Fifth Grade Elementary Science Psychomotor Assessment Instruments

Benedicta Rani Nugraheni; Widihastuti; Edi Istiyono

doi:10.23887/jisd.v7i4.59416

Authors

Benedicta Rani Nugraheni Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Widihastuti Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Edi Istiyono Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23887/jisd.v7i4.59416

Keywords:

Psychomotor, Elementary School, Assessment, Development, Science

Abstract

The lack of variation in the assessment of the psychomotor domain in science learning in elementary schools and the need for appropriate assessment instruments in online practical learning. The study aimed to analyze the quality of the development of the psychomotor assessment instrument for fifth-grade elementary school children on limb material. This type of research is development research. The subjects of this study were 87 students in grade 5 elementary school. Retrieval of data with self-assessment sheets was carried out using the Google form. The questionnaire consists of 10 statement items with four answer choices. Sampling technique with purposive sampling. The criteria used in the decision were: 5th-grade elementary school students who had studied limb material. Content validity was verified using Aiken's V formula and construct validity using EFA. Calculation of instrument reliability using the Alpha Cronbach formula. The results of this study are that the psychomotor domain assessment instrument has valid and reliable instrument criteria. The instrument used has a validity value in the "Very valid" category and a reliability value in the "High" category. It can be concluded that the use of psychomotor assessment with nine development steps for elementary science learning can be used properly.

References

Adeoye, B. F. (2019). The Era of Digital Technology in Teaching and Learning in Nigeria Educational Institutions (pp. 43–51). https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-9746-9.ch004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-9746-9.ch004

Agustin Mulyani, S. (2014). Penggunaan Boneka Sebagai Media Simulasi Kreatif Di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Pemikiran Dan Pengembangan Sekolah Dasar, 1(2), 20. https://doi.org/10.22219/jp2sd.v1i2.1801. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22219/jp2sd.v1i2.1801

Al-Hunaiyyan, A., Alhajri, R., & Bimba, A. (2021). Towards an Efficient Integrated Distance and Blended Learning Model: How to Minimise the Impact of COVID-19 on Education. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 15(10), 173–193. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v15i10.21331. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v15i10.21331

Al-Okaily, M., Alqudah, H., Matar, A., Lutfi, A., & Taamneh, A. (2020). Dataset on the Acceptance of e-learning System among Universities Students’ under the COVID-19 Pandemic Conditions. Data in Brief, 32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2020.106176. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2020.106176

Alawiyah, F. (2017). Standar Nasional Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. Aspirasi, 8. https://doi.org/10.18844/wjet.v13i3.5952. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46807/aspirasi.v8i1.1256

Ambarwati, D., Herwin, H., & Dahalan, S. C. (2022). How elementary school teachers assess students’ psychomotor during distance learning? Jurnal Prima Edukasia, 10(1), 58–65. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpe.v10i1.45040. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jpe.v10i1.45040

Bolton, D. L., & Lane, M. D. (2012). Individual entrepreneurial orientation: development of a measurement instrument. Education+ Training, 54(2), 219–233. https://doi.org/10.1108/00400911211210314. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/00400911211210314

Dettmer, P. (2005). New blooms in established fields: Four domains of learning and doing. Roeper Review, 28(2), 70–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190609554341. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190609554341

Edgar, S. N., & Elias, M. J. (2020). Setting the stage for Social Emotional Learning (SEL) policy and the arts. Arts Education Policy Review, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1080/10632913.2020.1777494. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10632913.2020.1777494

Gay, G. H. E. (2016). An assessment of online instructor e-learning readiness before, during, and after course delivery. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 28(2), 199–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-016-9115-z. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-016-9115-z

Hekmah, N., Wilujeng, I., & Suryadarma, I. G. P. (2019). Web-Lembar Kerja Siswa IPA Terintegrasi Lingkungan untuk Meningkatkan Literasi Lingkungan Siswa. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 5(2), 129–138. https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v5i2.25402. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v5i2.25402

Herwin, H., Hastomo, A., Saptono, B., Ardiansyah, A. R., & Wibowo, S. E. (2021). How elementary school teachers organized online learning during the covid-19 pandemic? World Journal on Educational Technology: Current Issues, 13(3), 437–449. https://doi.org/10.18844/wjet.v13i3.5952. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18844/wjet.v13i3.5952

Hidayat, W. (2017). Adversity Quotient Dan Penalaran Kreatif Matematis Siswa Sma Dalam Pembelajaran Argument Driven Inquiry Pada Materi Turunan Fungsi. KALAMATIKA Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 2(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.22236/kalamatika.vol2no1.2017pp15-28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22236/KALAMATIKA.vol2no1.2017pp15-28

Istiyono, E. (2020). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian dan Analisis Hasil Belajar Fisika Dengan Teori Tes Klasik dan Modern (Kedua. UNY Press.

Karakaita Putri, P. N. A., Arini, N. W., & Sumantri, M. (2019). Pengaruh Strategi Directed Reading Thinking Activity (DRTA) Berbantuan Media Flip Chart Terhadap Keterampilan Membaca Pemahaman. Jurnal Ilmiah Sekolah Dasar, 3(2), 158. https://doi.org/10.23887/jisd.v3i2.17762. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/jisd.v3i2.17762

Lai, A.-F., Chen, C.-H., & Lee, G.-Y. (2019). An augmented reality-based learning approach to enhancing students’ science reading performances from the perspective of the cognitive load theory. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(1), 232–247. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12716. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12716

Mahendra, I. W. E. (2017). Project based learning bermuatan etnomatematika dalam pembelajar matematika. JPI (Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia), 6(1), 106–114. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v6i1.9257. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v6i1.9257

