Medical Authority's Trust as Mediator of Risk Perception on Haze Mitigation Efforts
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23887/jpai.v4i2.26101Keywords:
risk perception, medical authority's trust, mitigation, hazeAbstract
Haze is a seasonal disaster that continues to recur in several parts of Indonesia. Mitigation as an effort to reduce risk needs to be done to anticipate more losses. Individual risk perceptions in assessing the impact of haze are considered as factors that influence mitigation efforts, however, mitigation is also related to external situations related to individual dependence on the authority that is more authorized in disaster situations, in this case, the medical authority. Trust in medical authorities is considered to mediate the relationship between risk perception and smoke haze mitigation. This study aims to look at the role of trust in medical authorities in helping individuals to perceive risk and seek mitigation. The research sample was 234 affected people, using purposive random sampling. Data were collected on three scales, mitigation scale, risk perception and trust of medical authorities. Research shows that the trust of medical authorities is not able to mediate the relationship between perceived risk and mitigation haze, but risk perception and trust in medical authorities simultaneously contribute to efforts to mitigate the smoke haze in Riau.
References
Aiyuda, N. (2018a). Perbedaan upaya mitigasi masyarakat ditinjau dair lama masa tinggal di daerah terdampak kabut asap Riau. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Dan Call For Paper Peranan Psikologi Bencana Dalam Mengurangi Risiko Bencana, 131–139. Retrieved from http://ejournal.iikmpbali.ac.id/index.php/semnaspsikologibencana/article/view/71
Aiyuda, N. (2018b). Persepsi Risiko Masyarakat Terdampak Dalam Upaya Mitigasi Dampak Kabut Asap Riau. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Dan Call For Paper Peranan Psikologi Bencana Dalam Mengurangi Risiko Bencana, 122–130. Retrieved from http://ejournal.iikmpbali.ac.id/index.php/semnaspsikologibencana/article/view/70/49
Aiyuda, N., & Koentjoro. (2017). Hubungan antara Persepsi Risiko dan Kepercayaan Masyarakat Terdampak terhadap Otoritas dalam Upaya Mitigasi Dampak Kabut Asap Riau. Gadjah Mada Journal Of Psychology, 2(2), 101–112. Retrieved from https://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/gamajop/article/download/33094/19976 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/gamajop.33094
Baron, R. M., & David A Kenny. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02512353 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
Benson, C., Twigg, J., & Rossetto, T. (2007). Perangkat untuk mengarusutamakan pengurangan risiko bencana : Catatan panduan bagi Lembaga-lembaga yang bergerak dalam bidang pembangunan (CIRCLE Indonesia, Terjemahan). (T. Wuryantari, Ed.). Yogjakarta: Hivos Kantor Regional Asia Tenggara dan CIRCLE Indonesia. (di cetak ulang dari Tool for mainstreaming disaster risk reduction : Guidancce notes fo development organisations,2007, Switzerland : the ProVention Consortium).
Bickerstaff, K. (2004). Risk perception research: Socio-cultural perspectives on the public experience of air pollution. Environment International, 30(6), 827–840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2003.12.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2003.12.001
BNPB (Badan penanggulangan bencana). (2014). Gema bnpb, Ketangguhan bangsa dalam menghadapi bencana. Gema BNPB, 5(3).
Brenkert-smith, H., Champ, P. A., & Flores, N. (2012). Trying not to get burned: Understanding homeowners’ wildfire risk-mitigation behaviors. Environmental Management, 50(6), 1139–1151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-012-9949-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-012-9949-8
Bronfman, N. C., Cisternas, P. C., López-Vázquez, E., & Cifuentes, L. A. (2016). Trust and risk perception of natural hazards: implications for risk preparedness in Chile. Natural Hazards, 81(1), 307–327. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-015-2080-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-015-2080-4
Bronfman, N. C., Jimenez, R. B., Arevalo, P. C., & Cifuentes, L. A. (2012). Understanding social acceptance of electricity generation sources. Energy Policy, 46, 246–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.03.057 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.03.057
Bronfman, N. C., Jimenez, R. B., Arevalo, P. C., & Cifuentes, L. A. (2015). Public acceptance of electricity generation sources : The role of trust in regulatory institutions. Energy & Environment, 26(3), 349–368. https://doi.org/10.1260/0958-305X.26.3.349 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1260/0958-305X.26.3.349
Chaiken, S., & Ledgerwood, A. (2012). A theory of heuristic and systematic information processing. In P. A. M. Van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology-Volume 2 (pp. 246–265). Los Angeles: SAGE Publications Ltd. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446249215.n13
Champ, P. A., Brenkert-smith, H., & Flores, N. (2011). Living with wildfire in Larimer county, Colorado, 2007. Res. Note RMRS-RN-48WWW. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 27 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2737/RMRS-RN-48
Deni, F., & Pratiwi, C. (2016). Dampak kebijakan Indonesia dalam penanganan kabut asap terhadap Malaysia. International & Diplomacy, 2(1), 55–68.
