Types of Sentences in EFL Students' Paragraph Assignments: A Quantitative Study on Teaching and Learning Writing at Higher Education Level

Penulis

  • Syayid Sandi Sukandi Sekolah Tinggi Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan (STKIP) PGRI Sumatera Barat http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4739-8533
  • Yola Merina Sekolah Tinggi Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan (STKIP) PGRI Sumatera Barat

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23887/jere.v1i3.10322

Kata Kunci:

Composition, EFL, Genre, Sentence, Students

Abstrak

This research investigates Indonesian EFL students writing four types of English sentences in their paragraph writing assignments that were posted online in Writing 1 course of English Education at STKIP PGRI Sumatera Barat. The analysed types of sentences are Simple Sentence (code: S.S.), Compound Sentence (code: C.S.1), Complex Sentence (code: C.S.2), and Compound-Complex Sentence (code: C.C.S). The percentage of each type of sentences that appears in the students’ writings within each five genres represents the students’ syntactical composition. Moreover, this research focuses on quantitatively analysing the above five types of sentences that appeared in students’ assignments in each type of following genres: argumentative, descriptive, process, cause-effect, and comparison-contrast. Data are taken from 10% samples of all population. The finding shows that writing Simple Sentence in paragraphs is a common type of sentence that is used by the students. It indicates that the guiding process to teaching students about writing paragraphs with varied sentence types is important for further development of teaching process of writing.

Biografi Penulis

Syayid Sandi Sukandi, Sekolah Tinggi Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan (STKIP) PGRI Sumatera Barat

Syayid Sandi Sukandi is a senior lecturer at English Education Study Program of STKIP PGRI Sumatera Barat. In 2017, he has received 380 kum (Lektor) and with III/c inpassing from Kopertis wilayah X. He has passed National Certification for Educators by Kemenristekdikti in 2016.

Referensi

Baroudy, I. (2008). Process Writing: Successful and Unsuccessful Writers; Discovering Writing Behaviours. International Journal of English Studies, 8(2), 43-63.

Beach, R. (1992). Experimental and Descriptive Research Methods in Composition. In G. Kirsch, & P. A. Sullivan (Eds.), Methods and Methodology in Composition Research (pp. 217-242). Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.

Blakeslee, A., & Fleischer, C. (2007). Becoming a Writing Researcher. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

Brown, D. (2004). Language Assessment: Principle and Classroom Practices. San Fransisco: Pearson Education, Inc. .

Facella, M. A., Rampino, K. M., & Shea, E. K. (2005). Effective Teaching Strategies for English Language Learners. Bilingual Research Journal, 210.

Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2008). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education. Boston: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.

Gunawan, I. (2016). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif: Teori & Praktik. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara.

Hart-Davidson, W. (1991). Inquiry, Writing, & Technology. In J. M. Lauer, & et al (Eds.), Four Worlds of Writing: Inquiry and Action in Context (p. 550). Boston: Pearson Custom Publishing.

Hindman, J. E. (2002). Contexts and Criteria for Evaluating Student Writing. In R. Duane, V. Pantoja, L. Yena, S. K. Miller, & E. Waggoner , Strategies for Teaching First-Year Composition (pp. 405-417). Illinois: National Council of Teachers of English.

Hyland, K. (2003). Second Language Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hyland, K. (2009). Teaching and Researching Writing. New York: Longman.

Jalilifar, A. (2008). Discourse Markers in Composition Writings: The Case of Iranian Learners of English as a Foreign Language. English Language Teaching, 1(2), 114-115.

Lekova, B. (2010). Language Interference and Methods of Its Overcoming in Foreign Language Teaching. Trakia Journal of Sciences, 8(3), 320-324.

Leo, S. (2007). English for Academic Purpose: Essay Writing. Yogyakarta: C.V. Andi Offset.

Nazir, M. (2014). Metode Penelitian. Bogor: Penerbit Ghalia Indonesia.

Pardiyono. (2007). Pasti Bisa! Teaching Genre-Based Writing. Yogyakarta: C.V ANDI Offset.

Penrod, D. (2005). Composition in Convergence: The Impact of New Media on Writing Assessment. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

Perl, S. (2011). The Composing Processes of Unskilled College Writers. In V. Villanueva, & K. L. Arola, Cross-Talk in Comp Theory: A Reader (p. 34). Illinois: National Council of Teachers of English.

Reid, J. M. (1988). The Process of Composition. London: Prentice-Hall International (UK) Limited.

Rowe, B. M., & Levine, D. P. (2009). A Concise Introduction to Linguistics. Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.

Subana, M., & Sudrajat. (2001). Dasar-Dasar Penelitian Ilmiah (1 ed.). Bandung: Pustaka Setia.

Tawachai, C. (2010). Implementing a Genre Pedagogy to the Teaching of Writing in a University Context in Thailand. Language Education in Asia, 181.

Wyse, D., & Jones, R. (2005). Teaching English, Language and Literacy. London: Routledge Falmer.

Yusuf, A. M. (2007). Metodologi Penelitian: Dasar-Dasar Penyelidikan Ilmiah. Padang: Universitas Negeri Padang Press.

Unduhan

Diterbitkan

2017-08-14

Cara Mengutip

Sukandi, S. S., & Merina, Y. (2017). Types of Sentences in EFL Students’ Paragraph Assignments: A Quantitative Study on Teaching and Learning Writing at Higher Education Level. Journal of Education Reseach and Evaluation, 1(3), 137–146. https://doi.org/10.23887/jere.v1i3.10322

Terbitan

Vol 1 No 3 (2017): August

Bagian

Articles

Lisensi

Authors who publish with the Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (JERE)  agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. 
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Access)