Filsafat Sains dan Inkuiri Sebagai Pendekatan dalam Membelajarkan Konsep Kekekalan Massa Lavoisier's Law
Philosophy of Science and Inquiry as an Approach to Learning the Concept of Conservation of Mass Lavoisier's Law
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23887/jfi.v7i3.78268Keywords:
philosophy, inquiry, real world applications, Lavoisier LawAbstract
The process of learning science is inseparable from the nature of science, which includes knowledge about methods (epistemology), the process of science formation (ontology), and the values and beliefs supporting the development of science (axiology). This study aims to examine and explain Lavoisier’s law of conservation of mass (Lavoisier Law) through the lenses of epistemology, ontology, and axiology. The research employs a descriptive qualitative method, with document analysis involving the collection, analysis, and interpretation of non-numerical data from various articles published in both national and international journals. The results of this study reveal that the ontological analysis of Lavoisier’s law of conservation of mass can be observed through Lavoisier's experimental facts. The epistemological analysis of Lavoisier’s law explains how Antoine Lavoisier discovered the law and how its validity can be assessed. The axiological analysis of Lavoisier’s law is understood as a study of how the law is applied or utilized and its connection to moral and ethical considerations. The concept of Lavoisier’s law of conservation of mass can be taught using a real-world applications inquiry approach, involving activities such as conducting chemical reaction simulations, product design projects, and real- world case analyses. The real-world applications level can help students improve their skills in data collection and interpretation based on experiments, making predictions, and constructing logical arguments based on scientific evidence, as well as making and justifying decisions based on the obtained evidence
References
Brock, R., & Park, W. (2022). Distinguishing Nature of Science Beliefs, Knowledge and Understandings: Towards Clarity and Coherence in Educational Goals Related to the Nature of Science. Science and Education, 0123456789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-022-00368-6.
Bugingo, J. B., Yadav, L. L., Mugisha, I. S., & Mashood, K. K. (2024). Improving Teachers’ and Students’ Views on Nature of Science Through Active Instructional Approaches: a Review of the Literature. In Science and Education (Vol. 33, Issue 1). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-022-00382-8.
Cellucci, C. (2014). Rethinking Philosophy. Philosophia (United States), 42(2), 271–288. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-013-9497-3.
Cheung, K. K. C., & Erduran, S. (2023). A Systematic Review of Research on Family Resemblance Approach to Nature of Science in Science Education. In Science and Education (Vol. 32, Issue 5). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-022-00379-3.
Cooper, A. (2023). Hypotheses in Kant’s philosophy of science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 99(May 2022), 97–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2022.04.007.
de Jong, T., Lazonder, A. W., Chinn, C. A., Fischer, F., Gobert, J., Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Koedinger, K. R., Krajcik, J. S., Kyza, E. A., Linn, M. C., Pedaste, M., Scheiter, K., & Zacharia, Z. C. (2023). Let’s talk evidence – The case for combining inquiry-based and direct instruction. Educational Research Review, 39(May), 100536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100536.
Goren, D., & Kaya, E. (2023). How is Students’ Understanding of Nature of Science Related with Their Metacognitive Awareness? Science and Education, 32(5), 1471–1496. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-022-00381-9.
Höttecke, D., & Allchin, D. (2020). Reconceptualizing nature-of-science education in the age of social media. Science Education, 104(4), 641–666. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21575.
Kaspers, T. (2023). The Practical Bearings of Truth as Correspondence. Erkenntnis, 0123456789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-023-00765-5.
Kersting, M., Haglund, J., & Steier, R. (2021). A Growing Body of Knowledge: On Four Different Senses of Embodiment in Science Education. Science and Education, 30(5), 1183–1210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00232-z.
Khishfe, R. (2023). Improving Students’ Conceptions of Nature of Science: A Review of the Literature. In Science and Education (Vol. 32, Issue 6). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-022-00390-8.
Kostøl, K. B., Bøe, M. V., & Skår, A. R. (2023). Nature of Science in Norway’s Recent Curricula Reform: Analysis of the Biology, Chemistry, and Physics Curricula. Science and Education, 32(5), 1561–1581. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-022-00399-z.
Kousloglou, M., Petridou, E., Molohidis, A., & Hatzikraniotis, E. (2023). Assessing Students’ Awareness of 4Cs Skills after Mobile-Technology-Supported Inquiry-Based Learning. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086725.
Kunisch, S., Denyer, D., Bartunek, J. M., Menz, M., & Cardinal, L. B. (2023). Review Research as Scientific Inquiry. Organizational Research Methods, 26(1), 3–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/10944281221127292.