Ferguson, M. A., & Branscombe, N. R. (2010). Collective guilt mediates the effect of beliefs about global warming on willingness to engage in mitigation behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(2), 135–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.11.010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.11.010
Hidayati, N., Hanifa, J., Aiyuda, N., & Yunas, I. M. (2019). The Mediating Role Of Risk Perception In The Association Between Climate Change Awareness And Mitigation Effort On Riau Haze. In Proceedings book : International Summit on Science Technology and Humanity (ISETH2019) (pp. 189–199). Solo: ISETH 2019 (International Summit on Science, Technology, and Humanity).
Kasperson, R. E., Renn, O., Slovic, P., Brown, H. S., Emel, J., Goble, R., … Ratick, S. (2000). The social amplification of risk : A conceptual framework. In R. E. Lofstedt (Ed.), The Perception of Risk (pp. 232–245). UK and USA: Taylor & Francis.
Kusumawati, I., Ihsani, I. N. M., & Aiyuda, N. (2019). Risk Perception and Helplessness in Mitigation Efforts to Impact Haze in Riau. In Proceedings book : International Summit on Science Technology and Humanity (ISETH2019) (pp. 220–226). Solo: ISETH 2019 (International Summit on Science, Technology, and Humanity).
Leiserowitz, A. (2006). CLIMATE CHANGE RISK PERCEPTION AND POLICY PREFERENCES : THE ROLE OF AFFECT , IMAGERY , AND VALUES, 45–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-006-9059-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-006-9059-9
Lin, S., & Shaw, Æ. D. (2008). Why are flood and landslide victims less willing to take mitigation measures than the public ? Nat Hazards, 44, 305–314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-007-9136-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-007-9136-z
Maulana, D. S., Toha, M., Widyanto, S. “Gendon,” Sofyan, & Wibowo, T. E. (2007). Berkawan dengan ancaman strategi dan adaptasi reduksi bencana (Kedua). Jakarta: Wahana Lingkungan Hidup Indonesia (WALHI).
O’Conner, R. E., Bord, R. J., & Fischer, A. (1999). Risk perceptions, general environmental beliefs and willingnedss to address climate change. Risk Analysis, 19(3), 461–471. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1999.tb00421.x
Paton, D., Smith, L., Daly, M., & Johnston, D. (2008). Risk perception and volcanic hazard mitigation: Individual and social perspectives. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 172(3–4), 179–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2007.12.026 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2007.12.026
Renn, O. (2008). Risk Governance Coping with Uncertainty in a Complec Word. London . Sterling, VA: Earthscan.
Renn, O., & Rohrmann, B. (Eds.). (2000). Cross-Cultural risk perception : A survey of empirical studies. Stuttgart and Melbourne: Springer-Science+Business Media, B.V. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-4891-8
Slovic, P. (2000). The perception of risk. (R. E. Lofstedt, Ed.). UK and USA: Taylor & Francis.
Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B., & Lichtenstein, S. (2000). Facts and fears : Understanding perceived risk. In R. E. Lofstedt (Ed.), The Perception of Risk (pp. 137–153). New York: Taylor & Francis.
Slovic, P., Flynn, J., Mertz, C. K., Poumadere, M., & Mays, C. (2000). Nuclear power and the public : A comparative study of risk perception in France and the United States. In O. Renn & B. Rohrmann (Eds.), Cross-Cultural Risk Perception, A Survey of Empirical Studies (pp. 55–102). Springer-Science+Business Media, B.V. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-4891-8_2
Truelove, H. B., & Parks, C. (2012). Perceptions of behaviors that cause and mitigate global warming and intentions to perform these behaviors. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 32(3), 246–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.04.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.04.002
Wachinger, G., Renn, O., Begg, C., & Kuhlicke, C. (2013). The risk perception paradox-implications for governance and communication of natural hazards. Risk Analysis, 33(6), 1049–1065. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01942.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01942.x
Whitmarsh, L. (2008). Are flood victims more concerned about climate change than other people ? The role of direct experience in risk perception and behavioural response, 11(3), 351–374. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669870701552235 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13669870701552235
Widhiarso, W. (2010). Berkenalan dengan Analisis Mediasi : Regresi dengan Melibatkan Variabel Mediator.
Zhou, L., & Dai, Y. (2019). The influencing factors of Haze tolerance in China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16020287 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16020287