Maison, M., Haryanto, H., Ernawati, M. D. W., Ningsih, Y., Jannah, N., Puspitasari, T. O., & Putra, D. S. (2020). Comparison of student attitudes towards natural sciences. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 9(1), 54–61. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v9i1.20394. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v9i1.20394

Maryati, M., Zubaidah, E., & Mustadi, A. (2019). A content analysis study of scientific approach and authentic assessment in the textbook of Curriculum 2013. Jurnal Prima Edukasia, 7(2), 128–138. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpe.v7i2.26792. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jpe.v7i2.26792

Michalski, S. C., Szpak, A., Saredakis, D., Ross, T. J., Billinghurst, M., & Loetscher, T. (2019). Getting your game on: Using virtual reality to improve real table tennis skills. PLoS ONE, 14(9). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222351. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222351

Munandar, H., Junita, S., & dan. (2020). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Psikomotorik Berbasis Peer Assessment Pada Kegiatan Praktikum IPA. Jurnal Tunas Bangsa, 7(2), 143. https://doi.org/10.46244/tunasbangsa.v7i2.1127. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46244/tunasbangsa.v7i2.1127

Nduru, M. P. (2022). Penilaian Aspek Kognitif, Afektif dan Psikomotorik di Masa Pandemi Covid 19 Kelas V Sekolah Dasar Inpres Onekore 6 Kecamatan Ende Tengah The Assessment of Cognitive, Affective and Psychomotor Aspects at Class V Inpres Onekore 6 Elementary School Ende Teng. http://journalfai.unisla.ac.id/index.php/at-thulab/index. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30736/atl.v6i2.1115

Nugraha, C. A., & Wahyono, S. B. (2019). Developing Interactive Multimedia Learning for Psychomotor Domain to Students of Vocational High School. Jurnal Kependidikan: Penelitian Inovasi Pembelajaran, 3(2), 220–235. https://doi.org/10.21831/jk.v3i2.21797. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jk.v3i2.21797

Nur Jannah, I. (2020). Efektivitas Penggunaan Multimedia dalam Pembelajaran IPA di SD. Jurnal Ilmiah Sekolah Dasar, 4(1), 54. https://doi.org/10.23887/jisd.v4i1.24135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/jisd.v4i1.24135

Pinilih, F., Budiharti, R., & Ekawati, E. (2013). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Produk Pada Pembelajaran Ipa Untuk Siswa Smp. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Universitas Sebelas Maret, 1(2), 23–27. https://jurnal.fkip.uns.ac.id/index.php/pfisika/article/view/2798.

Pranata, Y. R. P. S. A. S. (2017). Pengembangan Media Boneka Tangan Berbasis Digital Storytelling. Kreatif Jurnal Kependidikan Dasar, 10, 627–636. http://journal.um.ac.id/index.php/jptpp/article/view/10332.

Pratiwi, I. A., Ardianti, S. D., & Kanzunnudin, M. (2018). Peningkatan kemampuan kerjasama melalui model project based learning (PjBL) berbantuan metode edutainment pada mata pelajaran ilmu pengetahuan sosial. Refleksi Edukatika: Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.24176/re.v8i2.2357. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24176/re.v8i2.2357

Putri, F. S., & Istiyono, E. (2017). The Development of Performance Assessment of STEM-Based Critical Thinking Skill in the High School Physics Lessons. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 12(5), 1269–1281. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1278188.

Renganayagalu, S. kumar, Mallam, S. C., & Nazir, S. (2021). Effectiveness of VR Head Mounted Displays in Professional Training: A Systematic Review. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 26(4), 999–1041. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-020-09489-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-020-09489-9

Riddell, J. (2015). Performance, Feedback, and Revision: Metacognitive Approaches to Undergraduate Essay Writing. Collected Essays on Learning and Teaching, 8, 79. https://doi.org/10.22329/celt.v8i0.4256. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22329/celt.v8i0.4256

Rosidin, U, Kadaritna, N., & Hasnunidah, N. (2019). Can argument-driven inquiry models have impact on critical thinking skills for students with differentpersonality types? Cakrawala Pendidikan, 38(3), 511–526. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v38i3.24725. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v38i3.24725

Rosidin, Undang, Herpratiwi, Suana, W., & Firdaos, R. (2019). Evaluation of National Examination (UN) and National-Based School Examination (USBN) in Indonesia. European Journal of Educational Research, 8(3), 827–837. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.8.3.827. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.8.3.827

Sintema, E. J. (2020). Effect of COVID-19 on the performance of grade 12 students: Implications for STEM education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(7), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.29333/EJMSTE/7893. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/7893

Sukistono, D. (2008). Wayang Boneka untuk Anak. Pengkajian Penciptaan Wayang, 5(1). https://jurnal.isi-ska.ac.id/index.php/lakon/article/view/739/735.

Sulianto, J., Untari, M. F. A., & Yulianti, F. (2014). Profil Cerita Anak Dan Media Boneka Tangan Dalam Metode Bercerita Berkarakter Untuk Siswa Sd. Mimbar Sekolah Dasar, 1(2), 113–122. https://doi.org/10.17509/mimbar-sd.v1i2.872. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/mimbar-sd.v1i2.872

Wanabuliandari, S., & Ardianti, S. D. (2018). Pengaruh Modul E-Jas Edutainment terhadap Karakter Peduli Lingkungan dan Tanggung Jawab. Scholaria: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 8(1), 70–79. https://doi.org/10.24246/j.js.2018.v8.i1.p70-79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24246/j.js.2018.v8.i1.p70-79

Zeng, N. (2017). Effects of physical activity on motor skills and cognitive development in early childhood: A systematic review. In BioMed Research International (Vol. 2017). https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/2760716. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/2760716