Mesci, G., Yeşildağ-Hasançebi, F., & Tuncay-Yüksel, B. (2023). Argumentation based nature of science instruction: Influence on pre-service science teachers’ NOS views and practicing. Teaching and Teacher Education, 132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104231.
Muchson, M., Pratiwi, Y. N., Sulistina, O., & Sigit, D. (2016). Persepsi Mahasiswa Baru Jurusan Kimia Fmipa Um Angkatan 2016 Tentang Fenomena Perubahan Materi. Jurnal Pembelajaran Kimia, 01(2), 76–83.
Nugroho, I. (2016). Positivisme Auguste Comte: Analisa Epistemologis Dan Nilai Etisnya Terhadap Sains. Cakrawala: Jurnal Studi Islam, 11(2), 167–177. https://doi.org/10.31603/cakrawala.v11i2.192.
Nurasa, A., Natsir, N. F., & Haryanti, E. (2022). Tinjauan Kritis terhadap Ontologi Ilmu (Hakikat Realitas) dalam Perspektif Sains Modern. JIIP - Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, 5(1), 181–191. https://doi.org/10.54371/jiip.v5i1.396.
Orosz, G., Németh, V., Kovács, L., Somogyi, Z., & Korom, E. (2022). Guided Inquiry-Based Learning In Secondary-School Chemistry Classes: A Case Study. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 24(1), 50–70. https://doi.org/10.1039/d2rp00110a.
Park, W., Cullinane, A., Gandolfi, H., Alameh, S., & Mesci, G. (2024). Innovations, Challenges and Future Directions in Nature of Science Research: Reflections from Early Career Academics. Research in Science Education, 54(1), 27–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-023-10102-z.
Psillos, S. (2012). What is General Philosophy of Science? Journal for General Philosophy of Science, 43(1), 93–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10838-012-9182-4.
Robbia, A. Z., & Fuadi, H. (2020). Pengembangan Keterampilan Multimedia Interaktif Pembelajaran IPA Untuk Meningkatkan Literasi Sains Peserta Didik di Abad 21. Jurnal Ilmiah Profesi Pendidikan, 5(2), 117–123. https://doi.org/10.29303/jipp.v5i2.125.
Rombout, F., Schuitema, J. A., & Volman, M. L. L. (2022). Teaching Strategies for Value- Loaded Critical Thinking in Philosophy Classroom Dialogues. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 43(November 2021), 100991. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100991.
Schwartz, R. S., & Crawford, B. A. (2006). Authentic Scientific Inquiry As Context For Teaching Nature of Science. Springer, 331–355.
Schwartz, R. S., Lederman, N. G., & Crawford, B. A. (2004). Developing Views of Nature of Science in an Authentic Context: An Explicit Approach to Bridging The GAP Between Nature of Science and Scientific Inquiry. Science Education, 88(4), 610–645. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10128.
Tan, A. L., Ong, Y. S., Ng, Y. S., & Tan, J. H. J. (2023). STEM Problem Solving: Inquiry, Concepts, and Reasoning. Science and Education, 32(2), 381–397. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00310-2.
Till, M., Abu-Omar, K., Ferschl, S., Abel, T., Pfeifer, K., & Gelius, P. (2022). Implementing the capability Approach In Health Promotion Projects: Recommendations for Implementation Based on Empirical Evidence. Evaluation and Program Planning, 95(May). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2022.102149.
Verawati, N. N. S. P., & Sarjan, M. (2023). Tinjauan Filsafat (Aksiologi) Pendidikan Sains Masa Depan Berbasis Teknologi. Jurnal Ilmiah Profesi Pendidikan, 8(4), 2381–2387. https://doi.org/10.29303/jipp.v8i4.1650
Waruwu, M. (2023). Pendekatan Penelitian Pendidikan: Metode Penelitian Kualitatif, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif dan Metode Penelitian Kombinasi (Mixed Method). Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai , 7(1), 2896–2910.
Wenning, C. J. (2011a). Experimental Inquiry in Introductory Physics Course. Physics Course, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.12737/762.
Wenning, C. J. (2011b). Level of Inquiry: Using Inquiry Spectrum Learning Sequences on Teach Science. Journal of Physics Teacher Eucation Online, 6(2), 11–20.
Woodcock, B. A. (2014). “The Scientific Method” as Myth and Ideal. Science and Education, 23(10), 2069–2093. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-014-9704-z.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Jurnal Filsafat Indonesia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Filsafat Indonesia Undiksha is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
