyaedhi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with the Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (JERE) agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Access)